Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » On Par Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
On Par's Journal
Posted by On Par in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Thu Nov 09th 2006, 09:34 PM
If you are Pro-Choice, the word "choice" tells you that you have just that - a choice. You can choose life, or you can choose to abort. This fact has always seemed fairly clear to my thinking.
Read entry | Discuss (2 comments)
Posted by On Par in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Thu Nov 09th 2006, 09:31 PM
Nancy is going to make George an offer he can't refuse. Either sign the bills coming his way, or find himself with subpeona's that include high crimes and misdemeanors.

Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if "W" wakes up with a horse's head at the bottom of his bed.
Read entry | Discuss (15 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by On Par in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Wed Apr 26th 2006, 08:42 PM
For the real tune, and to follow along if you don't recall it.... http://www.icubed.com/~trz/myboyfriendsbac...

Rove is back, and there's going to be trouble,
Hey Fitz, hey Fitz....Rove is back!
You’ll see him coming, cause his chin is always double
Hey Fitz, hey Fitz....Rove is back!

Rove's been spreadin' lies that Plame was untrue
Hey Fitz, hey Fitz....Rove is back!
Look out now cause Fitz is coming after you.
Hey Fitz, hey Fitz....Rove is back!

And…Fitz knows what you been tryin’
And... he knows that you been lyin’

Rove's told lies for such a long time
Hey Fitz, hey Fitz, Rove is back !
Now he's back and going to do time
Hey Fitz, hey Fitz, Rove is back !

Rove's going to sorry he was every born
Hey Fitz, hey Fitz, Rove is back !
Fitz has a subpoena, and he’s full of scorn
Hey Fitz, hey Fitz, Rove is back !

Hey, Fitz knows you were a cheatin,
Now you're going to get a beaten

What made you think he'd believe all your lies
Aah-ooh, aah-ooh
You're a big man now but he’ll to cut you down to size.
Aah-ooh,
Wait and see!

Rove is back and Fitz will ruin his reputation
Hey Fitz, hey Fitz, Rove is back !
If I were Rove I'd take a permanent vacation
Hey Fitz, hey Fitz, Rove is back !

I can see Fitz comin’, and Rove better start a-runnin’…..
All right now...
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah


Read entry | Discuss (3 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by On Par in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Mon Apr 03rd 2006, 06:28 PM
Couldn't find the thread where I first saw this, but I made a commerical as well. It's based on the 60's anti-war song of Barry McGuire and The Eve of Destruction.

http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?co...
Read entry | Discuss (7 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by On Par in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Sat Mar 25th 2006, 10:28 AM
I have yet to understand why the Federal Government, doesn't have one machine, and one machine only, for voting in Federal elections?

That way, no matter where you lived, what precinct you voted in, or regardless of how many times you moved, you would be voting on the same machine as everyone else in the county.

To help pay for the machines, counties/states would pay a fee to use the machines, and help pay for the maintenance.

That way, the machine would be in compliance, there would be a VVPT, and would be monitored by an independent office of the Federal Gov't. And since Federal law supercedes State law, there wouldn't be any problem, and people like Kathyrn Harris, or Blackwell in Ohio wouldn't be able to control the elections in their state.

You could even have more than one manufacturer make them as long as they produce the same machine. So everyone could get a piece of the pie.

I don't get it. Someone needs to tell me why this is a stupid idea.
Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
Posted by On Par in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Fri Mar 24th 2006, 10:32 AM
At least by the House of Delegates...

"Diebold, the electronic voting machine maker, suffered another sharp setback recently, when Maryland's House of Delegates voted 137-to-0 to drop its machines and switch to paper ballots. The vote came in the same week that Texas held elections marred by electronic voting troubles. Maryland's State Senate should join the House in voting to discontinue the use of the Diebold machines, and other states should follow Maryland's lead."

Full Story:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/23/opinion/...


Read entry | Discuss (41 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by On Par in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Sat Mar 18th 2006, 10:04 PM
Without owning any part of the government, we certainly need to do what we're doing. Raising our voices at the last bastian of freedom of speech - the Internet.

There is no doubt, there could be a huge swing in the electorate come November - if we have a fair count. But with all that we know, can we not imagine some unknown 'opposition upsurge' in the voting public with the exit polls being wrong - yet again?

At the moment, only 33% of American's back Dubya. I've always felt this was the core of the Freepers, and it's the Reagan Democrats that have been swinging the elections - before Diebold, that is. At this point, we hope the trend continues. That must be what Harry Reid is thinking, because otherwise, he's embarrassing me almost as much as the Rethugs.

I've watched the James Spader (Alan Shore) video a dozen times. I was pulled from my chair when it was on, and tears in my eyes at it's end. I knew I was listening to something profound, powerful, with reasoning that washed over me like an ocean wave. I could envision the power of the argument so being so powerful that every man, woman, and child would be standing and applauding the sentiments.

What can we do? We can look for a hero. Someone who can take the fight to those currently in power, and knock the door down. Paul Wellstone would have just that. Until we find a new Sir Lancelot, maybe Feingold, maybe not, we need to send letters to the editors, post on blogs, place messages on our bumpers, in short, whatever you feel will make a difference.

Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
Posted by On Par in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Thu Mar 16th 2006, 09:56 AM
After once again viewing the "Boston Legal" speech titled "In the United States of America, I sent an email to Senator Harry Reid.

I told Harry that we're looking for a hero, and it's a sad note that it takes writing skills of David Kelly, and the acting of James Spader to deliver a message we've all been waiting for. BTW, you can read/or view the speech by clicking on http:www.wcdcpa.net

I also told Harry that if he fears "backlash" of those who think our security depends on eavesdropping of Americans, he shouldn't be. What he needs to be deeply concerned about is APATHY from the democratic party. By not supporting Feingold's resolution, Reid and the rest of the democratic senators are creating voter indifference, not support. They're killing what emotion or feeling we have remaining.

At any single moment the Democrats can take "something" and turn it into "nothing!" Harry, you're making me ill. Give 'em hell, not impassiveness !


Read entry | Discuss (1 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by On Par in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Wed Mar 15th 2006, 05:34 PM
If you didn't see it Tuesday night, noted creator/writer David E. Kelly of Boston Legal wrote a speech that was powerfully and profoundly delivered by James Spader. It's the speech we all want to hear. And while it wasn't delivered by a voice in Washington DC, for a brief and shining moment, I was once again reminded of how it was to be a proud American. While I can't yet find the text, this is the video from Crooks and Liars.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/03/15.h...
Read entry | Discuss (28 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by On Par in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Tue Mar 14th 2006, 06:41 PM
Making your voice heard....

Read entry | Discuss (9 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by On Par in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Sat Jan 21st 2006, 11:52 AM
We have a leased 2003 VW Passat that ends Feb 2007. It has 30,600 miles and still well within the 4 year – 50,000 warranty.

Thursday, January 12, my wife pulls into the driveway and said, as she was pulling in, a “Stop Engine” light came on stating low oil pressure. I checked it in the garage and the oil stick said “full.” I took it around the block, no light. I told her to take mine the next day, just in case, and I’ll take the Passat to our independent certified BP mechanic that is about “one” mile from our home.

I thought it was a faulty sensor. So did BP when I told them the “Stop Engine” light again came on as I started down the hill to the BP station. They checked the dip-stick. The oil pump was working. Oil all the way up the stick. I was about to leave and call my VW dealership when the car began to spasm. The mechanic said, that’s a bad cam lifter on the turbo. I parked it. Called VW from the service station. No problem, roadside assistance will tow it, and pay for it. The VW dealership is about 10 miles away.

Upon calling the VW Dealership, they said, “you’ll need proof of oil changes.” This was to be the death rattle. While on the phone with VW, I looked at my mechanic, knowing my wife, who drives the car, would never keep them, if they could get them. Shouldn’t be a problem.

Background: Once home, I begin to check this on the Internet. No less than Time Magazine, Newsweek, and AutoWeek have featured stories on the VW 1.8 L turbo engine and the sludge problem that ensues because the turbo gets too hot, prematurely breaks down the oil and the oil filter sump capacity is too small to handle the sludge. It’s sent back to the engine, and the turbo lifters get coked, starve the engine of oil, stop engine light comes on. VW has lost multi-millions fixing this problem. According to Time, there operating profit in the U.S. went from $944 million to $68 million. http://www.time.com/time/globalbusiness/ar...

Oil receipts: My BP station doesn’t keep records of oil changes, but they thought they could “re-generate” a non-numerical receipt and reasonable facsimile of the oil changes. Why? The Passat has a plate that covers the bottom of the engine. You can’t take it to a Wal-Mart or Jiffy lube with a walk down bay because they can’t get to the bolts holding the base plate.

The 17th, I take the ‘re-generated’ receipts down to Three Rivers VW. They copied them and return the originals to me. An hour later the dealership called.

The first words I heard were, "Are you willing to testify in court that these are original documents?" Nice tone, huh? I told the service manager, who wasn’t there when I dropped them off, that I told the other service manager they were "re-generated." "Oh, so they're fake, a fraud" I was told. No, they are facsimiles.

Well, he said, "they aren't numbered." “Yes. Okay,” I told them. “They're re-generated!” My BP doesn’t keep those records.

The service manager replies, "Our field rep. called the BP dealer, and he won't stand behind them." Well, "let's see," I stated. Your rep called and used the same tone that you're using with me? Is it any wonder why a small business would not immediately think they'd need to get a lawyer and go to court, and therefore bail out? BTW, I later found out "no rep" had called the BP. It was the dealership service manager.

From there, the service manager tried to jump on me about the 5w-30 oil. "Oh, it may not be the right kind." I reminded them of the VW pamphlet they gave me a few days prior, stating it was. Plus, BP oil is synthetically reinforced. You see VW, realizing the problem sent out a memo http://www.autosafety.org/uploads/phpHPDpv... to 426,000 owners telling them they extended the sludge warranty from 4 to 8 years, and maintain your present 6mo/5000 mile oil change. 5w-30 is what my VW’s manual states. The new ‘05’s take synthetic only, and they’ve redesigned the engine, and changed to a much larger oil filter.

Operative part of the memo:
What Will Volkswagen Do?
“After listening to you, our valued customers, Volkswagen is implementing an extended warranty for oil sludge related repairs for 1998 - 2004 model year Volkswagen Passat equipped with the 1.8L Turbo engines to 8 years from the vehicle's original in service date without a mileage limitation. This extended warranty is fully transferable to any subsequent owner. This extended warranty does not affect - and is in addition to - any other applicable warranty covering your vehicle. Volkswagen will cover necessary engine repairs if oil "sludge" causes a malfunction in your engine and you can provide documentation of oil changes according to the maintenance schedule for your vehicle.”

My repair, of several thousand dollars, has been denied. In fact,they are all being denied. I called two dealerships that have a total of 7 Passats in their lots in one week, all denied. Multiply that by approx 9500 dealerships, and you see the massive problem)

With his tone, I explained, I have no choice but to stop payment on my lease. Oh, he said, "you better call VW."

I have read online horror story after horror story about the 1998-2004 VW Passat at http://www.myvwlemon.com . Even when people have proper oil receipts, they’ve been denied! Newsweek: This tells about VW's oil sludge problems.
http://www.clublexus.com/forums/archive/in...

I called VW Corp and spoke to a representative in Michigan. She took all the information including my explanation of the regenerated oil receipts. I explained to her about the horror stories about people being denied warranty service even with receipts or reasonable facsimiles. I also told her of the accusatory tone of their representatives. After two days, she called and said "denied!."

1. From my perspective, this is not an “oil” problem, but a turbo problem. The oil prematurely breaks down due to the overly hot turbo, now redesigned. The oil filter can’t handle the residue, and passes it back through the engine. The oil sludge is the result, not the primary cause. The “oil change” receipt is a red-herring. They’ve stated they will pay IF you have verification, knowing most, like me, won’t have the originals with numbered receipts. It's Orwellian language of the highest order, and one the Bush Administration is not demanding a recall of 1998-2004 VW's with the 1.8 turbo engine even thought the Nat'l Highway and Saftey administration has received a mountain of complaints.

2. Even when people have done everything correctly with proper receipts, changed their oil within 5,000/6mo, the sludge “still occurs!” That’s fact by every account, including theirs. No one is going to issue an 8 yr warranty if they don’t have a problem. Again, it's not the oil, it's the engine!

So here I sit with a car with 30,600 miles, owing $3600+ in payments, another several grand that could run into 5 figures, and I give it back to them in 12 months. And there's not a freaking thing I can do since VW, without gov't interference, has placed the onus on the customer in an obvious attempt to minimize their liability.

If you have a Passat...It's a time bomb. There will be no warning until the flashing stop engine light appears...Kaboom. It's too late.

If you have this 1.8 turbo engine. Sell it. If you don't have a VW, don't buy one!



Read entry | Discuss (132 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Website
Visit Us at www.wcdcpa.net
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.