Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
Posted by Time for change in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Fri Oct 10th 2008, 11:02 PM
It is in this type of a situation, where too many Americans buy into the Alice-in-Wonderland, up is down and down is up type of logic perpetrated by our government, where irresponsible rhetoric could lead to some tragic consequences from which we may
In a desperate bid to save his rapidly sinking presidential campaign, John McCain has taken to trying to associate his opponent with terrorism. This tactic has inflamed crowds at McCain/Palin rallies to the extent that cries of “TREASON!”, “TERRORIST!”, and “KILL HIM!” are often heard from the crowds.

This is beyond irresponsible. Though Barack Obama’s meteoric political rise testifies to the absence of racism in large segments of the U.S. population, racial hatred is far from dead in our country. And it is not at all beyond possibility that the hatred towards Obama stirred up by the McCain campaign will inflame racial tensions to the point where one of his followers decides to take drastic action. Or alternatively, the racial hatred so produced may serve as a convenient back-drop to conceal a highly organized conspiracy designed to facilitate a regime change, similar to what transpired in November 1963.

Therefore, it would behoove the McCain campaign, as well as other Americans, to take a close look at the facts behind these allegations. The best that the McCain campaign could come up with in its attempt to tie Obama to terrorism was William Ayers. So that would be a good place to start.


The relationship between Obama and William Ayers

In response to the McCain campaign’s frequent accusations that Obama is ‘palling around with terrorists’ an article on CNN Politics.com called “Fact Check: Is Obama ‘Palling around with Terrorists’?”, discusses the extent of the relationship between Obama and Ayers.

In 1995, Obama and Ayers both were involved in a Chicago public education improvement project called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.

From 1999 to 2001, Obama and Ayers were both board members of a charitable foundation called the Woods Fund.

In 1999, Ayers hosted a campaign event for Obama in his bid for the Illinois State Senate.

The two have not spoken on the phone together or communicated by e-mail since 2005. But they did bump into each other on the street a little over a year ago, as they both live in the same neighborhood.

No evidence exists of a relationship between Obama and Ayers beyond what is noted here.

The article concludes:

There is no indication that Ayers and Obama are now "palling around," or that they have had an ongoing relationship in the past three years. Also, there is nothing to suggest that Ayers is now involved in terrorist activity or that other Obama associates are.


Is/Was William Ayers a Terrorist?

The relationship between Obama and Ayers is so tenuous that when confronted with inflammatory accusations about the relationship, the Obama campaign merely points out the tenuousness of the relationship rather than make any attempt to defend Ayers, whose actions Obama has repudiated.

Nevertheless, I think it is important to consider the history of this man whom the McCain campaign feels is the best vehicle to tie Obama to “terrorism”.

John McCain is not the first person to try to make the connection between Ayers and Obama. His task was made easier for him by virtue of the fact that the subject was brought up during a Democratic debate moderated by ABC News’ lackeys, George Stephanopoulos and Charlie Gibson. At that debate, Stephanopoulos said the following about Ayers and the organization he used to work for:

They bombed the Pentagon, the Capitol, and other buildings. He's never apologized for that. And, in fact, on 9/11, he was quoted in the New York Times saying, "I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough."

The organization that Stephanopoulos referred to with that statement was the Weather Underground, a former anti-Vietnam War organization, which was on the FBI’s ten most-wanted list during the Hoover days. Whether their activities ever killed anyone is not clear to me, but that appears doubtful.

Though Ayers and his wife were members of the Weather Underground, Ayers maintains that he never participated in any terrorist activities. In any event, Ayers and his wife turned themselves in during the 1980s, and all charges against them were dropped. Stephanopoulos’ characterization of Ayers was clearly misleading at best. Here is what Ayers himself had to say about his supposed advocacy of terrorism:

I heard Sean Hannity tell Senator John McCain that I was an unrepentant terrorist… extolling bombings against the U.S. and even advocating more terrorist bombs. Senator McCain couldn’t believe it (that is, before Obama became his principle barrier to the presidency), and neither could I. I’m often quoted as saying “I have no regrets”. That is not true. I’m sometimes asked if I regret anything I did to oppose the war in Vietnam, and I say “No, I don’t regret anything I did to stop the slaughter of millions of human beings by my own government.” Sometimes I add, “I don’t think I did enough”. This is then elided: “He has no regrets for setting bombs and thinks there should be more bombings”…. Terrorism is never justifiable, even in a just cause. I’ve never advocated terrorism, never participated in it, never defended it. The U.S. government, by contrast, does it routinely…

So, lets be absolutely clear about this. The evidence that William Ayers was ever a terrorist is slim at best. If such evidence existed, why were charges dropped against him before even bringing him to trial? Far from being a terrorist, William Ayers is a passionate anti-terrorist. So much so that even when he sees his own country engaging in what he considers to be terrorism, he speaks out against it.

John McCain’s association with George W. Bush

John McCain’s association with George W. Bush is best summarized by a couple of simple statements and a picture. First, he has (truthfully) stated that “Nobody has supported President Bush More than I Have”. Secondly, he has regularly supported Bush’s policies by voting for them 95% of the time.

And then there’s this picture:



Is George W. Bush a terrorist?

In most of my DU political posts I try to aim my message to moderates as well as progressives/liberals, in the hope that I might be able to sway their opinions. This post may be an exception to that general rule, in that I don’t think that there are many moderates who are willing to consider the possibility that their own president is a terrorist. But this has to be said in any honest discussion of the terrorist connections of the presidential candidates.

The Iraq War and occupation as terrorism
In assessing the use of terror by the U.S. military in Iraq, two of the most basic facts to consider are: 1) Given that George Bush’s excuses for perpetrating the war all turned out to be lies, it is evident that the real reasons for the war were a combination of baser motives, including control of Iraqi oil supplies, the expansion of American military power, and war profiteering; and 2) Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians have died as a result of our invasion. Nor are those hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths mere accidents. As noted by Michael Schwartz:

The architects of American policy in the Middle East tend to keep escalating the level of brutality in search of a way to convince the Iraqis (and now the Iranians) that the only path that avoids indiscriminate slaughter is submission to a Pax Americana. Put another way, American policy in the Middle East has devolved into unadorned state terrorism.

The brutality described by Schwartz is evidenced in numerous different ways: The U.S. military does not hesitate to attack heavily populated Iraqi cities, with predictable results:

The US Coalition has used overwhelming military force to attack Iraqi cities on grounds that they were “insurgent strongholds.” The offensives, involving air and ground bombardment and armored assaults, have resulted in the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people (actually millions), large civilian casualties and colossal destruction of the urban physical infrastructure, making affected cities at least partly uninhabitable.

Frequent aerial bombing of Iraq has resulted in numerous civilian deaths. The use of chemical weapons by the U.S. military has undoubtedly resulted in especially gruesome deaths and injuries of many civilians. And as frustration mounts on the ground, “Day after day, scores of Iraqi civilians are being massacred in concerted offensives aimed at terrorizing the population and stamping American control over the country…”, while the U.S. government implausibly maintains that the atrocities are merely the work of “a few bad apples”.

George Bush’s Iraq War as an act of terrorism is summarized well in this article:

The invasion launched by George W. Bush was heralded by the most frightening and powerful use of force and military violence in recent history. His Shock and Awe bombardment of Baghdad was designed to intimidate and coerce the government as well as the civilian population of that nation to change its existing leadership.

George Bush’s “War on Terror” as terrorism
George Bush conducts his “War on Terror” using a variety of illegal, brutal, and cowardly means: We capture thousands of “terrorist suspects” through a variety of means, most commonly by paying bounties for them; we render a great many of them into the custody of tyrannical regimes to be tortured; thousands of others we hold indefinitely in Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantanamo Bay, or various secret CIA prisons, without even charging them with a crime; we allow them no access to legal counsel or their own families, who aren’t even notified of their disappearances; we torture them repeatedly; and for those who are tried for crimes, we don’t allow them to see the evidence against them or to contest that evidence. According to Stephen Grey, award winning journalist for Excellence in Human Rights Reporting for Amnesty International, in “Ghost Plane – The True Story of the CIA Torture Program”, we have done such things to about 11,000 human beings since September 11, 2001.

Why do I call this terrorism? Terrorism has been defined as “ideologically or politically motivated violence directed against civilian targets.” Substituting the word “innocent” for “civilian” also provides a good definition. Well, many or most of these people are civilians, or if not, they were merely fighting in defense of their country against George Bush’s invasion, when they were picked up by the U.S. military and branded “terrorists”. Just as important, it is highly likely that the good majority of them are innocent of any crime. Such were the conclusions of Major General Antonio Taguba, who investigated our torture of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib. And such were the conclusions of the International Red Cross.


Who’s the bigger terrorist?

So who’s the bigger terrorist – William Ayers or George W. Bush and Dick Cheney? On the one hand we have a man who belonged to an organization that plotted or threatened to bomb some buildings, but who as far as we know never participated in or condoned a single act of terrorism. And on the other hand we have a man who is responsible for numerous acts of state terror, resulting in the deaths of probably over a million people.

No wonder that even our allies consider George Bush to be a threat to world peace, as demonstrated by a November 2006 international poll which showed that 83% of Mexicans, 78% of British citizens and 74% of Canadians consider George Bush to be a severe or moderate threat to world peace.

But following the 9/11 attacks on our country, the word “terrorism”, as used by the Bush administration, has come to have the most perverted of meanings. Instead of the meaning it was previously known to have, “terrorism” has come to be defined as any activity directed against the government of the United States. If you’re a citizen of a nation that is invaded by the United States, and you take up arms to defend your country against the invaders, you’re a terrorist. Or, if you’re a citizen of the United States and you protest your government’s use of terror against other peoples, you may also be considered a terrorist by your nation’s rulers.

It is in this type of a situation, where too many Americans buy into the Alice-in-Wonderland, up is down and down is up type of logic perpetrated by our government, where irresponsible rhetoric could lead to some tragic consequences from which we may never recover. John McCain and Sarah Palin should take this very seriously and work hard to get their campaign out of the gutter.


PS

As I was nearing the completion of this article I saw the news that John McCain did something that quite frankly surprised me. In response to some typically heated rhetoric by one of his supporters, he announced something to the effect that Barack Obama is not a terrorist, and in fact is “a good family man”. I saw him say that, and he sounded sincere to me.

Some will argue that he did that out of political calculation, as the irresponsible rhetoric of his campaign has been driving his reputation and his poll numbers to new lows. That may be, and I won’t argue the point. But either way, he did the right thing by handling that episode the way he did. This may have come too late to prevent a tragedy, but nevertheless he deserves credit for doing it. Thank you, John McCain. Let’s all hope that this represents the beginning of a new tone for the rest of this campaign.
Discuss (15 comments) | Recommend (+12 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
StarStar
AlienGirl has passed away
16 recs : By Contrary1
Star
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.