Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
McCain’s numerous attempts to mislead and outright lie to the American people clearly brand him as the debate loser. But the truth of the matter is that he has little choice. He can’t afford to be honest with the American people about his long record
There seems to be an attitude among many TV talking heads that since John McCain didn’t self-destruct in his first presidential debate against Barack Obama, that the debate should be considered a win for him or at least a tie. But presidential debates are too important to the American people to be judged in that manner. The substance of what a candidate says should be considered much more important than the style (Obama’s style was far superior to McCain’s as well, in my opinion, but that’s more subjective). And the truth is that John McCain’s debate arguments were filled with misleading information, half truths, and outright lies. Here are some of the most important examples:


McCain’s statement of support for the bailout bill

After helping torpedo the Democratic version of the bailout bill on Thursday, McCain lamely let himself be pressured by debate moderator Jim Lehrer into promising support for the bill.

LEHRER: Are you going to vote for the plan, Senator McCain?
MCCAIN: I – I hope so. And I...
LEHRER: As a United States senator...
MCCAIN: Sure.
LEHRER: You’re going to vote for the plan?
MCCAIN: Sure…

McCain doesn’t even know what the plan is going to look like yet when it comes up for a vote, and yet he let the moderator quickly pressure him into agreeing to vote for whatever it is, instead of having the presence of mind to say that he couldn’t promise to vote for a bill that hasn’t even been written yet.

McCain then went into a lecture about the importance of accountability. Apparently he doesn’t understand the connection between accountability in the private sector and government oversight and regulation, since he has always been unabashedly and ideologically against government regulation of corporations, as he has previously made clear:

“I’m always for less regulation,” he told The Wall Street Journal last March, “but I am aware of the view that there is a need for government oversight” in situations like the subprime lending crisis, the problem that has cascaded through Wall Street this year. He concluded, “but I am fundamentally a deregulator.”

Later that month, he gave a speech on the housing crisis in which he called for less regulation, saying, “Our financial market approach should include encouraging increased capital in financial institutions by removing regulatory, accounting and tax impediments to raising capital.”


McCain’s claim that Obama voted to increase taxes on people making as low as $42,000 a year

Without specifying the vote McCain was referring to, it is impossible to evaluate with any confidence his claim that Obama voted to raise taxes on individual making as little as $42,000. Many bills are filled with dozens of unrelated items, where a Congressperson is faced with the choice of voting for all of them or none of them. In such cases, cherry picking specific items with which to criticize someone is often taken out of context and highly misleading.

The salient point is that Obama has put forth a tax plan that will not raise taxes for anyone making less than a quarter million dollars a year. He has been steadfast in sticking to that point, and his tax plans have consistently been displayed on his website. He has made it quite clear over and over again that he will reverse the Bush tax cuts on the rich while decreasing taxes on the other 95% of us. For McCain to repeatedly claim that Obama will do otherwise, without pointing to anything in his plan or a specific vote that proves otherwise, is highly disingenuous.


McCain’s claim to have saved taxpayers $6.8 billion by killing a Boeing contract

To display his fiscal credentials McCain noted during the debate:

I saved the taxpayers $6.8 billion by fighting a contract that was negotiated between Boeing and DOD that was completely wrong. And we fixed it and we killed it…

But what McCain didn’t mention were the ties of his campaign staffers to a Boeing competitor. From an article titled “John McCain: Did his Lobbyist Ties to Airbus Cost American Jobs?”:

The Pentagon announced last month that it would award a $35 billion contract for new Air Force tankers to European Aeronautic Defense and Space Co. and Northrop Grumman Corp., instead of to Seattle-based Boeing Co.

McCain had pushed the Pentagon to open the bidding process to EADS, and some question whether the three former EADS lobbyists who are on his campaign staff had anything to do with that. “Mr. Clean has a bunch of lobbyists that work for a company that won that contract,” House Democratic Caucus chairman Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) said. “Some people claim the way the specs were written, it was all but certain that the company that his campaign lobbyists worked for couldn’t but get that contract.”


McCain’s claim that Obama’s health care plan would hand health care decisions to the federal government

McCain said during the debate:

Well, I want to make sure we're not handing the health care system over to the federal government which is basically what would ultimately happen with Senator Obama's health care plan. I want the families to make decisions between themselves and their doctors. Not the federal government.

McCain has repeated this statement many times in the past. He either hasn’t read Obama’s health care plan, doesn’t understand it, or else (more likely) he is outright lying about it.

Obama’s health care plan is explained on his website. The plan would make health care affordable to tens of millions of Americans who currently can’t afford health insurance, by giving them government subsidies to purchase health insurance. The plan has nothing in it that would give the federal government the responsibility of providing health care or would in any way interfere with a person’s choice of physician or type of care. It would be run on the same principle that Medicare is now run.


McCain’s claim to have opposed President Bush on torture of our prisoners

McCain’s repeated claims to have opposed George Bush’s torture policies are partially true. Though McCain has achieved a reputation for challenging George Bush’s torture program, and he has in fact said that torture “should never be condoned”, for which he deserves credit, when push comes to shove, he almost always votes with Bush on supporting his torture plans. The most recent example was when McCain not only voted against a bill that would have required CIA interrogations to conform to the U.S. Army Field Manual, but he urged George Bush to veto the bill when Congress passed it.


McCain’s support for the Iraq surge

In order to brag about how well the “surge” that McCain supported turned out, he said:

There is social, economic progress, and a strategy, a strategy of going into an area, clearing and holding, and the people of the country then become allied with you. They inform on the bad guys. And peace comes to the country, and prosperity.
That's what's happening in Iraq…

Peace comes to the country? This year alone, long after the McCain/Bush surge was initiated, there have been 266 American military deaths, nearly two thousand American soldiers wounded, and many times that many Iraqi civilians killed. Granted, the American military death toll is less now than it was prior to the surge. We have more soldiers there to keep the violence down, and the violence is indeed down. But American soldiers are still being killed, and the reason they’re being killed is because Iraqis deeply resent the U.S. occupation of their country. We have killed over a million of them, created more than four million refugees, and destroyed the infrastructure of their country. They have quite understandably wanted us to leave for a long time. Where is the “honor” in all that, which John McCain so often invokes to justify our imperial occupation? Furthermore, this is how the editors of The Nation explain the apparent “success” of the surge:

Second, the surge has had an ugly flip side. To reduce the violence, the US military built concrete walls to separate Sunnis and Shiites, which facilitated ethnic cleansing by both sides but especially by Shiite militias against Sunni residents of Baghdad. The drop-off in violence reflects the fact that ethnic cleansing led to the internal partition of Iraqi cities and regions, reducing the opportunity for sectarian killing.

Third, the surge has not created the conditions for political reconciliation or a stable Iraq, which, after all, was its main purpose. The "success" of the surge was based on Sunni repression of jihadi extremists, ethnic cleansing and separation walls, not compromise. The Shiite-led government seems no more willing to compromise on key issues than it was before the surge…


McCain’s claim to have opposed Bush on global warming and clean energy development

McCain said that he has opposed Bush on the issue of global warming, and he claimed to have supported the use of clean alternative energy. The truth is quite a bit different.

Words are cheap. McCain often uses populist rhetoric in an attempt to gain the allegiance of independent voters. But when it comes to his voting record, his corporate backers know where he stands.

Though McCain has made a big deal of pretending to go against George Bush on the issue of global warming (I have received e-mails from him noting the necessity of doing something to combat it), in an attempt maintain his reputation as a “maverick” and vie for the votes of Independents, his actions speak otherwise. The League of Conservation Voters (LCV) gives him a 24% lifetime score for his global warming policies, and a 0% score for 2007. His overall environmental score with the League of Conservation voters is 0%. And in an act of political cowardice, he was the only Senator to fail to show up for a recent vote on a clean energy bill that failed to pass by one vote.

When McCain was asked his opinion on subsidies for clean energy technology such as wind and solar, he said:

I'm not one who believes that we need to subsidize things. The wind industry is doing fine, the solar industry is doing fine. In the '70s, we gave too many subsidies and too much help, and we had substandard products sold to the American people, which then made them disenchanted with solar for a long time… There’s a point where you should let the free-enterprise system take over.


McCain’s concern for our veterans

As he always does, McCain made a big deal about how much he cares about our veterans:

I know the veterans. I know them well. And I know that they know that I'll take care of them. And I've been proud of their support and their recognition of my service to the veterans. And I love them. And I'll take care of them. And they know that I'll take care of them. And that's going to be my job.

But the truth is that McCain almost always votes against veterans’ benefits. Here is a listing of some of his most important votes, compared with Obama’s votes (pro-veteran votes are in blue, anti-veteran votes are in red).

Aug-01: Bill to increase the amount of medical care available to veterans by $650 million
McCain: Nay

April-03: Vote to table bill to provide $1 billion in make up for shortfall in equipment for Air National Guard and Reserves fighting in Iraq
McCain: Yea

October-03: Vote to table bill to provide $322 million for safety equipment for forces in Iraq
McCain: Yea

March-04: Bill to increase medical care for veterans by $1.8 billion
McCain: Nay

April-05: Vote on $2 billion for veterans’ health care
McCain: Nay
Obama: Yea

March-06: Bill to increase medical care for veterans by $1.5 billion
McCain: Nay
Obama: Yea

April-06: Bill to increase outpatient care for veterans by $430 million
McCain: Nay
Obama: Yea

May-06: Bill to provide $20 million for veterans’ medical facilities
McCain: Nay
Obama: Nay

June-06: Resolution for withdrawal of troops from Iraq
McCain: Nay
Obama Yea

July-07: Vote on cloture of bill to specify minimum rest periods for troops in Iraq
McCain: Nay
Obama: Yea

And it is not true that veterans groups generally support him. Because of his anti-veteran voting record, the opposite is often true. Here is what Hispanic veterans have to say about this issue:

We Hispanic Veterans want to know why McCain voted against health care funding for our troops and veterans in 2004, 2005, 2006 & 2007. We want to know why John McCain did not vote for the new G.I. Bill for our troops and veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars…. Why doesn’t John McCain want our troops and veterans to have health care or the opportunity for education? John McCain gets his health care provided by the US taxpayer and his education was provided by the US taxpayer…. These are questions John McCain will not allow or give a straight answer to. John McCain likes to USE our Troops and Veterans as puppets and photos opportunities.


Obama’s willingness to meet with foreign leaders without preconditions

McCain repeatedly made a big deal about Obama’s willingness to meet with Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad without preconditions. He said:

What Senator Obama doesn't seem to understand that if without precondition you sit down across the table from someone who has called Israel a "stinking corpse," and wants to destroy that country and wipe it off the map, you legitimize those comments.

Dangerous? Legitimize Ahmadinejad’s comments about Israel? So, I suppose that Churchill and FDR legitimized Stalin’s actions when they met with him? And Nixon legitimized Mao’s actions when he met with him. Or did FDR, Churchill and Nixon require Stalin and Mao to apologize for their massive slaughter of their respective countrypersons before they met with them?

Who’s the naïve one here? Enemies have met to discuss and negotiate their mutual problems throughout history. As Obama said during the debate, “I reserve the right, as president of the United States to meet with anybody at a time and place of my choosing if I think it's going to keep America safe.”


Debate summary

Barack Obama did a thoroughly credible job during the debate, demonstrating a solid grasp of every issue he was asked to speak about. Though some talking heads incredibly criticized him for agreeing with McCain on too many issues, thus appearing “weak”, I think that most Americans want a president who is level-headed, not quick to anger, and willing to find areas of agreement with his opponents. To reflexively criticize everything McCain said would have been un-presidential and dishonest. I do, however, acknowledge that Obama could have (and should have) done a more aggressive job of calling McCain out on his many lies and distortions.

John McCain, on the other hand, came across as incredibly condescending, arrogant, and hostile towards Obama, and he exhibited some very ugly and weird facial expressions. I don’t like or expect to see our leaders use that kind of behavior to make their points, in place of reasoned argument.

But McCain’s style was not by any means the worst aspect of his debate performance. His numerous attempts to mislead and outright lie to the American people clearly brand him as the debate loser. But the truth of the matter is that he has little choice. He can’t afford to be honest with the American people about his long record in Congress because he has consistently followed a pro-corporate and far right ideological agenda, to the great detriment of the American people.
Discuss (22 comments) | Recommend (+25 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Star
Give'm hell Clint!
7 recs : By Ernesto
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.