Now I am not knocking all the people out there who think that each and every thing that happens is a conspiracy. In fact, the more I look at voter fraud in 2000 and 2004, the more likely it seems that it really happened. And I also believe that while bush and co. did not commit 9/11, they certainly had the information to try and prevent it. But it does seem that a few (not all) people in here think that everything must be a conspiracy, without any concrete evidence. The arrest of terrorists in Canada last week, the death of AlZarqawi, the beheading of Berg last year, deaths of various progressives, New Orleans wall explosions, and on and on.
Lets face it people, the majority of conspiracy theories are based on less than verifiable evidence and should not be taken all that seriously. An example. The terrorist plot uncovered in Canada last week. Some say (sounds like faux news) that it was all a ploy to make the new conservative government up there look good in the U.S administration's eyes. I say bull****. The RCMP investigated this plot for quite a while and moved when they thought it was necessary; that is when they had solid evidence. That is the way most police investigations go. Another one; JFK Jr. was killed by someone in power. Or maybe he was not a real good pilot. I don't know, neither do you.
Just remember how implausible some of the stuff against Clinton seemed in the '90's and stop and think before you accuse anyone of some sort of conspiracy stuff. As already stated, I do think that there is something to Election fraud in the last two Presidential elections, in fact 2000 seems irrefutable, but some of the other stuff is just speculation and circumstantial stuff, or entirely made up from a fertile imagination. Proof, we need absolute irrefutable proof. If we have it, then it will be easy to bring the bush gang down.