Bush will veto any bill to stop port deal
AP ALERT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1...

Posted on 02/21/2006 12:32:20 PM PST by Brian Mosely


ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (AP) — President Bush says the deal allowing an Arab company to take over six major U.S. seaports should go forward and he will veto any bill that would stop it.



1 posted on 02/21/2006 12:32:21 PM PST by Brian Mosely
< Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Cmon BushBots...

Lets hear you explain this away...



2 posted on 02/21/2006 12:33:01 PM PST by antaresequity (PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH, PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
don't start using the veto now, Georgie. Keep it in your pocket.



3 posted on 02/21/2006 12:33:09 PM PST by jw777
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Geez, why does he have such a woody about this?



4 posted on 02/21/2006 12:33:11 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Glad hes so aware of the bipartisan opposition.



5 posted on 02/21/2006 12:33:16 PM PST by omega4179 (minutemanproject)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: antaresequity
Too much french kissing with that Saudi Sheik



6 posted on 02/21/2006 12:34:16 PM PST by BearWash (@)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
So he DOES have a veto pen.

Won't it be interesting...am I mistaken, wor will this be the first thing he has ever vetoed?



7 posted on 02/21/2006 12:34:22 PM PST by DC Ripper
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
If true, the democrats will erect a statue of Bush for making them the tough on security party.



8 posted on 02/21/2006 12:34:27 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Apparently, there is more to this than meets the eye.



9 posted on 02/21/2006 12:34:38 PM PST by demlosers (Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Are there enough votes to override?



10 posted on 02/21/2006 12:34:44 PM PST by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
No he won't. Bush won't veto anything.



12 posted on 02/21/2006 12:34:55 PM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Ok, I know sometimes something seems worse than it actually is, and I haven't been following this story. So do I understand correctly that President Bush supports the purchase of facilities at six of our major ports by UAE companies?



13 posted on 02/21/2006 12:35:01 PM PST by American Quilter
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Bush just sounded the death knel for this deal. He can't veto things that happen at the state level.

It was foolish of him to make such a statement. Even if he ultimately wins, which I doubt, he will lose significant political face over this.




14 posted on 02/21/2006 12:35:05 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: DC Ripper
Yup...I just don't get it



15 posted on 02/21/2006 12:35:05 PM PST by genxer
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: demlosers
"Apparently, there is more to this than meets the eye."

If there is, George Bush feels no need to explain it, apparently.



16 posted on 02/21/2006 12:35:22 PM PST by DC Ripper
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Won't matter the local governments will stop it first.



17 posted on 02/21/2006 12:35:26 PM PST by gopwinsin04
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
"I earned capital in the campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it."



18 posted on 02/21/2006 12:35:39 PM PST by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
And here I was thinking he was elected to do our bidding. My mistake.



19 posted on 02/21/2006 12:35:40 PM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: raybbr; DTogo; AZ_Cowboy; Itzlzha; Stellar Dendrite; NRA2BFree; Happy2BMe; Spiff; Pelham; ...
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!



20 posted on 02/21/2006 12:35:45 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
I am a Bush bot, I guess. But, I hope they go ahead and get that 2/3 vote necessary to override the veto.



21 posted on 02/21/2006 12:35:49 PM PST by AmericaUnite
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: AppyPappy
It may be part of the war that we "won't see."



22 posted on 02/21/2006 12:35:56 PM PST by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Clemenza
"It may not be the best thing to do poltically,"


Nor is it the best thing for national security, but what the hell - you go George!!



23 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:17 PM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Not a surprise. Bush is digging in to fight the cowardly cover their ass politicians and the MSM trying to turn the deal into something that it's not.




24 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:17 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: ncountylee
As long as there party chairman is on record saying "Bin Laden is innocent until proven guilty, only selective amnesia nitwits would be erecting a statue."

25 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:21 PM PST by new yorker 77 (Conservatives who eat their own are a liberal's best friend.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Well, I used to think that the main difference between Democrats and Republicans was the parts of the Constitution they chose to bang upon.
But I think we can also now say that they are also differentiated by what foreign interests they wish to sell us out to.


26 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:22 PM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Clemenza
Seattle isn't one of the ports in question, I take it. : )



27 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:34 PM PST by firebrand
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Wow. Using the veto pen for this? I didn't think one existed.

28 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:36 PM PST by b4its2late (Terrorists will either succeed in changing our way of life, or we will change theirs. - Rummy)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely



29 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:37 PM PST by oblomov (Join the FR Folding@Home Team (#36120) keyword: folding@home)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: demlosers
...Apparently, there is more to this than meets the eye....
There usually is.

Unfortunately, the lamestream press will jump on this with 4 hoofs.

At least it will get the Cheney bashing off the front pages.


30 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:42 PM PST by FReepaholic (If ignorance ain't bliss, I don't know what is.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
That would be his first veto ever, if I'm not mistaken. But not the last... wait until the clemency for illegals bill comes through...

31 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:43 PM PST by Shalom Israel (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Is this RinO IDio#T living in the real world or what?



32 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:43 PM PST by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
President Bush says the deal allowing an Arab company to take over six major U.S. seaports should go forward and he will veto any bill that would stop it.
The Bush Administration is simply the Clinton Administration with slightly cleaner rugs.


33 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:49 PM PST by Lazamataz (Islam is a fatal disease that must be eradicated from the body Earth.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Would this be his first veto ever? I don't understand why he wants to drive away a large percentage of his base with this decision.



34 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:51 PM PST by jimbo123
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
I'm not seeing anything in the news about this



35 posted on 02/21/2006 12:36:51 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: antaresequity
Lets hear you explain this away...
He must have some big trump cards!

Could this be why Pops has been keeping Clintoon close?


36 posted on 02/21/2006 12:37:00 PM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: AppyPappy
"Geez, why does he have such a woody about this?"

Let me guess... do you remember the hand holding with the Saudi prince?

The press and the dems will eat him alive for this one.



37 posted on 02/21/2006 12:37:10 PM PST by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: BearWash
Too much french kissing with that Saudi Sheik

And walking along holding hands, and placing a koran in the whitehouse, even though the koran says kill all infidels.



38 posted on 02/21/2006 12:37:11 PM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when")
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
He'll finally veto something and THIS is it? Is he CRAZY?



39 posted on 02/21/2006 12:37:12 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Good! The company that has the contract now is not American either and the company that has won this contract already has multi contracts around the world in port management. And NASA buys its rocket fuel from a French company so what is the big deal. A lot of spineless idiots are raising hell about something that is not a problem.. The problem is the leaking of classified information to the enemy and the idiots in the congress who want to stop the foreign listening program.

At least it is not like WW II and the mafia or the Communist are not in charge of the ports.

40 posted on 02/21/2006 12:37:13 PM PST by YOUGOTIT
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
As the song goes:

You got to know when to hold em'
Know when to fold em
Know when to walk away
Know when to run...

This hand stinks...best to just fold at this point.



41 posted on 02/21/2006 12:37:25 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: So Cal Rocket
Are there enough votes to override?
Yes.

This is very strange, the only thing both the Dims & GOP have agreed on this year and he finally threatens a veto. Something smells ....


42 posted on 02/21/2006 12:37:39 PM PST by Lurking in Kansas (Nothing witty here… move on.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: demlosers
"Apparently, there is more to this than meets the eye."
UAE could be a staging area for airstrikes and special forces operations against Iran.


43 posted on 02/21/2006 12:37:45 PM PST by defenderSD (¤¤ If ecoterrorists attack my SUV, I'll taser them.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Bikers4Bush
Naw, the Dems will shut up once they realize that the only US company that could actually fulfill this contract is Halliburton.
L


44 posted on 02/21/2006 12:37:46 PM PST by Lurker (In God I trust. Everybody else shows me their hands.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: AppyPappy
Geez, why does he have such a woody about this?
Because in Establishment Republican minds, making money trumps all else.

Including national security.

How Clintonian.


45 posted on 02/21/2006 12:37:50 PM PST by Lazamataz (Islam is a fatal disease that must be eradicated from the body Earth.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: AppyPappy
He or his family/friends probably stand to make a lot of money on this deal.



46 posted on 02/21/2006 12:38:05 PM PST by linda_22003
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Bush won't veto a spending bill...but this one he will? He is beyond stupid on this matter & illegal immigration. If this goes through, any attack on those ports in the future will be his fault.



47 posted on 02/21/2006 12:38:09 PM PST by feinswinesuksass ("Muslims are the only people who make feminists seem laid-back." Ann Coulter)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Brian Mosely
Bush Clinton Bush Clinton
Da fix is in.


48 posted on 02/21/2006 12:38:11 PM PST by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: YOUGOTIT
A lot of spineless idiots are raising hell about something that is not a problem..
Using that "logic," I guess you also think it was OK for Carter to give away the Panama Canal.


49 posted on 02/21/2006 12:38:24 PM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: DC Ripper
If there is, George Bush feels no need to explain it, apparently.
We'll see what happens. The storms on this issue started on a long weekend. Yes, the president does need to explain what is happening here.


50 posted on 02/21/2006 12:38:31 PM PST by demlosers (Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies | Report Abuse >


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------