As more and more conservative pundits are jumping ship and pointing fingers at McCain and Bush, I think we need to pool their complicity from their print articles and video, in the policies of the last 8 years. We all know they will be highly critical of an Obama administration from day one. Perhaps one way of lessening their blows would be to remind our fellow citizenry of their non-critical assessments, often cheerleading efforts for the Bush administration. Pundits such as George Will, Peggy Noonan, David Brooks, Charles Krauthammer, Rush Limbaugh, Bill Krystol, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and various other print, tv, and radio personalities need to be held accountable as well. A repository of readily accessible information showcasing their integrity lacking comments would be an invaluable tool for our soon to be needed arsenal. If judgement is to be a key of their "critical assessments" into the future, then they are fair game.

Has anyone read whether there will be any transparency in the decisions yet to be made concerning which stocks or banks the government will support. First, I'm concerned about which companies get the support and which ones do not. Secondly, I would think anyone with the information of who gets the support could stand to make a lucrative investment. Such a governmental investment, one would think, would drive up the price of that respective stock.