Here are some examples of her "dancing around the the line of civility" in posts made in response to multiple parties in this thread:

- Try to ask coherent questions,
- One bangs one's head.
- Blah blah blah
- Why would you invent such silliness?
- say something unimaginably dumb
- not even a little learning, in this case
- God damn you're boring.
- Your words make me puke
- You've reached the point where even your vile misrepresentations of people who disagree with you have become totally incoherent.


in post #62 she proffers a definition for civil discourse, it ends with:

Insult, misrepresentation, deceit, demagoguery, dishonesty, false claims, unsubstantiated claims ... none of these are "argument".

Which in fact enumerates the primary features of her posts. For her to claim to be on the side of civil discourse is ludicrous.

.