Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » MikeH » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
MikeH's Journal
Posted by MikeH in Religion/Theology
Tue Jan 19th 2010, 07:38 PM
Response to OP: Exercise: Improve the Ten Commandments
and replace it with a commandment to parents to "treat your children with dignity and respect, that they may come to treat others with dignity and respect."

I say this as a former Christian, and as one who had a very difficult relationship with my father.

My dad did many very good things and many very nice things, and I had many good times with him. He was far from being the worst father anybody ever had. Even so he sometimes behaved in ways that bordered on being abusive.

Oftentimes if I made an honest mistake, honestly forgot something, or something was not quite up to his standards, he would decide in Godlike fashion to treat it like I had committed some kind of crime. And he would always say he was doing it "for my own good". And he was often very poor at understanding, or trying to understand, from my point of view, some sensitive issue which was causing me to be frustrated, upset, or otherwise unhappy.

My dad often seemed to have the attitude (though he would deny it) that being father of his children and head of the house gave him certain arbitrary privileges, and that because of all the good things he did he could do no wrong. If I were angry or upset with him or with something he said or did it was always a problem with me, never with him.

I was a Christian for about 15 years as a young man. I came to realize about a year after my dad died how angry I still was at him, and that he really was at times abusive, or borderline so. I.e. it was not just something wrong, or "sinful" with me that I had problems and issues with him, which problems and issues spilled elsewhere into my life.

Along with the realization that my dad at times bordered on being abusive, I also came to realize that my being a Christian had been of no help to me in enabling me to deal with my dad those times he was obnoxious or borderline abusive. This was the biggest single reason that I became disenchanted with the Christian faith and eventually, after a number of years and some struggle, decided to part company with the faith. I am as certain as I am of anything that doing this was the right and healthy thing for me to do.

I do not consider it to be just simply misfortune that Christianity was not of help to me, especially in dealing with my dad, but also with other things. There is, of course, the commandment to "honor your father and mother", which in the biblical text does not make any exceptions if a parent is abusive or is otherwise undeserving or unworthy of honor or respect. And there is a passage in Hebrews 12 which says to gladly accept the chastening of the Lord, like that of a "good" father (like my father, who always made a point that anything he said or did was done out of "love" and "for my own good").

It is wrong to tell anybody who has had an abusive parent or parents that such a person has an obligation or duty to "honor your father and mother." We hear of those who want to display the Ten Commandments in public places. Anybody who wants to do so might just as well tell me to my face that it was my duty and obligation to meekly submit to and gladly accept the abuse from my dad which came in the guise of "loving" rebukes which he decided in Godlike fashion that I needed "for my own good". Or might as well tell anybody else who has or has had abusive parents that it is their duty to accept and take whatever abuse from their parents.

The Swiss writer and psychologist Alice Miller, in her books and on her web sites, documents the harmful effects of accepting, "forgiving", and exonerating parental abuse in the name of the commandment to "honor your father and mother". These effects include physical illness, and passing on abuse received from one's parents to one's children, or to convenient scapegoats. Alice Miller has an entire chapter on Hitler documenting the abuse he received from his father, and the lack of any real love from his mother, and how that made him into the person that he became.


Discuss (0 comments)
Profile Information
MikeH
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
1123 posts
Member since 2002
San Diego, California, USA
Male
Learning from Hitler and his childhood
What point is there for us today in learning about Hitler and his history? For me, the main point is this: our knowledge will serve as a warning against our blindness and encourage us to give it up once and for all and to struggle against collective repression. This is what I do consistently in all my books in order to help people understand the psychodynamics of the mistreatment of children and its immeasurable danger for society, as demonstrated by Hitler's case. My explanations are by no means intended to suggest pity for a man as merciless as Hitler.

it was in large part owing to Hitler and his history that I became aware of the dangers of our traditional morality. We are exhorted to honor our parents and never question them no matter what they have done. Yet when I realize that millions of human beings had to die so that Adolf Hitler could keep his repression of childhood trauma intact, that millions were subjected to humiliation in concentration camps so that he never had to recognize how he had once been humiliated, then I believe that one can't point out these connections often enough in order to shed light on this unconscious production of evil. How should young people be expected to recognize and reject inhumanity and crime if these continue to be disguised instead of being pointed out as plainly as possible? Only when young people are permitted to know exactly what happened and how it could happen, only if they don't allow anything to stifle their curiosity and are not afraid of the truth, can they free themselves from the burden placed upon them by their forebears' blindness.

Alice Miller
Adolf Hitler: How Could a Monster Succeed in Blinding a Nation?

See also
For Your Own Good: Preface to the American Edition

For Your Own Good: Adolf Hitler's Childhood: From Hidden to Manifest Horror
The "Final Solution", Adaptation to Society's Norms, Morality and Duty, and Childhood Feelings
People with any sensitivity cannot be turned into mass murderers overnight. But the men and women who carried out "the final solution" did not let their feelings stand in their way for the simple reason that they had been raised from infancy not to have any feelings of their own but to experience their parents' wishes as their own. These were people who, as children, had been proud of being tough and not crying, of carrying out all their duties "gladly," of not being afraid--that is, at bottom, of not having an inner life at all.

...

This perfect adaptation to society's norms--in other words, to what is called "healthy normality"--carries with it the danger that such a person can be used for practically any purpose. It is not a loss of autonomy that occurs here, because this autonomy never existed, but a switching of values, which in themselves are of no importance anyway for the person in question as long as his whole value system is dominated by the principle of obedience. He has never gone beyond the stage of idealizing his parents with their demands for unquestioning obedience; this idealization can easily be transferred to a Führer or to an ideology. Since authoritarian parents are always right, there is no need for their children to rack their brains in each case to determine whether what is demanded of them is right or not. And how is this to be judged? Where are the standards supposed to come from if someone has always been told what was right and what was wrong and if he never had an opportunity to become familiar with his own feelings and if, beyond that, attempts at criticism were unacceptable to the parents and thus were too threatening for the child? If an adult has not developed a mind of his own, then he will find himself at the mercy of the authorities for better or worse, just as an infant finds itself at the mercy of its parents. Saying no to those more powerful will always seem too threatening to him.

...

Morality and performance of duty are artificial measures that become necessary when something essential is lacking. The more successfully a person was denied access to his or her feelings in childhood, the larger the arsenal of intellectual weapons and the supply of moral prostheses has to be, because morality and a sense of duty are not sources of strength or fruitful soil for genuine affection. Blood does not flow in artificial limbs; they are for sale and can serve many masters. What was considered good yesterday can--depending on the decree of government of party--be considered evil and corrupt today, and vice versa. But those who have spontaneous feelings can only be themselves. They have no other choice if they want to remain true to themselves. Rejection, ostracism, loss of love, and name calling will not fail to affect them; they will suffer as a result and will dread them, but once they have found their authentic self they will not want to lose it. And when they sense that something is being demanded of them to which their whole being says no, they cannot do it. They simply cannot.

Alice Miller
For Your Own Good: The Central Mechanism of "Poisonous Pedagogy"
Other tyrants and their childhood
In the lives of all the tyrants I examined, I found without exception paranoid trains of thought bound up with their biographies in early childhood and the repression of the experiences they had been through. Mao had been regularly whipped by his father and later sent 30 million people to their deaths, but he hardly ever admitted the full extent of the rage he must have felt toward his own father, a very severe teacher who had tried through beatings to "make a man" out of his son. Stalin caused millions to suffer and die because even at the height of his power his actions were determined by unconscious infantile fear of powerlessness. Apparently his father, a poor cobbler from Georgia, attempted to drown his frustration with liquor and whipped his son almost every day. His mother displayed psychotic traits, was completely incapable of defending her son and was usually away from home either praying in church or running the priest's household. Stalin idealized his parents right up to the end of his life and was constantly haunted by the fear of dangers that had long since ceased to exist but were still present in his deranged mind. The same might be true of many other tyrants. The groups of people they singled out for persecution and the rationalization mechanisms they employed were different in each case, but the fundamental reason behind it was probably identical. They often drew on ideologies to disguise the truth and their own paranoia. And the masses chimed in enthusiastically because they were unaware of the real motives, including those operative in their own biographies. The infantile revenge fantasies of individuals would be of no account if society did not regularly show such naive alacrity in helping to make them come true.

Alice Miller
The Political Consequences of Child Abuse
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Star
The Usual Suspects
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.