Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
Posted by Time for change in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Mon Jun 18th 2007, 06:32 PM
The numerous violations of our First Amendment rights depicted in this post would constitute impeachable offenses of the first magnitude; for a democracy cannot long exist without freedom of speech and a free press.
While President Bush likes to project an image of strength and courage, the truth is that in the presence of his large financial contributors and powerful political supporters, he is morally timid – so much so that he seldom if ever says “no” to them on anything – no matter what the public interest might mandate. – Al Gore, explaining the many ways in which biased television news coverage has distorted Americans’ view of reality


Most people – and most Americans as well – are basically decent, but lack the courage, energy or opportunity to right the great many wrongs in our world. They have a basic sense of fairness and justice, yet when their country turns away from justice or commits atrocities in their name, rather than strenuously object to those atrocities they turn a blind eye and allow themselves to believe that nothing is wrong. Thus explains the acquiescence of the German people to the Nazi Holocaust committed in their name. And thus explains the acquiescence of too many Americans to the imperialist ambitions of the Bush/Cheney administration with respect to the abuse and torture of their prisoners, their invasion and occupation of Iraq, their plans for war with Iran and who knows what else. In both of those cases a small group of excessively ambitious and ruthless men convinced enough of their fellow countrymen of the necessity of their disastrous schemes to secure their help and acquiescence in carrying them out.

Many of our Founding Fathers, being well versed in world history, recognized the potential for a single or small group of powerful, ambitious and ruthless men to enlist the help of others in carrying out their imperial ambitions. To prevent that from happening they created a Constitution (albeit flawed in many ways) that contained numerous mechanisms meant to serve as a check on such ambitions. Paramount among those mechanisms were the concepts of “one-man-one-vote” and our First Amendment guarantees of free speech and freedom of the press.

Those two concepts are inexorably intertwined. Our right to vote means little without our First Amendment rights because it is our First Amendment rights that enable us to gather the information that we need in order to make an enlightened choice in the voting booth.

Our First Amendment – and hence our democracy – is now under vigorous assault by our government, greatly facilitated by the fact that most of the news that Americans receive today is under the control of a very small number of powerful and wealthy individuals and corporations. Because that assault has been largely successful, those powerful and wealthy individuals have obscenely disproportionate influence on our nation’s priorities and policies today, including our military budget and actions.


Al Gore explains how the loss of our First Amendment rights has enabled Bush administration outrages

Al Gore, in his new book, “The Assault on Reason”, explains how the Bush administration has taken advantage of this lack of access to information (after playing a critical role in exacerbating the problem) to perpetrate a series of outrages on the people he was selected to serve:

The perpetrators have clearly assumed that they have little to fear from public outrage and that very few people will learn about their misdeeds.

All of them assume an ignorant public. Bush would not be able credibly to label a bill that increases air pollution “the clear skies initiative” – or call a bill that increases clear-cutting of national forests “the healthy forests initiative” – unless he was confident that the public was never going to know what these bills actually did.

Nor could he appoint Ken Lay from Enron to play such a prominent role in handpicking members to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) … unless the president felt totally comfortable that no one would pay attention … After members of the FERC were appointed with Mr. Lay’s personal review and approval, Enron went on to bilk the electric ratepayers of California and other states without the inconvenience of federal regulators trying to protect citizens from the company’s criminal behavior.

Likewise, this explains why many of the most important Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) positions have been carefully filled with lawyers and lobbyists representing the worst polluters in their respective industries, ensuring that those polluters are not inconvenienced by the actual enforcement of the laws against excessive pollution …

The private foxes have been placed in charge of the public henhouses. And shockingly, the same pattern has been followed in many other agencies and departments. But there is precious little outrage because there is so little two-way conversations left in our democracy… This behavior could never take place if there were the slightest chance that such institutionalized corruption would be exposed in a public forum that had relevance to the outcome of elections.

Now let’s consider some of the methods that the Bush administration has used to create or perpetuate this grave danger to our democracy, especially with respect to issues of war and peace.


Hiding the excesses of our war in Iraq – the April 2004 attack on Fallujah

The story of the two week April 2004 U.S. assault on the Iraq city of Fallujah, with a population of 350,000, demonstrates the extent to which the Bush administration will go to censor unfavorable reporting of its military actions.

Despite the uniformly positive coverage of the battle by “embedded” American journalists, and the U.S. claim that there were no civilian casualties, coverage by non-embedded journalists depicted a vastly different picture. Al Jazeera journalist Ahmed Mansour and his team reported the following from that battle:

We found children, women, elderly, all lifting white flags and walking, or in their cars leaving the city… When we reached the heart of the city at the hospital, I almost lost my mind from the terror that I saw… I felt like we need a thousand cameras to grab those disastrous picture: fear, terror, planes bombing, ambulances taking the dead people… We were the only team that was able to enter the city…

The planes bombed this house, as they did the whole neighborhood, and they brought the corpses and bodies to the hospital… I could not see anything but a sea of corpses of children and women – mostly children… I was taking photographs and forcing myself to photograph. At the same time I was crying…

In response to the Al Jazeera reporting George Bush first proposed bombing Al Jazeera’s international headquarters, but was dissuaded from doing so. The Guardian reported on how the Bush administration chose to deal with the only non-embedded news organization that made an intense effort to report on the battle:

An Al Jazeera camera man, Salah Hassan, had been arrested In Iraq, held incommunicado in a chicken-coop sized cell and forced to stand hooded, bound and naked for up to 11 hours at a time. He was beaten by U.S. soldiers… Finally, after a month, he was dumped on a street just outside Baghdad, in the same vomit-stained red jumpsuit that he had been detained in. Twenty other Al Jazeera journalists have been arrested and jailed by U.S. forces in Iraq and one, Tariq Ayoub, was killed last April when a U.S. tank fired a shell at the Al Jazeera offices in Baghdad’s Palestine Hotel. It was an accident, the Pentagon said, even though Al Jazeera had given the Pentagon the coordinates of its Baghdad offices…

Amy Goodman and David Goodman further describe the difficulties that journalists face in reporting on the Iraq war, in their book, “Static – Government Liars, Media Cheerleaders, and the People Who Fight Back”:

The Al Jazeera offices in Afghanistan and Basra were bombed by American planes, and two of its correspondents have been imprisoned on unspecified terrorism charges… Al Jazeera’s journalists are not the only ones under siege. The Iraq War has been among the deadliest conflicts ever for journalists. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) reported that by mid-2006, over 100 journalists and media assistants had been killed in Iraq while doing their jobs. By comparison, 66 journalists lost their lives over the course of the 20-year-long Vietnam conflict. More than half of those killed in Iraq were Iraqi and other Arab journalists. Fifteen journalists have been killed by U.S. fire…

Journalists also risk arrest while reporting on the war in Iraq: In 2005 alone, U.S. forces arrested seven Iraqi journalists “for prolonged periods without charge or the disclosure of any supporting evidence,” according to CPJ. All were eventually released, and no charges were ever filed. CPJ concluded that the Pentagon has “displayed a pattern of disregard when confronted with issues involving the security of Iraqi journalists and citizens.”…

In an extraordinary attack on the press, the U.S. military declared in April 2004 that there could be no peace for Fallujah unless Al Jazeera abandoned the city … In August 2004, the U.S.-backed Iraqi government ordered Al Jazeera’s Baghdad bureau closed.


The role of a free press in the war and peace decisions of nations

As I said at the beginning of this post, most people are basically decent. That is a major reason why a free press can potentially serve a vitally important role in a democracy in persuading a nation’s citizens to reject war, in opposition to the ambitions of that nation’s war-mongering leaders. And that is why the Bush administration has tried so vigorously to censure meaningful coverage of its Iraq war.

Dan Carlin explains the importance of accurate war reporting in general and visual images in particular, to help enable a nation’s citizens to make enlightened decisions regarding war and peace:

Images can end wars…. Like the photo taken after the My Lai massacre, showing dead babies piled half-naked in a dirt road atop their slain mothers and brothers and sisters, or the photo of the Saigon police chief pulling the trigger on a wincing Viet Cong officer, or the image of a little Vietnamese girl running naked, screaming, her clothes burnt off by the horrible, hot blast of a napalm attack.

If Larry Stimeling’s theory is correct – that these images fueled the anti-war movement and helped bring about the end of the Vietnam War…. average citizens, armed with the visual revelation of wasteful atrocities being perpetrated in their names on foreign peoples, and killing American soldiers, mobilized to stop it – and succeeded.


The consequences of censuring coverage of the Iraq War

In contrast, the lack of relevant information provided to the American people hinders the occurrence of a similar phenomenon with respect to the Iraq war. Carlin continues:

But if Vietnam entered the collective American imagination as those brutal snapshots of ravaging bombs, murdered civilians, and American soldiers in body bags – as real, gruesome images of war that demanded outrage and action – the latest American war against Iraq was most notable for its unreality, for its poverty of visual imagery. Where are the pictures? …

There were images collected in Iraq as startling as anything to come out of Vietnam, and as an American – and particularly as one who supported the war – I feel lucky to have seen them at all: most Americans will never even know they exist. Most people following the war in the U.S. through newspapers and on television weren’t shown images of war, but rather visual shorthand for war… Those images, which did exist, were excluded from American coverage for matters of “taste,” and because of government censorship.

There is an enormous blind spot in the American imagination today where the victims of the Iraq war – American, British, and Iraqi alike – should be present… to allow us to weigh the dead in our thoughts on the war and on all future wars…Americans today have no visual relationship with the lives that were lost in Iraq this year, and the collective amnesia… may be fast becoming the status quo.

The mainstream American media decided in the Iraq war (and in the Gulf War before it) that Americans would rather not be exposed to those difficult images of war, that they would prefer to ignore the ugly reality of the sacrifices being made in their names. We could not honor the soldiers who died, because images of their funerals were banned from TV and newspapers. We could not acknowledge the deaths we caused among Iraqis because the media decided that their deaths were beside the point, uninteresting, or too gruesome for us to stomach.

Of course, it is not only the lack of visual images, but the lack of a great deal of information that Americans should know about the Iraq War, including our reasons for being there, that hinders us from responding in a fully effective manner. The overall effect of U.S. government censorship of Iraq War news is to prevent us from being sufficiently informed to make the decisions required of a democracy. Carlin explains:

To stop reacting is to stop exercising the emotions, good or bad, that make us human, and without those emotions there can be no agency whether one of selfish nationalism or willful indifference, or one of universal respect for the dignity of the individual, one that spawns compassion, activism and change. By limiting what we see, news sources limit our ability to feel anger, or sorrow, or indignation – they limit our ability to act. And when the media decide that their audiences don’t need to see something, or don’t want to see it, they strip us of the ability to act ethically.


The many ways in which the Bush/Cheney regime has abridged our First Amendment rights

Thus far I have concentrated on how our First Amendment rights have deteriorated through the Bush/Cheney administration’s efforts to censure coverage of the Iraq War, as well as our corporate news media’s acquiescence or active participation in the censure. But there are many other means by which the Bush administration has abridged our First Amendment rights. Though the demise of our First Amendment rights did not start with George Bush and Dick Cheney, it certainly has accelerated under them:

First Amendment zones
With the onset of the Bush pResidency in 2001 we saw the creation of the concept of “First Amendment zones”, in which American citizens would have their Constitutional rights to free speech protected. The corollary to that is that their Constitutional rights are NOT protected outside of those zones. The American Constitution does not say anything about “zones” in which the Constitution applies. It is supposed to apply throughout the country. And in fact, the very purpose of George Bush’s “First Amendment zones” is to impede the ability of American citizens to have their protests of government heard by other citizens. As such, the first amendment zones should be seen as a clear violation of our Constitutional rights to free speech.

Access to the President
The Bush White House has also established a well publicized policy of denying access to the President for journalists who fall out of favor with the Bush administration. Since the jobs or careers of many journalists depend on having this access, this practice gives those journalists a strong incentive to write stories that cast the pResident in a favorable light, and a strong disincentive to write stories that are unfavorable to the pResident.

That practice also violates our First Amendment rights. The pResident works for us, the people. We have a right to know what he is doing, and that right is definitely abridged if only those journalists who have proven their loyalty to the pResident are allowed access to him – especially in the context of presidential press conferences.

Paid pResidential Pre$$titutes
Another unprecedented practice of the Bush administration is to insert its own reporters (paid by tax payer dollars, by the way, but that’s another issue) into its press conferences or other venues and have those reporters pretend to be real journalists, printing stories as if they constituted real news or independent editorials, when in fact they are nothing but government propaganda.

This again is a violation of our First Amendment rights, including free speech and freedom of the press. The purpose of the press, as previously noted, is to provide citizens with the information they need in order to form opinions. If the United States government arranges to put out government propaganda disguised as news, then citizens will not be able to distinguish between the two, and therefore “news” loses much of its value. And also, it ties up airtime or newspaper space that would otherwise be devoted to real news. Inaccurate reporting about the reasons for our invasion of Iraq was a major factor in creating reasonable acceptance of that invasion among the American electorate.

The criminalization of independent news reporting
The most egregious violation of our First Amendment rights by the Bush Administration has been its attempt to criminalize journalists who report stories that the administration considers unfavorable. As with all tyrannical power grabs, this is done under the guise of “national security”. But since the Bush administration itself allots to itself the power to determine when a journalistic action is criminal, it thereby has the power to send to prison any journalist who writes a story that displeases it. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has rationalized the right to imprison journalists for providing information to the public that the Bush administration deems to be criminal conduct.


Conclusion

The bottom line, as Bill Moyers points out, is that the protection offered us by our First Amendment is based on the assumption of a separation of our government and a free press, which is supposed to protect us from government abuses. Moyers goes on:

What would happen, however, if the contending giants of big government and big publishing and broadcasting ever joined hands, ever saw eye to eye in putting the public's need for news second to free-market economics? That's exactly what's happening now under the ideological banner of "deregulation". Giant media conglomerates that our founders could not possibly have envisioned are finding common cause with an imperial state in a betrothal certain to produce not the sons and daughters of liberty but the very kind of bastards that issued from the old arranged marriage of church and state.

Consider the situation. Never has there been an administration so disciplined in secrecy, so precisely in lockstep in keeping information from the people at large and -- in defiance of the Constitution -- from their representatives in Congress. Never has the powerful media oligopoly ... been so unabashed in reaching like Caesar for still more wealth and power. Never have hand and glove fitted together so comfortably to manipulate free political debate, sow contempt for the idea of government itself, and trivialize the peoples' need to know.

How can we fight this? A very useful starting point is that we must recognize the extent to which our First Amendment rights have been grievously abrogated, as well as the fact that our corporate news media is on not on our side. Recognizing the problem and the enemy is always the first step towards finding a solution. And as soon as we elect a new President we must make it a priority to break the monopoly that our current corporate news media has on deciding what news we will receive.

George Bush and Dick Cheney have committed numerous impeachable offenses, including: lying to the American people and to Congress in order to justify a preemptive war of aggression; the abuse and torture of its prisoners, in violation of international law, our Constitution, and the laws of our land; warrantless spying on hundreds of thousands of Americans, in violation of the Fourth Amendment to our Constitution and our Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA); the use of presidential “signing statements” to nullify over 800 laws duly passed by Congress; the firing of several federal prosecutors in order to promote a partisan political agenda that involved among other things the illegal disenfranchising of hundreds of thousands of American citizens; repeated and willful violations of the Whistleblower Protection Act in order to promote their corrupt political agenda; and many many more. But even without any of that, the numerous violations of our First Amendment rights depicted in this post would constitute impeachable offenses of the first magnitude; for a democracy cannot long exist without freedom of speech and a free press.
Discuss (7 comments) | Recommend (+6 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
StarStar
AlienGirl has passed away
16 recs : By Contrary1
Star
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.