'If you do not, you will be breaking the law and subject to a fine.'

Is this an accurate statement of the case in relation to the purchase of medical insurance or is it not? Actually, I thought you would be subject to imprisonment, but maybe they've just 'tempered the wind to the shorn lamb' by slugging you with a monetary penalty, when your breach of non-undertaking will in many cases arise from lack of funds in the first place. 'Tempering the wind to the shorn lamb' like that, is a Republican and DINO speciality. Think credit-card usury.

'You have no control over how much you will pay for that product.'

Is this really the case? I find it hard to believe. But right now, I'm more inclined to believe Olberman than you.

The government will have virtually no control over how much the company will charge for that product!"

Say it ain't so. But not with forked tongue.