Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Thats my opinion » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
Thats my opinion's Journal
Posted by Thats my opinion in Religion/Theology
Fri Sep 23rd 2011, 10:43 AM
I respect the way you handle these disagreements. You have never really attacked my rationality while your critique has often been fierce. I can handle that. But there are a half dozen old hands here with a very different agenda. They do not want religion discussed at all, except to condemn it. Their vocation is to bash religion. When a poster reported that a religion man showed up to protest an execution, the response was that this sort of thing had no place on r/t and the poster should go elsewhere,.

This is why r/t is held in such low regard by most DUers who won't even bother to post or respond here. I decided to do what I could to alter that approach, and I have the scars to prove it.

To your answer. I listen to it realizing that it is a rational response. Of course I come at things very differently as my answers to your questions suggest.

The main critique is that I employ the NTS fallacy. The implication is that I speak for all religious thought and that those who do not agree with my thesis are therefor not real Christians--only those who believe as I do. Carried to this conclusion would mean that here can be no internal debate in anything where anybody held that their view was authentic, assuming others were not. Thus the end of any dialogic process of firmly held propositions. I am in no position to judge whether someone else is or is not not a Christian, or a historian, or a scientist or an politician. I hold what I do about the heart of Christianity as compassion for all. This is common proposition of liberal scholars and religious historians throughout the world. I am a member of the Jesus Seminar, and that is what Marcus Borg proposed in his book, "The Heart of Christianity." You NTS comment strikes me as a debater's rhetorical ploy that is intended to sidetrack what I really have to say.

I just flatly disagree that my 3 is epistemological mush. It is a deeply thought out perspective on Biblical literature that has been solid for a long long time.
Discuss (1 comments)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.