Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » TicketyBoo » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
TicketyBoo's Journal
Posted by TicketyBoo in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Sun Nov 22nd 2009, 06:26 AM
Most women would be very hurt and insulted if their husband insisted on a paternity test. I know I would be.

Here, I'm not sure a married man even has a say in the matter. If you're married, the child is considered yours, and nobody but the mother signs the application for a birth certificate. The application is sent to the state capital and the Bureau of Vital Statistics issues the formal birth certificate.

One thing that could be done that would not be as disruptive to family life and insulting to the wife is if the law were changed to make a mandatory paternity test done on every child so that it was not a father's reflection of suspicion against his wife. But that opens another can of worms, introducing another intrusion upon privacy, and what if the test proved that the child was not the husband's? Maybe the husband would be better off not knowing? Maybe the mother and baby would be better off not knowing, too?
Discuss (0 comments)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
StarStar
Star
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.