Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
Posted by Time for change in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Wed Feb 03rd 2010, 10:00 PM
It’s difficult to envision how federal agencies will take future Congressional investigations seriously when they continue to flout the will of Congress by withholding so many files whose release is required by law – from “Legacy of Secrecy”, on the
What do our opponents mean when they apply to us the label “liberal”? …. If by liberal they mean someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people – their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil liberties…. If that is what they mean by a liberal, then I’m proud to say I’m a liberal – John F. Kennedy, accepting the nomination for President from the New York Liberal Party, less than two months before he was elected our 35th President.


The 1960s was a time of great promise in the United States. It was a time when the word “liberal” was not a word that most politicians shunned. It began with the election of a President (John F Kennedy) who made the greatest effort to end to the Cold War of any U.S. President during its forty some year history and who aggressively challenged the military industrial complex as no U.S. President has done before or since. It was characterized by great progress in civil rights, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, spurred by two U.S. Presidents (Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson) and by perhaps the greatest civil rights leader our country has ever known (Martin Luther King). And it featured perhaps the greatest Attorney General in our country’s history (Robert F. Kennedy) – the only U.S. Attorney General to aggressively fight organized crime.

But our three great heroes of that era were all assassinated, and subsequently the great promise of that era died out, to be replaced in the 1980s by almost three decades of right wing reaction that saw levels of income inequality rise to unprecedented levels, our military budget rise to almost equal that of the rest of the world combined, our rate of incarceration rise to the highest in the world, and a so-called “War on Terror” that threatens to become permanent and turn our republic into an empire.

Some may still believe that the assassinations of the three icons of that era who perhaps most symbolized its promise are some sort of accident of history, with no relationship to each other. But the 2008 book, “Legacy of Secrecy – The Long Shadow of the JFK Assassination – Robert Kennedy, National Security, the Mafia, and the Assassination of Martin Luther King”, by Lamar Waldron with Thom Hartmann, challenges that belief with 771 pages of detailed explanation supported by a ton of references.

Consideration of the words and actions of these three great men in the last months or days prior to their assassinations can serve to remind us of how things might have turned out for us (and still might turn out some day).


LAST WORDS AND ACTIONS OF THE 1960s MARTYRS

John F Kennedy


JFK on civil rights
In domestic affairs, JFK is best known for his stand on civil rights. On several occasions he employed federal troops to the South to advance the cause of civil rights. In June 1963, after employing federal marshals to Alabama to confront George Wallace’s attempt to block the admission of two African-American students to the University of Alabama, President Kennedy gave one of the greatest civil rights speeches ever, during which he proposed what became the Civil Rights Act of 1964 following his death. Here are some excerpts:

I hope that every American, regardless of where he lives, will stop and examine his conscience about this and other related incidents. This Nation was founded… on the principle that all men are created equal, and that the rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened.

The Negro baby born in America today… has about one-half as much chance of completing a high school as a white baby born in the same place… a life expectancy which is 7 years shorter…

JFK’s quest for peace
In this post I explain how JFK repeatedly stood up against the efforts of his military and CIA to lead him into war. In this post I specifically discuss how he repeatedly resisted the advice of his military or CIA to lead him into war with Cuba.

JFK’s peace speech at American University
Then, a few months before he was assassinated, JFK gave a great and radical speech on behalf of peace that probably seemed terribly threatening to the military industrial complex. This speech was unprecedented in its emphasis on peace by a major U.S. political figure since the onset of the Cold War. Few people knew about the speech before he gave it, and he didn’t discuss it at all with his military because he knew that they would lobby against it. It is inconceivable that this speech was intended to win votes. To the contrary, it posed grave political risks. He talked about how the presence of nuclear weapons meant that that we MUST make peace a priority:

I speak of peace because of the new face of war. Total war makes no sense in an age when great powers can maintain large and relatively invulnerable nuclear forces and refuse to surrender without resort to those forces. It makes no sense in an age when a single nuclear weapon contains almost ten times the explosive force delivered by all of the allied air forces in the Second World War. It makes no sense in an age when the deadly poisons produced by a nuclear exchange would be carried by the wind and water and soil and seed to the far corners of the globe and to generations unborn.

In marked contrast to the prevailing tough anti-Communist rhetoric of the day, Kennedy spoke of the need for Americans to examine their own attitudes:

Some say that it is useless to speak of world peace or world law or world disarmament – and that it will be useless until the leaders of the Soviet Union adopt a more enlightened attitude. I hope they do. I believe we can help them do it. But I also believe that we must re-examine our own attitude – as individuals and as a Nation – for our attitude is as essential as theirs. And every graduate of this school, every thoughtful citizen who despairs of war and wishes to bring peace, should begin by looking inward – by examining his own attitude toward the possibilities of peace, toward the Soviet Union, toward the course of the Cold War and toward freedom and peace here at home.

First let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many of us think it is impossible. Too many of us think it is unreal. But that is dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitable – that mankind is doomed – that we are gripped by forces we cannot control…

He even sought to humanize, rather than demonize, our adversary:

Let us re-examine our attitude toward the Soviet Union… It is discouraging to think that their leaders may actually believe what their propagandists write… But it is also a warning – a warning to the American people not to fall into the same trap as the Soviets, not to see only a distorted and desperate view of the other side, not to see conflict as inevitable, accommodations as impossible and communication as nothing more than an exchange of threats. No government or social system is so evil that its people must be considered as lacking in virtue…

He spoke of the need for international cooperation and institutions:

Meanwhile, we seek to strengthen the United Nations, to help solve its financial problems, to make it a more effective instrument of peace, to develop it into a genuine world security system -- a system capable of resolving disputes on the basis of law, of insuring the security of the large and the small, and of creating conditions under which arms can finally be abolished. There can be no doubt that if all nations could refrain from interfering in the self-determination of others, then peace would be much more assured. This will require a new effort to achieve world law – a new context for world discussions. It will require increased understanding between the Soviets and ourselves. And increased understanding will require increased contact and communications….

And then he came to the practical matters – the topic that the hawks and arms merchants so hated – detailing numerous concrete steps that he intended to take to put his peace plans into action:

We have also been talking in Geneva about other first-step measures of arms control, designed to limit the intensity of the arms race and to reduce the risks of accidental war. Our primary long-range interest in Geneva, however, is general and complete disarmament – designed to take place by stages, permitting parallel political developments to build the new institutions of peace which would take the place of arms….

The one major area of these negotiations where the end is in sight – yet where a fresh start is badly needed – is in a treaty to outlaw nuclear tests. The conclusion of such a treaty – so near and yet so far – would check the spiraling arms race in one of its most dangerous areas. It would place the nuclear powers in a position to deal more effectively with one of the greatest hazards which man faces in 1963, the further spread of nuclear arms. It would increase our security – it would decrease the prospects of war…. I am taking this opportunity, therefore, to announce two important decisions in this regard….

The aftermath of Kennedy’s peace speech
Khrushchev declared Kennedy’s speech the greatest of any American President since Roosevelt. And for the first time he allowed an American Presidential speech to be rebroadcast in the Soviet Union.

Six weeks later, Kennedy announced to the American people the first nuclear test ban treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union. With an extensive public campaign and help from his Secretary of Defense and General Maxwell Taylor, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Kennedy prevailed upon the Senate to ratify the treaty.

Kennedy then undertook secret negotiations with Fidel Castro in an attempt to come to an accommodation with him.


Martin Luther King

Martin Luther King’s fight against racial discrimination made an indelible mark on the world, for which he will be remembered and loved as long as the human species exists. Yet, while celebrating his life and mourning his death, our corporate media largely neglects the last three years of his life. An article by Jeff Cohen and Norman Solomon explains why. The fundamental problem that our corporate media has with the last three years of King’s life is that he questioned the fundamental priorities of our country – which of course is a forbidden topic for our corporate news media.

King on economic justice

King maintained that civil rights laws were empty without "human rights" – including economic rights. For people too poor to eat at a restaurant or afford a decent home, King said, anti-discrimination laws were hollow…

King developed a class perspective. He decried the huge income gaps between rich and poor, and called for "radical changes in the structure of our society" to redistribute wealth and power. "True compassion," King declared, "is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring."

King on the Vietnam War
King also became one of our country’s foremost critics of the Viet Nam War and U.S. foreign policy in general:

King called the United States "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today." … From Vietnam to South Africa to Latin America, King said, the U.S. was "on the wrong side of a world revolution." King questioned "our alliance with the landed gentry of Latin America," and asked why the U.S. was suppressing revolutions "of the shirtless and barefoot people" in the Third World, instead of supporting them.

In foreign policy, King also offered an economic critique, complaining about "capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries."

King’s last (and perhaps greatest) speech – April 3, 1968 – the day before his assassination
Perhaps King’s greatest speech was given on April 3, 1968, the evening prior to his assassination. Perhaps knowledge of his impending death served as the incitement for this speech. The content of the speech certainly points towards an awareness of his impending death. After talking about his many brushes with death as a civil rights leader, King said “I don’t know what will happen now”, as he appeared to be fighting back tears:

We’ve got some difficult days ahead. But it really doesn’t matter with me now… because I’ve been to the mountain top… Like anybody, I would like to live – a long life – longevity has its place. But I’m not concerned about that now. I just want to do God’s will. And he’s allowed me to go up the mountain… and I’ve looked over. And I have seen the Promised Land. And I may not get there with you, but I want you to know tonight that we as a people will get to the Promised Land! ... So I’m happy tonight. I’m not worried about anything. I’m not worried about any man. Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord!


Robert F Kennedy

As was true of all the Kennedy brothers, Bobby led a privileged life from the day he was born, and for a long time he did not much understand the problems of the less privileged. But as Attorney General during his brother’s Presidency he became a fervent supporter of civil rights, as well as perhaps the most aggressive pursuer of organized crime of any Attorney General in U.S. history. He said in a 1962 interview that Civil Rights was his most important task. Concerning the Brown v. Board of Education U.S. Supreme Court decision, which outlawed segregation in our schools, he said in a speech in Georgia:

I happen to believe that the 1954 Supreme Court school desegregation decision was right. But my belief does not matter. It is the law. Some of you may believe the decision was wrong. That does not matter. It is the law.

RFK on poverty in America
“Legacy of Secrecy” details Bobby’s conversion from someone who hardly understood that poverty was a major problem in our country to a national leader against poverty:

After listening to shocking testimony about hunger and poverty at his hearings in Jackson, Bobby had insisted on seeing the conditions for himself. … Cameras were rolling as Bobby made an impromptu visit to dilapidated Delta shacks that housed poverty-stricken families. The cameras recorded Bobby’s barely contained surprise and concern when the New York Senator asked a young boy what he’d eaten for lunch – and the boy said he hadn’t had anything to eat…

Bobby noticed a little boy with his tummy sticking out. Bobby picked up the boy and said, “My God, I didn’t know this kind of thing existed. How can a country like this allow it?” When Bobby was unable to get a response from the starving child, and associate says that Bobby soon had “tears… running down his cheek and he just sat there and held the little child”…

Bobby told nine of his ten children that “in Mississippi a whole family lives in a shack the size of this room. The children are covered with sores and their tummies stick out because they have no food. Do you know how lucky your are?” … What he had seen continued to torment him, and the following night, Bubby could no longer contain himself. He exploded in self-incrimination, telling the wife of an aide, “You don’t know what I saw! Everything I have done was worthless!”

Bobby channeled the shock of what he saw in Mississippi, and the lingering pain of losing his brother, into a new cause the re-energized him. Poverty, and all the ills that flowed from it, became his cause, his crusade. He pressured Congress and LBJ to increase funding for food programs… Bobby made a high profile appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press, proclaiming, “If we can append $24 billion for the freedom and liberty of the people in ‘Vietnam, certainly we can spend a small percentage of that for the liberty and the freedom and the future of our own people in the United States.” Bobby reached out to Martin Luther King, saying in a letter to him that when it came to the issues of poverty and hunger,” I cannot agree with you more that something must be done. If you have any suggestions, I would appreciate hearing from you.”…

Bobby’s determination to aid the poor only increased when the New York senator found appalling conditions among migrant laborers in his own state… Bobby’s little-publicized discovery of horrible conditions in New York showed him that the plight of the poor was a national problem that needed national solutions. To Bobby, migrant-worker issues, civil rights, poverty, and even Vietnam were all one cause – that of standing up for the less fortunate who were held down by laws or force….

Bobby’s growing public status as a champion of the down-trodden only fueled the hatred directed at him by the far Right and extreme conservatives…

RFK speech just after the assassination of Martin Luther King – April 4, 1968
Martin Luther King was assassinated while RFK was a U.S. Senator from New York and was campaigning for the presidency. “Legacy of Secrecy” describes the situation in which he found himself following King’s assassination, just about two months prior to his own assassination.

Police officials were worried about a riot, so Bobby was advised to cancel his appearance. He went anyway, despite the fact that his police escort left as soon as he reached the predominantly black part of Indianapolis… It must have been a daunting prospect for a white politician to face an African American crowd and tell them their greatest and most beloved leader had just been shot and killed. But Bobby delivered what was perhaps his greatest speech – and without the aid of teleprompters or spin doctors:

“Ladies and gentlemen… I’m only going to talk to you just for a minute or so this evening, because I have some – some very sad news for all of you… I think, sad news for all of our fellow citizens, and people who love peace all over the world, and that is that Martin Luther King was shot and was killed tonight in Memphis, Tennessee.”

Gasps, screams, and cries arose from the audience. Bobby continued, saying that

King dedicated his life to love and to justice between fellow human beings. He died in the cause of that effort… For those of you who are black – considering the evidence… that there were white people who were responsible – you can be filled with bitterness, and with hatred, and a desire for revenge… Or we can make an effort, as Martin Luther King did, to understand, and to comprehend, and replace that violence, that stain of bloodshed that has spread across our land, with an effort to understand, compassion, and love.


Ted Kennedy’s reaction to the deaths of the martyrs

“Legacy of Secrecy” describes the reaction of the youngest of the Kennedy brothers to the early and tragic death of his third brother:
On June 6, 1968, a grieving Senator Edward Kennedy summed up the feelings of many Americans about the murder of his brother. … To NBC TV newsman Sander Vanocur… “Edward Kennedy had remonstrated bitterly about the ‘faceless men’ who had been charged with the slayings of his brothers and Martin Luther King… always faceless men with no apparent motive. ‘There has to be more to it,’ Ted Kennedy had told Vanocur”.


CONCLUSION -- A BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF “LEGACY OF SECRECY” AND OUR CURRENT STATUS

I must acknowledge that the great mass of detail in “Legacy of Secrecy” makes it a difficult book to read.

The authors point to the mafia, specifically Carlos Marcello, Santo Trafficante, and Johnny Rosselli as the major culprits. The Kennedy administration was highly adverse to their interests. Intertwined with the culpability of the mafia were CIA plots to assassinate Fidel Castro.

One of those plots, sanctioned by President Kennedy (while he simultaneously pursued an accommodation with Castro which would have precluded the need for assassination), involved the replacement of Castro with the highly respected Cuban general, Juan Almeida. The Kennedy administration worked with relatively liberal Cuban leaders on this plot, and excluded the mafia from any involvement in it.

But simultaneously, rogue elements in the CIA, including future CIA Director Richard Helms, who was then in charge of CIA covert operations and the second most powerful figure in the CIA, were spinning their own, unauthorized plans for overthrowing Castro. These plans involved radical right wing Cuban elements and numerous mafia figures, and resulted in access of these mafia figures to the Kennedy administration’s authorized plan as well. It was the access to these Castro assassination plots that allowed the mafia figures to turn them around and utilize them to assassinate JFK.

The precise details of how this was done are not clear – though abundant evidence is provided for mafia involvement. It is also not at all clear from the book to what extent the “rogue elements” in the CIA were involved in the JFK assassination. It appears evident that the CIA Director, John McCone, was not involved. But the extent to which others, including Helms, were involved is far from clear and is likely to remain far from clear for a long time to come, due largely to the fact that over a million relevant files remain classified (or destroyed) to this day. The authors summarize the current status of the three assassinations in the final two pages of their book:

As “Legacy of Secrecy” has shown for the first time, releasing those JFK files – and their information about Marcello, Milteer (the white supremacist who contracted with the mafia to kill King), and Rosselli – is also crucial to fully resolve Martin Luther King’s assassination… Fully releasing all the JFK files, as required by law might also answer lingering questions about Robert Kennedy’s assassination. Congress has never taken any action regarding the CIA’s deliberate 1978 deception of the House Select Committee on Assassinations… Most current members of the House and Senate are unaware that the 1992 JFK Act failed to dislodge over a million relevant files, or that the Secret Service admitted destroying important files after the Act was passed. It’s difficult to envision how federal agencies will take future Congressional investigations seriously when they continue to flout the will of Congress by withholding so many files whose release is required by law. The amount of material yet to be declassified is vast… The most obvious example is the hundreds of hours of Marcello tapes recorded in 1985. Other pressing files that need to be released include the relevant files of all those individuals who have confessed to JFK’s assassination: Marcello, Trafficante, Rosselli, David Morales, and John Martino.

Discuss (68 comments) | Recommend (+115 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
StarStar
Star
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.