Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
Posted by Time for change in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Sat Jul 10th 2010, 12:12 AM
Like the frog who gets gradually boiled in water, the American public seems to have become so accustomed to corporate rule in their country that crucial questions about the consequences of corporate rule rarely get asked.
The question in the title of this post is of course facetious and sarcastic. But as time goes on and more information accumulates, it appears to me that most independent and intelligent observers of what has transpired in the Gulf of Mexico – since the catastrophic accident that claimed 11 human lives and uncounted numbers of animal lives, resulted in by far the biggest oil spill in U.S. history (and still counting), destroyed the Gulf fishing industry, and continues to cause disastrous and as yet undefined damage to the gulf of Mexico – would have to come to the conclusion that yes, BP does own the Gulf of Mexico.

That is a terrible conclusion to come to because – excuse my ideological sentiments – our planet was not made for the fun and profit of the few at the expense of the rest of humanity, not to mention its own destruction along with untold numbers of its creatures. But though they have no moral right to own it, their actions over the past few months make it appear as if they do own it, and our government doesn’t seem to be doing much to counter that impression. So the American people should consider some powerful reasons why BP shouldn’t be trusted in their current role, and they ought to be asking some very pointed questions of our government about BP’s continued role in this matter:


NUMEROUS REASONS WHY BP SHOULDN’T BE TRUSTED

BP has a long history of dishonesty and putting profits above people and the security of our environment:


Past behavior

A recent history of numerous preventable disasters
A ProPublica report describes BP's involvement in some of the biggest oil and gas disasters in recent years due to their negligence, including: an explosion at BP's Texas oil refinery that killed 15 workers and injured 170; and, 267,000 gallons of oil spread onto the Alaskan tundra due to a hole in the company's pipeline, after BP ignored a warning.

Fighting off safety regulations
From an article titled “Big Oil Fought Off New Safety Rules Before Rig Explosion”:

BP and TransOcean have aggressively opposed new safety regulations proposed last year by a federal agency that oversees offshore drilling – which were prompted by a study that found many accidents in the industry.

There were 41 deaths and 302 injuries out of 1,443 incidents from 2001 to 2007, according to the study conducted by the Minerals and Management Service of the Interior Department. In addition, the agency issued 150 reports over incidents of non-compliant production and drilling operations and determined there was "no discernible improvement by industry over the past 7 years."

As a result, the agency proposed taking a more proactive stance…The industry has launched a coordinated campaign to attack those regulations, with over 100 letters objecting to the regulations.

Long record of fines for irresponsible behavior
BP’s long record of fines shows that they would rather pay fines for the damage they cause than take steps to prevent the damage. They have paid $485 million in fines in the U.S. alone in the past 5 years, including: $87.43 million to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in 2009 – the largest fine in OSHA's history – for the above noted Texas refinery explosion; $3 million to OSHA for 42 safety violations at an Ohio refinery; and $20 million to the Department of Justice for a spill in the Alaska Prudhoe Bay.

Benefitting from a regime of terror
In order to secure and protect a 450 mile pipeline in Colombia, a thousand farmers and their families were pushed off their farms and forced to live lives of destitution. As a result of accusations to that effect, in 2006 BP was pressured into making a multimillion pound payout to the Colombian farmers.

Overemphasizing their devotion to green technology
Despite their green sunflower logo and their rebranding themselves as “beyond petroleum”, BP’s investment in green technology has been minimal compared to its continued devotion to oil. For example:

In the first quarter of 2010, they made $73 billion in revenue, $72.3 billion… from the exploration, production, refining and marketing of oil and natural gas. Only $700 million (less than 1% of the total) came from solar and wind energy.


Behavior relating to the current crisis

They lied about the potential for the current crisis
BP filed a 52 page plan with Minerals Management Service regarding their Deep Horizon well, filled with information that proved to be false:

Before BP had authorization to drill for oil they filed their plan with the Minerals Management Service. The plan explained that the Deepwater Horizon well would have a minimal environmental impact. The report expressed that it was very unlikely and virtually impossible that an accident would occur from activities that the Deepwater Horizon Well would perform. In addition the report stated that if something were to happen that due to their response capabilities, no significant impacts would be expected. The report, as everyone now knows, was extremely inaccurate.

Showing concern for their victims while trying to avoid liability
While claiming that they planned to compensate the victims of their negligence, BP proceeded to offer them settlements of a mere $5,000 in return for signing away their right to sue. They have since given up this idea after they were severely criticized for it.

BP’s secret and phony public relations campaign
BP has spent at least $70 million on a phony PR campaign to restore its sinking public image. The ads run something like this:

“The beaches are clean! The seafood is fresh! And the national parks are open!” gushes a pleasant female voice, as the television commercial displays a sunbather, a trawler and huge pile of yumm… “Government agencies and local municipalities are working around the clock to protect the region’s economy and ecology. And we’ll continue working as long as it takes…,” the announcer continues…

But in order to give the message credibility, BP has had to erase their fingerprints from the ads. They pay others to provide the message because they recognize that few people would put much stock in it if they knew that it was written and paid for by BP.


QUESTIONS THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE ASKING

There are many more reasons for not trusting BP than those discussed above. Some of the most important of these reasons are part and parcel to a discussion of the questions we should be asking our government:


What right does BP have to deny any American access to information regarding the current crisis?

BP has repeatedly denied reporters access to information that could shed light on the current catastrophe, often going to the extent of refusing to let scenes be photographed. At least once they forcefully detained a reporter who had taken photographs of the carnage. Both BP and U.S. government officials have claimed that “instances of denying news media access have been anomalies”. But as Jeremy Peters made clear in a New York Times article, the efforts to deny access appear to be pervasive and systematic and even to apply to scientists and the requests of U.S. Senators:

Anomalies or not, reporters and photographers continue to be blocked from covering aspects of the spill.

Last week, Senator Bill Nelson, Democrat of Florida, tried to bring a small group of journalists with him on a trip he was taking through the gulf on a Coast Guard vessel. Mr. Nelson’s office said the Coast Guard agreed to accommodate the reporters and camera operators. But at about 10 p.m. on the evening before the trip, someone from the Department of Homeland Security’s legislative affairs office called the senator’s office to tell them that no journalists would be allowed.

“They said it was the Department of Homeland Security’s response-wide policy not to allow elected officials and media on the same ‘federal asset,’ ” said Bryan Gulley, a spokesman for the senator. “No further elaboration” was given, Mr. Gulley added…”

Scientists, too, have complained about the trickle of information that has emerged from BP and government sources. Three weeks passed, for instance, from the time the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded on April 20 and the first images of oil gushing from an underwater pipe were released by BP.

Perhaps it’s understandable that BP would want to avoid adverse publicity even to the extent of lying about what happened. But what conceivable right do they have to deny others access to information and even use force to do so? And under what exception to our freedom of the press clause of our First Amendment does our government undertake to assist BP in their efforts to deny access to news that is intimately related to the health of our planet?


Why is BP allowed to continue to use toxic dispersants?

Initially the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claimed that it had no authority to tell BP what dispersants it could use in its efforts to clean up the oil spill. Then on May 20th they reversed course, telling BP that it had three days to stop using a dispersant that EPA data suggested was unnecessarily toxic. The EPA has also noted that “the long term effects on aquatic life are unknown”.

In fact, many or most scientists believe that dispersants shouldn’t be used at all, since the dispersants may be just as or more toxic to marine life as the oil itself. It seems to many that BP’s use of dispersants is more for public relations purposes – they prevent visible slicks of oil from washing up on shore – than for limiting the damage to marine life. Regarding a statement by Samantha Joye, professor of marine sciences at the University of Georgia:

The hazardous effects of the plume are two-fold. Joye said the oil itself can prove toxic to fish swimming in the sea, while vast amounts of oxygen are also being sucked from the water by microbes that eat oil. Dispersants used to fight the oil are also food for the microbes, speeding up the oxygen depletion.

And According to Richard Charter, a foremost expert on marine biology and oil spills:

There is a chemical toxicity to the dispersant compound that in many ways is worse than oil. It’s a trade-off of trying to minimize the damage coming to shore, but in so doing you may be more seriously damaging the ecosystem offshore.

And equally disconcerting is the fact that “The exact makeup of the dispersants is kept secret under competitive trade laws”.

In response to EPA’s order, BP said “NO” to EPA on switching dispersants. And indeed BP did flout EPA’s order:

Officials and scientists from the E.P.A. and the oil company met Sunday night and were apparently unable to reach a compromise before the deadline passed… “We are continuing to use Corexit while we look at other alternatives,” Mark Salt, a spokesman for the oil company, said by telephone from Texas on Monday.

So why haven’t we heard that our government is taking action against BP for defying an EPA order that involves an apparent effort by the EPA to prevent BP from further poisoning our public waters? Does our federal government believe that it has no authority to regulate the pollution of our environment by private corporations, even in the face of a major crisis, as suggested by Congressman Barton when he apologized to BP? What right does BP have to keep the makeup of chemicals that they spew into our oceans secret?


What right does BP have to deny worker protection in efforts to clean up the damage they did?

In apparent efforts to improve their image at the expense of their workers, BP has disallowed cleanup workers from using protective equipment to prevent toxic exposures. From an article titled “Human rights group: BP discouraging crews from using respirators”:

RFK Center President Kerry Kennedy traveled to the Gulf Coast to talk to cleanup workers and found that BP was trying to repress the use of safety equipment. "In all three states that I've visited, fishermen said when they went out to work on the cleanup, that if they tried to bring respirators they were told it was unnecessary equipment and would only spread hysteria," Kennedy told Fox News Friday. "When I went out with eleven people, we had respirators on and within half an hour, all of our eyes were burning and our throats were closing and we all had headaches," she explained.

Even for those who are ideologically opposed to worker safety laws, it should be kept in mind that BP’s efforts to clean up the damage they wrought is their responsibility, not something they are merely undertaking voluntarily because of their concern for all those who continue to suffer from their actions. As such, they have the responsibility of putting the safety of their workers ahead of their public relations concerns. And our government has the responsibility of mandating adequate efforts to protect worker safety in the process. So what has our government done about this responsibility?


What right does BP have to take full charge of the effort to stop the oil flow?

Stopping the oil flow should be the number one priority in resolving this crisis. Though BP has estimated that only 5,000 barrels of oil per day are gushing into the Gulf, independent scientists have estimated much higher rates, on the order of 5 to 16 times the BP/U.S. government estimates. If those estimates are correct, that means that about 2,000 barrels of oil per hour have continued to gush into the Gulf for nearly three months by now. Nobody knows how much additional irreparable damage to the Gulf and all the life that depends upon it occurs with every day that the gush goes unplugged.

While BP certainly has a responsibility to assist in the effort to plug the oil gush that they created, being in charge of it is an entirely different matter. It has repeatedly been pointed out that BP being in charge of this effort represents a serious conflict of interest, since BP may (and probably does) have a number of reasons for wanting the gush to continue until they complete and put into operation their relief well.

Indeed, there are many who believe that BP’s many efforts to date to plug the gush have been misconceived at best and criminal at worst. Some have suggested better methods:

There is a way to seal the wellhead with known Marine Pile Driving Technology. By lowering a larger pipe over the preventer and wellhead they can be sealed to the ocean floor.

I defy any “expert” in Heavy Marine Construction to explain to me why this will not work. It will take 83 sections of welded 60’ pipe and 80 valves to get to 5,000 feet in depth and as the pipe is hammered into the sea floor it will seal the preventer, wellhead and the end of the open riser and the oil will be contained permanently inside the pipe. The pipe and wellhead can then be permanently sealed from the surface and the pipe can be cut off far below the water surface. This can be accomplished in a few days.

I do not have the slightest technical expertise with which to evaluate proposals such as this. But why has the corporation that caused the damage and apparently stands to benefit from its numerous obstructionist policies been allowed, despite repeated failures, to be in charge of this effort? I half-heartedly defended the Obama administration on this score nearly two months ago, on the basis that maybe they were in fact seriously consulting with independent scientists on this matter. But that possibility becomes more and more difficult to believe as each of BP’s efforts to plug the gush results in failure, and as they continue to deny the American public, as well as concerned scientists, access to information on the crisis – and yet we hear of little or no meaningful input from independent scientists. So why doesn’t our government, as demanded by Lawrence Baker, create a:

STOP THE OIL FLOW TASK FORCE today that is independent of BP command to permanently stop the flow of oil tomorrow. This independent task force of FBI, Corps of Army Engineers, scientist and private marine construction contractors would begin taking positive action to permanently stop the oil flow.


PUTTING THIS IN PERSPECTIVE

In a sane world, the American people would be asking these questions and demanding answers. Yet, like the frog who gets gradually boiled in water, the American public seems to have become so accustomed to corporate rule in their country that questions like these rarely get asked. Barry Lynn, in his new book, “Cornered – The New Monopoly Capitalism and the Economics of Destruction”, asks the question in Chapter 1, “How did such a well-educated and vigilant people allow the few among us to re-impose so many monopolies upon us?” His answer:

The simplest answer is that beginning in the late 1970s… the interests that favor monopoly in the United States managed not merely to greatly solidify control over the Republican Party but also, for the first time since Grover Cleveland sat in the White House in the late 19th century, to take control of the Democratic Party…

When Reagan’s “regulators” made clear that they no longer intended to enforce our antimonopoly laws, the man who took the lead in opposing the putsch was Democratic senator Howard Metzenbaum of Ohio….

“Vigorous antitrust enforcement is an essential underpinning to the free enterprise private economy,” Metzenbaum wrote… Monopolists would destroy small businesses and repress U.S. workers. They would retard and pervert innovation, undermine the security of the nation, and corrupt the political system…

Lynn goes on to describe how matters became even worse under Clinton. He continues:

Perhaps most disturbing was their decision, after promising to do the opposite, to allow the consolidation of U.S. media companies that had begun under Reagan to continue in a process that cut the number of big firms from more than fifty to six…

He concludes:

The simplest and most obvious reason that we the American people did not notice the political revolution that is monopolization – which resulted in such a vast shift of power away from us and into the hands of a few – is that for a full generation there has been no public debate on the issue. And there has been no public debate because both of our major parties are now under the control of the same monopolist powers.*

And of course those monopolist powers include our major news media. A most depressing thought… and yet, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that Lynn is largely correct. No wonder that an oil company is able to behave, without consequences, as if it owns our planet.



* This is from the first chapter of Lynn’s book. The book jacket promises “With an entirely fresh set of solutions… empowering the individual citizen, Cornered is both a wake-up call and a call to arms for anyone who believes in democracy, competition, and liberty for all”.
Discuss (40 comments) | Recommend (+78 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Star
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.