Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
Biden’ performance was stellar. Following the debate, 53% of previously undecided viewers said they had a better opinion of him, compared to 5% who said they had a worse opinion of him. And Biden was generally very well regarded by the American publi
I was so impressed with Joe Biden’s debate performance Friday evening. We could hardly have hoped for better.

Sarah Palin’s performance was also better than expected. She didn’t implode. And viewers who listened only superficially to what she said, without thinking about it, may actually have gotten the impression that she knew what she was talking about, was generally truthful, or had something important to say.

Biden hit on many of the major principles of the Democratic Party and explained why he and his running mate support them. In particular he repeatedly challenged the idea that ushered in the Reagan Revolution in 1981, that government has no useful role to play in providing its citizens with the opportunity to make a decent life for themselves. He thoroughly and repeatedly answered the moderator’s questions in sufficient detail to show that he is thoroughly knowledgeable on the issues and where the Obama/Biden ticket stands on those issues.

Palin, on the other hand, could only come up with distorted facts, evasions, clichés, and generalities. Anyone who thought she “won” the debate was either not paying close attention or was so partisan that their opinion was pre-determined.

Here are examples of some of the biggest differences between them from the October 3rd debate:


General political philosophy

Asked by Gwen Ifill what the VP candidates would do if they suddenly became President, Biden used that opportunity to concisely, yet specifically, lay out the major principles of the Obama/Biden ticket. In doing so, he was not the least bit ashamed to acknowledge that government does indeed have an important and useful role to play in peoples’ lives:

I would carry out Barack Obama's policy, his policies of reinstating the middle class, making sure they get a fair break, making sure they have access to affordable health insurance, making sure they get serious tax breaks, making sure we can help their children get to college, making sure there is an energy policy that leads us in the direction of not only toward independence and clean environment but an energy policy that creates 5 million new jobs, a foreign policy that ends this war in Iraq, a foreign policy that goes after the one mission the American public gave the president after 9/11, to get and capture or kill bin Laden and to eliminate al Qaeda. A policy that would in fact engage our allies in making sure that we knew we were acting on the same page and not dictating. And a policy that would reject the Bush Doctrine of preemption and regime change and replace it with a doctrine of prevention and cooperation…

Palin’s answer to the same question provided no useful information other than to make the point that she and McCain are against greed and corruption and to emphasize the good old Republican cliché about the horrors of “big government”:

I would… continue the good work he (McCain) is so committed to of putting government back on the side of the people and get rid of the greed and corruption on Wall Street and in Washington… So that people there can understand how the average working class family is viewing bureaucracy in the federal government… Just everyday working class Americans saying, you know, government, just get out of my way.


Taxes and fairness

Anyone who has studied the Obama and McCain tax plans understands the primary difference between them. McCain would continue and even increase the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, whereas Obama would reverse them to Clinton era levels while providing additional tax breaks for the middle and working classes.

Biden was asked by Ifill to explain why the Obama/Biden idea of reversing the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy doesn’t constitute “class warfare”. He responded:

Well Gwen, where I come from, it's called fairness, just simple fairness. The middle class is struggling. The middle class under John McCain's tax proposal, 100 million families, middle class families, households to be precise, they got not a single change, they got not a single break in taxes. No one making less than $250,000 under Barack Obama's plan will see one single penny of their tax raised… And 95 percent of the people in the United States of America making less than $150,000 will get a tax break….John wants to add $300 billion in new tax cuts per year for corporate America and the very wealthy while giving virtually nothing to the middle class. We have a different value set.

Palin’s strategy for talking about taxes was right in line with the McCain campaign’s strategy (same as the Bush 2000 strategy) from day one: Make no distinction in your rhetoric between tax cuts for the wealthy vs. nothing for the middle and working class; use every opportunity to tell the American people that your opponent plans to increase taxes, even if you have to lie about it. That was the whole theme of the debate for Sarah Palin. She repeatedly came back to this issue, regardless of what topic the debate moderator tried to get the candidates to talk about. Here are some excerpts:

Now, Barack Obama and Sen. Biden also voted for the largest tax increases in U.S. history. Barack had 94 opportunities to side on the people's side and reduce taxes and 94 times he voted to increase taxes or not support a tax reduction, 94 times… Barack Obama even supported increasing taxes as late as last year for those families making only $42,000 a year…

Biden explained in detail how Palin’s statement on Obama’s plan to raise taxes on the middle class was a lie. But she kept coming back to it, and included it in her closing statement as well:

Voters on November 4th are going to have that choice to either support a ticket that supports policies that create jobs. You do that by lowering taxes on American workers and on our businesses. And you build up infrastructure, and you rein in government spending… Or you support a ticket that supports policies that will kill jobs by increasing taxes. And that's what the track record shows, is a desire to increase taxes, increase spending…


McCain’s zeal to deregulate

One of McCain’s biggest vulnerabilities is that his long Senate history has been marked by radical anti-regulatory rhetoric and ideology. That history is especially difficult to defend now that we are faced with what many believe is the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression, given that it is widely agreed that the fundamental cause of the crisis is several years of Republican-fostered deregulation of the banking and credit industry. Biden emphasized that issue in detail during the debate:

Two years ago Barack Obama warned about the sub prime mortgage crisis. John McCain said shortly after that in December he was surprised there was a sub prime mortgage problem. John McCain, while Barack Obama was warning about what we had to do, was literally giving an interview to The Wall Street Journal saying that I'm always for cutting regulations. We let Wall Street run wild. John McCain, and he's a good man, but John McCain thought the answer is that tried and true Republican response, deregulate, deregulate. So what you had is you had overwhelming "deregulation." You had actually the belief that Wall Street could self-regulate itself. And while Barack Obama was talking about reinstating those regulations, John on 20 different occasions in the previous year and a half called for more deregulation. As a matter of fact, John recently wrote an article in a major magazine saying that he wants to do for the health care industry deregulate it and let the free market move like he did for the banking industry.

And what was Palin’s response to this issue of monumental importance to the American people? First, she ignored it and launched into her false claim of Obama tax increases on the middle class. Biden exposed that lie, and then he called Palin on her evasion of McCain’s long anti-regulatory history:

BIDEN: If you notice, Gwen, the governor did not answer the question about deregulation, did not answer the question of defending John McCain about not going along with the deregulation, letting Wall Street run wild….

IFILL (to Palin): Would you like to have an opportunity to answer that before we move on?

PALIN: … And I may not answer the questions that either the moderator or you want to hear, but I'm going to talk straight to the American people…

And then she launched into some more of her anti-tax rhetoric. In other words, fuck this debate and fuck any American citizen who wants to understand how the candidates stand on the issues. Sarah Palin will talk about whatever she damn well wants to talk about, or what she was pre-scripted to talk about.


The economy

Biden explained how out of touch John McCain is with the state of our economy:

It was two Mondays ago John McCain said… that the fundamentals of the economy were strong. Two weeks before that, he said – we've made great economic progress under George Bush's policies. Nine o'clock, the economy was strong. Eleven o'clock that same day, two Mondays ago, John McCain said that we have an economic crisis…

Palin rebutted that with the same stupid argument that McCain has used:

John McCain, in referring to the fundamental of our economy being strong, he was talking to and he was talking about the American workforce. And the American workforce is the greatest in this world…

Now, Barack Obama, of course, he's pretty much only voted along his party lines. In fact, 96 percent of his votes have been solely along party line, not having that proof for the American people to know that his commitment, too, is, you know, put the partisanship, put the special interests aside, and get down to getting business done for the people of America.

Huh? So if McCain and Palin equate the economy with the American work force, then why is it that one day it’s sound and later that same day we’re having an economic crisis? What happened to “the greatest work force in the world”?

If anyone can understand what Palin means by that second paragraph above, then please explain it to me. The best I can make of it is that she’s trying to say that because Obama usually votes with the Democratic Party, that means that he’s partisan, favors “special interests”, and doesn’t represent the American people.


Health care

This is how Palin compared the Obama and McCain health care plans:

He's proposing a $5,000 tax credit for families so that they can get out there and they can purchase their own health care coverage. That's a smart thing to do. That's budget neutral. That doesn't cost the government anything as opposed to Barack Obama's plan to mandate health care coverage and have universal government run program and unless you're pleased with the way the federal government has been running anything lately, I don't think that it's going to be real pleasing for Americans to consider health care being taken over by the feds.

There are so many problems with that short description that it’s hard to know where to start. First, what kind of idiot thinks that $5,000 a year is enough for Americans to obtain adequate health insurance? Secondly, as meager as that figure is, how on earth can she say that it won’t cost the government anything to give a $5,000 tax credit to every family in the country? And thirdly, she lied about Obama’s health care plan, or else she is completely ignorant of it. Obama’s plan is not a mandate (anyone can refuse to participate in it), and it does not involve health care being taken over by the government. It is simply a plan for the government to offer Medicare-like health insurance to all Americans, so that every American has the opportunity to have their medical needs met. I guess that there was so much to respond to here that Biden decided merely to concentrate on explaining the woeful inadequacy of the McCain “health care plan”:

Do you know how John McCain pays for his $5,000 tax credit you're going to get? … He taxes as income every one of you out there, every one of you listening who has a health care plan through your employer. That's how he raises $3.6 trillion… taxing your health care benefit to give you a $5,000 plan, which his Web site points out will go straight to the insurance company. And then you're going to have to replace a $12,000 – that's the average cost of the plan you get through your employer … 20 million of you are going to be dropped… So you're going to have to replace a $12,000 plan with a $5,000 check you just give to the insurance company.


Global warming

As Alaskan governor, Sarah Palin has often maintained that there is no proof that global warming is caused by the activities of man. So when asked about that issue in the debate she kind of squirmed her way through:

There is something to be said also for man's activities, but also for the cyclical temperature changes on our planet… But there are real changes going on in our climate. And I don't want to argue about the causes. What I want to argue about is, how are we going to get there to positively affect the impacts?... John McCain is right there with an "all of the above" approach to deal with climate change impacts.

Biden responded by explaining the Obama/Biden approach to the question, the absurdity of trying to address a problem without questioning its cause, and then describing the woefully deficient McCain approach to the problem:

I think it's clearly manmade. And, look, this probably explains the biggest fundamental difference between John McCain and Barack Obama and Sarah Palin and Joe Biden. If you don't understand what the cause is, it's virtually impossible to come up with a solution. … We consume 25 percent of the oil in the world. John McCain has voted 20 times in the last decade-and-a-half against funding alternative energy sources, clean energy sources, wind, solar, biofuels… The way in which we can stop the greenhouse gases from emitting. We believe -- Barack Obama believes by investing in clean coal and safe nuclear, we can not only create jobs in wind and solar here in the United States, we can export it.

When Biden directly contradicted Palin’s statement that McCain has supported an “all of the above” approach to global warming by pointing out his many votes against clean energy funding, Palin had no answer to that – which is not her fault, since there is no answer to it except to admit to it.

In answer to Ifill’s question on whether or not she and McCain support capping carbon emissions, Palin said that they both do support that. What she didn’t say was shat McCain doesn’t consider “capping carbon emissions” to be a mandate. In other words, he believes that carbon emissions should be capped, but he thinks they should be capped voluntarily. And that is precisely why Mark Hertsgaard says that McCain’s plan for reducing greenhouse gas emissions is not likely to work.


The role of the Vice President

Amazingly, Sarah Palin seemed to agree with Dick Cheney’s assertion that the Vice President is a member of the Legislative Branch of government (though she was typically bumbling in her explanation):

IFILL: Governor, you mentioned a moment ago the constitution might give the vice president more power than it has in the past. Do you believe as Vice President Cheney does, that the Executive Branch does not hold complete sway over the office of the vice presidency, that it it is also a member of the Legislative Branch?

PALIN: Well, our founding fathers were very wise there in allowing through the Constitution much flexibility there in the office of the vice president. And we will do what is best for the American people in tapping into that position and ushering in an agenda that is supportive and cooperative with the president's agenda in that position. Yeah, so I do agree with him that we have a lot of flexibility in there, and we'll do what we have to do to administer very appropriately the plans that are needed for this nation.

Biden set the record straight on that:

Vice President Cheney has been the most dangerous vice president we've had probably in American history. The idea he doesn't realize that Article I of the Constitution defines the role of the vice president of the United States, that's the Executive Branch. He works in the Executive Branch. He should understand that. Everyone should understand that. And the primary role of the vice president of the United States of America is to support the president of the United States of America, give that president his or her best judgment when sought, and as vice president, to preside over the Senate, only in a time when in fact there's a tie vote. The Constitution is explicit.

The only authority the vice president has from the legislative standpoint is the vote, only when there is a tie vote. He has no authority relative to the Congress. The idea he's part of the Legislative Branch is a bizarre notion invented by Cheney to aggrandize the power of a unitary executive, and look where it has gotten us. It has been very dangerous.


McCain similarity to Bush

One of Joe Biden’s major (and appropriate) themes in the debate was to draw striking parallels between John McCain and George Bush. In response, Palin would often accuse him of “looking backwards”, as if anything that has happened in the past is not relevant to the current debate. Biden responded:

Look, past is prologue, Gwen. The issue is, how different is John McCain's policy going to be than George Bush's? I haven't heard anything yet. I haven't heard how his policy is going to be different on Iran than George Bush's. I haven't heard how his policy is going to be different with Israel than George Bush's. I haven't heard how his policy in Afghanistan is going to be different than George Bush's. I haven't heard how his policy in Pakistan is going to be different than George Bush's. It may be. But so far, it is the same as George Bush's. And you know where that policy has taken us…

Ask anybody… whether or not the economic and foreign policy of this administration has made them better off in the last eight years. And then ask them whether there's a single major initiative that John McCain differs with the president on. On taxes, on Iraq, on Afghanistan, on the whole question of how to help education, on the dealing with health care…The middle class has gotten the short end. The wealthy have done very well. Corporate America has been rewarded. It's time we change it.

Palin never had any answer to that, except to change the subject.


McCain the maverick

Sarah Palin’s favorite strategy, as has always been the case with her, was to talk in generalities. Whenever she was stumped by a question, she’d go to the old stand-byes: We’re for reform; we’re against greed and corruption; we’re against pork; we’re against “big government”; and most of all, “we’re mavericks”. Biden finally had all he could take of that one:

Look, the maverick – let's talk about the maverick John McCain is. And, again, I love him. He's been a maverick on some issues, but he has been no maverick on the things that matter to people's lives.

He voted four out of five times for George Bush's budget, which put us a half a trillion dollars in debt this year and over $3 trillion in debt since he's got there.

He has not been a maverick in providing health care for people. He has voted against -- he voted including another 3.6 million children in coverage of the existing health care plan, when he voted in the United States Senate.

He's not been a maverick when it comes to education. He has not supported tax cuts and significant changes for people being able to send their kids to college.

He's not been a maverick on the war. He's not been a maverick on virtually anything that genuinely affects the things that people really talk about around their kitchen table….

He voted against even providing for what they call LIHEAP, for assistance to people, with oil prices going through the roof in the winter.

So maverick he is not on the important, critical issues that affect people at that kitchen table.

Palin had no answer to any of that.


Palin’s short answer strategy

Another of Palin’s favorite strategies for responding to questions that she knew nothing about was simply to answer yes or no and then quickly change the subject.

On a bankruptcy bill:

IFILL: Last year, Congress passed a bill that would make it more difficult for debt-strapped mortgage-holders to declare bankruptcy, to get out from under that debt. This is something that John McCain supported. Would you have?

PALIN: Yes, I would have. But here, again… (changes subject)

And she had nothing else to say about that subject, while Biden went into great detail to explain how an Obama/Biden administration would improve the situation.

And when Biden went into great detail to explain what an abject failure the Bush administration (which McCain supported 90% of the time) has been:

IFILL: Has this administration's policy been an abject failure, as the senator says, Governor?

PALIN: No, I do not believe that it has been.

And she had absolutely nothing else to say about it.

And when Palin went to great effort to criticize Obama for saying that he would retain the option of meeting with our enemies without preconditions to engage in diplomacy, there was this exchange:

IFILL: Governor and senator, I want you both to respond to this. Secretaries of state Baker, Kissinger, Powell, they have all advocated some level of engagement with enemies. Do you think these former secretaries of state are wrong on that?

PALIN: No… But again, with some of these dictators who hate America and hate what we stand for, with our freedoms, our democracy, our tolerance, our respect for women's rights, those who would try to destroy what we stand for cannot be met with just sitting down…

In other words, no, but, yada yada yada. So Sarah, were those Secretaries of State right or wrong?


Conclusion

There was so much more in this debate that could be used to make similar points. But that’s enough for now.

Biden’ performance was stellar. Following the debate, 53% of previously undecided viewers said they had a better opinion of him, compared to 5% who said they had a worse opinion of him. And Biden was generally very well regarded by the American public before the debate.

Palin’s improvement numbers were also pretty good: 55% had a better opinion of her, while 14% had a worse opinion of her. But her approval numbers were so bad prior to the debate, coming off her abysmal interviews with Katie Couric, that it would have been difficult not to improve.

The percentage of previously uncommitted viewers who now see the candidates as “knowledgeable about important issues” went from 79% to an amazing 98% for Biden. For Palin, that number went from 43% to 66%.

But probably the most important statistic was the percent of previously uncommitted voters who decided to vote for the candidate’s ticket:

Obama/Biden: 18%
McCain/Palin: 10%
Discuss (18 comments) | Recommend (+9 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
StarStar
AlienGirl has passed away
16 recs : By Contrary1
Star
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.