Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Chipster » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
Chipster's Journal
Posted by Chipster in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Mon May 07th 2007, 03:43 PM
Why isn't it credible that the purpose of the war in Iraq was to cover up that Bush was warned about 911 and did nothing?

We know that Bush knew that the New Orleans levees would breach, and we know that he did nothing with that information, when he could have saved at least lives if not property if he would have contacted Louisiana officials. So, in another life-threatening circumstance, Bush did nothing. That isn't benign neglect; it's CRIMINALneglect.

Knowing about 911 and doing nothing would have been treasonous and impeachable.

I'd quibble with the thought that it was the sole purpose of the Iraq invasion, though. The interests of PNAC and the oilboyz also played a part.
Discuss (1 comments)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
StarStar
AlienGirl has passed away
12 recs : By Contrary1
Star
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.