Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » WesDem » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
WesDem
Posted by WesDem in General Discussion: Presidential
Tue Jul 01st 2008, 10:31 AM
I strongly disagree with this statement: "Obama doesn't see it as a valid critique relating to the presidency."

Obama doesn't see it as something he can say out loud, but his campaign surely looks at polls and sees that national security is showing up as the one strength McCain has against Obama.

Somebody needed to break open that strength and get it looked at in the light, not shaded by the patriotic protection racket, and that is what will come of Clark's pressure. Wes Clark can do it and take the heat for doing it, while his own constituency, Democratic and nonpartisan veterans, get his back.

Clark has smashed open a gate that is not going to close straight at the qualifications McCain is claiming for the presidency. After this week, the media is not going to be able to keep spouting that meme. You can bet your ass, they won't, because it shows them up as the lazy ass cowardly collaborationists they are. A public discussion has begun on McCain's military legend and whether or not it qualifies him for the presidency.

This is a big thing. This is a good thing. This helps Obama, not hurts him.

I'm not saying the Obama campaign is in collusion with Clark, mind you. I'm just not that sure. But I am saying that Obama's too smart not to see the value of Clark's doing this. I would also say, if Obama wanted Clark to stop, he'd tell him to stop. Clark's not stopping, which tells me Obama's campaign hasn't asked him to stop. What I know about Clark is he would never set out to stomp on a candidate's message unless the campaign thinks the message needs stomping on.

Somebody said last night and I think this is most likely the case: "Wes Clark wasn't kicked under the bus; Wes Clark is the bus.




Discuss (2 comments)
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Profile Information
Profile Picture
WesDem
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
24623 posts
Member since Wed Feb 11th 2004
Mexico
I was "Jersey" on DU, Summer 2003-February 2004. I'm a writer and a Democrat. I believe more than ever that America needs Wes Clark. And Barack Obama.

Thanks to the lovely incapsulated for the Clark graphics.
Random Journal
Random Journal
photo by kevin spidel
wes clark says


I don't believe that America is run by politicians in Washington. I believe it's run by people like us, in places like this. -Tulsa OK, January 29, 2004


We must assure investments in the technology infrastructure — the broadband and wireless access improved and modernized highway, air, and rail transportation systems, and the access to affordable, reliable sustainable energy essential to continuing economic development. We must have a real plan to achieve energy independence. And we need to do so without further damaging our fragile environment. In fact, sustainable energy and so-called green engineering provide major growth opportunities for American ingenuity, and we must move in that direction. - "Real State Of The Union," January 30, 2006


We need to really get to the bottom of the Abramoff scandal, we should have a special prosecutor appointed for that, we really need a congressional investigation of the whole business of the NSA wiretapping and how far that goes, there's been a lot of squirreling around the edges; we've never completed the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had - the evidence seems pretty clear to me, I've seen that for a long time. I think Americans are best served by a strong 2-party system and that's been out of whack and what I can do in 2006 is try to help the right Democrats get into office and that's what I'm going to do. - "This Week," March 5, 2006




stand tall



2004 primary, how'd he do?



Clark entered the primary race a year or two after everybody else was running. He was a novice candidate who ran in a field that was 80% elected officials or former elected officials; experienced campaigners, in other words. The only other candidate without an election history had been a preacher-political activist since childhood, a very, very experienced campaigner.

So how did Clark do?

In a four-month long campaign, before withdrawing on 2/11/04 and endorsing Kerry, Clark competed in 13 states. He won Oklahoma over experienced campaigners. He came in second in Arizona, New Mexico and North Dakota ahead of experienced campaigners. Third in New Hampshire, Tennessee and Virginia ahead of experienced campaigners. Fourth in Missouri and South Carolina ahead of experienced campaigners. Fifth in Delaware, Maine, Michigan, and Washington ahead of experienced campaigners.

Since the day he dropped out in February 2004 and began campaigning non-stop for John Kerry, he's been campaigning for Democratic candidates all over the country. He's now a very experienced campaigner in his own right.

GO WES!!!!



The Necessary Language
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.