Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » KCabotDullesMarxIII » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
Joe Chi Minh
It's only a matter of time before the psychopaths achieve hegemony and they twist even the most unambiguous criticism against them, while praising the authors to the heavens for precepts, which, far from being a central part of their teaching, they, in fact, vehemently opposed.

Adam Smith is a prime example: "All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind."

Take good note of the term, 'the masters of mankind'. Ponder it in general terms; but also ponder it in specific terms. Who are currently the masters of mankind? Who call the shots? Who does Obama have to defer to?

Smith goes right to the heart of the problem: regulate THEM, because they are anarchists who will impose their 'freedoms' on mankind.

In his essay on comparative religion, The Perennial Philosophy, Aldous Huxley addresses man's hubris and the eventual nemesis visited upon him, ascribing some blame to the injunctions in the Judaeo-Christian scriptures for man to assume dominion over creation. However, it is Man's fallen nature which leads him to abuse that power, and part of his quasi divine dignity to exercise such dominion in a humble, respectful, responsible and loving manner.
Discuss (1 comments)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Logic, not physics
What Random_Australian failed to grasp, but I believe I had intimated initially, is that my contentions regarding the radiation of photons from the Singularity and simply in the form of light, as viewed here on our earth, were not assertions concerning any truths of empirical science*, in themselves, at all, but, rather, the ineluctable, logical implications of them in relation to philosophy/theology. Just not open to dispute.

*The pinnacle of my achievements in the direction of empirical science, was a somewhat modest ability to solve quadratic equations.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.