<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>eridani's Journal - Democratic Underground</title>
    <description></description>
    <link>http://www.democraticunderground.com</link>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:23:31</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:23:31</pubDate><item>
	<title>
	A more fiscally responsible alternative to the Pelosi bill
	</title>
	<description>
	The current cost for covering 45 million Medicare enrollees (including patients' portion) is estimated to be $484 billion in 2009. Since enrollees pay a 20% co-pay for most services, the total government-payout will be 80% of that total, or $387 billion for 2009. (This is consistent with the Treasur...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/413
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:05:17
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	So, why support Democrats?
	</title>
	<description>
	Because literally, in terms of voting records, Democrats and Republicans are almost two separate species.  Following are graphs of the 2008 environmental records of the WA state legislature.  Scores are voting records rated from 0-100% by the League of Conservation Voters.<br />
<br />
http://i10.photobucket....
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/412
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:24:01
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	We have no alternative to dumping a bottle of Chanel #5 into a full cat box
	</title>
	<description>
	At least according to the cheerleaders for the Pelosi health care bill.  You are all right of course, in insisting that there are some things in this bill that are worth having.  I just don't get the insistence that these things absolutely have to be tied to the forced purchase of a garbage product ...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/411
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Sun, 01 Nov 2009 03:15:55
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Mandatory insurance--legislatively enacting a permanent jobless recession/recovery
	</title>
	<description>
	That is because huge amounts of everyone's otherwise discretionary income will be diverted from buying real products to subsidize a totally unproductive part of the economy. The sociopaths who are really running the country don't even bother talking in terms of recession/recovery anymore.  They are ...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/409
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:51:19
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Public Option = Holy Roman Empire
	</title>
	<description>
	The traditional historians’ joke about the Holy Roman Empire is that it was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire.  Once upon a time, the original framers of the public option proposal envisioned a plan that would be open to anybody, and very likely have more than 100 million enrolled—a really big ...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/408
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Sun, 25 Oct 2009 06:50:59
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	What Kinds of Choices Do We Need For Our Health Care?
	</title>
	<description>
	Most people would answer this by saying that they want to choose their doctor and make decisions about the kind of treatment they get.  If you ask them if they enjoy trying to figure out which of dozens of insurance plans are both within budget and likely to actually reimburse them in the event of i...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/407
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:22:33
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	I just don't get it.  Why are people more interested in the IDEA of a public option--
	</title>
	<description>
	--than the actual facts about it?  Probably this is an automatic reflex response against the Repubs and insurance companies who don't like the idea, but please consider that they are taking this approach because it enables them to win no matter what happens.  This is already a close replay of 1993, ...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/406
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:20:18
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Can the Repubs do to us in 2010 what we did to them in 2006?
	</title>
	<description>
	Hard to tell at this point.  If they ramp up the assholism, that may counter their advantage in attacking a health care bill with no visible benefits for anyone until 2013.<br />
<br />
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2010080329_sirota19.html<br />
<br />
Recall that with solid Democratic and Republican b...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/405
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:13:35
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	A message to America from insurance company CEOs
	</title>
	<description>
	http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a115/vindamiatrix/Politics/Grimreaperweb.jpg<br />
<br />
Drawn by Roberta Gregory.  See more of her stuff at http://www.robertagregory.com/index.html.  She's fine with spreading it far and wide, and I mention her website every time I do.<br />
<br />
Backstory:  A CIGNA employee gave ...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/404
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:27:39
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Resolution Urging that the Senate Adopt the Rockefeller Amendment --
	</title>
	<description>
	--Opening Medicare to Retirees Over 55<br />
<br />
WHEREAS people between the ages of 55 and 64 are being particularly hard hit by layoffs, involuntary early retirement and subsequent age discrimination when looking for new employment; and<br />
<br />
WHEREAS Democrats will be campaigning for state and national publi...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/403
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:33:04
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	&quot;Choose what's best for your family.&quot;  I want to barf when Obama or anyone else says that.
	</title>
	<description>
	This is one of the most morally and ethically vile things that anyone could ever say, because what it really means is that some people deserve good health care, and other people are disposable human garbage who do not.  Families with more money are better than families with less money, who just ough...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/402
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:59:05
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Four Basic Kinds of Health Care Financing Around the World
	</title>
	<description>
	Are current health care reform proposals modeled after any of them?<br />
<br />
<br />
The four basic methods of paying for health care are as follows.<br />
<br />
[b]The Bismarck model[/b]<br />
&amp;#61601;	Created in 1880s by Otto von Bismarck in Germany<br />
&amp;#61601;	Based on private, tightly regulated, insurance funds<br />
&amp;#61601;	M...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/401
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:08:20
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	If current health care bills get derailed--
	</title>
	<description>
	If nothing passes, the Dems can correctly blame Republican obstructionism.  The only incremental approach acceptable to me is allowing voluntary enrollment in Medicare, which could be implemented right away.  This ought to be a slam dunk, given that Medicare is so popular that even elderly teabagger...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/400
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:48:15
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	13 problems with the current health care bills  Michael Moore
	</title>
	<description>
	http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/why-the-current-bills-don_b_302483.html<br />
<br />
Here are 13 problems with the current health care bills (partial list):<br />
<br />
1. No cost controls on insurance companies. The coming sharp increases in premiums, deductibles, co-pays, co-insurance, etc. will quickly ...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/399
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:51:30
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Mandatory private insurance--the biggest conceivable anti-stimulus policy possible
	</title>
	<description>
	That is because huge amounts of everyone's otherwise discretionary income will be diverted to totally useless intermediaries.  We are talking 12% of income for premiums alone, not even counting co-pays and deductibles.  This is an unmitigated disaster for an economy consisting of 70% consumer spendi...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/398
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:18:21
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	A mathematician, a scientist, and engineer and a computer programmer were asked
	</title>
	<description>
	--to prove or disprove the theorem that all odd numbers are prime.<br />
<br />
Mathematician: 1 is prime,  3 is prime,  5 is prime,  7 is prime,  9 is not prime.  Therefore the theroem is false.<br />
<br />
Scientist:  1 is prime,  3 is prime,  5 is prime,  7 is prime,  9 is not prime, but that could be an experiment...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/397
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Sat, 05 Sep 2009 03:37:34
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	California's Real Death Panels: Insurers Deny 21% of Claims
	</title>
	<description>
	http://www.calnurses.org/media-center/press-releases/2009/september/california-s-real-death-panels-insurers-deny-21-of-claims.html<br />
<br />
<br />
For Immediate Release<br />
September 2, 2009 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
California's Real Death Panels: Insurers Deny 21% of Claims<br />
PacifiCare's Denials 40%, Cigna’s 33% in First Half of...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/396
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Fri, 04 Sep 2009 06:46:57
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Reps Kucinich and Weiner!  One more amendment, please!
	</title>
	<description>
	We have two election cycles to get through before anyone at all notices any improvement in health care delivery, assuming any meaningful bill is passed.   Insurance companies will continue to jack premiums, people will still lose jobs and coverage, employers will still reduce benefits and constantly...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/395
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:35:23
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Resolution Urging That Congress Make Buying Into Medicare the Public Option
	</title>
	<description>
	[b]Resolution Urging That Congress Make Buying Into Medicare the Public Option[/b]<br />
<br />
WHEREAS 77% of the American public supports the choice of a public option(1); and<br />
<br />
WHEREAS there is no timetable for establishing a public option in any of the Senate proposals and the public option is postponed ...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/394
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:09:14
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Is a public option the best criterion for success in health care reform?
	</title>
	<description>
	I'm beginning to think not, ever since reading more about the Netherlands.  Ny new criterion is &quot;How much per month do individuals have to pay for both insurance and out of pocket costs?&quot;  Individuals are, of course not the only source of funds.  In both the Netherlands and in single payer proposals...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/393
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:54:26
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	This horseshit about special breaks for healthy people is exactly
	</title>
	<description>
	--like demanding property tax rebates for every year that you don't have a fire.  You might like to think that that's because you are so super-responsible about wiring your house correctly, teaching your kids not to play with matches, and not storing oily rags in the basement.  But you are full of s...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/392
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:27:20
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Health care debates:  &quot;That just isn't true!&quot; = total wussy, unconditional surrender
	</title>
	<description>
	You think that the sociopaths disrupting meetings know or even care one way or another what is or is not true?  Denial is always, ALWAYS utter craven surrender.  It is equivalent to shouting as loud as you can &quot;I'm wrong and my opponent is right.&quot;<br />
<br />
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/columnists/john_go...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/391
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:08:32
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	Is it fascism yet?
	</title>
	<description>
	I'm actually wondering to what extent the PTB are worried about this.  They have utter contempt for Palin, and attack her in class-based language  (&quot;snowbilly&quot; etc.).  Unlike Bush, whose real base was the PTB but who could fake being a down-home ignorant whackjob, Palin is the real thing.  I mean re...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/390
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:42:03
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	I've come to the conclusion that public vs private is not the issue at all
	</title>
	<description>
	Following is a three way comparison of a state single payer proposal (WHST), HR 3200, and the government-regulated private insurance system in the Netherlands.  <br />
<br />
Oddly enough, the tightly regulated private insurance of the Netherlands is much more like US single payer proposals than like HR 3200 ...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/389
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Thu, 06 Aug 2009 07:57:16
	</pubDate>
	</item>

<item>
	<title>
	To the Dem senators who voted against the Sanders state single payer amendment
	</title>
	<description>
	What possible reason could there be for voting against the Sanders amendment to allow states to establish single payer health care? Why did you vote agains the right of the citizens of our states to do better than a floor that national legislation might offer?<br />
<br />
The cheapest public option in the Ho...
	</description>
	<link>
	http://journals.democraticunderground.com/eridani/387
	</link>
	<pubDate>
	Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:28:30
	</pubDate>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>