In her speech yesterday on the housing crisis (which started off pretty decent), Hillary had the following to say:
Right now, many mortgage companies are reluctant to help families restructure their mortgages
because they’re afraid of being sued by the investment banks, the private equity firms and others who actually own the mortgage papers. Because remember, all of these mortgages were bundled up in these huge packages and sold around the world. So you can’t just go down to see your mortgage broker or your bank or your other lender to work out a deal because they no longer own the paper. This is the case even though writing down the value of a mortgage is often more profitable than foreclosing - both for mortgage companies and for most of those who own the mortgages.
That’s why I will be proposing legislation when Congress returns to provide mortgage companies with protection against the threat of such lawsuits. I know this kind of policy isn’t particularly glamorous and it probably won’t make headlines. But it will make a critical difference in helping families save their homes and getting our economy back on track.
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/speech/... If these mortage companies and lending institutions were following the law and other regulations, why would we need to protect them from lawsuits? This sounds just like the argument for retroactive immunity for the telecoms.