AZCat wrote that Petgoat "has made claims about its contents that were easily checked (and refuted, once someone did so)."
That, right there, is a far more substantive criticism of Petgoat's approach than anything Boloboffin said in the entire preceding sub-thread. It is precisely the sort of additional point that I said Boloboffin needed to complete his argument. The only thing still lacking, in what you said above, is a mention of the specific issues on which you claim that Petgoat has misrepresented the NIST report.
But it would seem that Boloboffin is "too fucking lazy" (borrowing a phrase from AZCat's post) to make substantive criticisms, preferring instead just to hurl, and repeat, logically incomplete insults.
Important Notices: By registering on this website,
visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums and
Journals are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily
represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.