Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » Time for change » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE
Posted by Time for change in General Discussion (Through 2005)
Tue Dec 06th 2005, 05:30 PM
Right wingers want corporations to take over the functions of government (including our elections) and not to be regulated by government. They call that "freedom". I call it tyranny.
The main theme of the eye opening new book, “The Fox in the Henhouse – How Privatization Threatens Democracy”, by Si Kahn and Elizabeth Minnich, is self evident from the book’s title. The ideas for this post are largely taken from that book, though I held most of these ideas prior to reading the book.

Prior to the 2000 election I believed that the most important single issue facing our country was campaign finance reform – because I felt that too much money in our political system was corrupting the system and threatening our democracy. But now I see that the Republican agenda has moved so far to the right that all the money in the world wouldn’t allow them to win elections without the help of other aspects of the privatization movement – most especially their control of the national news media and their control of our elections.

The privatization movement in the United States has been described by the Wall Street Journal as the “effort to bring the power of private markets to bear on traditional government benefits and services”. Kahn’s and Minnich’s translation of this says it well: “Privatization is letting corporations take over and run for profit what the public sector has traditionally done”. I would change that translation slightly by adding to the end of it, “and must continue to do in order to preserve our democracy”.

One of the essential features of evil people is that they try to make people believe that down is up and up is down (Example: We are going to Iraq to spread democracy there). How else could they survive? Who would like these people or buy into their ideas if they were presented as they actually are?

That is the essence of the privatization movement. The rationale behind it is presented as good old fashioned American values: Self-reliance, freedom, competition, efficiency. We need to be able to expose how the meanings of those values are twisted beyond recognition by the privatizers so as to make their movement the antithesis of what those values are meant to represent.


Self reliance

When the privatizers use “self reliance” to characterize their privatization schemes, they are mainly using this as a code phrase to express contempt for our social safety net programs, such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, worker’s compensation, and welfare for the poor.

A great deal can and has been said in justification of each of these programs, but since Social Security is probably the least controversial of these programs, I’ll confine myself to that for this post: Social Security has been a program to which millions of people have contributed their hard earned money throughout decades of their working life. It is a program that spreads financial risk over a large population so as to reduce the risk of financial catastrophe, in the process reducing by a small amount the financial gap between the rich and the poor.

Consequently, it is a great and undeserved insult to impugn the “self-reliance” of people who receive and need Social Security checks. If those individuals who have retired and don’t need Social Security checks to maintain their livelihood want to express contempt for those who do need those checks, we should ask them to disavow their own reliance on inheritance money, for example (they could contribute the money to charity or to reduce the national debt), thereby increasing their own self-reliance, and in the process expressing their patriotism and altruism.


Freedom

Of course nobody would want to say that they are against freedom – so the privatizers aggressively try to equate their privatization schemes with “freedom”. But in doing so, they greatly oversimplify this very complex issue, for one person’s freedom to enslave, for example, is another person’s slavery. In fact, one of the most important and legitimate purposes of government is to put limits on the “freedom” of the powerful to intrude on the livelihood of the rest of us. Without that function of government we would have anarchy. And that, in fact, is exactly what the privatizers are advocating: The freedom of the powerful (themselves) to do whatever they want.

Consider environmental issues, for example. The privatizers speak of the need for people (themselves) to have the freedom to own as much land as they please and to do with it whatever they want, as long as they pay for the privilege. And, they also claim the right to pollute the air, water, and soil that they don’t own. Disregarding the fact that they generally are required to pay no more than ridiculously low prices for these privileges (for comparatively small campaign contributions they reap huge profits), we need to have a national policy for land use and pollution control because the absence of such a policy will result in the deterioration of our natural resources in return for the short term profits of a few wealthy individuals. This will not only deprive our current population of the benefits of this land, but will deprive future generations as well. Here is a current example of the plan for the privatizers to take over our land.

Few American citizens are aware of the extent to which our election system has been privatized over the last several years, and they would be appalled to learn of this (I hope). If there is any government function that should not be privatized it is the running of our elections, since they provide the foundation for our democracy.

Yet, private companies now run our elections to a large extent. Their own employees have told us how easy it would be to rig their machines to help a specific candidate, and our General Accounting Office has told us that we should have little basis for confidence in the results of our 2004 election. Another voting machine employee has testified before Congressman Conyers’ Committee that he was asked to write a computer program that would transfer votes from one candidate to another and yet be undetectable. And under the banner of privatization, the voting machine companies tell us that we (the public) have no right to interfere with their “freedom” to run our elections by inspecting the codes that their machines use to count our votes . And they have so far succeeded in guarding that “freedom” that they claim, as they have successfully resisted numerous legal challenges to inspect the machines that counted our votes in the 2004 election.


Competition

The privatizers want us to believe that a program run by the government, by definition, lacks the competitive elements that ensure that only the best programs will be chosen to do the job. But the privatizers don’t want competition. In fact, they will do whatever they can to eliminate competition, as long as they are the ones who benefit. I don’t see them complain when Halliburton receives one no-bid contract after another.

As a moderate, I believe that there are many economic activities that should be left to the private sector, in order to foster a competition that will ensure that those with the best products will be appropriately rewarded. And, as Theodore Roosevelt recognized in the early 20th century, there is a need for government regulation to ensure that big corporations don’t become too powerful and thereby eliminate competition.

But the privatizers do whatever they can to eliminate competition. They whine about any government regulation meant to foster competition, as an impingement on their freedom. Hence, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which eliminated much of our control over monopolies in the telecommunications industry, followed by consolidation and control of our national news media by a small number of powerful people. Consequently, our national (corporate) news media has largely become a megaphone for our Administration, thus representing perhaps as large a threat to our democracy as the privatization of our elections system.

As Bill Moyers says, in explaining the consequences of this: “Never has there been an administration so disciplined in secrecy, so precisely in lockstep in keeping information from the people at large and – in defiance of the Constitution – from their representatives in Congress. Never has the powerful media oligopoly ... been so unabashed in reaching like Caesar for still more wealth and power. Never have hand and glove fitted together so comfortably to manipulate free political debate, sow contempt for the idea of government itself, and trivialize the peoples' need to know.”


Efficiency

The privatizers and our corporate news media have for so long echoed the claim that privately run programs are more “efficient” than government programs that most Americans take that as a given. I am unaware of evidence that makes this case, but even if is was true to some extent, we need to look carefully at what is meant by “efficiency”.

For a corporation, “efficiency” is joined at the hip with making a profit. In fact, if a corporation makes a decision that is in the public interest but which hinders their ability to make a profit, they can be sued by their shareholders for that decision.

But the purpose of government programs should not be to make a profit. The purpose of government programs should be to serve the citizens who elected their representatives to enact and enforce those programs.

Take Public Health, for example. Public Health has been largely the responsibility of government in the United States for about two centuries. When a disease outbreak is in the making it is responsibility of governmental public health programs to take steps to stop that outbreak. A privatized public health program, on the other hand, may be encouraged to cut corners, in order not to impinge on their profits. It might even be to their advantage to allow the outbreak to spread widely, because that would provide numerous opportunities for even more profits.

Or consider our prison system. According to Kahn and Minnich, the increasing privatization of our prison system since the 1980s is responsible for at least three ominous trends: 1) As wealthy corporations take over our prison systems, recognizing that their profits are related to the size of the prison population, they lobby for legislation that will result in more prisoners. That may be one reason why we have seen a large increase in our already outrageously large prison population in the United States, paralleling the prison privatization movement; 2) Physical and sexual prisoner abuse is much higher in private than in public prisons. It costs money, which cuts into profits, to train prison guards to control this kind of thing; 3) Private prisons do not have to comply with many of the requirements for open decision making that public prisons must comply with. Therefore, corruption of all kinds is able to flourish to a greater extent in private than in public prisons.

And finally, why do you think it is that our military personnel must rely on patriotic groups in the United States to raise money for the protective equipment that they lack but need to enhance their safety?




Discuss (36 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
The Unfulfilled Promise
The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream: The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals




Time for change


Notwithstanding the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality of the United States of America did not then – and never has – lived up to its ideal. Our nation remains today a long way from fulfilling the promise implied by those ideals. Yet, our Declaration was a great start, and it has long shone as a beacon of hope for people all over the world.

Throughout our history, while many have striven to close the gap between our highest ideals and the reality of our nation, others have focused on the accumulation of private wealth and power, at the expense of everyone else. In recent decades the latter have gained much ground, leading to increasing imperialism abroad and deteriorating democracy at home, characterized by routine (and legal) bribery of our public officials, the fusion of government and private corporate interests (corporatocracy), a corrupt election system largely in the hands of private corporations, a corporate controlled communications media, and the widespread acceptance of Executive Branch secrecy, routinely justified with little if any questioning, by the magic words “national security”. All of this is rapidly turning our country from the democracy proclaimed at our founding into a plutocracy (government by the wealthy and for the wealthy). The result is the most obscene wealth gap our country has ever known, the highest imprisonment rate in the world, rampant militarism, routine flaunting of international law, the least efficient health care system in the developed world, a pending environmental catastrophe that threatens to destroy the life sustaining forces of our planet, and myriad other problems that threaten to destroy our nation and tyrannize our people.

My new book, The Unfulfilled Promise of the American Dream – The Widening Gap between the Reality of the United States and its Highest Ideals, explores the roots and consequences of the demise of our democracy, and why most Americans have been unable to understand this process or even become aware of it. A good understanding of why and how we have deviated so greatly from the ideals of our nation is the first and necessary step towards getting back on the right track and revitalizing our society.

The book is currently being sold in electronic PDF format and can be purchased at http://www.unfulfilledpromise.com/Buy-the-... for $3.99. It will also soon be available in Amazon Kindle format. DU members who cannot afford to buy the book but would like to read it can pm me with your e-mail address, and I will send you a free PDF copy.

I’ve previously posted on DU a slightly earlier version of the introduction to the book, which is also posted at my site. Here is the Table of Contents, followed by a brief description of the three parts of the book:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Acknowledgements
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America?

Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Media
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism

Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Imperialism
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism in Cold War
Chapter 11 – Iraq War and Occupation
Chapter 12 – Afghanistan War

Part III – Consequences
Chapter 13 – Election of George W. Bush
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism
Chapter 15 – Class Warfare
Chapter 16 – Predator Financial Class
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy
Chapter 18 – Contempt for Int. Law
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs”
Chapter 20 – Climate Change
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror”
Chapter 22 – Health Care
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government
Chapter 24 – Response to 9/11 Attacks
Epilogue


PART I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy

It is somewhat difficult to separate the causes of our problems from their consequences, since they combine to form a long chain of cause leading to consequence, leading to more consequences, etcetera. Nevertheless, it seems worth while to identify the root causes of our problems, those that occur early in the chain and lead to so many of the tragic consequences we see today. The only chance we have of reversing the demise of our democracy is through addressing and attacking its root causes.

At the top of the list is the systematic bribery of public officials by the powerful corporations (Chapter 1) whom our government is charged with regulating in the public interest. Instead of calling it bribery, we call it “campaign contributions”, but what we call it isn’t as important as what it is. It is hard to fathom how democracy can survive when such a practice is legal and condoned.

Working in tandem with our system of legalized bribery is the nature of the people who inhabit our country. That is not to say that Americans are inherently substantially different than any other people. Human beings are imperfect, and that is probably a major reason why in a world where civilization began more than five millennia ago, the oldest written national framework of government in the world today – the Constitution of the United States of America – is only a little more than two and a quarter centuries old. Chapter 2 explores the roles of basic human needs, authoritarianism, psychological defense mechanisms used to prevent us from perceiving reality as it is rather than as we’d like it to be, and corrupted ideologies in causing us to passively accept the accumulation of power in the hands of ambitious and ruthless individuals who care about little else than expanding their own wealth and power.

When bribery of public officials is tolerated as an inevitable aspect of public life, government inevitably grows close to the wealthy interests that shower it with money in return for legislative and other favors. A malevolent symbiosis grows between the state and corporate power, resulting in rule by an oligarchy that is highly detrimental to the lives of ordinary people (Chapter 3). Using their accumulated wealth and power to manipulate our legislative process, the oligarchy grabs for more and more control of the communications media (Chapter 4) that are used to control the information available to and shape the attitudes of our nation’s people, in pursuit of their own narrow interests.

Since the 1980s an orchestrated campaign has been underway to demonize “big government”, thereby paving the way for private corporate control over more and more functions that were previously deemed intrinsic functions of government. Among those functions is the running of public elections (Chapter 5) – the function that symbolizes democracy perhaps more than any other single function. Consequently, the purging of selected registered voters from our computerized voter rolls has become a routine recurring event throughout much of our country, and without a doubt determined the results of the 2000 – and probably 2004 as well – presidential election. Just as bad, more and more of the counting of votes in our public elections have been turned over to private corporations, which count our votes using electronic machines using secret software to produce vote counts that cannot be verified by anyone.

Bribery, the fusion of government and private interest, fake and biased news, and corrupt elections are not things that government and its corporate allies want us to know about. Consequently, they construct walls of secrecy (Chapter 6) to keep us from obtaining information that sheds light on their activities. The perfect phrase for facilitating this is “national security”. When our government tells us that the “national security” requires that certain things be kept secret from us, the understanding is that to question such a pronouncement is unpatriotic, and to actually attempt to obtain the “secret” information may be treasonous.

But indefinitely maintaining secrets from the American people can be very difficult, because at least some people want to know what their government is up to. So in addition to the formal mechanisms of secrecy, informal mechanisms are constructed (Chapter 7) to keep vital information away from us. One of the primary methods for doing this is to make certain sensitive subjects taboo – that is, to create the widespread belief that discussion of these topics is so outside the bounds of acceptable human discourse that anyone who discusses them should be shunned by society, or worse. The most common issue that falls into this category is any discussion that sheds light on the disparity between American ideals and the reality of life in our country today.


PART II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History

Notwithstanding the fact that our founding document says that “all men are created equal” and speaks of the inalienable rights of humankind, the United States has throughout its history partaken of massive exploitation of other peoples.

It is estimated that at the time of our birth, 18% of our population was black slaves. In our expansion westwards during the late 18th and 19th centuries, we decimated the original inhabitants of our continent, and often treated them with great cruelty. In 1846 we manufactured an excuse for war with our neighbor Mexico, in which we continued to expand our country westwards and southwards. In 1893 we began our overseas imperialism with the conquest of Hawaii. Our overseas expansion was greatly accelerated in 1898 with our participation in the Spanish-American War, which led to our conquest of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. With our arrival at world superpower status at the end of World War II, we began the Cold War, which led to and served as a rationalization for covert and/or direct military actions against myriad foreign nations over the next 46 years. With the September 11, 2001 attacks on our country, we declared a perpetual “War on Terror”, which served and continues to serve as an excuse to invade and occupy Iraq and Afghanistan, nations that posed no threat to us. We do not know when or if this perpetual war will ever end. We don’t know how many additional imperial conquests it will lead to.

Most Americans don’t think much about all this. Many of these actions are done in secrecy, and the American people don’t find out about them until many years later – or we never find out about them at all. Those that we do know about are spun into the most favorable light, to make them seem benign or even noble.

But these actions come at great costs: in the lives of our soldiers; in the ruined lives of the peoples of the victim countries; in trillions of dollars cost to our people and their future generations; in our international reputation; in anti-American hatred leading to terrorism; and, to our democracy itself. For how can a nation claim to believe in the inalienable rights of humankind specified in its founding document, while making a mockery of that belief in the way it treats other peoples? For that reason alone it is worth while to take a brief look at our long history of imperialist actions.


PART III – Consequences

In the Prologue I give a brief account of what I see as some of the worst and tragic consequences of the root causes that I discuss in Part I – to enable the reader to see where this book is heading. When elections of our public officials are for sale to the highest bidder… when our public officials are so addicted to the “campaign contributions” of their wealthiest constituents that they develop a symbiotic relationship with them… when our communications media are owned and controlled by an oligarchy of wealthy elites… when our citizenry lack the ability to differentiate propaganda from reality… when we allow machines provided by private corporations to count our votes using secret electronic software… then we should expect that the consequences will not be pretty or comfortable for the vast majority of our citizens.

In Part III, I explore those consequences in much greater detail, in the hope that the reader will agree with me that these are very serious problems, and that they must be successfully addressed if our country is ever to fulfill the promise of its ideals, or even make progress in that direction. When enough Americans recognize our problems as problems, stripped of the gloss and spin put on them by our oligarchy, they will rise up and do something about them. Until then there will be no progress, and we are very likely to head in the direction of all the former empires of our planet, ending in chaos, widespread catastrophe, suffering, and ignominy.

Profile Information
Time for change
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
12554 posts
Member since Thu Dec 2nd 2004
Silver Spring, MD, US
Male
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
The Usual Suspects
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Star
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.