Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » MikeH » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
MikeH's Journal
Posted by MikeH in The DU Lounge
Sun Jul 20th 2008, 08:57 PM
In thread about do-it-yourself waxing
Who started this whole shaving thing anyways?

In modern times, it was started by Gillette in 1915.

Here is an excerpt from an article:

In the late 1800's a fellow named "King" Gillette was convinced that the way to get rich was to invent some gadget that people would soon be unable to do without. You know, "build a better mousetrap...". He didn't have much luck until one morning when he went to shave, he found his straight razor was dull. Bingo! One can almost see the little light bulb go on over his head as he thought about a razor with presharpened, replaceable blades. By 1906, he was selling 300,000 razors a year, and when WW I began, the government bought 3.5 million Gillette razors and 36 million blades. Men soon couldn't do without them.

Soon thereafter, women's fashions began to change. Sleeveless dresses appeared. Magazine ads advertising these new styles used models with shaved armpits. Around 1915, Gillette had another idea and began an advertising blitz to convince women that they absolutely had to have bare armpits. It worked. Before the invention of Gillette's razor, shaving their armpits and legs just wasn't a very practical thing for women to do with a straight razor. Better to be hairy than to bleed to death...

The next things to occur were the roaring twenties and the movies. In the twenties, the "flapper look" came into style, with shorter dresses and new bathing suits that showed women's legs. Women in the movies who wore the new styles had shaved legs, and, just like today, the movie fad caught on. Just like today, women imitated glamorous movie stars and models.

King Gillette retired in 1931, a very wealthy man.

http://www.hungrybrowser.com/phaedrus/m062...


Also here is a link to a very relevant excerpt from a book titled Gibson Girls and Suffragists: Perceptions of Women from 1900 to 1918 by Catherine Gourley. I was not able to copy and paste the excerpt. According to the excerpt women did not shave their legs and underarms at the turn of the 20th century.

http://books.google.com/books?id=XmwCN-Bju...


I will say that I am a man who has always had a liking for the natural look since adolescence. I have always had an attraction to natural body hair on women, particularly natural unshaven legs, and have had a wish that women in non-trivial numbers would let their body hair grow out. I have always been a loss to understand why just about everything else has been acceptable in our society at some time since the 1960's except for natural body hair on women.

However I respect that it is a very difficult personal decision to break some long-established cultural taboo, and to make oneself very conspicuous in doing so. I wish you the best in doing what you feel you need to do.

Discuss (0 comments)
Profile Information
MikeH
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
913 posts
Member since 2002
San Diego, California, USA
Male
Morality and Duty, and Access to Spontaneous or Childhood Feelings
Morality and performance of duty are artificial measures that become necessary when something essential is lacking. The more successfully a person was denied access to his or her feelings in childhood, the larger the arsenal of intellectual weapons and the supply of moral prostheses has to be, because morality and a sense of duty are not sources of strength or fruitful soil for genuine affection. Blood does not flow in artificial limbs; they are for sale and can serve many masters. What was considered good yesterday can--depending on the decree of government of party--be considered evil and corrupt today, and vice versa. But those who have spontaneous feelings can only be themselves. They have no other choice if they want to remain true to themselves. Rejection, ostracism, loss of love, and name calling will not fail to affect them; they will suffer as a result and will dread them, but once they have found their authentic self they will not want to lose it. And when they sense that something is being demanded of them to which their whole being says no, they cannot do it. They simply cannot.

Alice Miller, For Your Own Good

http://www.nospank.net/fyog10.htm#central
Learning from Hitler and his childhood
What point is there for us today in learning about Hitler and his history? For me, the main point is this: our knowledge will serve as a warning against our blindness and encourage us to give it up once and for all and to struggle against collective repression. This is what I do consistently in all my books in order to help people understand the psychodynamics of the mistreatment of children and its immeasurable danger for society, as demonstrated by Hitler's case. My explanations are by no means intended to suggest pity for a man as merciless as Hitler.

it was in large part owing to Hitler and his history that I became aware of the dangers of our traditional morality. We are exhorted to honor our parents and never question them no matter what they have done. Yet when I realize that millions of human beings had to die so that Adolf Hitler could keep his repression of childhood trauma intact, that millions were subjected to humiliation in concentration camps so that he never had to recognize how he had once been humiliated, then I believe that one can't point out these connections often enough in order to shed light on this unconscious production of evil. How should young people be expected to recognize and reject inhumanity and crime if these continue to be disguised instead of being pointed out as plainly as possible? Only when young people are permitted to know exactly what happened and how it could happen, only if they don't allow anything to stifle their curiosity and are not afraid of the truth, can they free themselves from the burden placed upon them by their forebears' blindness.

Alice Miller

http://www.naturalchild.com/alice_miller/a...

See also
http://www.nospank.net/fyog13.htm
http://www.nospank.net/fyog2.htm
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.