
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
|
CAcyclist's Journal
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/31306... Bush To Sacrifice Own Life For Good Of Nation April 17, 2002 | Issue 38•14 WASHINGTON, DC— Displaying the selfless courage that has defined his presidency, President Bush announced Tuesday that he will heroically lay down his life that the rest of the nation may live on. "It is the only way," Bush said. "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. I must, therefore, die to preserve future generations." Over the vociferous objections of his closest Cabinet members, Bush brushed aside their outstretched arms, repeating, "It is the only way." Onion symbol
sent to the political hacks over at the chron:
Carla and John, in reference to your continued biased and negative coverage of Phil Angelides, I am passing along a LTTE that I wrote about the major media such as your reporting in the Chronicle and other corporate outlets - the letter was published in a local, non-corporate daily newspaper . I am passing it along to you because the reference is intended for reporters such as yourselves and your corporate bosses who are telling you what the story is.
I find it amusing that you think that Angelides is somehow the prisoner of special interests and that Schwartzenegger will be immune to attacks from Angelides over the special interests ala Pete Wilson's crew that brought us Enron who put Schwartzenegger in office.
Let me tell you something. As a small business owner just in my first few years of ownership, I have seen my state fees and licenses increase by at least $500 this year alone. If that's not a tax on the middle class, I don't know what is. At the same time, my business's landlord, who is a multi-millionaire and inherited this shopping center, and who probably got over $25,000 in federal tax cuts last year, is still raising my rent by $500-$700 a month this year. I'm struggling to get by - I know where my best interest lies and it is in Phil.
The Chron better take a long hard look at where the Hearst Corp. wants to take this paper because it is quickly becoming irrelevant to the needs of THIS community, which wants FACTS, not propaganda.
Dear Editor:
As dependable as an Osama video appearing after a Republican poll down-turn,we hear the perennial prediction of the "lowest turn-out ever" from the mass media every time we have an election, particularly a primary.
From my stand-point, this election was intensely important to many. As I write this, we won't have the final count until probably Wednesday, due to the need to count paper ballots in Alameda County, the election problems in Sacramento, San Joaquin and Kern Counties and the large number of absentee ballots.
The conclusions I have derived from this election are that the mass media, particularly the papers owned by corporate conglomerates, have lost sight of their duty to inform the public and, instead, prefer a spectacle.
In fact, the other words that came to mind, were, as Jon Stewart might say, what do you call it? Oh, yeah - partisan hackery. Never mind that these two are both nominally Democrats.
We have one candidate, supported by 67% of state Democratic delegates, with a very detailed plan, who clearly and firmly called for raising taxes on the very wealthy and corporations, the same group of people who enjoyed tax cuts amounting to 17 BILLION dollars from the federal government, in order to put California back on track as the best state in the nation. We have another candidate who paid $34 million from his own very deep pocket out of $36 million spent, whose only experience in office is signing checks, who couldn't generate more than 30% support at the Democratic State Convention, and who has no clear plan for what he's going to do when in office or how he's going to pay for it.
This isn't American Idol, folks. The way we vote has actual consequences for what happens to us individually and as a state. If we can't get real information from the mass media, we are lost.
So, as Jon Stewart might say, Stop. Just Stop. Stop the affected cynicism, stop the spin, stop the he said/she said "reporting". Stop trying to fit the quote to the agenda. Prove to us that investigative journalism isn't just fiction any more, after all.
Sincerely, Dani Weber
PS: The Chron might find apathy because you are seeking it, you might find people who are fed up with the mud slinging because that's been your meme - that people should be so turned off by the mud-slinging that people don't vote - that's what you are trying to sell. And it's the major media that is doing most of the mud-slinging and failing to report on real issues. Or you help create mud if the opponents aren't slinging it hard enough for your preconceived point of view.
Dani --
newspaper. Can I get some feedback on this article? It is clear, are the references understandable - is it too vitriolic? I have a good relationship with this paper, which, while it did endorse Westly to my dismay, I don't want to damage. I am not sure this is the kind of letter Jon (the editor) has in mind, but it's the letter I want to write. I can always send this out to other papers and write him a different one if this is too strong. Please don't anyone copy any of this letter, though, until tomorrow and then I would be honored if anyone wanted to copy it for themselves - I just want to be the first one to publish it. The LTTE  Concerning the California Governor's race) Dear Editor, Note:The following letter is commentary on the whole mass media spectacle surrounding this election, not the Daily Journal. As dependable as an Osama video appearing after a Republican poll down-turn,we hear the perennial prediction of the "lowest turn-out ever" from the mass media every time we have an election, particularly a primary. From my stand-point, this election was intensely important to many. As I write this, we won't have the final count until probably Wednesday, due to the need to count paper ballots in Alameda County, the election problems in Sacramento, San Joaquin and Kern Counties and the large number of absentee ballots. The conclusions I have derived from this election are that the mass media, particularly the papers owned by corporate conglomerates, have lost sight of their duty to inform the public and, instead, prefer a spectacle. In fact, the other words that came to mind, were, as Jon Stewart might say, what do you call it? Oh, yeah - partisan hackery. Never mind that these two are both nominally Democrats. We have one candidate, supported by 67% of state Democratic delegates, with a very detailed plan, who clearly and firmly called for raising taxes on the very wealthy and corporations, the same group of people who enjoyed tax cuts amounting to 17 BILLION dollars from the federal government, in order to put California back on track as the best state in the nation. We have another candidate who paid $34 million from his own very deep pocket out of $36 million spent, whose only experience in office is signing checks, who couldn't generate more than 20% support at the Democratic State Convention, and who has no clear plan for what he's going to do when in office or how he's going to pay for it. This isn't American Idol, folks. The way we vote has real consequences for what happens to us individually and as a state. If we can't get real information from the mass media, we are lost. So, as Jon Stewart might say, Stop. Just Stop. Stop the affected cynicism, stop the spin, stop the he said/she said "reporting". Prove to us that investigative journalism isn't just fiction any more, after all.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/ne... Colbert, who slipped in and out of his rightwing blowhard TV persona on Comedy Central's "The Colbert Report," received an overwhelmingly positive response compared with the mixed reaction at the recent White House Correspondents Dinner. Afterward, two of the school's alumni presented him with a purple "Veritasiness Tour" t-shirt (which translates, very roughly, as "truthiness"). He had opened his speech with: "My name is Stephen Colbert, but I actually play someone on television named Stephen Colbert, who looks like me, and talks like me, but who says things with a straight face he doesn't mean." http://www.knox.edu/x12547.xml - edited to add text of entire speech
Dear Editor
I want a governor who is honest and dedicated to the public welfare. Angelides has demonstrated that he is a hard-working advocate for the people. He doesn't have any political consultants - his campaign doesn't spend money on packaging him as a product. He says what he's going to do - he's got a lot of plans for improving education and the environment and and it's going to take money to pay for those plans. He's candid about that - but he also plans to tax the very wealthy and the corporations first to pay for those plans.
Maybe that's why the Hearst newspaper is opposed to Angelides. But if so, they are abandoning the public trust to protect their own self-interest.
I strongly urge this paper to stop the partisan hackery and simply report the facts on the Angelides and Westly campaign. When this paper ignores serious charges raised against Westly, charges that could result in future legal problems which would be embarrassing to the state if he were governor and instead focuses on whether or not the Angelides campaign merely called Cari's office, that's not news, that's gotcha journalism. And that's hurting California.
apologies if this is a repeat, since it is from yesterday: http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/200... Memo to the folks behind Tom DeLay's legal defense fund: Stephen Colbert is a comedian. And when he sits down with Robert Greenwald, the producer of "The Big Buy: Tom DeLay's Stolen Congress," and asks things like, "Who hates America more, you or Michael Moore?" -- well, that's what we call "satire," and it probably isn't the best fodder for the fundraising e-mail you just sent to a bunch of your supporters.
http://news.aol.com/entertainment/tv/artic... After-Dinner Speech Remains a Favorite Dish By NOAM COHEN The New York Times (May 22) -- The after-dinner speech that refuses to go away has scored another distinction: top of the charts.
|
Profile Information CAcyclist
2231 posts Member since Mon Oct 4th 2004 ``Unlike the governor, I know where I stand, I know whose side I'm on,'' Angelides said. ``I'll stand on the ground that I believe is right for California and I believe Californians are hungry for that.'' Phil Angelides Dani's Bike Pages
URLs of just a few of the great Chevy Ad parodies - the first two listed are mine, the rest are just brilliant contributions from others. Who know how long these will be good for though. See also the thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discu... mine: http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... Others: http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co... ***************************************************************************************************** I am posting bicycle-related articles, mostly relating to bicycle rights in California, as time goes by. Since this issue isn't frequently touched on at DU, but is an issue close to my heart and entirely pro-environment, pro-health and pro-freedom and anti-oil, I think the subject merits consideration. The first point I would like to make is to educate people as to the actual Vehicle Code in the state of California. The following code is good to download and take with you as you ride: (the url you can find this at is http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html ) The below code describes the actual exceptions to riding to the right including the right to take the lane and it specifically DOES NOT require single-file riding. Note that these rules hold for cyclists traveling at less than the normal speed of traffic. Cyclists traveling at the normal speed of traffic do not have to stay to the right at all, because they are now no longer a "slow-moving" device (vehicle). California CVC 21202. (a) Any person operating a bicycle upon a roadway at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at that time shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway except under any of the following situations: 1. When overtaking and passing another bicycle or vehicle proceeding in the same direction. 2. When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway. 3. When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions (including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards, or substandard width lanes) that make it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or edge, subject to the provisions of Section 21656. For purposes of this section, a "substandard width lane" is a lane that is too narrow for a bicycle and a vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane. 4.When approaching a place where a right turn is authorized. (b) Any person operating a bicycle upon a roadway of a highway, which highway carries traffic in one direction only and has two or more marked traffic lanes, may ride as near the left-hand curb or edge of that roadway as practicable. 21208. (a) Whenever a bicycle lane has been established on a roadway pursuant to Section 21207, any person operating a bicycle upon the roadway at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at that time shall ride within the bicycle lane, except that the person may move out of the lane under any of the following situations: (1)When overtaking and passing another bicycle, vehicle, or pedestrian within the lane or about to enter the lane if the overtaking and passing cannot be done safely within the lane. (2) When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway. (3) When reasonably necessary to leave the bicycle lane to avoid debris or other hazardous conditions. (4) When approaching a place where a right turn is authorized. (b) No person operating a bicycle shall leave a bicycle lane until the movement can be made with reasonable safety and then only after giving an appropriate signal in the manner provided in Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 22100) in the event that any vehicle may be affected by the movement. 21211. (a) No person may stop, stand, sit, or loiter upon any class I bikeway, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 890.4 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other public or private bicycle path or trail, if the stopping, standing, sitting, or loitering impedes or blocks the normal and reasonable movement of any bicyclist. (b) No person may place or park any bicycle, vehicle, or any other object upon any bikeway or bicycle path or trail, as specified in subdivision (a), which impedes or blocks the normal and reasonable movement of any bicyclist unless the placement or parking is necessary for safe operation or is otherwise in compliance with the law. (c) This section does not apply to drivers or owners of utility or public utility vehicles, as provided in Section 22512. (d) This section does not apply to owners or drivers of vehicles who make brief stops while engaged in the delivery of newspapers to customers along the person's route. (e) This section does not apply to the driver or owner of a rubbish or garbage truck while actually engaged in the collection of rubbish or garbage within a business or residence district if the front turn signal lamps at each side of the vehicle are being flashed simultaneously and the rear turn signal lamps at each side of the vehicle are being flashed simultaneously. (f) This section does not apply to the driver or owner of a tow vehicle while actually engaged in the towing of a vehicle if the front turn signal lamps at each side of the vehicle are being flashed simultaneously and the rear turn signal lamps at each side of the vehicle are being flashed simultaneously. 22517. No person shall open the door of a vehicle on the side available to moving traffic unless it is reasonably safe to do so and can be done without interfering with the movement of such traffic, nor shall any person leave a door open on the side of a vehicle available to moving traffic for a period of time longer than necessary to load or unload passengers. Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
|