Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
Posted by Time for change in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Thu Sep 17th 2009, 11:50 PM
In order to allay the fears of the extreme right wing that a public health insurance option would tyrannize the American people by taking away their choice to have the health care they want, we’re now told that the choice of a public health insurance
The story of how our previously promised public health insurance option shrunk from an option that was originally supposed to be offered to ALL Americans, to one in which “less than 5 percent of Americans would sign up”, as our President said in his September 9th address to Congress, is an incredible one. In this post I’ll discuss how that happened, possible reasons why “less than 5 percent of Americans would sign up”, and what it is likely to mean to the American people if we are unable to pressure Congress and our President to expand the public health insurance option to its original form.


A brief recent history of the public health insurance option

The unveiling of the public health insurance option by the major 2008 Democratic Presidential candidates
In February of 2007, with the unveiling of John Edwards’ health plan, Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman wrote an editorial about it, titled “Edwards Gets it Right”. He began by saying that promises of universal health insurance don’t mean much unless accompanied by specific details. He likened rhetoric without details to George Bush’s promises of “compassionate conservatism”. Then he went on to describe the Edwards plan, singling out the public health insurance option (without using those words) as the crucially important and unique aspect of the plan:

People who don't get insurance from their employers wouldn't have to deal individually with insurance companies: they'd purchase insurance through "Health Markets": government-run bodies negotiating with insurance companies on the public's behalf. People would, in effect, be buying insurance from the government…

Why is this such a good idea? … "Health Markets will offer a choice between private insurers and a public insurance plan modeled after Medicare." This would offer a crucial degree of competition. The public insurance plan would almost certainly be cheaper than anything the private sector offers right now – after all, Medicare has very low overhead. Private insurers would either have to match the public plan's low premiums, or lose the competition.

And Mr. Edwards is O.K. with that. Over time the system may evolve toward a single-payer approach if individuals and businesses prefer the public plan. So this is a smart, serious proposal. It addresses both the problem of the uninsured and the waste and inefficiency of our fragmented insurance system.

Then in May of 2007, Barack Obama came out with a similar plan, which Krugman characterized as a “comprehensive health care plan” that had “a lot to commend” it, though he said it was a little weaker than the Edwards plan. This later became the Obama-Biden plan (no longer available on-line), which I described in a 2008 post:

The Obama-Biden plan will create a National Health Insurance Exchange to help individuals purchase new affordable health care options if they are uninsured or want new health insurance. Through the Exchange, any American will have the opportunity to enroll in the new public plan or an approved private plan, and income-based sliding scale tax credits will be provided for people and families who need it.

Then in September, Senator Clinton came out with her plan, which Krugman characterized as almost identical to the Edwards plan. He prophetically summed up the situation as follows:

Even if the Democrats take the White House and expand their Congressional majorities, the insurance and drug lobbies will try to bully them into backing down on their campaign promises…. It’s good to know that whoever gets the Democratic nomination will run on a very good health care plan. What remains is the question of whether he or she will have the determination to turn that plan into reality.

Attack on the public health insurance option
No sooner did President Obama begin to push for his public health insurance option plan than he and his plan were met with a barrage of incredible propaganda and lies, emanating from the private health insurance industry, and distributed by their bought-and-paid-for politicians, along with their incredibly ignorant right wing followers.

The public health insurance option was a plan to provide Americans an alternative choice to their private health insurance plans, or for those who currently lacked health insurance, to provide them with the means to purchase it. In other words, they would be given the option of replacing a private system whose primary purpose was the accumulation of profits with a public one whose primary purpose was to make affordable health care available to all Americans.

But the insurance industry propaganda machine simply turned reality upside down. Instead of a choice, the public option became “government run health care” that would be forced on the American people. Instead of making health care affordable to the American people, the public option became a plan to “ration health care” and kill old people. Somehow the insurance industry propaganda machine successfully caused millions of Americans to forget that private health insurance companies ration health care routinely, even when it means denying coverage to customers who paid premiums to them for years without reaping any benefit. Consequently, the private health insurance industry, their politician-whores, and their crazy right wing ideologue followers ranted and raved about the SOCIALISM, DEATH PANELS, and TYRANNY that would plague our nation if the Obama plan to make health care affordable to the American people ever became a reality.

President Obama’s reaction
One would hope that the lies and propaganda would be met with a full scale effort to counter them. Instead, when President Obama gave his long awaited televised speech to Congress on September 9th, he backed almost completely away from the public health insurance option, while attempting to maintain an aura of continuing to back it:


An additional step we can take to keep insurance companies honest is by making a not-for-profit public option available in the insurance exchange. (Applause.) Now, let me be clear. Let me be clear. It would only be an option for those who don't have insurance. No one would be forced to choose it, and it would not impact those of you who already have insurance. In fact, based on Congressional Budget Office estimates, we believe that less than 5 percent of Americans would sign up.

Gone was the health care plan that candidate Obama offered during his run for the presidency. The plan that was touted as being available to EVERYONE is now available only to those who currently don’t have health insurance. And just as bad, only 5% of the American people are expected to sign up for it.

To sum up what happened: In order to allay the fears of the extreme right wing that a public health insurance option would tyrannize the American people by taking away their choice to have the health care they want, we’re now told that the choice of a public health insurance option will be available to less than 5% of the American people. Wow!


Why are only 5% of Americans expected to sign up for a public option?

Obama did not explain why only 5% of Americans would sign up for the plan. But in order to evaluate what he is offering we would do well to consider why only 5% of Americans would be expected to sign up for this plan that was previously promised to all Americans.

Ineligibility of large numbers of Americans
We know at least part of the reason why so few Americans would sign up for the plan. Obama made it clear in his speech that “It would only be an option for those who don’t have insurance.” But that can’t be the whole reason. There are 46 million Americans who currently have no health insurance. That’s about 15% of the U.S. population. Obama said in his speech that he expects less than 5% to sign up. The difference is 10% of the U.S. population – or 30 million Americans.

Why is it that those 30 million Americans won’t sign up? Could it be that the plan will not be available to many of those people? Will there be restrictions on eligibility in addition to the current possession of private health insurance? Or….

An inferior plan
Common sense tells us that a public health insurance option should be far less expensive and of much better quality (that is, better coverage and less denial of claims) than private for-profit health insurance. Much of the premiums collected by private health insurance companies go towards advertising and marketing costs, lobbying costs, profits for their investors, multimillion dollar salaries for their CEOs, and administrative and legislative costs aimed at enabling them to deny claims. After all that, how much is left to cover the health care claims of their customers? A government health insurance plan would not be burdened by all that. It would therefore have much more money available for health care – which is the purpose of health insurance. So why on earth would less than 15 million Americans out of 46 million who currently have no health insurance choose a private plan over a presumably superior quality public plan?

Well, the fact that government has the potential to offer an inexpensive and high quality plan doesn’t mean that it will. Perhaps the plan that Obama spoke of would be much more expensive and of worse quality than it could be. An analysis by Kip Sullivan of two bills that are currently under consideration in Congress supports that theory:

The “option” in both bills will be a balkanized program…. The “options” in both bills will be administered by private-sector corporations, some or all of which will be insurance companies. The “option” in neither bill resembles Medicare.


What will be the consequences of a public option that covers only 5% of us?

Greater expense and less coverage
Since private health insurance is much more expensive than government health insurance, that means that the shrinking of the public option to 5% will of necessity result in one of three very serious problems, or more likely by a combination of those three problems: Either it will: 1) be far more expensive; 2) cover far fewer people; or 3) cover far less health care for those who have insurance than a plan that contains a strong public option would.

There is no getting around this. It is simple arithmetic. Those who complain about the expense of a public option are woefully ignorant or they are hypocrites. Private health insurance is far more expensive than public insurance needs to be, for reasons I mentioned above.

And let’s be clear about this. The value of a strong public option plan pertains to far more Americans than just those who are currently uninsured. There are many tens of millions of Americans who are under-insured. The bottom line is that, in addition to 46 million Americans who have no health insurance at all, many tens of millions of additional Americans have health insurance that fails to cover them when they most desperately need health care. And lest this is not obvious, consider the following:

Researchers from the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee analyzed data reported by the insurers to the California Department of Managed Care. From 2002 through June 30, 2009, the six insurers rejected 45.7 million claims – 22 percent of all claims.

The end result is that private health insurance is much more expensive and of lower quality than it needs to be. For example, a survey of insured Americans in 2002 demonstrated the following problems in their family due to a family member’s inability to get the health care they needed:

Long term disability: 14%
Significant loss of time at important activities: 21%
Painful temporary disability: 36%
Seriously increased stress: 58%

Subsidizing the private insurance industry
It should be obvious that a public health insurance option that only 5% of Americans sign up for will not provide the competition to the private insurance industry that candidate Obama promised his plan would. And not only would this new plan relieve the private insurance industry of the competition they were threatened with.

In addition, the new plan would mandate that many tens of millions of Americans purchase health insurance from private health insurance companies. Many Americans who purchase private health insurance under this plan would receive subsidies from the U.S. government to do so – in which case our government would be subsidizing the insurance industry at taxpayer expense. That could add greatly to the wealth of the private health insurance industry – which would further increase their power to influence legislation, perhaps resulting in a vicious cycle.


The bottom line

I don’t see how an option that covers only 5% of Americans will be of much help, and as I discussed above, it has the potential to do much harm. Why the need for all this compromise with the private insurance industry, the Republican Party, and crazy right wing ideologues? Why should they be allowed to benefit from all their lies and propaganda? I’ll finish this post with excerpts from a recent editorial in The Nation, which speaks of the folly of trying to appease those who won’t be appeased:

We hope the president, his Congressional allies and millions of Americans will be inspired to honor and do battle for Kennedy's lifelong cause. Surely Obama knows that the Senate's fighting liberal would not have put the fate of the nation's healthcare into the hands of private insurance companies, which increase their quarterly earnings by denying people care. Reform is not possible without a public alternative to the private companies, one based on coverage for all and quality care rather than profit…

Obama often speaks of his desire to get beyond the partisan divide, but what good is bipartisanship at this moment? The Republican Party… does not simply want to criticize or modify Democratic healthcare proposals. It is determined to cripple or kill reform, and with it Obama's presidency… It's high time for Obama to part ways with the Party of No, which has been stoking outlandish fears about government "death panels" and "socialism" …

If the Dems put forth a watered-down "bipartisan" bill with no public option, they will be justly blamed for its inevitable failure – and will see ugly results in the 2010 midterm elections. If, on the other hand, Republicans manage to defeat a good bill, let them try to explain themselves to midterm voters, who will still be at the mercy of Big Insurance and Big Pharma.

Discuss (43 comments) | Recommend (+42 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
StarStar
AlienGirl has passed away
16 recs : By Contrary1
Star
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.