Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » MiaCulpa Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
MiaCulpa's Journal
Posted by MiaCulpa in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Mon Sep 29th 2008, 08:05 AM
The Council for American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Muslim advocacy group with an office in Southfield, Mich., has asked the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) to investigate whether the distributor of millions of copies of an anti-terrorism DVDs is a front for an Israeli-based group with the goal of helping Republican presidential candidate John McCain. If so, that could be a violation of campaign law.

Millions of DVD copies of the film “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against The West” were delivered recently to the doorsteps of potential voters in November’s upcoming presidential election between Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain, via their Sunday newspapers through an advertising purchase by a shadowy group called the Clarion Fund.

The distribution, which began last week with inserts in The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, The Grand Rapids Press, the Lansing State Journal and others, follows highly visible giveaways of the “Obsession” DVD at the Democratic and Republican parties’ conventions.

The 60-minute documentary showcases scenes of Muslim children being encouraged to become suicide bombers, interspersed with shots of Nazi rallies. “The threat of Radical Islam is the most important issue facing us today,” reads the sleeve of the DVD. ”But it’s a topic that neither the presidential candidates nor the media are discussing openly. It’s our responsibility to ensure we can all make an informed vote in November.”

CAIR refers us to a report in the Detroit Free Press:

“In its complaint, CAIR cites New York Secretary of State records showing that three people who incorporated Clarion Fund also are employees or have been employees of Aish HaTorah International, a Jerusalem-based Jewish educational organization that has offices around the world.

“American voters deserve to know whether they are the targets of a multimillion-dollar campaign funded and directed by a foreign group seeking to whip up anti-Muslim hysteria as a way to influence the outcome of our presidential election,” Nihad Awad, executive director of CAIR, said in a statement.

The three named as those who incorporated Clarion Fund and also employees of Aish Ha Torah are Obsession’s producer, Raphael Shore, Clarion spokesman Gregory Ross as a former employee of Aish Ha Torah, and Ari Morgenstern, spokesman for the Endowment for Middle East Truth, which is a partner with the Clarion Fund in “The Obsession Project.”

Full story here:

http://michiganmessenger.com/5247/is-a-pro...
Read entry | Discuss (2 comments) | Recommend (+1 votes)
Posted by MiaCulpa in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Sun Aug 10th 2008, 06:07 PM
From Newsweek:

When the FBI publicly branded the late Dr. Bruce Ivins as the anthrax killer, it unsealed court affidavits suggesting a possible motive for the mailing to one target: NBC anchor Tom Brokaw. According to the affidavits, Ivins was angry about repeated Freedom of Information Act requests from Gary Matsumoto, identified as "an investigative journalist who worked for NBC News" who was looking into Ivins's work on an anthrax vaccine. "Tell Matsumoto to kiss my ass," the affidavit says Ivins wrote in an Aug. 28, 2001, e-mail, noting that was "weeks" before the Sept. 18, 2001, anthrax mailing addressed to Brokaw. But Matsumoto told NEWSWEEK the FBI never interviewed him as part of its investigation. If it had, he says, he could have told them he'd actually left NBC News five years earlier. At the time he was bombarding Ivins's lab with FOIA requests, he was employed by ABC. "They're trying to connect dots that don't connect," he said.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/151784

From the WaPo:

Ivin's 'psychiatrist' who wasn't really a psychiatrist, but a counselor, but not really a counselor, a newly graduated social worker is really not a social worker but an 'addictions counselor':

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...

WSJ:

In April 2002, researchers noticed an anthrax-laced deposit on the outside of a flask outside the biocontainment area. The contamination spawned an investigation and a 361-page Army report, during which Dr. Ivins admitted his unauthorized office cleanup.

He told Army investigators that he had cleaned his office the previous fall, and then again without permission in April, because "I had no desire to cry 'Wolf!' " and blame someone else for the spill. The Army cleared him and adopted his recommendations to improve "cleaning inside the suites and maybe surveillance."

By this time, all of the scientists in the bacteriology division were under the FBI's investigative microscope, people working there at the time said. One after another, they submitted to a 3˝-hour polygraph test. Dr. Ivins "was in the safety zone" because he had already passed his polygraph, Dr. Andrews said. Dr. Ivins was never tested again, a law-enforcement official said.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1218241222...

And finally this article from the NYT just speaks to the recklessness with which this case was 'investigated':

In 2002, Mr. Mikesell came under F.B.I. scrutiny, officials familiar with the case said. He began drinking heavily — a fifth of hard liquor a day toward the end, a family member said.

“It was a shock that all of a sudden he’s a raging alcoholic,” recalled the relative, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of family sensitivities.

By late October 2002, Mr. Mikesell, 54, was dead, his short obituary in The Columbus Dispatch making no mention of his work with anthrax or the investigation. “He drank himself to death,” the relative said.

Dr. Hatfill, who worked at Fort Detrick from 1997 to 1999, also drew the investigators’ attention. He loved covert exploits and padded his résumé, habits that intrigued F.B.I. agents and, not long after that, reporters.

In June 2002, officials tipped off television stations that the bureau would search Dr. Hatfill’s apartment, just outside the gates to Fort Detrick. Later, F.B.I. agents told the woman he was living with at the time that he was a murderer and warned that she could be charged as an accomplice if she failed to tell all. At a teary press conference in August 2002, Dr. Hatfill protested his innocence.

For at least a year, F.B.I. surveillance teams followed him — and in one remarkable encounter, a car that was trailing him ran over his foot. (Dr. Hatfill, not the agent, was given a ticket.)


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/10/washingt...


This needs a thorough, independent investigation before anyone else is harmed or killed.

-Diane
Read entry | Discuss (5 comments) | Recommend (+12 votes)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.