THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE - Privatizing Benefits, Socializing Risks: The Roots of our Economic Crisis

Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!

THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE

Privatizing Benefits, Socializing Risks: The Roots of our Economic Crisis

Posted by Time for change in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Mon Dec 28th 2009, 10:58 PM

Privatizing benefits while socializing the consequences of risks should strike us as the most obvious of frauds. Yet those in power have managed to bamboozle millions of Americans into thinking of it as “throwing off the restraints on free enterprise

Our nation’s elites have long disparaged the words “Communism” and “Socialism” to such an extent as to make these words almost synonymous with evil. Yet it is only one side of the equation that they hate. They hate the idea of a society or government that provides a safety net to its most vulnerable members, in an attempt to ensure that everyone has access to the basic necessities of life. Yet you don’t often hear them complain when government provides them with benefits, at the expense of the rest of society.

This attitude is the essence of the privatization and deregulation movement that came into full force in our country during the Reagan Revolution of the 1980s. Deregulation is the crux of their philosophy, and it is the very essence of privatized benefits in the face of socialized risks. They equate deregulation with freedom. But their “freedom” comes at a great cost to the rest of society: Deregulation of environmental controls means pollution of our air, water, and soil and putting our planet on the brink of a climate crisis that threatens catastrophe to billions; deregulation in the workplace means threatening the health and safety of our workers; deregulation of prohibitions against monopolies means granting control of huge areas of our economy to the wealthy few, with consequent rising costs and declining quality of goods and services for the average consumer; and deregulation of the financial industry means that our financial elites are granted the “freedom” to operate as they please, amass huge fortunes from irresponsible risky ventures, and then receive huge subsidies from the American taxpayer when things go sour – rationalized with the argument that the “services” they provide are so essential to the economy of our country that we can’t function without them.

A classic example – Robert Rubin and the Citigroup fiasco

A classic example of how privatized benefits combine with socialized risks to create vast fortunes for the few at the expense of the many is seen in the career of Robert Rubin. Rubin was Bill Clinton’s Secretary of the Treasury before he resigned in 1999. Shortly before he resigned he advocated for the repeal of the Glass-Steagall law, which protected the American people against financial fraud by prohibiting commercial banks from taking on the risky role of investment banks. Citigroup is widely considered the greatest beneficiary of the repeal of Glass-Steagall. Charles Gasparino explains the philosophy:

The theory of Citigroup was widely accepted in business circles as the future of the financial business; combining commercial and investment banking services under one roof and allowing firms to sell all sorts of products was a step forward toward "financial modernization."

With Rubin’s backing, Glass-Steagall (which was already severely weakened through years of abuse) was repealed. Within days of the repeal of Glass-Steagall, Rubin joined Citigroup, as a senior executive with the title of “Chairman of the Executive Committee”. In that capacity he strongly advocated for high risk policies which eventually contributed to Citigroup’s downfall. Gasparino describes the sequence of events:

Citigroup, with its mandate now in hand, and with Rubin approving the effort, became one of the biggest creators of mortgage bonds… With Wall Street buying these loans en mass from the banks to pack into their ever-riskier bonds, lending to so-called "subprime" borrowers became an accepted practice fully sanctioned by the federal government. When Citigroup couldn't sell the bonds to investors, it horded them on their balance sheet, earning the high interest rates the bonds threw off.

That is until reality set in, as it did last year when the entire financial system, burdened by investments in these mortgage bonds on their way to default, Wall Street, began to collapse and the economy fell into the Great Recession, now with 10.2% unemployment that shows no signs of letting up. Citigroup was the biggest casualties of the collapse; its risk takers had lost so much money that it needed tens of billions in guarantees and handouts, as well as the government becoming the bank's largest shareholder.

When the dust finally cleared, it became obvious that the demise of Glass-Steagall allowed the risk-taking traders at Citigroup to jeopardize nearly $1 trillion worth of customers’ deposits, which is the main reason the feds had to spend so much bailing it out. With that, Bob Rubin's Wall Street career was over. He was forced to resign from the Citi board and the firm itself with his reputation in tatters, but not without earning more than $100 million.

In what kind of a world does massive failure result in “earning” $100 million? Answer: a world in which the game is played with a stacked deck, in which the consequences of failure and massive financial losses are spread out (socialized) so that the American people pick up the tab for the wealthy.

The origins of Glass-Steagall

Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman explains the origins of the Glass-Steagall legislation in his book, “The Return of Depression Economics – and the Crisis of 2008”. Prior to the Great Depression of the 1930s, the United States had experienced periodic severe recessions and depressions, which were due largely to an unregulated financial system. Nothing demonstrated the need for regulation of the financial sector more than the Great Depression. Krugman explains:

Because they were supposed to engage only in low-risk activities, trusts were less regulated… than national banks. However, as the economy boomed during the first decade of the 20th century, trusts began speculating in real estate and the stock market, areas from which national banks were prohibited. Because they were less regulated than national banks, trusts were able to pay their depositors higher returns. Meanwhile, trusts took a free ride on national banks’ reputation for soundness… As a result, trusts grew rapidly… and the most severe banking crisis in history emerged in the early 1930s… precipitating a series of loan defaults followed by bank runs… There’s more or less unanimous agreement among economic historians that the banking crisis is what turned a nasty recession into the Great Depression.

The response was the creation of a system with many more safe guards. The Glass-Steagall Act separated banks into two kinds; commercial banks, which accepted deposits, and investment banks, which didn’t. Commercial banks were sharply restricted in the risks they could take; in return, they had ready access to credit from the Fed… their deposits were insured by the taxpayer. Investment banks were much less tightly regulated, but that was considered acceptable because as non-depository institutions they weren’t supposed to be subject to bank runs.

This new system protected the economy from financial crises for almost seventy years.

The deregulation craze of the 1980s and the initial efforts to repeal Glass-Steagall

The presidency of Ronald Reagan ushered in the era of privatization and deregulation. Another way of saying this is that the Reagan administration ushered in the era of favoritism towards wealthy corporations and individuals at the expense of everyone else, which began a trend towards a disappearing middle class and the greatest level of incomeand wealth inequality ever seen in this country. William Kleinknecht describes what this process meant in terms of financial deregulation, in his book, “The Man Who Sold the World – Ronald Reagan and the Betrayal of Main Street America”:

The Reagan administration’s zest for financial deregulation was responsible for the boom-and-bust cataclysms of the 1980s and 1990s, the obscene inflation of executive compensation; the corporate scandals and stock market meltdown of 2000-2001; and innumerable crises in international finance, including the most devastating of them all: the subprime mortgage scandal. Deregulation corrupted financial institutions at the same time that it made them the lords of the world economy and allowed their proxies, people like Robert Rubin and Alan Greenspan, to dictate the policies of the federal government. History will marvel that these two standard-bearers of Reaganism – Greenspan and Rubin – were lionized as geniuses and visionaries at the very time they were steering the nation toward disaster….

Reagan’s plan for deregulation of the financial sector would take years to come to full fruition – what was finally left of Glass-Steagall would not finally be repealed until 1999 – but the processes he and his Republican colleagues set in motion in 1981 were the genesis of so much that is wrong with the U.S. economy in the 21st century.

Reagan didn’t have the votes in Congress to repeal Glass-Steagall. So he attacked it the same way that he attacked everything else he didn’t like about our system of government: by executive fiat. He simply neglected to fulfill his responsibility as a U.S. president to enforce our existing laws and regulations. As Kleinknecht explains:

Reagan changed the role of government from that of watchdog to lapdog without even bothering to consult the Congress. He also gave a potent political voice to the backlash against regulations, ensuring that the movement would continue to burgeon after he left office… The Reaganites went after regulatory agencies with relish, starving them of resources and staffing them with officials committed to their destruction…The S&L mess worked out well for the new class of robber barons that emerged in the Reagan years. A small group of rich business types went on a spending spree, and the public picked up the $150 billion tab. Privatize the wealth and socialize the risk.

Reagan’s Treasury Secretary, Donald Regan, drafted legislation in 1983 to repeal Glass-Steagall, but it was defeated in the Democratic House of Representatives. With the help of his newly appointed chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, Reagan tried again in 1988, but the effort was again defeated in the House. Nevertheless, Reagan put Glass-Steagall on life support through his continuous refusals to enforce the terms of the law.

President Clinton’s about-face

Thom Hartmann explains in his book, “Threshold – The Crisis of Western Culture”, that Bill Clinton campaigned for the presidency as an unabashed FDR style liberal. In a speech at Georgetown University on October 23, 1991, he declared:

We need a new covenant, a solemn agreement between the people and their government to provide opportunity for everybody, inspire responsibility throughout our society, and restore a sense of community to our great nation – a new covenant to take government back from the powerful interests and the bureaucracy, and give it back to the ordinary people of our country…

More than 200 years ago, our founding fathers outlined our first social compact, between government and the people, not just between Lords and Kings… More than 60 years ago, Franklin Roosevelt renewed that promise with a New Deal that offered opportunity in return for hard work. Today we need to forge a new covenant that will repair the damaged bond between the people and their government, restore our basic values, embed the idea that a country has the responsibility to help people get ahead… And most important of all, that we’re all in this together…

Clinton was elected President on that promise. Hartmann points out that:

A majority of voters in 1992 were old enough to remember what America was like under the 1940-1981 New Deal era, when a single worker with a good job had health care, a pension, and could raise a family and buy a home… And they noticed that the twelve years of Reagan and Bush had begun the process of shattering that historic era; that the middle class was slipping away; that government had become remote and hostile rather than protecting the rights of workers and the middle class…

But something happened before Clinton was inaugurated. Hartmann continues:

A few weeks before Bill Clinton was to be sworn into office as president of the United States, he was visited by Goldman, Sachs CEO Robert Robin and Alan Greenspan. Rubin and Greenspan sat the young new president down and told him the facts of life as they saw them. Clinton would not govern as an FDR liberal; instead he must cut government, “free” trade, and reduce regulation of business… Clinton complied… In his second inaugural address, he declared, “The era of big government is over.”

I would love to know how a “visit” from Greenspan and Rubin so changed the course of our country. Did they threaten him, bribe him, or just convince him? I guess we’ll never know. Anyhow, Kleinknecht describes how Clinton’s thinking changed:

Bill Clinton… ended up buying into the Reagan mantra of deregulation and continued efforts to undermine Glass-Steagall… He made his chief economic adviser Robert Rubin, the former cochairman of Goldman Sachs and Company, a man who saw the world through the prism of Wall Street… The two men (Greenspan and Rubin) ensured that Clinton stayed the course of Reaganism on economic matters, much to the chagrin of administration liberals like Labor Secretary Robert Reich and Joseph Stiglitz, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers…

Final repeal of Glass-Steagall

In 1999, Congress passed the Financial Services Modernization Act, commonly known as the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act, which repealed Glass-Steagall. Kleinknecht describes the effects of that:

It was no surprise that the conflicts of interest and sleazy behavior that Glass-Steagall was designed to prevent quickly reappeared once the law was shelved… There were enormous sums of money to be made on Wall Street, and some of that wealth would be plowed into political campaign funds… Within two years after the repeal of Glass-Steagall, companies were inflating their earnings by billions of dollars…

This was the dawn of the George W. Bush era, when the ethos of Reaganism was once again enshrined as holy writ, so the stock market implosion of the millennium would not give rise to new banking regulation. Instead, the financial press continued to deify Greenspan, Rubin, and Reagan, and the country plunged headlong into the subprime mortgage scandal.

One bubble on top of another

Paul Krugman describes the two nation-wide financial bubbles leading up to our current crisis. The first was the stock market bubble, which peaked in the summer of 2000 and then burst, leading to a 40% decline in the stock market over the next two years. Krugman notes that Alan Greenspan received high praise for the fact that the recession that resulted from the bursting of the stock market bubble of 2000 was so short-lived and mild. But that praise was misplaced. The reason that the recession was short-lived and mild was deceptive. The fact of the matter was that the deflating stock market bubble was replaced by the housing bubble. Therefore the recession wasn’t cured by anything Alan Greenspan did, but rather it was interrupted and delayed by the occurrence of another bubble – a much more dangerous one. Krugman explains what an asset bubble is:

An asset bubble is a sort of natural Ponzi scheme in which people keep making money as long as there are more suckers to draw in. But eventually the scheme runs out of suckers, and the whole thing crashes.

As for the housing bubble:

What justified a bubble in housing? … Americans have long been in the habit of buying houses with borrowed money, but it’s hard to see why anyone should have believed, circa 2003, that the basic principles of such borrowing had been repealed. From long experience, we knew that home buyers shouldn’t take on mortgages whose payments they couldn’t afford, and that they should put enough money down so that they can sustain a moderate drop in home prices and still have positive equity… What actually happened, however, was a complete abandonment of traditional principles… It was driven to a greater extent by a change in lending practices. Buyers were given loans requiring little or no down payment and with monthly bills that were well beyond their ability to afford…

Why did lenders relax their standards? … The lenders didn’t concern themselves with the quality of their loans because they didn’t hold on to them. Instead, they sold them to investors, who didn’t understand what they were buying….

As for Greenspan’s role:

As long as housing prices kept rising, everything looked fine and the Ponzi scheme kept rolling… Some economists warned that there was a major housing bubble… But authoritative figures declared otherwise. Alan Greenspan, in particular, declared that any major decline in home prices would be “most unlikely.”… But there was, and it began deflating in 2006 – slowly at first, then with increasing speed. By that time Greenspan was no longer chairman of the Fed…

Krugman sums up the recession of the early 21st Century:

Officially the recession was short, but the job market kept deteriorating long after the recession had officially been declared over… The unemployment rate rose steeply during the recession but continued to rise in the months that followed. The period of deteriorating employment actually lasted two and a half years, not eight months.

Prelude to depression – The shadow banking system

Krugman explains that in ordinary times it would likely have been possible for our country to have survived the bursting of the housing bubble without too much difficulty. However, the combination of high unemployment and a dysfunctional financial system was more than we could bear. Our financial system was (and is) dysfunctional in ways that the previously existing Glass-Steagall legislation was meant to prevent. But it wasn’t simply the demise of Glass-Steagall that was responsible for the problem. Rather, it was the whole deregulatory atmosphere under which our country has operated since the onset of the Reagan presidency. And more specifically, it was the taking on of investment bank functions by financial entities that were not formally labeled as banks but which actually were banks, in that they functioned as banks. Glass-Steagall wouldn’t have covered these entities even if it had still existed, because they were not “banks”. Krugman explains that the solution to this confusing situation is that:

Influential figures should have proclaimed a simple rule: anything that does what a bank does, anything that has to be rescued in crises the way banks are, should be regulated like a bank…

Krugman singles out for discussion one particular financial tool, known as the “auction-rate security”:

The idea of an auction-rate security was that it would reconcile the desire of borrowers for secure long-term funding with the desire of lenders for ready access to their money. But that’s exactly what a bank does. Yet auction-rate securities seemed to offer everyone a better deal than conventional banking. Investors in auction-rate securities were paid higher interest rates… while the issuers of these securities paid lower rates than they would have on long-term bank loans. There’s no such thing as a free lunch… yet auction-rate securities seemed to offer just that. How did they do that?

Well, the answer seems obvious in retrospect: Banks are highly regulated (even without Glass-Steagall)… By raising funds via auction-rate securities, borrowers could bypass these regulations and their attendant expense. But that also meant that auction-rate securities weren’t protected by the banking safety net. And sure enough, the auction-rate security system collapsed in early 2008. One after another, auctions failed, as too few new investors arrived to let existing investors get their money out… And each auction failure led to another; having seen the perils of these too-clever investment schemes, who wanted to put fresh money into the system? What happened to auction-rate securities was, in all but name, a contagious series of bank runs.

Today, the set of institutions and arrangements that act as “non-bank banks” are generally referred to either as the “parallel banking system” or as the “shadow banking system.” Conventional banks operate more or less in the sunlight, with open books and regulators looking over their shoulders. The operations of non-depository institutions that are de facto banks, by contrast, are far more obscure. Indeed, until the crisis hit, few people seem to have appreciated just how important the shadow banking system had become.

The roots of economic catastrophe

Krugman sums up the anti-regulatory craze that led to our current crisis:

As the shadow banking system expanded to rival or even surpass conventional banking in importance, politicians and government officials should have realized that we were re-creating the kind of financial vulnerability that made the Great Depression possible – and they should have responded by extending regulation and the financial safety net to cover these new institutions.

But this warning was ignored, and there was no move to extend regulation. On the contrary, the spirit of the times – and the ideology of the George W. Bush administration – was deeply anti-regulation. This attitude was symbolized by a photo-op… in which representatives of various agencies… used pruning shears and a chainsaw to cut up stacks of regulations. More concretely, the Bush administration used federal power… to block state-level efforts to impose some oversight on subprime lending…

So the growing risks of a crisis for the financial system and the economy as a whole were ignored or dismissed. And the crisis came.

This should not be surprising. Why should we expect that the results of deregulating financial institutions – or any corporate sector of our economy – should be any different than deregulating organized crime (i.e. doing away with all laws used to control it), for example? Both organized crime and corporate America are focused primarily on a ruthless pursuit of profits and power, and neither is particularly concerned about who gets run over in the process. So when the barriers are purposely removed we should not be too surprised to see lots of people get run over.

It is inevitable when the wealthy few are given huge advantages over vast masses of people. What we have seen in this country since the Reagan presidency is vast expansion of the income and wealth gap in our country, and consequently the accumulation into the hands of the wealthy few vast powers to shape national legislation to their advantage.

Privatizing benefits while socializing the responsibility for the consequences of risks should strike us as the most obvious of frauds. Yet those in power have managed to bamboozle millions of Americans into thinking of it as “throwing off the restraints on free enterprise”. James Galbraith explains the whole concept in a nutshell, with regard to Treasury Secretary Geithner’s plan for bailing out Wall Street:

The plan is yet another massive, ineffective gift to banks and Wall Street. Taxpayers, of course, will take the hit… The banks don't want to take their share of those losses because doing so will wipe them out. So they, and Geithner, are doing everything they can to pawn the losses off on the taxpayer…. In Geithner's plan, this debt won't disappear. It will just be passed from banks to taxpayers, where it will sit until the government finally admits that a major portion of it will never be paid back.

Discuss (51 comments) | Recommend (+111 votes)

The Unfulfilled Promise

The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals

Time for change

Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue

PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.

PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.

PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information

Time for change

DU Donor

12554 posts

Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004

Silver Spring, MD, US

Male

Visit Homepage

Visitor Tools

Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.

	Track this Journal
	Blogroll this Journal
	RSS/XML

The Usual Suspects

	The Top 10 Conservative Idiots Mondays
	The Crisis Papers Tuesdays
	Ask Auntie Pinko Thursdays
	Blog Box Fridays
	Hate Mailbag Whenever

Greatest Threads

The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.

AlienGirl has passed away
16 recs : By Contrary1

More Greatest Threads

My Forums

Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.

	Activist HQ
	Election Reform

Random Journal

Discussion Forums

Enter Discussion Forums

Big Forums

	Latest Breaking News
	Editorials & Other Articles
	Political Videos
	General Discussion
	General Discussion: Presidency
	The DU Lounge
	Ask the Administrators

More Forums

	Topic Forums (35)
	State & Country Forums (56)
	DU Groups (136)

Today's Featured Forums

	September 11
	Iowa
	Ancient Wisdom and Pagan Spirituality Group
	Deaf/Hard of Hearing Group

Latest Threads

The ten most recent threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums.

'National Review' calls on Gingrich to quit race
By DainBramaged

Small towns try to save vital grocery stores
By DainBramaged

ACLU: New Questions About Legality of Drone Strikes
By No Elephants

ACLU sues to force release of drone attack records (Story from February 1)
By No Elephants

Who voted against the NDAA?
By No Elephants

Fair Labor Association begins independent audits of Foxconn factories
By DainBramaged

Israel accuses Iran of bombings in India, Georgia
By No Elephants

Arrest after Amsterdam airport evacuated
By No Elephants

Big fight looms over Obama's budget proposal
By No Elephants

Pastor's daughter accidentally shot at church
By No Elephants

More Latest Threads