Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
Republican Congresspersons lambast government run programs because they compete with and cut into the profits of their corporate donors. The kinds of government programs that they approve of are bank bailouts. Essentially they are corporate sociali
It’s hard to say whether Senator Ensign (R-NV) planned it this way. Did he really believe that his argument against giving Americans the choice of government sponsored health insurance would make sense to anyone? Is he so blinded by ideology that he doesn’t realize that at least three quarters of Americans would welcome such a choice? Or has his mistress scandal simply turned off his thinking process?

Arguing against giving Americans the option of government sponsored health insurance – which would represent serious competition against the private health insurance industry – Ensign said that the public option is “a slippery slope into a government run single payer program”.

More revealing than the fact that Ensign said that is the reasoning he used to support his statement. Why would a public option lead to single payer health care in the United States? Actually, Paul Krugman made exactly the same point more than a year ago. But I certainly wouldn’t have expected Ensign to make that point. This is what Krugman had to say in his book, “Conscience of a Liberal”, about providing some competition to private insurance companies by giving people the option of choosing government run insurance plans over private insurance plans:

The evidence suggests that the government plans, which would have lower overhead costs because they wouldn’t devote large sums to marketing, would win that competition. When Medicare began requiring that Medicare Advantage plans – taxpayer-supported private plans for seniors – compete with traditional Medicare on an actuarially fair basis, the private plans withered away… If the government plans consistently out-competed private insurers, the system would evolve over time into single-payer, as private insurers lost market share…

So, how did Ensign’s opinion on this issue differ from Krugman’s? In all essentials, it didn’t? This is what Ensign said:

Why we think all of this is a slippery slope toward government-run – complete government-run health care, complete government takeover of our health care system, is that a lot of the things that we do around here, we put into place – and supposedly safeguards are put into place, but when we see the effects and people like government programs, they then defend those government programs and they make them want to compete and want to survive that much more.

So to summarize the difference between what Krugman said and what Ensign said, Krugman said that “Government plans… would win that competition (against private insurance)”, while Ensign said that “When we see the effects and people like government programs, they then defend those government programs…” Really, the only difference is that Krugman thinks it a good thing when people have access to government programs that they like and that benefit them, while Ensign thinks it’s a bad thing – which of course sums up Republican philosophy in a nutshell.


But why??

What was left unsaid by Ensign’s little diatribe is why it is bad when people have access to a government program that they like and that benefits them. Ensign – and Republicans in general – think it’s sufficient merely to note that something is run by the government in order to prove that it’s a bad program – even if the primarily reason for its survival is its “effect and people like government programs”. But WHY is that bad?

This brings to mind Ronald Reagan’s opposition to Medicare in the early ‘60s. Just put a label on it – call it socialism – and that should be enough to make the point:

Now what reason could the other people have for backing a bill which says we insist on compulsory health insurance for senior citizens on a basis of age alone… I think we could be excused for believing that… this was simply an excuse to bring about what they wanted all the time: socialized medicine.

There is a little difference between Medicare and the currently proposed Public Option. Medicare was compulsory – in the sense that all Americans who meet the age qualification are allowed to use it – whereas the proposed Public Option is not compulsory, in that you have to sign up for it and pay for it (with government subsidy for those who need it) in order to get it. But Reagan’s strategy was to call it “socialism” – just as today’s Republicans (and some blue dog Democrats) are doing. But at least Reagan had the good sense not to admit that the reason he was against it was because it would benefit people and they would like it. I guess that was just a little slip of the tongue on Ensign’s part.

Anyhow, since Ensign failed to explain what he has against the idea of a program that people like because it benefits them, I’ll explain it for him – and the rest of our Republican Congress: Republicans are adamantly opposed to government programs that benefit people because such government programs compete quite successfully against their corporate donors. Since the purpose of a government program is to provide its citizens with needed benefits, whereas the purpose of private corporate programs are to make a profit, it should be obvious that governments have a tremendous advantage in their ability to provide programs that people will like and that will benefit them. It’s like Senator McConnell (R-KY) said when he whined to President Obama about the “unfair” competition that a government program would provide to private insurance companies:

Forcing free market plans to compete with these government-run programs would create an un-level playing field and inevitably doom true competition. Ultimately, we would be left with a single government-run program controlling all of the market…


Corporate socialists

So there you have it. As Senator Ensign admitted (inadvertently, I’m sure), and as Senator McConnell before him admitted, Republican Congresspersons lambast government run programs because they compete with and cut into the profits of their corporate donors. And furthermore, they don’t need government programs that provide benefits to poor people or people of modest means. The kinds of government programs that they approve of are bank bailouts, government subsidies for powerful corporations, and legislation that helps their corporate donors gain monopoly control over … whatever they can. Essentially they are Corporate Socialists. And that should be quite clear from the above noted remarks of Senators Ensign and McConnell – regardless of how much the Republican Party endeavors to hide that fact with the use of such terms as “free market”. Is it not clear by now that they have no desire whatsoever for a truly free market? They are anti-competition to the core. They are Corporate Socialists.


What we need now

And let me say one more thing about the Public Option: Let’s not let them pull semantic tricks on us. If Congress passes a “Public Option” that is available to only a small fraction of the American people (such as people who currently have no health insurance), that is not sufficient. It should be available to ALL Americans. People who currently have no health insurance need it the most. But the rest of us need it too – to provide a true alternative to having to suffer along with the nasty tricks that the private health insurance industry plays on us.

And not only that. It must be made truly affordable to all Americans – which means that those who struggle to get by from paycheck to paycheck should get it for free. People need health care, and if a family can barely maintain financial solvency without putting out money for health insurance, then they certainly can’t maintain financial solvency when they have to pay for health insurance as well. And of course it is also essential that a Public Option provide decent quality health care.

Are we going to take seriously the Declaration that made us a sovereign nation? – The one that said that everyone has an inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Well, we can hardly pursue those things if we have no access to decent health care. I think that FDR said it as well as anyone when he proposed his Second Bill of Rights at his 1944 State of the Union address:

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. Necessitous men are not free men. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all – regardless of station, race, or creed. Among these are:

Opportunity
 The right to a useful and remunerative job…
 The right to a good education.
 The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies…

Security
 The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment.
 The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health.
 The right of every family to a decent home.
 The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation.

I’m glad that Senator Ensign made it crystal clear how he and his Republican colleagues differ from FDR’s vision.
Discuss (16 comments) | Recommend (+26 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
StarStar
AlienGirl has passed away
16 recs : By Contrary1
Star
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.