No according to the courts! A very useful article was published in Chance Magazine from the American Statistical Association in 2008:

"Florida 2006: Can Statistics Tell Us Who Won Congressional District-13?"

Some quotes lifted from the article:

"...the conclusion that Jennings was the real winner in CD-13 becomes even surer."
"...it is clear that those missing votes switched the outcome of the congressional race from Jennings to Buchanan."
"The statistical evidence shows, beyond any reasonable doubt, that more voters wanted Jennings than Buchanan. However, there is-as yet-no precedent for a court overturning an electoral 'count' based on a statistical analysis."

I witnessed vote switching machines in 2004 just as many are doing today.
Even though courts accept statistical and eye-witness evidence for DNA analysis and murder trials; they don't want to do so for elections.

As such - it appears that this election is one where direct, concrete proof of election manipulation is required for true election reform to come from the courts:

1.) Impounding the machines.
2.) Pictures or video of switching.
3.) Absolute proof of ballots being destroyed, changed, or miscounted.

I hope that every DUer is prepared to watch and collect evidence if you see it. We don't have to prove all the elections are manipulated, but proving that ONE is manipulated may be the outrage that triggers reform for all of us. Meanwhile, the sheer number of voters must overwhelm the attempts to change the election - so get out there and vote - and keep your eyes open!