Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
Posted by Time for change in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Thu Jul 24th 2008, 09:24 PM
Republicans routinely undertake large scale efforts to disenfranchise poor and minority voters: They whine about “voter fraud”, in order to pave the way for restrictive voting requirements, harassment of voter registration groups, and by targeted pur
Even as millions of Americans turn away from the Republican Party, Republicans continue their efforts to disenfranchise millions of Democratic voters. They employ numerous methods to do this, including: 1) Restrictive voting laws; 2) Intimidation of grassroots voter registration organizations; 3) Illegal purging of legally registered voters; and 4) Dirty tricks.

Such efforts were required for George W. Bush to win presidential elections in 2000 and 2004. And as President, Bush has done everything he can to ensure that they continue and expand. Let’s consider some of these efforts:


Restrictive voting laws

Restrictive voting laws decrease voter turnout by making it more difficult for people to vote. They disproportionately disenfranchise minorities, the poor, and Democrats. To rationalize these anti-democratic laws, Republicans have been pushing for several years the myth of “voter fraud” – the idea that voters who impersonate other people and otherwise vote illegally represent a monumental threat to the integrity of our elections.


The roots of the recent Republican “voter fraud” movement

Art Levine discusses these issues in a recent article titled “The Republican War on Voting”:

On Election Day 2000, hundreds or thousands of St. Louis voters were turned away from the polls because their names didn’t appear on the voting rolls. Because of the resulting turmoil, the polls in St. Louis were ordered to stay open for an extra 45 minutes, so as to give more people the opportunity to vote. That was the election where John Ashcroft lost his bid for re-election to the Senate to Mel Carnahan, who had recently died in a plane crash. Republican leaders were outraged over this turn of events, and Missouri’s remaining Republican Senator subsequently made the unsubstantiated charge that dogs and dead people voted in that election. Levine describes what happened then:

What began in Missouri soon went nationwide. Starting in 2003, the Justice Department's civil-rights division issued a flurry of advisory letters, rulings, and lawsuits under the guise of fighting fraud that appear designed to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters.


The truth about so-called “voter fraud”

An analysis of voter fraud in the United States by Lorraine Minnite found it to be “rare and isolated”. Levine puts the “voter fraud” scam in perspective:

Voter fraud is actually less likely to occur than lightning striking a person, according to data compiled by New York University's Brennan Center for Justice… The claim that voter fraud threatens the integrity of American elections is itself a fraud.

Getting back to the 2000 Election Day “outrage” in St. Louis, the GOP decided to make a big deal of it and press charges. Levine explains:

Missouri's then-Secretary of State Matt Blunt launched a trumped-up investigation that concluded that more than 1,000 fraudulent ballots had been cast in an organized scheme. A Justice Department Civil Rights Division investigation, started before Ashcroft shifted the department's priorities, found no fraudulent ballots, however. Instead, it discovered that the St. Louis election board had improperly purged 50,000 voters from the rolls.

Later, in October 2002, Ashcroft as U.S. Attorney General initiated an effort to combat voter fraud – the “Ballot Access and Voting Integrity Initiative”. Yet, though “voter fraud” was declared a high priority, only 24 people were convicted of illegal voting between 2002 and 2005. Not a single person was even charged with impersonating another voter – the claimed rationale for the restrictive voting laws. Fourteen of the 24 convictions were of noncitizens who were apparently confused about election laws.


The effects of restrictive voting laws

In the introduction to his study on the effect of Indiana’s new Voter ID requirement, Matt Barreto notes that restrictive voting laws have been around for a long time, and he discusses their historical anti-democratic effect:

Several restrictive registration regulations remain in place in many states, including early closing dates for registration, purging of registration rolls, and the limiting of voter registration to specific times and places…

Disparities in rates of voter registration in this country are not inevitable. Rather, they are
the product of historical and continuing racial and socioeconomic bias in the operation of
our registration laws”…State registration laws decrease turnout… More rigid voting prerequisite requirements not only negatively impact the electorate, but also have a disproportionate effect on racial minorities and the poor.

The above discussion serves as background to Barreto’s study on the effects of Indiana’s new Photo ID requirement. His study found that only 71.7% of otherwise eligible Black voters in Indiana, compared to 83.2% of White voters, meet Indiana’s Voter ID requirements. Even among Blacks who are currently registered to vote in Indiana, only 78.2% meet those requirements. Translating that into Party identification, 86.2% of registered Republicans meet the ID requirements, compared to only 81.7% of registered Democrats, a difference of 4.5%.

We are looking at a massive disenfranchisement of Indiana’s otherwise eligible voting population for the 2008 election – one that puts Democrats at a large disadvantage. And this is for the proclaimed rationale of preventing a problem that has never even been shown to exist in Indiana.


Intimidation of grassroots voter registration organizations

Grassroots voter registration groups pose a big threat to the Republican Party. In the run-up to the 2004 election there was tremendous activity on that front, as indicated by this article: The 2004 Campaign: As Deadlines Hit, Rolls of Voters Show Big Surge:

A coalition of nonpartisan groups called National Voice announced last week a push for an additional 200,000 registrations in the last days…. claims more than a million registrations in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Washington and other states. These nonpartisan community groups, as well as Democratic organizations like America Coming Together, have driven most of the increase, registration officials say. In Florida and Ohio, Republicans have mounted moderately successful campaigns… but the huge gains have come in areas with minority and low-income populations. In some of those areas in Ohio, new registrations have quadrupled from 2000.

Art Levine describes how Republicans have counteracted the efforts of voter registration organizations, through intimidation of the organizations that undertake them:


Lawsuits against voter registration organizations

Republican operatives, election officials, and the GOP-controlled Justice Department have limited voting access and gone after
voter-registration groups such as ACORN (The Association for Community Organizations for Reform Now)… Attacking ACORN has been a central element of a systematic GOP disenfranchisement agenda to undermine Democratic prospects before each Election Day…

The GOP in Missouri also turned to prosecutions and lawsuits, most either overblown or groundless…. All these campaigns have created a kind of GOP vote-suppression playbook that aims to limit voting rights in the states and attack registration groups such as ACORN. In most states where ACORN wages ballot-initiative and voter-registration campaigns, Republican lawyers, officials, and some prosecutors routinely file dubious lawsuits and complaints… The lawsuits seldom if ever succeed, but the bad press they engender creates a climate to pass restrictive voting laws.

Responding to the GOP-generated hysteria over voter fraud, criminal investigations were launched in 2004 and 2005 in Wisconsin, Colorado, Florida, and Ohio, with ACORN often a target. But by the end of 2005, the investigations ended after finding either no evidence of wrongdoing by ACORN or any pervasive voter fraud. Nationally, only six former ACORN employees were charged with registration fraud or other election-related crimes in the 2004 election, offenses involving fewer than 20 forms. That's out of 1 million new voters registered by ACORN during that cycle.

The (Florida) legislature passed one of the most restrictive voting-registration laws in the country. The new law fined every registration worker $5,000 for any lost application, potentially wiping out the entire budget of the state League of Women Voters if just 14 forms were lost and forcing the group to stop registering voters for the first time in over 70 years.


Complicity and corruption of the U.S. Justice Department

Even the Bush administration’s U.S. Justice Department has become actively involved in pushing unsupported criminal investigations for “voter fraud”, thereby making itself into nothing but a political arm of the Republican Party. We know now that several U.S. Attorneys were fired because they refused play along with the corruption of our Justice Department.

The case of David Iglesias, the U.S. Attorney for New Mexico, illustrates this process. Iglesias was so much a believer in the dangers of “voter fraud” that he was invited to lecture other U.S. attorneys at the 2005 annual Justice Department ballot-integrity conference. Yet, as the U.S. Attorney responsible for hunting down “voter fraud” in New Mexico, he was unable to find sufficient cause for prosecution to satisfy the Bush administration. Consequently:

Patrick Rogers, the Republican National Lawyers Association point person in the state, mounted a campaign to pressure Iglesias to bring criminal charges before the election, rather than form a task force. Even before Iglesias concluded in 2006 that there wasn't enough evidence to indict on voter fraud, major Republicans in the state had started asking the Bush administration for his removal. In early December 2006, Iglesias was one of seven U.S. attorneys whom the Justice Department fired.

Today, Iglesias says of voter fraud: "It's like the boogeyman parents use to scare their children. It's very frightening, and it doesn't exist. U.S. attorneys have better things to do with their time than chasing voter-fraud phantoms."


Purging of legally registered voters

2000-2004

I’ve discussed in detail in a recent post how purging of legally registered voters in Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004 enabled George W. Bush to win two presidential elections. To summarize briefly: Greg Palast showed (See pages 6-44) how approximately 92,000 voters, most of them Black (54%) and Democratic (90%), were illegally and purposely disenfranchised for the Florida 2000 election, thereby enabling Bush to win Florida and the general election by 537 votes. A report by Victoria Lovegren described the apparently illegal purging of 165,224 voters from heavily Democratic Cuyahoga County, Ohio, prior to the 2004 election, for no other specified rationale than that they hadn’t voted recently. In “Fooled Again – How the Right Stole the 2004 Election and Why They’ll Steal the Next One Too (Unless We Stop Them)”, Mark Crispin Miller documents how tens or hundreds of thousands of voters were purged from other Ohio counties as well, and how those purges were targeted against Democrats by using voting lists obtained from stolen computers.


2005-2007

Apparently, these cases did not get enough national attention to prevent repeat performances. State GOP interests have since continued to collaborate with our corrupt U.S. Justice Department. Art Levine notes:

Justice Department-backed secretive purging policies have targeted voter-registration applicants and current voters in several key states: In Ohio in 2006, 303,000 voters were purged in three major urban counties. Over the past few years, what began as local phony lawsuits and investigations escalated into a concerted drive by the Civil Rights Division to restrict voting. Since 2004, the goal of the state GOP vote-caging initiatives has become official Justice Department policy…. pressuring 16 states and cities to speed up their purging of hundreds of thousands of voters.

In November 2005, Bradley Schlozman, then the Justice Department's acting civil-rights chief, insisted on filing a lawsuit that accused Missouri's secretary of state, Robin Carnahan, a Democrat, of failing to purge supposedly ineligible voters under federal law. A federal judge, who found that the Justice Department did not produce any evidence showing fraud justifying the purges, dismissed the lawsuit in April 2007.


Indiana 2008

The Brad Blog reports that prior to the April 2008 Indiana primary, 1,134,427 voter registrations in Indiana were marked as cancelled. In response to questions about this, Indiana election officials explained that “cancelled” doesn’t actually mean that the registrations were … uh, cancelled. Rather, “cancelled” simply means that they were updated. Brad goes on to say this about the “cancelled” voter registrations:

So what is it really doing? And should Rokita's office be trusted here? He is, after all, the state Republican most responsible for pushing the reprehensible, unconstitutional Photo ID restriction law with misleading (at best) information, despite being unable to cite a single instance of in-person, polling place voter impersonation fraud – ever in state history – of the type the law was deceptively "designed" to protect against.

Indiana appears to be a swing state for the 2008 Presidential election. But with their Photo ID law and the apparent purging of large numbers of voters, Democrats will be hard pressed to bring it into the Democratic column this year.


Dirty tricks

The term “dirty tricks” is used to describe a bunch of heterogeneous methods used to disenfranchise voters. The list of dirty tricks used by the Republican Party to disenfranchise voters is too long to recount here. One of the best descriptions of the process is a report on the 2004 election in Ohio by John Conyers: Preserving Democracy: What Went Wrong in Ohio – Status Report of the House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff.

Perhaps the most costly dirty trick detailed in Conyers’ report was the withholding of voting machines for Democratic precincts in Franklin County, resulting in voting lines up to eleven hours long. The resulting net loss of votes for the Kerry/Edwards ticket was calculated to be about 7,000.

Other dirty tricks recounted in Conyers’ report included:

 Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell withheld provisional ballots from tens or hundreds of thousands of eligible voters.
 Intimidating minority voters with thousands of partisan challenges – referred to as “caging”.
 Failure to send voters absentee ballots on time, and then not issuing them provisional ballots on Election Day
 Widespread distribution of false information regarding the date and place for voting
 Telling people they could go to jail if they showed up to vote.

In “Fooled again”, Mark Crispin Miller describes how a Republican organization posing as a non-partisan voter registration organization effectively disenfranchised Democratic voters by pretending to help them register to vote, and then shredding their voter registration applications.

“Voter caging” is one of the methods most commonly used by Republicans to disenfranchise voters. The first step of the process is for election officials to send mail to targeted voters, with instructions to “return to sender” if the voter doesn’t pick up the mail. “Caging lists” are then compiled of voters whose mail is returned for any reason, with the rationale that the returned mail is evidence of “voter fraud” (though the National Voter Registration Act prohibits the cancelling of a voter’s registration based merely on the return of a single piece of mail). The caging lists are then used to mount massive challenges of minority voter eligibility at the polls on Election Day.

Teresa James sums up voter caging operations in 2004, in her report, “Caging Democracy: A 50-year history of Partisan Challenges to Minority Voters”:

In 2004, political operatives targeted more than half a million voters in voter caging
campaigns in nine states. At least 77,000 voters had their eligibility challenged between
2004 and 2006.


Status of voter registration in selected swing states – 2008

In my volunteer work with the Election Defense Alliance, I have been working on a project to identify suspicious patterns of changes in the voter registration rolls of swing states that could be indicative of a repeat of the massive voter registration purges seen in recent years. The idea is that by identifying suspicious patterns, further investigation and corrective action may be possible prior to the election.


Comparison of voter registration changes since January 2008 in selected counties

For three swing states I have found websites that compare voter registration numbers by county and by party, over time. Looking at the changes since the beginning of 2008, the trends are so far very encouraging for Democrats:

Florida (Thanks to Patsy Stone for this info)
Miami-Dade County (12-07 to 7-08): Dems + 57,000 (+ 13%); Repubs +8,000 (+ 2%)
Broward County (12-07 to 6-08): Dems + 35,000 (+ 8%); Repubs +8,000 (+ 3%)

Pennsylvania
Allegheny County (11-07 to 7-08): Dems + 32,000 (+ 6%); Repubs - 39 (0% change)
Philadelphia County (11-07 to 7-08): Dems + 57,000 (+ 8%); Repubs - 6,000 (- 4%)
Montgomery County (11-07 to 7-08): Dems + 35,000 (+ 16%); Repubs -11,000 (- 4%)
Pennsylvania (11-07 to 7-08): Dems + 369,000 (+ 10%); Repubs - 61,000 (- 2%)

Colorado
Arapaho County (1-08 to 6-08): Dems + 7,000 (+ 7%); Repubs - 105 (0% change)
Denver County (1-08 to 6-08): Dems + 15,000 (+ 11%); Repubs + 142 (0% change)
Jefferson County (1-08 to 6-08): Dems + 6,000 (+ 6%); Repubs + 793 (+ 1%)


Other states

For Virginia and Michigan (Thanks to livvy for this info) I was able to obtain voter registration statistics over time, but not broken down by party. Virginia has shown a 3% increase in overall voter registration since January of 2008, and Michigan has shown a 1.4% increase.

In addition, there are three states for which I was able to obtain reasonably current voter registration statistics, but no previous dates for comparison. Presumably, the data will be updated as the election approaches, so that by going back to the same websites I will be able to observe changes in voter registration numbers as the election approaches. Those states include Nevada, New Mexico, and Indiana. Of those states, Nevada and New Mexico provide data by party affiliation, but Indiana doesn’t.

There are several swing states for which it is not necessary to keep track of voter registration, either because same day voter registration is allowed (Wisconsin, Iowa, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina), or because there is no voter registration (North Dakota).

Then there are two swing states (Ohio and Missouri) for which I could find no voter registration statistics. If anyone has any information on those, I would appreciate it.


Summary and overview

Republicans routinely undertake large scale efforts to disenfranchise poor and minority voters. They do so prior to elections by whining about “voter fraud”, in order to pave the way for restrictive voting requirements and harassment of voter registration organizations, and by targeted purging of voter rolls. And they do so on Election Day through massive ungrounded challenges of minority voter eligibility and a host of other dirty tricks.

It is necessary for them to do those kinds of things. It is often the only way they can win. If not for massive voter disenfranchisement in 2000 and 2004, George W. Bush would today represent nothing but a distant memory to us, we would not be at war, and our standing in the world would be 100% better than it is.

So far in 2008, despite the best efforts of the GOP, new Democratic voter registration is far outpacing Republican voter registration. But that should be no cause for celebration. Democrats, Independents, members of other parties, and even Republicans who value our democracy must remain vigilant of the possibility and likelihood of aggressive and widespread attempts at voter disenfranchisement by Republican operatives, from now until the polls close on November 4th.

And don’t forget EarlG’s request for action to help prevent Republican election fraud.
Discuss (41 comments) | Recommend (+47 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Star
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.