|
ClarkUSA's Journal - Archives
Military families will remember who ended/is ending the wars and is bringing them home.
Read entry | Discuss (0 comments)
<< so much egg on face there it has become an omlette >>
![]() That. Is. Too Funny. And so true. Did you notice the sound of silence from the heretofore "Impeach Him!" peanut gallery? Has Kucinich sent out a press release yet? Maybe he's too busy worrying about his friend, Syria's "highly loved" Assad?
Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
Read entry | Discuss (0 comments)
(Reuters) - Iraq will continue talks with Washington on how U.S. trainers can work with Iraqi forces after a complete withdrawal of American troops at the end of the year, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said on Saturday. U.S. President Barack Obama announced on Friday that all U.S. troops would leave Iraq as scheduled by the end of this year after the two governments failed to reach an agreement over giving American soldiers legal immunity. "Now that we have put this behind us, this will let us settle the issue of training," Maliki said. "Iraqis will ask to resume talks over the number of trainers, the duration (of their stay in Iraq) and how those trainers will be used."... U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton... said Washington expected to have a "significant" security training presence at the Baghdad embassy. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/22/... FYI: "Military advisers working at the embassy are covered by diplomatic immunity afforded to the State Department."
Read entry | Discuss (3 comments)
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - Iraq will continue talks with Washington on how U.S. trainers can work with Iraqi forces after a complete withdrawal of American troops at the end of the year, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said on Saturday. U.S. President Barack Obama announced on Friday that all U.S. troops would leave Iraq as scheduled by the end of this year after the two governments failed to reach an agreement over giving American soldiers legal immunity. "Now that we have put this behind us, this will let us settle the issue of training," Maliki said. "Iraqis will ask to resume talks over the number of trainers, the duration (of their stay in Iraq) and how those trainers will be used."...Military advisers working at the embassy are covered by diplomatic immunity afforded to the State Department. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Saturday that U.S. commitment to the democratic future of Iraq remains strong despite the decision to go ahead with the withdrawal of American troops as scheduled. "Even as our troops come home, the United States's commitment to Iraq's future as a secure, stable, democratic nation remains as strong as ever," she said at a news conference in the Tajik capital. "This will end the war..."... Clinton said Washington expected to have a "significant" security training presence at the Baghdad embassy. Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/22/...
Read entry | Discuss (3 comments)
![]() Libyans welcome returning anti-Qaddafi fighters to Benghazi on Saturday. BENGHAZI, Libya — Veterans of the decisive battle for Surt streamed into this eastern Libyan port city on Saturday to a raucous heroes’ welcome, firing round after round into the air and yelling greetings to a jubilant crowd that jammed the entry-point to a main boulevard into town. Benghazi, proud of its role as the first headquarters of the rebellion against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, has assigned itself a central part in what people here call the new Libya. In the tumultuous, hours-long reception at the edge of the city on Saturday, children waved the country’s new flag, women wearing head scarves chanted hymns to fallen fighters, and the packed crowd chanted derisive slogans mocking the dead leader... Though transition officials have insisted they would not try to move the capital to Benghazi from Tripoli, some in the crowd of proud residents still suggested that their city’s political fortunes would improve after the passing of a dictator who, at best, neglected Benghazi. ![]() The crowd’s noisy enthusiasm for the returning soldiers seemed to grow as the sunlit afternoon wore on, and car after car jammed the tree-lined road. A judge, Tudje Naima Gebril, who was on hand to greet the troops wearing a head scarf with the country’s new red, black and green colors — she said she was the first female judge in Libya, appointed in 1975 — called the moment a symbolic new beginning for her country. “All the people are here for building the new Libya,” she said. As soldiers fired into the air, she added: “We don’t want to see any more guns in Libya. We want civil institutions in Libya.” http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/23/world/af... Tomorrow, they will celebrate Liberation Sunday. Elections will soon follow. Welcome to the world of democratic nations, new Libya! You did good. ![]()
Read entry | Discuss (2 comments)
Ever heard of the snowball effect or the butterfly effect?
"The Sound of Thunder" is a famous short story by Ray Bradbury which illustrates the writer's point. Here's a synopsis: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Sound_of_Th... Here's the story: http://www.lasalle.edu/~didio/courses/hon4...
Read entry | Discuss (3 comments)
Read entry | Discuss (3 comments)
You stood up for your principles and told us Bush=Gore back in 1999 and 2000 - but you assured the foolish people that Gore would win anyways. Remember? Because you have principles. Dear Gore Voters or Those Frightened Enough to Vote for Gore: Thank you for your 20,000 e-mails. Please consider this letter my olive branch to you. <..> Nader has endured some brutal attacks. He is being blamed for the possibility that Bush may win. When packs of humans become desperate and consumed with fear, irrational things are said. Threats are made. I respect and understand those of you who are voting for Gore because you fear Bush may win. That, after all, is our common ground George Bush must not sit in the Oval Office. Yet, to say that "a vote for Nader is a vote for Bush" implies that if we weren't voting for Nader we would be voting for Gore. That simply is not true. If Ralph were not on the ballot, I think most of us would vote for another third party candidate, write someone else in, or just stay home. That's how disgusted the millions of us are. ![]() Well, as George W. Bush said, you really covered your ass on that one. Because, you know, you have principles - unlike us Obots and unprincipled pragmatists. We are so unprincipled that we don't think your "disgust" is more important than tens of thousands of Iraqi orphans and cripples. Maybe 100,000 civilian deaths, not to mention all the American men and women killed, maimed, and traumatized. But, hell "that's how disgusted the millions of us are". We think of those bodies floating down the street in New Orleans and we are too unprincipled to think: a small price to pay for Michael Moore's integrity. Voting for a protest candidate was worth it, and Mike, your understanding of political dynamics is so good you were able to confidently predict a Gore win anyways. You rock Mike - and thanks for still being here in 2011 to explain why President Obama doesn't measure up to your standards. http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2011/10/than...
Read entry | Discuss (42 comments)
NASHVILLE, TN (WSMV) - Some military families in Tennessee say they're delighted to hear Friday's announcement that all troops will be leaving Iraq by the end of 2011. "Happy. Happy. Absolutely happy. Ecstatic," said Staff Sgt. Michael Peckham, who is stationed at Ft. Campbell with the 101st Airborne. Peckham served two deployments in Iraq and is recently back from Afghanistan. "It's good for the families, and the soldiers that have families. They can stay back here and do some training here," Peckham said... Commander Brian Allen served with the Navy in Iraq. He remembers coming home two weeks before Christmas in 2008. Allen said Friday's news will make for a joyous holiday season. "It was a great announcement. I'm sure there will be a lot of people happy," Allen said. "For the kids, the families, I don't think you could do it any better than that," he said. http://www.wsmv.com/story/15771755/militar... I can only imagine the happiness and excitement military families must feel right now as they wait for their loved ones to come home. I hope they remember to vote their interests in 2012.
Read entry | Discuss (20 comments)
Biden's a far better choice for the 99% than Andrew "$400,000 Koch Bros. (who live in NY) donation = not raising taxes on millionaires in NY" Cuomo.
Read entry | Discuss (0 comments)
That is baseless hyperbolic rhetoric coupled by false rhetoric; ergo, a false narrative.
President Obama was NOT "thrown out" nor was it he who "wanted to stay." The Pentagon brass wanted a residual force to stay beyond 2011, as per The New York Times. That's what I have asserted and what my quotes from the NYT proved.
Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
I am right. President Obama wasn't the one who wanted the troops to stay; it was the Pentagon brass who did.
American military officials had wanted a “residual” force of as many as tens of thousands of soldiers to remain past 2011 as an insurance policy against future violence. Those numbers were scaled back, but the expectation was that 3,000 to 5,000 American troops would remain. Some top American military officials were dismayed by the decision, saying Mr. Obama was putting the best face on a breakdown in tortured negotiations with the Iraqis. Pentagon lawyers insisted that the Iraqi Parliament grant soldiers immunity from legal prosecution. In recent weeks, American negotiators in Baghdad concluded that it would be impossible to obtain that protection, essentially scuttling any chance of a substantial troop presence there next year. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/22/world/mi... Nowhere does it say President Obama was "thrown out". That's your simplistic and subjective take based on your clear and abiding dislike for all things Obama.
Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
American military officials had wanted a “residual” force of as many as tens of thousands of soldiers to remain past 2011 as an insurance policy against future violence. Those numbers were scaled back, but the expectation was that 3,000 to 5,000 American troops would remain. Some top American military officials were dismayed by the decision, saying Mr. Obama was putting the best face on a breakdown in tortured negotiations with the Iraqis. Pentagon lawyers insisted that the Iraqi Parliament grant soldiers immunity from legal prosecution. In recent weeks, American negotiators in Baghdad concluded that it would be impossible to obtain that protection, essentially scuttling any chance of a substantial troop presence there next year. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/22/world/mi... President Obama didn't want to be accused of leaving our new Middle East ally in the lurch, so he offered to stay but only if Iraq wanted it. This is a win-win for both America and Iraq (and Iran) but the Pentagon must be unhappy.
Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
"U.S. To Hand Over Iraq Bases, Equipment Worth Billions"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/26/i...
Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
|
Latest Threads
The ten most recent threads posted on
the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums. MadFloridian... By formercia FL GOP tries to close state pension system to new workers, yet take THEIR pension at 2X accrual rate By seafan FL GOP denies $51 billion federal Medicaid to poor, yet order cheap health care for themselves By seafan Happy Mother's Day By formercia I love DU2! By Enthusiast Florida Senate President Don Gaetz (R) ran company now accused of Medicaid fraud (Rick Scott redux) By seafan Mediterranean diet cuts risk of heart dis-ease By No Elephants Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
|
