Oh come on. Please do.

Please come back and explain why you were so eager to defend the Tea Party.

Please come back and tell us why you posted a picture of a liberal talking calmly to a black man with a gun and claimed the liberal was a Tea Partier.

Please come back and tell us why you chose to omit linkage or sourcing of the photo.

Please come back and tell us how you weren't intentionally trying to mislead people by posting a picture of a pro-health care reform rally and claiming it was a Tea Party rally, and how it was just an oversight that you left off a link that would have allowed people to see the falsehood of your statement for themselves.

Please return to this. Retract your false statements, or defend them; but they're false. That was no Tea Party rally.

that the community's elected leaders believe will make a safer environment?

Or do you think the safety of urban populations is secondary to the whims of white suburbanites?

If you think the second amendment, or your own theories about gun safety, matter more than ethnic communities making their own choices about what will make their lives better, then yes, you actively support oppressing minorities. It doesn't matter that you disagree with the community leaders; if you try to force them to ignore their beliefs about guns and follow yours, then you're oppressing them.

So no, there's no surprise that the liberals didn't shoot him. Contrary to a dishonest narrative, most liberals -- like most Americans -- support gun control, and probably few if any of the ralliers were carrying. Liberals also don't have a problem with Black people.

So you've posted this picture of a white liberal talking to a black guy with a gun to make a false claim that Tea Partiers aren't racist. How very FOX News of you.

You did get one thing right:

the level of stupidity in the posts here does boggle the mind.