Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
The McCain/Palin presidential campaign has been one of the most dishonest ever conducted. Such a strategy could only have been undertaken in the belief that the national news media would be grossly negligent in its duty to confront the campaign with
The most important purpose of our national news media is to report, clarify and explain issues that have the potential to affect the lives of the American people. Especially in the days, weeks and months preceding a Presidential election, the press should hold the candidates to account for misleading voters with respect to the major issues of the day. Since John McCain has repeatedly misled our country’s voters on so many issues, it is especially important that they confront him with his lies and mis-statements, and give him a chance to explain them.

The list of questions that McCain should be confronted with is very large. I realize that these questions aren’t at all likely to be asked of McCain by our corporate news media, but here are 10 that I think are especially important:


Veterans’ health benefits

Senator McCain: You often make a big point of telling your audiences how much you care about our veterans and our troops. At a recent presidential debate you said:

I know the veterans. I know them well. And I know that they know that I'll take care of them. And I've been proud of their support and their recognition of my service to the veterans. And I love them. And I'll take care of them. And they know that I'll take care of them. And that's going to be my job.

Yet you have consistently voted against health benefits for veterans, against minimum rest periods for troops in Iraq, and against adequate safety equipment for our troops. Most recently you opposed the GI bill sponsored by Senator Webb, which was supported by all of your fellow veterans in the Senate and passed in the Senate by a 75-22 vote.

You recently claimed that you have “received every award from every veteran’s organization”. Yet there are several veterans’ organizations that don’t support you, including for example the non-partisan Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, who gave you a grade of D for your Senate votes, while giving Senator Obama a B+.

When Senator Obama criticized your lack of support for Senator Webb’s GI bill, saying that he couldn’t understand why you believe the bill is too generous to veterans, you dismissed his criticism by saying that you wouldn’t listen to him because he has never served in the military.

My questions to you are: 1) How do you account for the large differences between your perception of your support for issues that veterans care about and their support for you on the one hand, and the perception of veterans’ groups on the other hand? 2) Why did you oppose Senator Webb’s GI bill? And 3) Do you believe that only those who have served in the military have the right to discuss these issues with you?


The Iraq War and occupation and the “surge”

In 2003 we invaded and occupied a nation that posed no threat to our country. That war and occupation has resulted in the deaths of more than a million Iraqis, made refugees out of over four million, and ruined their infrastructure. Polls of Iraqi citizens, whose freedom we claim to be fighting for, have consistently shown that over 90% of Iraqis want us to set a timetable for withdrawal and that more than 60% approve of violence against U.S. troops. Former N.Y. Times reporter Chris Hedges has summed up the attitude of many U.S. politicians and news media towards the tragedy of the Iraqi people by writing:

The reality of the war – the fact that the occupation forces have become… a source of terror to most Iraqis – is not transmitted to the American public… The Iraqis, those we kill, are largely nameless, faceless dead.

You often boast about your early support for George Bush’s “surge”, which was followed by reductions in the monthly toll of American soldier deaths in Iraq. To demonstrate the success of the surge you publicly led a Republican Congressional delegation from Baghdad’s airport to the city center, claiming that that was proof that one could “walk freely” in some areas of Baghdad, while neglecting to tell the American people that you were wearing a bullet proof vest and accompanied by 100 American soldiers, three Blackhawk helicopters, and two Apache gunships overhead.

At the same time, you often criticize Senator Obama’s opposition to the surge and his plans for U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq, saying that those plans and his opposition to the surge would have precluded our ability to achieve victory in Iraq and “withdraw with honor”.

My questions to you are: 1) Given the vast amount of death and destruction we have brought to the Iraqi people for the purpose of “liberating” them, and the fact that the Iraqi people overwhelmingly want us to leave, where is the “honor” in staying there longer, and why do you consider Senator Obama’s plan to withdraw our military forces “dishonorable”? And 2) When you led the Congressional delegation through Baghdad to demonstrate how safe it was, why didn’t you tell the American people about the vast amount of U.S. military support that accompanied you?


Obama bill to teach comprehensive sex education to kindergarteners

One of your campaign ads claims that Senator Obama supported "legislation to teach 'comprehensive sex education' to kindergarteners." The bill that the ad refers to would have required “age-appropriate” sex education for kindergarteners. One of the major elements of the bill was to provide kindergarteners with the ability to recognize and refuse unwanted sexual advances, as illustrated by the following wording:

Course material and instruction shall teach pupils ... how to say no to unwanted sexual advances ... and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.

Do you think it was fair to disparage Senator Obama for supporting “comprehensive sex education” of kindergarteners when the main purpose of that legislation was to protect kindergarteners against sexual predators?


Earmarked legislation

One of the major themes of your campaign is your consistent stance against earmarked legislation. In a September 2008 speech you said “I have never asked for a single earmark, pork barrel project for my state of Arizona”

However: In 2006 you co-sponsored legislation that asked for $10 million for an academic center at the University of Arizona to honor the late Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist; In 2003, you won authorization to buy property to create a buffer zone around Luke Air Force Base in Arizona; and, in 1992, you asked the Environmental Protection Agency to provide $5 million toward a wastewater project in Nogales, Ariz.

Can you explain on what basis you consider this legislation that you sponsored not to constitute earmarked legislation?


Obama handing over our health care system to the federal government

You have repeatedly said that Senator Obama’s health care plan would turn health care over to the federal government. At the first presidential debate you said:

I want to make sure we're not handing the health care system over to the federal government which is basically what would ultimately happen with Senator Obama's health care plan. I want the families to make decisions between themselves and their doctors. Not the federal government.

But the Obama/Biden health care plan, posted on their website, contains no mention of government provision of health care. Rather, it offers Americans the option of purchasing health insurance from the government, with the aid of government subsidies. Furthermore, Americans have the option of sticking with their current insurance or purchasing government insurance, along the same principles used by our Medicare program. In summary, the Obama/Biden health care plan does not restrict the choices of the American people with respect to either the health care that they receive or the health insurance that covers them.

I have two questions for you: 1) Do you believe that Medicare interferes with the ability of families and individuals to make their own health care decisions and gives that power to the federal government? And 2) On what basis do you say that the Obama/Biden health care plan hands the health care system over to the federal government and interferes with the ability of families to make their own health care decisions?


Energy independence and global warming

Another major theme of your campaign is our need for energy independence from foreign oil. Related to that theme, you claim to have distanced yourself from President Bush by acknowledging the risk that global warming poses to our planet and the need to take corrective action. However, many of your policy positions and statements cast doubt on your commitment to the development of alternative energy sources that would increase our energy independence and reduce the load of greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere by our nation’s industries and people.

First, you have consistently opposed government subsidies for clean energy development. When asked your opinion on government subsidies for clean energy technology such as wind and solar, you said:

I'm not one who believes that we need to subsidize things. The wind industry is doing fine, the solar industry is doing fine. In the '70s, we gave too many subsidies and too much help, and we had substandard products sold to the American people, which then made them disenchanted with solar for a long time… There’s a point where you should let the free-enterprise system take over.

Secondly, you have proposed no plans for improving energy efficiency, as Senator Obama’s energy plan does.

Thirdly, you have made it clear that you favor the appointment of so-called “strict constructionist judges”, four of who argued in dissent, in a recent U.S. Supreme Court case, that carbon dioxide, “which is alleged to be causing global climate change”, is not an air pollutant.

Fourthly, though you say that you support a cap-and-trade system to lower greenhouse gas emissions, earlier this year in a Republican presidential debate you denied that a cap-and-trade system is a mandate, and you expressed your belief that voluntary cuts in greenhouse gas emissions by industry will be sufficient to lower greenhouse gas emissions in our country by 60% by 2050.

And fifthly, the non-partisan League of Conservation Voters (LCV) has given you a 24% lifetime score for your global warming policies, and a 0% score for 2007.

So, my questions to you are: 1) Why have you consistently opposed government subsidies for wind and solar energy development? 2) Why doesn’t your proposed energy plan include ideas for improving energy efficiency? 3) Do you agree with justices Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts that carbon dioxide in not an air pollutant? And 4) Why do you believe that efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by U.S. industry should be voluntary rather than mandatory?


Obama “pals around with terrorists”

Your running mate has repeatedly accused Senator Obama of “palling around with terrorists”, which has incited hatred and calls for violence at your recent campaign rallies. You have gone along with these tactics by claiming that Obama has not adequately answered questions relating to this subject.

These accusations are apparently related to Obama’s tenuous relationship with William Ayers. Professor Ayers was a founding member of the Weather Underground, an anti-Vietnam War protest organization which took credit for some non-fatal explosions at the Pentagon and U.S. Capital building and was characterized by the FBI as a domestic terrorist organization during the 1960s, when Senator Obama was eight years old. Ayers has denied any involvement in terrorist activities and has repudiated terrorism in any form for any reason, stating “Terrorism is never justifiable, even in a just cause. I’ve never advocated terrorism, never participated in it, never defended it”. He and his wife turned themselves in to the FBI in the 1980s, and all charges against them were subsequently dropped.

Senator Obama served with Ayers on a Chicago public education improvement project in 1995, and from 1999-2001 Obama and Ayers simultaneously served as board members for a charitable foundation. In 1999, Ayers hosted a campaign event for Obama in his bid for election to the Illinois State Senate. Beyond those associations, Obama has denied any relationship or contact with Ayers other than running into him a little over a year ago in the neighborhood in which they both live. Obama has repudiated the actions of the Weather Underground.

Do you believe that it is fair to characterize Senator Obama’s relationship with William Ayers as “palling around with terrorists”, or do you think that it is fair to characterize Obama in any way as “palling around with terrorists?


The “Bridge to nowhere”

Your running mate, in an effort to establish her credentials as a crusader against wasteful spending, announced at the Republican Convention, and at least 36 times since then, that “I told Congress ‘thanks but no thanks’ on that bridge to nowhere”.

The truth of the matter is that as a candidate for Alaska Governor in 2006, Sarah Palin supported the bridge, saying

This link (the bridge) is a commitment to help Ketchikan expand its access, to help this community prosper… I think we’re going to make a good team as we progress that bridge project.

After becoming governor Palin changed her mind about the need for the bridge. However, by that time Congress had already made the decision to provide Alaska with $223 million of the approximately $400 million needed for the bridge construction. Palin accepted the money that the U.S. Congress provided, and used it for other projects.

Do you believe that Governor Palin’s oft-repeated line that “I told Congress ‘thanks but no thanks’ on that bridge to nowhere” is misleading and dishonest, and do you think she should quit using it?


War for oil

You said at a town hall meeting in Denver a few months ago:

My friends, I will have an energy policy that we will be talking about, which will eliminate our dependence on oil from the Middle East that will – that will then prevent us – that will prevent us from having ever to send our young men and women into conflict again in the Middle East.

However, at the time that our country was considering going to war against Iraq, you espoused a very different reason for the need to go to war. You said at that time:

I believe Iraq is a threat of the first order, and only a change of regime will make Iraq a state that does not threaten us and others, and where liberated people assume the rights and responsibilities of freedom.

Do you believe that our need for another nation’s oil justifies our going to war against them, and do you believe that that was the reason that we went to war against Iraq? If not, then what sense does it make to say that your energy policy will prevent us from ever having to go to war again in the Middle East?


Alleged dishonest attacks by Obama against Palin

In September you released an ad that quoted FactCheck.org, saying “The attacks on Governor Palin are ‘completely false’ … ‘misleading’”. Those words are repeated while a picture of Senator Obama appears on-screen, thus giving the impression that FactCheck.org accused Obama or his campaign of making false attacks against Governor Palin. But Senator Obama never made the accusations that are the subject of the ad. FactCheck.org had this to say about that ad.

The McCain-Palin campaign has altered our message in a fashion we consider less than honest. The ad strives to convey the message that FactCheck.org said "completely false" attacks on Gov. Sarah Palin had come from Sen. Barack Obama. We said no such thing. We have yet to dispute any claim from the Obama campaign about Palin.

Do you believe that this ad was dishonest? If not, then why is Senator Obama pictured on-screen as the narrator says that the attacks against Governor Palin that are the subject of the ad are false and misleading?


The need for some hard questioning of the McCain/Palin campaign

The McCain/Palin presidential campaign has been one of the most dishonest ever conducted. Such a strategy could only have been undertaken in the belief that the national news media would be grossly negligent in its duty to confront the campaign with its numerous false assertions.

Fortunately, the U.S. national corporate news media has not been wholly negligent in reporting on the many lies of the McCain campaign – and that explains in part why Obama is beginning to put together a somewhat comfortable lead in national polls. In addition, Internet bloggers have greatly contributed to shining a light on most of the lies and distortions.

But the response of the national corporate news media has been far from satisfactory. Many millions of Americans believe the many lies and distortions that they hear from the McCain campaign. Worse yet, some of those lies have so inflamed with hatred certain segments of the U.S. population that the potential for violence appears to be greatly enhanced.

In response to the escalating toxic atmosphere engendered by his campaign, Senator McCain recently (and belatedly) made a substantial attempt to calm down his crowds, stating that Senator Obama is a “decent family man” and that our nation has nothing to fear from him if he were to be elected President. Senator McCain deserves credit for that, and I applaud his efforts in that regard, as does Senator Obama. Hopefully he will continue on that tack, and reign in his pit bull as well.

But the great bulk of the lies and distortions remain unaddressed. Our national corporate news media needs to do a much better job of holding the McCain campaign accountable for its numerous lies and distortions. Here is a list of 47 lies perpetrated by the McCain campaign, accompanied by detailed explanations, which need to be addressed much better than they have been. In addition to what I’ve discussed in this post, those lies include:

McCain 'suspended' his campaign.
Obama will raise your taxes.
Obama called Sarah Palin “a pig.”
Obama opposes all free trade.
Obama will increase spending by $1 trillion.
Obama will “hand the health care system over to the federal government.”
Obama thinks Iran “doesn’t pose a serious threat.”
Obama wants to bomb Pakistan.
Obama voted against funding the troops.
Obama voted for higher taxes 94 times.
Palin “vetoed millions of earmarks.”
McCain tried to reform Fannie Mae
Offshore drilling will reduce the cost of gas.
US companies pay world’s 2nd highest corporate taxes.
Obama will tax electricity.
McCain invented the BlackBerry.
Obama volunteer for the same charity.
Obama supports “infanticide.”
Obama thinks troops in Afghanistan are “just” killing civilians.
Obama snubbed wounded troops.
Biden supported McCain on Iraq until this election.
McCain refuses special interest money
Sarah Palin commands the Alaskan National Guard
Obama agrees that the economy is fundamentally strong
Alaska Produces 20% of US Energy
McCain's Campaign has no Connections to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac
Palin Rejected $500 million Earmarks
Obama is 'mum' on the economic crisis
Palin sold the Governor's jet on EBay
Obama gave big oil millions in subsidies
Palin took on big oil
Obama Killed Immigration reform
Palin visited troops in Iraq
Obama wants to increase government size by 23%
Obama opposes the electric car
Obama is advised by the former CEO of Freddie Mac
Obama wants to bomb Pakistan
McCain supports a 'bipartisanship' in the bailout
"23,000 People at our rallies"
Palin Fired Trooper for Performance Reasons
Obama is part of the corrupt Chicago establishment


Discuss (23 comments) | Recommend (+29 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
StarStar
AlienGirl has passed away
16 recs : By Contrary1
Star
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.