I'll start with the standard disclaimer: I don't usually do this, but...

I'm all for investigations, not only will we uncover the leaker of Classified information to the NYT I think in review of the history of this war to date, it appears that the Democrats sure did put a lot of bank into things going bad in Iraq. Starting with the 04 campaign season in fact, starting shortly after we had taken Baghdad. How could they possibly know things were going to deteriorate? The highly successful major combat operations were over within days, Saddam and most of his cronies were captured or killed and our Generals started to move forward with a reconstruction plan. Are the Democrats such good prognosticators that they figured out Iraq would become in John Kerry's words (Beirut) or did they use an old tried and true trick, you know the one, the same one that Ted Kennedy tried to use against Reagan, by coordinating with the KGB. Only this time those clairvoyant liberals coordinated with Al-Sadr or Ahmadnijad. Should investigations be held? Do we have terrorists in the midst of Congress?

1 posted on 11/12/2006 5:40:57 PM PST by tomnbeverly

ROFLMFAO. This is the funniest post I have EVER read! How did we know Iraq would deteriorate? Learning from history and putting 2 and 2 together is impossible; we must have caused the deterioration with a secret plan to undermine Bush by allying with terrorists!

Hey, dipshit, EVERYONE WITH AT LEAST TWO FUNCTIONING BRAIN CELLS KNEW IRAQ WOULD END UP A MESS. YOU DIDN'T NEED A DOCTORATE IN FOREIGN POLICY. YOU DIDN'T NEED ANY INSIDE INFO. I knew it was an intractable fiasco in the making, and that's why I was against the war from the beginning. Asshat. I tried to tell as many of you as I could before the war, but you didn't listen. But that couldn't be it. I must be in contact with Al Qaeda. Definitely.