Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » BrentWil Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
BrentWil's Journal
Posted by BrentWil in General Discussion
Thu Mar 03rd 2011, 06:42 PM
Tricare is one hell of a good benefit. But this is getting expensive. Thoughts?

Link


NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The cost of military health care, up 300% in the past decade, is eating a giant hole in the Pentagon's budget, according to a report released Monday by a group of defense experts.

The Defense Department expects to spend $52.5 billion on health care in 2012, a 300% increase since 2001, the report says. By 2015, health care will account for 10% of the Pentagon budget.
Read entry | Discuss (12 comments) | Recommend (+2 votes)
Posted by BrentWil in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Mon Oct 18th 2010, 07:22 PM
And using it against an organization that has fought for justice for 90 years.
Read entry | Discuss (2 comments)
Posted by BrentWil in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Fri Jul 02nd 2010, 09:35 PM
I have been following this thread. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discu...

I also lurk on the Sean Hannity board (I have long since been banned). A Sean Hannity poster started a thread on male circumcision. The thread (which you can no longer access) was locked very quickly. The poster did a protest thread and got it unlocked, here http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t... . The actual thread had no violating rules and the poster was simply debating. It was again locked here http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t... .

This seems to be a subject that REALLY gets under conservative skin. If you want to have a little fun on a Friday (you are on a computer on a friday night.. how much fun is it really?), go to their board and start another thread on it. Keep it absolutely nonsexual in any way, and see how long you last. I know, sort of boring, but they go nuts. Like they have never heard anyone make such an argument.
Read entry | Discuss (15 comments) | Recommend (<0 votes)
Posted by BrentWil in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Sun Jun 20th 2010, 09:44 PM
The right to free speech is almost universal in the United States. You can say anything hateful about any group. However, many European countries ban "hate speech". Should the United States amend the constitution to ban this type of speech?
Read entry | Discuss (37 comments) | Recommend (<0 votes)
Posted by BrentWil in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Sun Apr 25th 2010, 11:30 PM
Hello. I am new here. Long time viewer, just never joined. What made me join is that I wanted to get your opinion on Civil Asset Forfeiture.

I found this video.

video

This article below gives you the basics. If you click the link you can see the full study.

Article Link


Policing for Profit: The Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture
By Marian R. Williams, Ph.D.
Jefferson E. Holcomb, Ph.D.
Tomislav V. Kovandzic, Ph.D.
Scott Bullock

Civil forfeiture laws represent one of the most serious assaults on private property rights in the nation today. Under civil forfeiture, police and prosecutors can seize your car or other property, sell it and use the proceeds to fund agency budgets—all without so much as charging you with a crime. Unlike criminal forfeiture, where property is taken after its owner has been found guilty in a court of law, with civil forfeiture, owners need not be charged with or convicted of a crime to lose homes, cars, cash or other property.

Americans are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, but civil forfeiture turns that principle on its head. With civil forfeiture, your property is guilty until you prove it innocent.

Policing for Profit: The Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture chronicles how state and federal laws leave innocent property owners vulnerable to forfeiture abuse and encourage law enforcement to take property to boost their budgets. The report finds that by giving law enforcement a direct financial stake in forfeiture efforts, most state and federal laws encourage policing for profit, not justice.

Policing for Profit also grades the states on how well they protect property owners—only three states receive a B or better. And in most states, public accountability is limited as there is little oversight or reporting about how police and prosecutors use civil forfeiture or spend the proceeds.

Federal laws encourage even more civil forfeiture abuse through a loophole called “equitable sharing” that allows law enforcement to circumvent even the limited protections of state laws. With equitable sharing, law enforcement agencies can and do profit from forfeitures they wouldn’t be able to under state law.

It’s time to end civil forfeiture. People shouldn’t lose their property without being convicted of a crime, and law enforcement shouldn’t be able to profit from other people’s property.


So simply question. Is this a correct use of state power? Is it possible to change?
Read entry | Discuss (22 comments) | Recommend (+16 votes)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.