|
Oh Fa Chrissake...
I wrote this Thursday morning before the Palin bomb went off...
Michael Jackson passed away a week ago. He has not risen from the dead, as was prophesied in his "Thriller" video. That would be news, but no, the King of Pop remains un-un-dead at this point. But believe you me, the news media is ready if MJ appears before us again leading a well-rehearsed cadre of zombies in a dance routine down Main St. None of this would matter much to me, except it's raining. Again. It rained yesterday, and the day before, and the day before, and the day before. There have been exactly five days since June 1st without rain, and the walls are beginning to close in because I've been inside for a month watching cable network news channels. I'm not the only one feeling pinched between this unbelievably soaked summer and the passing of the King of Pop. Boston Globe columnist Scott Lehigh had himself a little editorial nutty on Wednesday about the content of the news lately: Would Jackson be buried at Neverland? Probably not, but Tuesday's "breaking news'' was that a public viewing and a memorial service would be held there. What legal battles would occur over his children - and his estate? Could Neverland come to rival Graceland? Mind you, those were just some of the crucial matters TV pondered. NBC led its Monday evening newscast with Jackson epiphenomena, putting it ahead of stories like the sentencing of swindler Bernie Madoff. CBS gave Madoff top play, but then went to Jackson coverage; a comparatively restrained ABC put Jackson third, behind Madoff and the Supreme Court decision about New Haven's firefighters - but still ahead of the coup in Honduras and the news from Iraq. Something's afoot here that seems to have started with Princess Diana, whose death turned into, or was turned into, an epoch of mourning. Then came the death of John F. Kennedy Jr., and the endless hours of TV footage showing ships searching for the wreckage of his plane. And now this. It's as though the TV networks think we're ever in search of a new celebrity death to bring us together and a spate of national mourning to offer us catharsis - and that such a death is a story that will keep people glued to their televisions. In the spirit of discovery, and because it's still raining, I took an hour on Thursday morning to discover if Mr. Lehigh has a point. I spent an hour flipping between CNN, MSNBC and Fox News to catalog the content of their coverage. *click* 10: 00 a.m. - "Swirling reports" abound on MSNBC about the state of Michael Jackson's health before his death, with a teaser about an exclusive interview with Jermaine Jackson. A few minutes later, the talk turns to the "Zombie economy;" they're comparing how much money Michael Jackson made to what hedge fund managers made before hedge funds moonwalked into infamy. What does it say about how we value our artists vs. our businesspeople in America when MJ made $300 million but hedge fund managers make more? 10:07 - This deranged discussioin tacks on while pictures of MJ swirl by on the screen. "He had 700,000 in cash in 2007, " says one talking head of MJ. "Hedge fund guys were smart enough to exploit the inefficiency of our economy," says another talking head, and goes on to say that we want that from our businesspeople. "Absoluitely," agrees talking head #1. 10:10am Contessa the talking head reports on a US soldier captured by the Taliban on Tuesday. 4,000 Marines have embarked on an offensive to drive the Taliban out of a southern region of Afghanistan. Also, North Korea fired a fourth missile into the ocean. South Carolina Republicans say Governor Marc Sanford has to step down after his little trip to Argentina. One talking head goes "tsk tsk" over all these arguments about morals and public officials, and then delivers a warning about holiday traffic during the 4th of July...but hey, kidnapped troops and fighting Marines and Korean missiles had to wait for the top-of-the-hour MJ update, so morality is generally out the window this morning. Cut to commercial. *click* 10:14 - Let's see what's shaking on CNN...a weatherman! We're building arks on the eastern seaboard, but it's nice out west. Quick quip about Obama working on health care before they head to commercial. *click* 10:17 - Fox News is holding court on a recent Vanity Fair article that shredded Alaska governor Sarah Palin and questioned McCain's decision to pick her for VP. This is a stupid, illegitimate story which shouldn't be covered, says the Fox talking head, poor Sarah, poor Sarah, they need a "sexism translator" to decode these obviously liberal attacks. Next on Fox: "Do people watch Wimbledon because of sex?" Also, are the Real Housewives of New Jersey worth covering on a news channel? Apparently, yes, because a report on exactly that is coming up. *click* 10:20 - Accidentally flipped to the Today Show, Matt Lauer is in Michael Jackson's bedroom at Neverland holding his arms out saying "It was right here that..." and I change the channel before he can finish that sentence. *click* 10:21 - MSNBC is talking traffic about patterns over the coming holiday weekend. When will we be getting light rail and better public transportation? Tax dollars tax dollars it'll cost tax dollars, but we want better transportation, but we don't want to pay taxes, but but but...that is pretty much the whole conversation in a nutshell. 10:25 - MSNBC goes to commercial again, but not before teasing an upcoming segment: "Neverland vs. Graceland - can Michael Jackson eclipse Elvis in popularity?" *click* 10:26 - Back to CNN, a recap on that abducted soldier, a report on multiple bombings in Baghdad, a recap on the North Korean missile firing, a recap on the Marines fighting in Afghanistan, followed by an actual report on the Marines themselves. News! The heat where they're operating is brutal, they're not just securing the area but intend to hold it, which is new US forces operating in this region of Afghanistan. Civilians are coming in behind the Marines - agriculture experts, doctors, veterinarians - to win the support of the populace 10:30 - "The death of Michael Jackson is now a federal case" is CNN's next story after the war in Afghanistan. Diana Ross was Jackson's second choicer after his mom to care for his children. "Is Jackson's 79 year old mom up to the challenge of raising his children?" Jermaine Jackson says yes. *click* 10:31 - MSNBC is showing a picture of Sarah Palin leaning on chair that has American flag draped over it. They ask if she's violating flag protocol by doing what she's doing, and then tease Neverland v. Graceland debate again before going to another commercial. *click* 10:35 - "Just as Nixon had Watergate, Obama is going to have Carbongate," says Texas GOP Rep. Joe Barton on Fox, talking about the energy bill that recently passed the House. After that, they go to a report on a former supermodel who was arrested for threatening her plastic surgeon. OK, they'ry covering the Housewives of New Jersey because one of the Housewives - the one who flipped a table on the show - has been caught up in a sex tape scandal. Of course. *click* 10:38 - MSNBC is deep into the Michael Jackson v. Elvis debate, it's a free-for-all involving, somehow, the Beatles. "Michael Jackson's popularity is multi-generational" says one talking head, and the others pounce on him like wolves in a meat locker. It's bedlam on the set. The most vivid debate of the morning, however, is yet to come: "Up next: what happens when politicians try to dance like Michael Jackson?" Cut to commercial. *click* 10:42 - CNN is showing a report on WWII women pilots being honored by congress. They have one of the pilots in the studio, "Lorraine Rodgers, WASP WWII" is the caption, she's a lovely old lady in a sharp blue uniform. It's a neat bit of reporting, actually, with good questions and better answers. *click* 10:44 - Fox is covering the Real Housewives sex tape. "Did she consent to doing the tape? She's an evil kidnapper in a cocaine ring, no, seriously, she is." Her lawyer is on proclaiming her innocence, for what, we don't know. *click* 10:47 - CNN covering the stock market, with one talking head saying men are having the hardest time in this down market. Unemployment among men is at 10%, unemployment among women is at 7.6%. The numbers are skewed against men because automotive, construction and finance industries are male-dominated, says the head. Cut to commercial. *click* *click* *click* 10:49 - All three networks are running commercials *click* 10:51 - CNN screen crawl says details on Sanford book deal coming soon. *click* 10:52 - Fox has some breaking news: the Air France that crashed into the sea some weeks ago plunged nose-first into ocean, and the plane's speed sensors were not the direct cause of crash, so the ultimate cause of the disaster has yet to be determined. On to a report about a "prayer station" in the town of Warren, Michigan. The "station" was erected so townspeople can pray for better economic days, but there's a problem: the prayer station is in the atrium of city hall. Sneaky, sneaky. They're showing an atheist complaining about the prayer station in a civic building, and the separation of church and state, but the guy looks like a hippie Santa Claus, and he's handing out flyers on atheism. Fair and balanced, baby. *click* 10:56 - CNN is covering a child who survived that recent plane crash. "Still ahead: Diana Ross and her surprise appearance in Michael Jackson's will," says the talking head. Of course. A debt reduction commercial begins. *click* MSNBC has a Sham-Wow! commercial. *click* Fox has a Wal-Mart commercial. *click* 11:00 - Top of the hour on MSNBC: "The secrets of Michael Jackson's fortune may never be known." *click* Top of the hour on CNN: "Diana Ross and Michael Jackson's children." *click* Top of the hour on Fox: the status of the abducted soldier in Afghanistan. *click off* Yup. Still raining. ![]() You next. Any movie, any line...so long as it comes with a pic. Go. http://www2.iava.org/o/436/t/8492/tellafri...
Rollins did the voice-over for the video. They're trying to get 4,000 views by the 4th of July. Henry Rollins says "Watch the vid." ![]() ![]() Former President George W. Bush with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki at a press conference in December 2008. (Photo: AP) Made of Lies By William Rivers Pitt t r u t h o u t | Columnist Tuesday 30 June 2009 It began more than six years ago with a lie, followed by another lie, and another lie, and then two more, ten more, a hundred, a thousand, an avalanche of lies from heads of state and hatchet men and well-fed media types more interested in getting the interview than in getting the facts. It began with lies like this: "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction." - Dick Cheney, Vice President Speech to VFW National Convention 8/26/2002 ... and this: "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." - Condoleezza Rice, US National Security Adviser CNN Late Edition 9/8/2002 ... and this: "We know for a fact that there are weapons there." - Ari Fleischer, Press Secretary Press Briefing 1/9/2003 ... and this: "We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more." - Colin Powell, Secretary of State Remarks to the UN Security Council 2/5/2003 ... and this: "We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." - Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense ABC Interview 3/30/2003 It began with George W. Bush standing before both houses of Congress and an international television audience for his January 2003 State of the Union address and stating that Iraq was in possession of 26,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, 500 tons - which is one million pounds - of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent, 30,000 missiles to deliver the stuff, mobile biological weapons labs, al-Qaeda connections and uranium from Niger for use in a robust nuclear weapons program. Lies. All lies. 4,321 American soldiers have died in Iraq because of those lies, 101 during this year, including Sgt. Timothy A. David of Michigan, who was killed on June 28 when an improvised explosive device detonated near his vehicle. Four more soldiers were killed in Iraq on Tuesday in the midst of the withdrawal. Tens of thousands of American soldiers have been shredded and maimed because of those lies. Nobody knows how many innocent Iraqis have been killed and wounded because, to this day, we don't do body counts. Estimates range from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands to perhaps more than a million, depending on who you ask, all because of those lies. Now, more than six years later, a new president and a new policy has brought about one of the most dramatic and determinative days Iraq has seen since the initial invasion and occupation. "Six years and three months after the March 2003 invasion," reported The Washington Post on Tuesday, "the United States has withdrawn its remaining combat troops from Iraq's cities, the US commander here said, and is turning over security to Iraqi police and soldiers. While more than 130,000 U.S. troops remain in the country, patrols by heavily armed soldiers in hulking vehicles have largely disappeared from Baghdad, Mosul and Iraq's other urban centers. Iraqis danced in the streets and set off fireworks overnight in impromptu celebrations of a pivotal moment in their nation's troubled history. The government staged a military parade to mark the new national holiday of 'National Sovereignty Day,' and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki made a triumphant, nationally televised address." Triumph comes in strange packages these days. The reality of the situation in Iraq has been best described by Robert Dreyfuss in a Nation article titled "Little to Celebrate in Iraq." Dreyfuss writes: As we pull back, we're leaving Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in charge. Increasingly, Maliki is taking on the trappings of a dictator. He's established a network of security agencies that report directly to him. He's built a countrywide patronage system to bribe and pay off tribal allies, in anticipation of 2010 elections. He's shown no compunction against using the army, the police and the secret agencies he controls to eliminate rivals. He's used divide-and-conquer tactics to outflank the Sunni-led sahwa movement, known as the Awakening or the Sons of Iraq, driving some of them back into armed resistance and others into sullen resentment or fear for their lives. And Maliki, despite his protestations that he is a born-again "nationalist," has close ties to Iran. With Iran now revealed as a fundamentalist-run, naked military dictatorship, I expect Iran to act ruthlessly vis-a-vis Iraq, and if he wants to stay in power Maliki will pretty much have to go along. A prominent Sunni activist from northern Iraq told me Tuesday that anyone who thinks about opposing Maliki in Iraq has to fear for his or her life. The fact remains that despite the resurgence of secular nationalism in Iraq, as evidenced by the results of provincial elections last February, Maliki sits atop a conspiratorial little party called Al Dawa, a fundamentalist Islamist grouping, and he is reliant on a small, secretive clique that surrounds him. During the February election, in order to appeal to Iraqi voters, Maliki posed as a nationalist of sorts, but in fact he is dependent on two outside powers. First, he's dependent on the United States, for despite his bravado about the US withdrawal from Iraq's cities, Maliki desperately needs American backing to remain in power, to build up his armed forces. And second, Maliki is dependent on the good will of Iran, which could topple him instantly if he crossed Tehran. While Iraq's Shia population celebrated in the streets and Iraq's Sunni population crouched in fear, another group got right to business. "The long-awaited auction of licenses to develop Iraq's huge oil reserves began Tuesday amid unusual contentiousness," reported The New York Times on Tuesday, "as multinationals demanded far more revenue from every barrel of increased production than the authorities were willing to allow. Scores of Chinese, Russian, American and British oil executives, representing eight of the world's top 10 non-state oil companies, gathered in a hotel meeting room in the Green Zone. They listened closely on headphones to translations as bids for six oil fields and two natural gas fields were read out and then rushed into consultations." The more things change, the more they stay the same in an Iraq torn to pieces, covered in blood, and made of lies. http://www.truthout.org/063009R Again. Hee. ![]() ![]() ...FYI, there is 0% Michael Jackson stuff in this thread...
White House Watched By Dan Froomkin Today's column is my last for The Washington Post. And the first thing I want to say is thank you. Thank you to all you readers, e-mailers, commenters, questioners, Facebook friends and Twitterers for spending your time with me and engaging with me over the years. And thank you for the recent outpouring of support. It was extraordinarily uplifting, and I'm deeply grateful. If I ever had any doubt, your words have further inspired me to continue doing accountability journalism. My plan is to take a few weeks off before embarking upon my next endeavor -- but when I do, I hope you'll join me. It's hard to summarize the past five and a half years. But I'll try. I started my column in January 2004, and one dominant theme quickly emerged: That George W. Bush was truly the proverbial emperor with no clothes. In the days and weeks after the 9/11 terror attacks, the nation, including the media, vested him with abilities he didn't have and credibility he didn't deserve. As it happens, it was on the day of my very first column that we also got the first insider look at the Bush White House, via Ron Suskind's book, The Price of Loyalty. In it, former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill described a disengaged president "like a blind man in a room full of deaf people", encircled by "a Praetorian guard,” intently looking for a way to overthrow Saddam Hussein long before 9/11. The ensuing five years and 1,088 columns really just fleshed out that portrait, describing a president who was oblivious, embubbled and untrustworthy. When I look back on the Bush years, I think of the lies. There were so many. Lies about the war and lies to cover up the lies about the war. Lies about torture and surveillance. Lies about Valerie Plame. Vice President Dick Cheney's lies, criminally prosecutable but for his chief of staff Scooter Libby's lies. I also think about the extraordinary and fundamentally cancerous expansion of executive power that led to violations of our laws and our principles. And while this wasn't as readily apparent until President Obama took office, it's now very clear that the Bush years were all about kicking the can down the road – either ignoring problems or, even worse, creating them and not solving them. This was true of a huge range of issues including the economy, energy, health care, global warming – and of course Iraq and Afghanistan. The rest: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-hou... ![]() South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford admitted to having an affair with a woman from Argentina. (Photo: AP) The Girl From Ipanema By William Rivers Pitt t r u t h o u t | Columnist Friday 26 June 2009 Dozens of people have been killed by suicide car-bombers in Iraq over the last several days in an ominous upswing of violence that gives lie to the recent veneer of stability in that nation. The streets of Iran run with the blood of protesters seeking a fair election and the end of their country's oppressive fundamentalist regime. North Korea has threatened to fire long-range missiles at Hawaii over the Fourth of July if anyone so much as looks funny at one of their weapons-laden cargo ships on the high seas. Tall and tan and young and lovely The girl from Ipanema goes walking And when she passes, each one she passes goes ... ah Ah, indeed. There are other things in life besides mayhem, madness and butchery, a fact South Carolina's Republican Gov. Mark Sanford was kind enough to remind us of this week. There is irony of the purest ray serene; there is hypocrisy like a house on fire, and there is perfect comedy, and when a man like Governor Sanford takes the time and energy to combine all three, the magnificent absurdity of it all reminds us of the joy that still exists in this cruel and crazy world. So, yeah, Governor Sanford fell off the planet last week, disappearing entirely from the grid over this past Father's Day weekend. Neither his wife nor his staff would say for sure where he was beyond some blurry allusions to writing a book on the Appalachian Trail - and, by the by, it should be noted that the person who initiated the "Where Is Sanford?" press frenzy is a Republican enemy of the South Carolina governor, because this story wasn't weird enough already - until his car was discovered in a parking lot at the Atlanta airport. Except it wasn't his car, really, but a state-owned vehicle Sanford had apparently borrowed from one of his security guards. When she walks, she's like a samba That swings so cool and sways so gentle That when she passes, each one she passes goes ... ooh Flash forward to Wednesday, when Governor Sanford got up on his hind legs and delivered one of the single most preposterous press conference performances in the history of the universe. He said he was sorry, very sorry, sorry to you, to me, to the people of South Carolina, his wife, his sons, Jesus, all the saints and your little dog, too, because he had not, in fact, spent the weekend writing a book in Appalachia. No, Governor Sanford had been an entire hemisphere away, crying for five days with a girlfriend in Argentina. The conservative Washington Times was kind enough to explain the crystalline hypocrisy buried within what could be dismissed as another instance of a politician having a problem with his fly. "Republicans' family-values platform often invites charges of hypocrisy," explained Times writer S.A. Miller on Thursday. "It happened when conservative pundit and former drug czar William Bennett was discovered in 2003 to be a gambler. In the late 1990s, during and after their pursuit of President Clinton on impeachment charges for a sexual liaison with an intern, several Republican luminaries acknowledged they, too, had indulged in affairs, including pro-life leader Rep. Henry Hyde of Illinois, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia and former Rep. Bob Livingston of Louisiana, who resigned just before assuming the speaker's chair. Mr. Sanford voted in favor of three of four articles of impeachment against Mr. Clinton." Wait, what? Governor Sanford, that jet-setting Lothario, whose passionate taste for marital infidelity was strong enough to hurl him thousands of miles across the planet for a date with his mistress, was in favor of impeaching President Clinton for lying about sex? "I think it would be much better for the country and for him personally (to resign)," Sanford said of Clinton in September of 1998. "I come from the business side. If you had a chairman or president in the business world facing these allegations, he'd be gone." When Republican Congressman and impeachment champion Bob Livingston was exposed for cheating on his own wife later in 1998, Sanford said, "The bottom line, though, is I am sure there will be a lot of legalistic explanations pointing out that the president lied under oath. His situation was not under oath. The bottom line, though, is he still lied. He lied under a different oath, and that is the oath to his wife. So it's got to be taken very, very seriously." Three weeks before Wednesday's epic press conference debacle, Governor Sanford gave an interview to Fox News, during which he was asked about the Clinton impeachment directly. "It was blown into a huge constitutional issue which if a president's lying, it's a big deal. It is a constitutional issue," said Sanford. "But it missed the larger point of human nature. You ask any guy, particularly one in office, you've been screwing around on your wife - maybe there's 1 percent or maybe there's 2 percent or maybe there's 5 percent. But 95 percent of the time, whoever it is, is gonna say 'no.' And so, I think the public said no matter what Clinton did, whether he did or he didn't do whatever it was that happened with Monica Lewinsky, is that guy gonna stand up and admit it. They said no, he's not." Eloquence? Perhaps not, but at least Governor Sanford sounded as if the strength of his convictions and integrity regarding marital fidelity was genuine. If you want true Sanfordian eloquence, however, you must peruse the recently-released emails Sanford wrote to his lady friend. In one, for example, he implores her to "please sleep soundly knowing that despite the best efforts of my head my heart cries out for you, your voice, your body, the touch of your lips, the touch of your finger tips and an even deeper connection to your soul." Or, you can read the other Sanford email to his lady friend that says, "I could digress and say that you have the ability to give magnificent gentle kisses, or that I love your tan lines or that I love the curve of your hips, the erotic beauty of you holding yourself (or two magnificent parts of yourself) in the faded glow of the night's light - but hey, that would be going into sexual details ..." But I watch her so sadly How can I tell her I love her Yes I would give my heart gladly But each day, when she walks to the sea She looks straight ahead, not at me Thank you, Governor Sanford, for reminding us that life can be good, that life can be saccharine sweet, but above all else, that life can be really, really, really, really funny. http://www.truthout.org/062609J In a surreal press conference, where for some inexplicable reason his aides allowed him to show up without a prepared text and even take questions from the media (!), Sanford apologized to his wife and family, to his staff and his state and his party, and resigned as chair of the Republican Governors Association.
He is term limited for 2010 and he only has a year and a half left as governor. But it's hard to imagine him staying in office much longer. Members of both parties have fought with him for much of his term, and many will be pushing him to leave. He said he's known this woman for eight years but it became romantic about a year ago. Sanford had made national headlines months ago when he refused to take stimulus money for South Carolina out of principle. When it comes to Mark Sanford, stimulus now has a new meaning. http://www.npr.org/blogs/politicaljunkie/2... ![]() Grand Old Parachutes By William Rivers Pitt t r u t h o u t | Columnist Tuesday 23 June 2009 George W. Bush crawled out of the puckerbrush last week to deliver a speech in Erie, Pennsylvania, in which he took a poke at President Obama. "I told you I'm not going to criticize my successor," he said, before doing exactly that. "I'll just tell you that there are people at Gitmo that will kill American people at a drop of a hat and I don't believe that persuasion isn't going to work. Therapy isn't going to cause terrorists to change their mind." Ah, yes, the eloquence we've all missed so much since January. "I don't believe that persuasion isn't going to work" has to be tall in the running for first-ballot induction into the Gibberish Hall of Fame, and that quip about terrorists in therapy absolutely pegged the needle on the Irony Meter, as ABC News pointed out. "Interestingly," reported the network, "it was the Bush administration that sent some Gitmo detainees to a Saudi jihadi rehabilitation camp - called the "Prince Mohammed bin Nayef Centre for Care and Counseling. To decidedly mixed success." Well, go figure. It wouldn't be vintage Bush without a few hearty dollops of mangled verbiage combined with maddening factual inconsistency, now, would it? It almost makes one nostalgic for the daily brain cramps our former president used to deliver with such gruesome consistency. Well, no, actually, not really. In all likelihood, a day will come when the Republican Party will recover from the dazzling carnival of buffoonery, insanity and self-destruction it has become over the last three years, but that day has neither come nor looks to anytime soon. For the time being and until further notice, mostly because no new leader has stepped forward without sounding like an Appalachian snake-handler far gone on the still, the GOP is the party of George W. Bush. There's bad; there's worse; there's worst, and then there's that. Greg Sargent, on his Washington Post blog, pointed out some data buried in a recent Wall Street Journal poll that must have every breathing Republican strategist grinding their teeth in despair: The overall popularity of the Republican Party has now dropped below even the abysmal level of approval enjoyed by Dick Cheney. The poll found that 26% of respondents have a very positive or somewhat positive view of Cheney, up eight points from April. Meanwhile, it found that the GOP overall is viewed very or somewhat positively by only 25%, down four points from April. Okay, the difference is within the margin of error, making this a statistical tie. But still, this is pretty awful for the GOP, given that for a long time Cheney's historic unpopularity seemed to define a kind of low-water mark among Republicans. There a couple of takeaways here. First, it appears that Cheney is doing a better job of making his own case than the current crop of GOP leaders are doing on behalf of the party as a whole, even though he's no longer in office. And second, it gives the lie to the notion that Cheney's ongoing media tour is helpful to the GOP overall, as some party leaders have publicly claimed to think. In reality, he only seems to be helping himself. All is not lost in GOP Land, however. Those loyal Republicans bemoaning the current state of their party will be heartened to know that the people who personally detonated the GOP through rank incompetence, rampant avarice and lust for power are actually doing just fine, thank you very much. Dick Cheney is shopping his memoirs around to publishers and asking for multi-millions in return, which some idiot will probably give him. Karl Rove just got a seven-figure deal to write his own Bush-era memoirs. Condi Rice just signed a three-book deal reportedly worth $2.5 million. Michael Mukasey, Tommy Thompson and Harriet Miers have all landed lucrative gigs at prestigious law firms, and Ari Fleischer somehow went to work for the Green Bay Packers. Richard Armitage and Michael Hayden have landed on the board of directors for a pair of large defense contractors. Only Alberto Gonzales stands out as the lone Bush administration official unable to cash in on his time in government; his book deal was roundly rejected by publishers, and no law firm has seen fit to add his name to their roster. Can't imagine why. And as for George W. Bush himself? Nothing less than $7 million for his memoirs, apparently to be titled "Decision Points," which will contain "a dozen of the most interesting and important decisions in the former President's personal and political life." Laura Bush has also inked a book deal for $3.5 million, meaning the former First Family will be getting more than $10 million to tell us what it was like to annihilate the Republican Party and grievously damage the country while eating off the best White House china. The Republican Party is less popular than Dick Cheney, and Dick Cheney is about as popular as the shingles, but the folks who ran the GOP's train off the tracks and delivered the nation into this multifaceted mess are doing quite well in the aftermath. One is left to wonder how the people who voted for them feel about that. It's a damned safe bet they're not doing nearly as well as their erstwhile leaders are. Some might call that karma, but nobody should be surprised. It's the George W. Bush Way, after all: I got mine, screw everyone else, amen. http://www.truthout.org/062309A South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford has not been seen or heard from since last Thursday, according to the State newspaper, although those closest to him remain unconcerned.
"Gov. Sanford is taking some time away from the office this week to recharge after the stimulus battle and the legislative session, and to work on a couple of projects that have fallen by the wayside," said Sanford communications director Joel Sawyer in a statement. "We are not going to discuss the specifics of his travel arrangements or his security arrangements." Sanford's wife as well as Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer said they have not heard from Sanford. "We've been concerned by the Governor's erratic behavior for some time," said South Carolina Senate Leader John C. Land III. "We're praying for him and his family. I hope he is safe and that he contacts the First Lady and his family soon." Given the decided lack of concern from Sanford's office, it would appear as though there are no fears that the governor is in danger. Still, pulling a disappearing act like this -- whatever the reason -- is a decidedly odd move for someone who is seen as a likely presidential candidate in 2012. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/go... === Sanford Goes Missing The whereabouts of South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford (R) "have been unknown to state officials since Thursday, and some state leaders are questioning who is in charge of the executive office," reports the Columbia State. "Neither the governor's office nor the State Law Enforcement Division has been able to reach Sanford, who left the mansion in a black SLED Suburban SUV." "Sanford's last known whereabouts were near Atlanta, where a mobile telephone tower picked up a signal from his phone, authorities said." According to WCBD-TV, the First Lady said he "has been gone for several days and she doesn't know where, but she is not concerned." http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/06/... === Hm. Rights, Responsibilities and Love
Submitted by Chris Dodd on June 21, 2009 - 10:36am. On Sunday, The Meriden Record-Journal published the following op-ed by Senator Chris Dodd June 21, 2009 (snip) My young daughters are growing up in a different reality than I did. Our family knows many same-sex couples – our neighbors in Connecticut, members of my staff, parents of their schoolmates. Some are now married because the Connecticut Supreme Court and our state legislature have made same-sex marriage legal in our state. But to my daughters, these couples are married simply because they love each other and want to build a life together. That’s what we’ve taught them. The things that make those families different from their own pale in comparison to the commitments that bind those couples together. And, really, that’s what marriage should be. It’s about rights and responsibilities and, most of all, love. I believe that, when my daughters grow up, barriers to marriage equality for same-sex couples will seem as archaic, and as unfair, as the laws we once had against inter-racial marriage. And I want them to know that, even if he was a little late, their dad came down on the right side of history. I have always been proud of my long record fighting for the civil rights of the LGBT community. I’ve co-sponsored legislation to strengthen hate crime laws and end discrimination in the workplace. I’ve spoken out against “don’t ask, don’t tell” and always supported equal rights for domestic partnerships. But I am also proud to now count myself among the many elected officials, advocates, and ordinary citizens who support full marriage equality for same-sex couples. The rest: http://dodd.senate.gov/?q=node/5040 Court will not revive Plame's lawsuit
2 hours ago WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will not revive a lawsuit that former CIA operative Valerie Plame brought against former members of the Bush administration. The court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson. A lower court last year threw out the lawsuit in which Plame and Wilson accused former Vice President Dick Cheney and several former high-ranking administration officials of revealing her identity to reporters in 2003. Plame and Wilson said that violated their constitutional rights. The lawsuit named former presidential adviser Karl Rove; Cheney's former top aide, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby; and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said that Plame and Wilson did not meet the legal standard for constitutional claims, in part because the lawsuit hinges on alleged violations of the Privacy Act — a law that does not cover the president or the vice president's offices. Armitage was the original source for a 2003 newspaper column identifying Plame as a CIA officer. At the time, her husband was criticizing the Bush administration's prewar intelligence on Iraq and had become a thorn in the side of the White House. Rove also discussed Plame's employment with reporters. The rest: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/articl... Robin Sloan Creates Iran Election Tracker for the Easily Overwhelmed
Posted by Amy Gahran at 11:35 AM on Jun. 22, 2009 It's easy to get overwhelmed by fast-moving international stories that roll through online and social media like wildfire. Which sources are worth paying attention to? When everyone sounds excited and urgent, how can you tell what's most important? How can you gauge accuracy and context? Current's Robin Sloan, the generalist writer and media nerd who once worked at Poynter, where he created "EPIC 2014" with Matt Thompson, used a few basic tools to pull together a curated page that provides a quick "dashboard" view of what's happening online regarding the Iran election. His #IranElection tracker for the easily overwhelmed represents an approach that any individual, group, journalist or news organization could take to offer value and engagement through selected aggregation. Iran election tracker link and the rest of this story here: http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&ai... Supreme Court Pulls Teeth From the Voting Rights Act
John Nichols The Nation 6/22/09 Once an election is done, it is hard to undo. That's true in Iran, and it's also true in the United States. This is why it is important to get the rules by which elections are held right before elections are held. For this reason, one of the essential components of the Voting Rights Act -- arguably its most powerful tool for combating discrimination and disenfranchisement -- has long been a requirement that officials get approval from the Department of Justice before they change the way in which elections are conducted. Allow states, counties, municipalities or school districts in the 16 states that are wholly or pafrtially with historic patterns of discrimination to opt out of the review, and they will be able to organize and hold elections that renew those patterns. That's why the requirement has been referred to by law professors as "one of the crown jewels of the civil rights movement." Foes of the Voting Rights Act have long focused on weakening Section 5 of the act, the provision that requires election officials in the states covered by the act to obtain federal permission before making changes to voting procedures, moving polling-place locations, requiring so-called "citizenship checks" and redrawing voting district lines. They rightly argued that to do so would remove the teeth from the measure that has long been disdained by southerners pining for the days before what former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott referred to as "all the laws of Washington" changed the way things were done in Dixie. On Monday, the Supreme Court tarnished the crown jewel, giving state and local officials new flexibility to "opt out" of the requirement that they obtain permission when changing election rules. The court ruling does not invalidate the Voting Rights Act -- as some had feared -- but it does undermine it. The court, with only one justice (Clarence Thomas) in partial dissent, said that the Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 in Austin, Texas, can avoid the advance approval requirement. The ruling is being interpreted as a signal all local jurisdictions in a Voting Rights Act state can at least apply for what is referred to as "a statutory bailout." That was a reversal of a lower federal court that had preserved the Voting Rights Act as it was intended to operate. That's a dangerous move, say civil rights supporters. The rest: http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/445... Twitter ripped the veil off ‘the other’ – and we saw ourselves
New media allowed the world to connect with the Tehran rebels By Andrew Sullivan Times UK June 21 2009 IT was not, to put it mildly, a new technology I found impressive. Twitter, the social networking website, allows for only a tiny number of characters to be broadcast in each “tweet”, or message, and much of the early tweeting was being done by bored teens or Hollywood celebrities: the illiterate speaking to the impatient. When Ashton Kutcher, the film star and avid tweeter, opined the following in April, I couldn’t stop laughing: “Years from now, when historians reflect on the time we are currently living in, the names Biz Stone and Evan Williams will be referenced side by side with the likes of Samuel Morse, Alexander Graham Bell, Guglielmo Marconi, Philo Farnsworth, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs - because the creation of Twitter . . . is as significant and paradigm-shifting as the invention of Morse code, the telephone, radio, television or the personal computer.” Well, the last laugh is on me. As I have spent the past week hunched over a laptop, channelling and broadcasting as much information, video and debate about the momentous events in Iran, nothing quite captured the mood and pace of events like the tweets coming from the people of Iran. With internet speed deliberately slowed to a crawl by the Iranian authorities, brevity and simplicity were essential. To communicate, they tweeted. Within hours of the farcical election result, I tracked down a bunch of live Twitter feeds and started to edit and rebroadcast them as a stream of human consciousness on the verge of revolution. The rest: http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/ne... |
Blogroll Latest Threads
The ten most recent threads posted on
the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums. OAS on NOW 7:33pm edt N/T By magbana How has your city undermined its infrastructure? By ColbertWatcher No WONDER I'm Bummed.... By tucsonlib Out of the mouths of babes; By greiner3 “Drapetomania”, “Communism”, and “Terrorism” in the Service of Class War By Time for change California governor signals key budget concession By Liberal_in_LA You know what's great about Sarah Palin? By Clintonista2 Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted
on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the
last 24 hours. Goodbye, DU - You Betcha! 105 recs : By NanceGreggs I disagree. President Obama tells liberal groups to stop attacks about health care reform. 72 recs : By madfloridian You dumb fucking ignorant ass rednecks 63 recs : By Horse with no Name Video of me discussing Sarah Palin's resignation with Stuart Varney on Fox News' Your World 43 recs : By stevenleser "OUTRAGEOUS!" great health care toon. 41 recs : By givemebackmycountry FREE Fourth of July desktop wallpaper guaranteed to piss off Freepers/Obama bashers 30 recs : By zulchzulu 29 people are to be executed tomorrow in Iran 30 recs : By rosesaylavee Forthcoming Sarah Palin Criminal Indictment 29 recs : By L. Coyote Black Caucus Muzzled - No Comment on Kidnapping of McKinney 27 recs : By ensho |

