Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » dbmk » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
dbmk's Journal
Posted by dbmk in General Discussion: Presidential
Mon Apr 21st 2008, 06:58 PM
Hello everyone!

Time for

The Danish Pennsylvania Democratic Primaries Prediction Projection Presentation v2.0


See v1.0 here.



Been searching for predictions on the districts today.

So far I have found five different takes on it:
minvis at myDD (yeah, I know, but it is relatively unbiased afaict)
Al Giordano at TheField
PsiFighter37 at dKos
CQPolitics
ObamaManiac2008 at dKos

The first two are from march 12. The next two are relatively fresh from within the last week. And the last is from today.
Apply whatever source critique you feel it needs.

So lets take it one district at the time:



South and central Philadelphia; Chester

minvis: 4-3
AG: 4-3
PsiFighter: 4-3
CQpolitics: 4-3
OM08: 5-2

Thing is - registration is way up in this area and especially around the AA communities and college areas. Add to that an overall 51% AA population.
It is viewed as increasingly likely that this could go 5-2 for Obama. To get there he has to break 64,286%.

That would prob. require about half the white vote. I can see that happening. A guy at dKos said he would give everyone there a dollar if it didn't break that way .
I am not going to go as far. And it would be easy to downplay expectations, and err in favour of Hillarys.

But I do think all the indications are strong enough that I will call it 5-2.




West Philadelphia(born and rais<STOOOOP!> ok, sorry.); Chestnut Hill; Cheltenham
(Split listed Obama-Clinton)
minvis: 6-3
AG: 6-3
PsiFighter: 7-2
CQpolitics: 7-2
OM08: 7-2

As you can see the newer predictions say 7-2. That needs a 72,222% vote for Obama.
The area is majority AA with an addition of a sizeable group of high education liberals. In that light the needed percentage is definately likely.
I am keeping that at 7-2. 83,333% for an 8-1 split is probably out of the question.




Northwest — Erie

minvis: 2-3
AG: 1-4
PsiFighter: 2-3
CQpolitics: 2-3
OM08: 2-3

In order for Obama to avoid the 1-4 split he needs to clear 30%. Not a good area for him, but he didn't go under 30 in the nearby Ohio areas, afaict, so I think 2-3 is the likely split. 3-2 seems way out of the question. Don't be overly surprised if it goes 1-4 though.



West — Pittsburgh suburbs

minvis: 2-3
AG: 1-4
PsiFighter: 2-3
CQpolitics: 2-3
OM08: 2-3

Same deal as CD #3. Except here the suburbs of Pittsburgh should make it relatively sure that he clears the 30% threshold. Calling it 2-3 Clinton.




North central — State College

minvis: 2-2
AG: 1-3
PsiFighter: 2-2
CQpolitics: 2-2
OM08: 2-2

For it to break 1-3 or 3-1 either needs to take 62,5%. And it could look p0ssible for Hillary, if it wasn't for Penn State. 2-2 it is. Outside chance of 1-3 Clinton.




Southeast — parts of Berks and Chester counties, Philadelphia suburbs

minvis: 3-3
AG: 3-3
PsiFighter: 3-3
CQpolitics: 3-3
OM08: 3-3

The break to a 4-2 split here is 58,333%. This could come down to the turnout and how new voters and undecided break. I have seen nothing to support a break either way though. Sticking with the five above. 3-3.



Suburban Philadelphia — most of Delaware County

minvis: 3-4
AG: 4-3
PsiFighter: 4-3
CQpolitics: 3-4
OM08: 4-3

Joe Sestak has endorsed Clinton. High income, highly educated parts, white area. Depends highly on turnout.
Very tough call. Sounds and looks like it could be 4-3 Obama if he gets enough new democrats.
Afraid to be too optimistic Obamas way and calling it 3-4 in Clintons favour.
64,286% for a 5-2 for either is not likely.



Northern Philadelphia suburbs — Bucks County

minvis: 4-3
AG: 4-3
PsiFighter: 4-3
CQpolitics: 3-4
OM08: 3-4

Seems very similar to CD #7. Except here we have Obama support in Patrick J. Murphy, an Irag veteran that will probably, and probably already has, worked hard for Obama.
4-3 Obama. Its close though.
Again: 64,286% for a 5-2 for either is not likely.




South central — Altoona

minvis: 1-2
AG: 1-2
PsiFighter: 1-2
CQpolitics: 1-2
OM08: 1-2

Red country. Clinton will surely take this with 50+ for the odd delegate. But 83,333%
for all three is more or less out of the question.




Northeast — Central Susquehanna Valley

minvis: 2-2
AG: 1-3
PsiFighter: 1-3
CQpolitics: 2-2
OM08: 1-3

Strong Clinton country. She needs to break 62,5% to get the 3-1 split and probably will. It _could_ go 2-2 i the close polls holds up. And I will get back to that down below.
1-3 it is.




District #11 -- Northeast — Scranton, Wilke-Barre

minvis: 2-3
AG: 1-4
PsiFighter: 1-4
CQpolitics: 2-3
OM08: 2-3

Scranton+ should be Clinton territory. If she breaks 70% its here. Even with Casey out for Obama.
Calling it 1-4 for Clinton.




District #12 Southwest — Johnstown

minvis: 2-3
AG: 1-4
PsiFighter: 1-4
CQpolitics: 2-3
OM08: 1-4

Again strong Clinton country. Throw in Murtha and we have a probable 1-4 in Clintons favour. Only plus for Obama is a lot of surburban area preventing him falling under 30%. Possibly. Calling it 2-3.

#11 could go 2-3 and #12 could go 1-4 depending on how well Obama does overall.




District #13 East — Northeast Philadelphia, part of Montgomery County

minvis: 3-4
AG: 4-3
PsiFighter: 3-4
CQpolitics: 3-4
OM08: 3-4

Congresswoman Allyson Schwartz is a Hillary backer, but it being quite diverse Philly suburbs, it will probably contain Clinton to a 4-3 split.




District #14 Pittsburgh and some close-in suburbs

minvis: 4-3
AG: 3-4
PsiFighter: 3-4
CQpolitics: 4-3
OM08: 4-3

3rd highest AA population of the districts just under 25%. besides that it should be advantage Clinton. Going a little out on a limb, so you can laugh at me afterwards, and call it 4-3 Obama as I think he will break the 50% mark here.




District #15 East — Allentown, Bethlehem

minvis: 2-3
AG: 2-3
PsiFighter: 2-3
CQpolitics: 2-3
OM08: 2-3

Clinton will win this one. But not with the 70% needed to break it 4-1. Think this is one of the the more solid results and picking it at 2-3.




District #16 Southeast — Lancaster, part of Reading

minvis: 2-2
AG: 2-2
PsiFighter: 2-2
CQpolitics: 2-2
OM08: 2-2

Surburban area. Nothing to indicate that either will break the 62,5% mark for a 3-1. If it does it will be Clinton. But then Obama has probably had a relatively bad day.
2-2 it is.



District #17 East central — Harrisburg, Lebanon, Pottsville

minvis: 2-2
AG: 2-2
PsiFighter: 2-2
CQpolitics: 2-2
OM08: 2-2

Rural area and Clinton land, with Harrisburg thrown in. She probably wont break the 62,5% mark for a 3-1, And some even think a small win for Obama here is not out of the question. But small doesn't move delegates in a 4 delegate district.
2-2 it is.




District #18 West — Pittsburgh suburbs, part of Washington and Westmoreland counties

minvis: 2-3
AG: 1-4
PsiFighter: 2-3
CQpolitics: 2-3
OM08: 2-3

Large rural areas, combined with high education suburbs. Enough to give Clinton 50%+ but not 70%+. for a 1-4.
Quite sure this goes 2-3.




District #19 South central — York, Gettysburg

minvis: 2-2
AG: 2-2
PsiFighter: 2-2
CQpolitics: 2-2
OM08: 2-2

Good Clinton base, but neighbouring Maryland areas show Obama have some strength here. At least enough to keep it above 37,5% for a 2-2 split.

----

So there we have it. My take on other peoples takes (yeah, you'll have to forgive me. My american history and geography classes here in Denmark were limited, so I take the help I can get ).

And my total is: Obama 50 - Clinton 53.
Same as the first time, arriving via a slightly different path.

--

Now on to something interesting:

The polls on popular vote. And the delegates they bring.

I have:
SUSA - Clinton 50 Obama 44
Mason-Dixon - Clinton 48, Obama 43
Rasmussen - Clinton 49, Obama 44
Quinnipiac - Clinton 51, Obama 44
Suffolk - Clinton 52, Obama 42
PPP - Obama 49, Clinton 46
...
..
..
Now who choked on their preferred beverage on the last one?

It would be easy to dismiss that as a statistical outlier - and probably is to some degree.
But as far as I can tell PPP has been on the money so far. And they called Wisconsin when everone else was calling them crazy. We could be in for something interesting here. If it holds up, any possible flips in the above, can go Obamas way.

I will calculate them into the average of all 6, which gives us:

Obama 44,333 Clinton 49,333

Seems they all agree that the undecideds will break 6-4 for Clinton. But new registrations is expected to break likewise for Obama. So I will split them evenly.

That gives us:

PLEOs: Obama 10 Clinton 10

At-Large: Obama 17 Clinton 18.

There is a threshold right around the 5% and 6% in the two cases, so Clinton could likely gain up to 4 more if it swings just a little her way from those numbers.

But it leaves my total at 4 delegates for Hillary. Possibly 6 or 8.

That can of course all change if one of the wider margins polled holds up. But even Suffolks 10 point spread only gives her 5 of the Statewide delegates. But that would probably also mean that she flips a district or two for a total of 12.

But just for fun, and to validate all my work, I am going to stick to my 4 delegate result.
You can always fire me as your number cruncher after tomorrow.

This of course will be turned upside down if Obama runs away with the popular vote like PPP predicts currently.

But what do you guys say? Am I crazy? Have I completely missed a truckload of points?
Discuss (35 comments) | Recommend (11 votes)
Blogroll
DU Journals
Other Blogs
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.