Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » BrokenBeyondRepair Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
BrokenBeyondRepair's Journal
Posted by BrokenBeyondRepair in September 11
Thu Jan 04th 2007, 03:56 PM
weakened the steel enough to initiate the pancake collapse why would explosives need to be placed throughout the building to produce the same result?

If “pancaking” initiated by weakened steel in the general area of the impact is a plausible hypothesis then theoretically, a demolition hypothesis where explosives are placed only in the area of impact would be plausible as well.

Why would a 100 tons of explosives be required?

does the force of gravity weaken w/o fire or something?
Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.