
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
|
Lex's Journal
Intel report sinks CNN Iran special Two-hour 'Nuclear' was slated for Dec. 12
By BRIAN LOWRY
HOLLYWOOD -- The latest National Intelligence Estimate concluding that Iran discontinued its nuclear weapons program four years ago has claimed one casualty: CNN has postponed speculative documentary "We Were Warned -- Iran Goes Nuclear."
The two-hour spec, which was slated for Dec. 12 under the "CNN Presents" banner, was "set partially in the future," featuring a what-if scenario as former government officials -- playing fictional cabinet members -- debate how to deal with the Iranian threat.
That special was "based on a different set of rules and a different set of conditions," said CNN veep-senior exec producer Mark Nelson, noting that the surprising NIE report "changed everything."
In its place, CNN will this weekend air two Campbell Brown-hosted specials on the Iran situation and its history. Portions of "We Were Warned" correspondent Frank Sesno's original reporting will be incorporated into those hours, which air Saturday and Sunday.
Among those participating in the war-game panel featured as part of "Iran Goes Nuclear" were former CIA director Jim Woolsey, former EPA administrator Christie Todd Whitman and former presidential adviser David Gergen.
http://www.variety.com/VR1117977083.html
Let us all hail the Goddess of Irony who put these stories side-by-side in the news.
Hey, shouldn't they be in Iraq? Too bad I didn't have any Enlistment Forms for them. (Sorry the lighting is so bad--they were across the street where it was dark.)  We had about 100 people there. And those 2 idiots. We got a lot of honks and shouts of support from cars passing by. Here's a few other photos from tonight. She had a message on each side of her sign:    -----------------------------
into something horrible. Even Edwards joke on Jon Stewart's "seat of heat." And Kerry's slam against Bush, which they turned into a slam against the troops.
And Every Freakin' Thing that Al Gore said in his presidential bid in 2000.
It's not about the Democrats being more "careful" about what they say--the Corp. Media will turn ANY random thing they say into something horrible.
No one is immune. Not Clark, not Obama, not anyone.
the Baptists and their pro-slavery stances. You know, that they got from the Bible.  Embarassing for them. Once again. I predict in another 100 years, or however long, they'll have to hang their heads for being backwards socially once again. Baptists at the 1998 Convention should go back and read the pro-slavery sermons, tracts and treatises of the founders of their denomination. Their Biblical expositions of Negro inferiority were based on Noah's curse of slavery upon Canaan, son of Ham, who was presumed to be the ancestor of the Black race; and also based on the patriarchal and Mosaic acceptance of slavery, and, also based on the New Testament commands of Peter and Paul regarding slave-master relationships. Rev. Furman stated, "For though they are slaves, they are also men; and are with ourselves accountable creatures; having immortal souls, and being destined to future eternal reward." The Southern Baptist view was that slaves were better off under the loving, tender, compassionate care of Christian slaveowners, and the institution of slavery was to be "a blessing both to master and slave." In fact it would little rewording of the 1998 “Family Amendment” to make it fit the 1845 Southern Baptist view toward slaves: “A slave/wife is to submit themselves graciously to the servant leadership of their master/husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. Slaves/females, being in the image of God as is their master/husband and thus equal to them , has the God-given responsibility to respect their master/husband and to serve as their helper in picking cotton/managing the household and nurturing the next generation .”
One hundred and fifty-five years later, after a Civil War that left six hundred thousand dead and one million wounded, we recognize that our Southern Baptist forefathers and foremothers were on the wrong side of history and Biblical interpretation…But if the slave subordination and submission passages are no longer binding upon the church, then why are the female subordination and submission passages?
http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/religion/sou...
Too long, of course. But 9/11 extended it a bit--people scared and willing to believe the rhetoric a bit longer. Americans didn't want to believe that WMDs were an outright lie or that Iraq was really about oil. They wanted to believe that Bush was doing the right thing. They really wanted to believe that.
But, after 12 years, it comes down to this for a lot of voters: where's ANYthing that Repubs promised the American people? ANYthing? They delivered on absolutely NONE of what they promised, none of what the AM radio right-wing nutjobs promised, none of what that inane 1994 "Contract For America" promised.
Sure some of us knew from the beginning it was all bullshit and that they were crooks, snake-oil salesmen, warmongers, and thieves.
But your typical voter kept thinking, just like people do with misbehaving teenagers, "Oh, they'll turn this around. They'll start doing the right thing. They wouldn't lie to us."
The lies, deception, and corruption do inevitably start to sink in, though. And since 2004, hasn't it just all gotten worse and worse. Body parts in streets in Iraq. Frist, DeLay, Abramoff . . . No end in sight.
Will 2006 be the year when America wakes up? I hope so.
www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/... Public FiguresUnder the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1964 Case, New York Times v Sullivan where a public figure attempts to bring an action for defamation, the public figure must prove an additional element: That the statement was made with "actual malice". In translation, that means that the person making the statement knew the statement to be false, or issued the statement with reckless disregard as to its truth. This is why Clinton's lawyers and Albright's lawyers sent ABC/Disney letters specifying which scenes in the movie were completely fabricated and never happened. They were laying the groundwork for a successful lawsuit, imho, and showing that ABC/Disney proceeded with "actual malice" -- that they did know that those scenes were lies.
What's the deal on these lame-brains who think it's okay to get spied on "if you aren't doing anything wrong, you shouldn't care?" Ridiculous!
I mean, seems to me if they aren't doing anything wrong, and they don't care if someone eavesdrops or invades their privacy, then they shouldn't mind "peeping Toms" looking through their windows either.
That's the question I always pose to them when I hear that tired old "if you aren't doing anything wrong, then you shouldn't mind . . . "
excerpt from Forbes.com 04.12.04http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2004/041... -------- Still, "companies are playing fast and loose," says Adam Pener of Conflict Securities Advisory Group, a D.C.-based consultancy to multinational businesses. Halliburton, for example, manages to do business with Iran obliquely. Its Dubai-based affiliate, Halliburton Products & Services Ltd., allegedly has no Americans on staff; the Houston oil services company claims it has no direct ownership of the operation. Nevertheless, FORBES has obtained documents showing how Kala Ltd., the British arm of the National Iranian Oil Co., solicited at least 17 separate bids from the affiliate during 1997 and 1998 (when Vice President Cheney was Halliburton's chief executive). A few bids include handwritten notes that say "FOB Dubai Airport" or "FOB Dubai port"--meaning that the U.A.E. was just a way station between Halliburton and Tehran.
------------
This is pretty interesting. Probably the tip of the ice-berg.
I read Tipping the Velvet several years ago and liked it pretty well.
I just finished Fingersmith and thought it was really one of the best books I'd read. Maybe now on my own Top 10 list.
Both are set in London and environs circa 1880 and have well-designed plots and the author does an amazing job of putting you right there in a very realistic way.
Wow.
You must read The Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey.
What a great book and it'll make you question whether everything you read in your history texts was correct or if some was just "tonypandy."
The book isn't very lengthy but it is excellent!
She was incisive, funny, energetic, insightful and charming. I couldn't take my eyes off her--couldn't wait to see what character she would slip into next, or what she would say about politics ("Dumbo meets Gumbo") or current events. She's definitely a liberal and she's definitely mad as hell about Bush. Anyway, all her old characters were there--Edith Ann and Ernestine *snort* and the whole gang! She even did a long Q & A (the q's were submitted beforehand on note cards) with the lights up at the end. Off the cuff, she's just as charming and witty as during her performance. "Our greatest tool for survival is our ability to delude ourselves" was one of her memorable quotes tonight. During the Q & A session, someone asked "What do you think about gay marriage?" Lily said, "I think imitating heterosexuals is a slippery slope. I mean, what next? Monster truck shows?" *sigh* I just love her.  She has a good website with her partner, Jane, here: www.lilytomlin.com
|
Profile Information Lex
 DU Donor 22469 posts Member since 2001 Blogroll DU Journals
Other Blogs Latest Threads
The ten most recent threads posted on
the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums. Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted
on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the
last 24 hours. My Forums
Democratic Underground forums
and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Discussion Forums
Big Forums
More Forums
Today's Featured Forums
|