Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » dccrossman Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
SilverDev's Journal
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Mon Nov 15th 2010, 10:46 PM
WTF

The quote from the Mayor of East Point just floors me: "If you're disabled, then why did you run for office?"

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/25804093/detail....

EAST POINT, Ga. -- Disabled Forest Park councilwoman Karen-Brandee Williams wants the city to buy her an ergo-dynamic orthopedic chair that would ease her pain while she sits during council meetings.

“I have a lot of excruciating pain,” said Williams. “And I only ask for a chair,” she said.

<snip...>

“She can buy herself one I guess,” said East Point Mayor Corine Deyton.

Deyton told Channel 2 Action News reporter Tom Jones that the city had nothing to do with the accident and shouldn't have to pay for a chair that costs $1,900.

“If you're disabled, then why did you run for office? I mean, … if you're really disabled. That's just the way I feel about it,” said Deyton.

Williams was offended by the comment.

“To me, that sounds very discriminatory,” said Williams.

<snip...>


Yeah, that sounds very discriminatory to me too.
Read entry | Discuss (10 comments) | Recommend (+12 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion: Presidency
Fri Oct 08th 2010, 08:27 AM
I was skimming through pollingreport.com and decided to look at the 2012 polls, more out of amusement than anything else. This Fox News poll data near the top really caught my eye. It seems that no matter how they set it up, Obama still comes out on top:

(Only kept the 9/28-29/10 results)
FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll. Sept. 28-29, 2010. N=900 registered voters nationwide. MoE ± 3.

"Thinking ahead to the next presidential election, if the 2012 presidential election were held today, would you definitely vote to reelect Barack Obama, probably vote to reelect Obama, probably vote for someone else, or definitely vote for someone else?"

DefinitelyObama | Probably Obama | Probably someone else | Definitely someone else | Too soon(vol.)/Unsure
9/28-29/10
19% | 20% | 14% | 40% | 7%


"Thinking ahead to the next presidential election, if the election were held today, how would you vote if the candidates were Democrat Barack Obama and Republican ?" Options rotated

Barack Obama (D) | Mitt Romney (R) | Other (vol.) | Wouldn't vote (vol.) | Unsure
9/28-29/10
41% | 40% | 7% | 2% | 11%


Barack Obama (D) | Sarah Palin (R) | Other (vol.) | Wouldn't vote (vol.) | Unsure
9/28-29/10
48% | 35% | 7% | 3% | 8%

Barack Obama (D) | Mike Huckabee (R) | Other (vol.) | Wouldn't vote (vol.) | Unsure
9/28-29/10
43% | 40% | 5% | 2% | 10%

Barack Obama (D) | Jeb Bush (R) | Other (vol.) | Wouldn't vote (vol.) | Unsure
9/28-29/10
45% | 37% | 6% | 3% | 9%

Barack Obama (D) | Chris Christie (R) | Other (vol.) | Wouldn't vote (vol.) | Unsure
9/28-29/10
42% | 30% | 7% | 2% | 19%

"How would you vote if the candidates were Democrat Barack Obama and a candidate from the Tea Party movement?" Options rotated
Barack Obama (D) | Tea Party candidate | Other (vol.) | Wouldn't vote (vol.) | Unsure
9/28-29/10
43% | 32% | 7% | 3% | 15%

"If the 2012 presidential election were held today, how would you vote if the choices were Barack Obama,
the Democrat, Sarah Palin, the Republican, and Mike Bloomberg, an independent?" Options rotated
Barack Obama (D) | Sarah Palin (R) | Mike Bloomberg (I) | Other (vol.) | Wouldn't vote (vol.)/Unsure
9/28-29/10
40% | 28% | 18% | 3% | 12%

"If the 2012 presidential election were held today, how would you vote if the choices were Barack Obama,
the Democrat, Sarah Palin, the Republican, and Hillary Clinton, as an independent candidate?"" Options rotated
Barack Obama (D) | Sarah Palin (R) | Hillary Clinton (I) | Other (vol.) | Wouldn't vote(vol.)/Unsure
9/28-29/10
30% | 29% | 27% | 4% | 10%



http://pollingreport.com/2012.htm


This is for entertainment purposes only, IMO.
Read entry | Discuss (0 comments) | Recommend (<0 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Fri Apr 23rd 2010, 10:29 PM
http://www.deathandtaxesposter.com /

I'm not an expert on budget issues, so I'm curious if others with more knowledge can confirm the data. Fascinating stuff to keep you up at night.

Read entry | Discuss (3 comments) | Recommend (+6 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in The DU Lounge
Fri Jan 08th 2010, 02:48 PM
We can all use it.

http://sleeptalkinman.blogspot.com /

Don't know if it's real or not, but it's funny, and that's what matters in this case.
Read entry | Discuss (6 comments) | Recommend (<0 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in Editorials & Other Articles
Mon Dec 07th 2009, 01:46 PM
I thought this a well-written and well-reasoned editorial. I also appreciated the acceptance and then neutering of the term 'socialized medicine'. Editorial written by John Gary Maxwell for StarNews Online.

As he writes in the article, health care is already rationed and socialized, just after health industry profits. Not only that, but the motivations are all wrong. Insurance companies for profit above all else. Doctors for income and liability protection above all else. There's more and better in the portions of the editorial that I did not copy across. I strongly encourage you to go read it.

Health care is already rationed and socialized. We have an unacknowledged disparity between insatiable demand for health care and a capability that cannot meet it. We now find health care rationed on the basis of who will receive care, not on what care will be provided.

Rationing does not apply to emergency care. The unemployed laborer severely injured in a car crash or the farmer who collapses will be given the best care possible. No expense will be spared, all needed consultants will be called, all necessary surgery and definitive care completed.

The patient who presents for planned, scheduled health care gets a different reception. Those needing elective heart surgery, or joint repair, for example, are filtered carefully. Care is rationed by ability to pay.

...

If "spreading the wealth" is socialization, our system is already socialized, with the "haves" paying for the "have-nots" by a tax on the wealthier group. This explains a $15 aspirin, $10,000 to $15,000 antibiotic bills, and bills for heart surgery of $250,000 or more.

We resist "socialized medicine" from the federal government while oblivious that we have embraced socialized medicine delivered -after profits - by the insurance industry.

A crisis is dangerously imminent in which the "haves" will not be able to pay for the increasingly larger segment of "have-nots."

...

Should limitless profit be the motivation to choose medicine as a career? Inequities in earnings have their origin, in large part, because doctors' pay is based on fee for service.

The more tests performed, the more X-rays ordered, every consultant called, every operation done influences income - directly or indirectly.

The solution to these disparities is one that will not sit well with some of my colleagues: Doctors should be paid a base salary commensurate with their time in education and the responsibilities they carry. Increases in pay should be based on such factors as measurements of quality of care, research and teaching. Highly specialized fields requiring extra education and experience, remaining current in new techniques and extra call on nights, weekends and holidays should be compensated.

...

Retired surgeon John Gary Maxwell is former director of the surgical residency program at New Hanover Regional Medical Center and a professor emeritus at the University of North Carolina and the University of Utah medical schools.




Link to Editorial

Plain text link (stick "www." at the beginning):
starnewsonline.com/article/20091205/ARTICLES/912044001/-1/EDITORIAL?Title=John-Gary-Maxwell-Health-reform-from-my-side-of-the-surgery-table&tc=autorefresh
Read entry | Discuss (2 comments) | Recommend (+3 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Mon Sep 21st 2009, 07:18 PM
Someone is pretending to be the CDC FCU and sending out SMS messages. http://www.cdcfcu.com/ASP/home.asp

http://ig.libertyonline.net/ImageGallery/C...

Got one earlier this evening:
CDC FCU Alert: Your CARD has been DEACTIVATED. Please contact us at ... to REACTIVATE your CARD.

I don't even have an account with the CDC FCU.

Good luck out there on the intertubes.
Read entry | Discuss (1 comments) | Recommend (+1 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Mon Sep 14th 2009, 02:14 PM


Store Link:
http://www.amazon.com/JESUS-HEALTH-INSURAN...

Buy your own t-shirt, and show your support for Glenn Beck's huddled masses... =)

Read entry | Discuss (3 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Thu Aug 27th 2009, 10:21 PM
Unfortunately, this is my representative in Congress. He supports Ron Paul's Health bill that assumes tax credits will solve the world's ills.

Would be amusing to see the poll on his site flip, not that I think it will change his position. This is one of those cases where I abhor living in the South. This guy only has to satisfy the "good ol' boy" network.

http://tom.house.gov /

Poll of the Month
Do you support the President's health care plan?

Currently at 78% against.

Thanks
Read entry | Discuss (15 comments) | Recommend (+2 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Tue Aug 25th 2009, 03:52 PM
Friend of mine passed this to me from Reddit. Worth the read and perhaps sharing. Note: I am not the disabled vet. My father served and my parents get great care via Tricare, but neither they nor I are the vet in the story.

Reddit - Hey Reddit, I am a Disabled US Vet and Use the "Socialist" VA Healthcare System Exclusively. This is My Story.

A small slice:
11:00AM
He notes that it has been 2 years since my last MRI and feels that we should get a new one to see how the injury has progressed. In our conversation I also told him that I have been having trouble sleeping (possible apnea). He picks up the phone and calls the VA hospital to schedule me for an MRI. They can get me in on Sunday morning. He also submits an electronic prescription for a pain killer, it will be ready in 20-25 minutes at the VA pharmacy for pick up.

Note: Yes they do walk in MRIs on a Sunday. Also note, the first MRI was done through my HMO. It took 3 months to get approved by Aetna, and 4 weeks to get scheduled. It only covered 80 percent of the bill, the rest was out of pocket. The first MRI occurred while I was still waiting for approval for admission into the VA program and was working for a company that offered a healthcare plan. My treatment for my back problems during that time, including MRI's, Physical Therapy, Cortisone Shots, and surgery left me with a $22,000 bill that I am still paying off. My treatment since then has been covered through the VA.


The VA routinely gets higher ratings that your private health insurance company and whether you like them or not, they are "socialized medicine".

VA Ratings higher than private insurance, 5 years running, from 2007.
(If anyone has a newer link for the ratings, I'd love to have it. Please send a message.)
Read entry | Discuss (5 comments) | Recommend (+4 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Mon Aug 17th 2009, 05:50 PM
http://www.amazon.com/review/R2TQOV2Z0F32X...

A few selected quotes:

Beck uses this book - and Paine's name - to criticize "Progressivism," blaming it for much of what ails the country. Sadly, this is a complete distortion of Paine's legacy. While the extent of most Americans' knowledge of Paine is "he wrote Common Sense, I teach his work in class every year. I use "The Crisis" and selections from "The Rights of Man" and "Age of Reason." If you want to understand Paine and his vision for America, you should read them. Beck doesn't understand Paine, but he does want to use the credibility of "The Founding Fathers" to promote an anti-government message.


From what I know of American history, Thomas Paine would have been appalled by Beck associating their two ideologies, and he would have bitch-slapped Beck. And Beck would have deserved it.


Awesome!
Read entry | Discuss (4 comments) | Recommend (+11 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Thu Aug 13th 2009, 08:33 PM
http://gawker.com/5336475/theres-just-no-w...

Research? Real thoughts presented coherently? An actual argument supporting a position?
Just before midnight, a "note" was posted on Sarah Palin's Facebook page titled, "Concerning the 'Death Panels.'" Predictably, the media latched onto it and reported her thoughts. However, there's a problem: there's no way in hell Sarah Palin wrote it.

How do I know this, you ask? Well, the answer to that question is perhaps best explained by a comment someone named Marvin Settle posted under Palin's note. He wrote:

Wow, and the public thought she wasn't educated enough to be President? That is some of the most well researched and thought out material I have ever read. Thanks Sarah.

Exactly! Thank you Marvin Settle. Thank you very much.


As the author sums up:
So who's writing Sarah's Facebook notes? Hell, your guess is as good as mine. Meg Stapleton perhaps? Bill Kristol? An intern? The person ghostwriting her forthcoming book? Who knows! But whoever it is, their being enlisted to perform these services is obviously part of a diabolical plan to rehabilitate Palin's image as a staggering dipshit.


Peace!
Read entry | Discuss (5 comments) | Recommend (<0 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in Editorials & Other Articles
Thu Aug 13th 2009, 08:27 PM
Insightful article from Rolling Stone evaluating Obama's performance to date.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story...

David Gergen, Paul Krugman, & Michael Moore

The print article is a lot more in depth, but even the highlights posted online are interesting.

During Franklin Roosevelt's first 100 days in office, congress granted every request the new president made. Barack Obama, despite enjoying a decisive majority in both houses of Congress, hasn't been so fortunate. His economic stimulus package failed to win a single Republican vote in the House, and conservative members of his own party are trying to block his ambitious plans to provide universal health care and curb global warming. What's more, Obama himself has alarmed supporters by compromising on key issues, and he has yet to flex his political muscle by mobilizing the tech-savvy network of grass-roots activists he assembled during last year's campaign. All of which raises the question: Is Obama raising false hopes? Or does he have what it takes to deliver real change?

To assess Obama's performance during his first six months in office, we sat down in our New York offices with three of America's leading political observers. David Gergen, a senior political analyst for CNN and director of the Center for Public Leadership at the Harvard Kennedy School, served in the White Houses of Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Clinton. Paul Krugman, a New York Times columnist and professor of economics and international affairs at Princeton University, won the 2008 Nobel Prize in economics. Michael Moore is the Academy Award-winning director of Bowling for Columbine and Sicko; his new film, Capitalism: A Love Story, will premiere on October 2nd.

Read entry | Discuss (1 comments) | Recommend (+1 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Wed Jul 01st 2009, 12:54 PM
Why not Single Payer and cover everyone and save taxpayers Billions?

Nice.



Unfortunately, Obama's answer isn't particularly interesting.

I don't really believe that health insurance companies provide any innovation at all, they only add overhead.
Read entry | Discuss (0 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Thu Jun 11th 2009, 10:09 PM
someone suggested that they would vote for Ahmedinijad (sp?), basically made the "enemy known" vs "enemy unknown" argument.

Anyone got a link on that? I looked around the Heritage Foundation site, but could not locate it.
Read entry | Discuss (2 comments) | Recommend (+1 votes)
Posted by dccrossman in Editorials & Other Articles
Wed Jun 03rd 2009, 11:26 AM
In case the real life stories have slipped off your radar for the need for this procedure.

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/... /


Edited to include a few paragraphs per recommendation of discussion:

... As we sat there, she said that the ultrasound indicated that the fetus had an open neural tube defect, meaning that the spinal column had not closed properly. It was a term I remembered skipping right over in my pregnancy book, along with all the other fetal anomalies and birth defects that I thought referred to other people's babies, not mine. She couldn't tell us much more. We would have to go to the main hospital in Boston, which had a more high-tech machine and a more highly trained technician. She tried to be hopeful -- there was a wide range of severity with these defects, she said. And then she left us to cry. ...

...Instead of cinnamon and spice, our child came with technical terms like hydrocephalus and spina bifida. The spine, she said, had not closed properly, and because of the location of the opening, it was as bad as it got. What they knew -- that the baby would certainly be paralyzed and incontinent, that the baby's brain was being tugged against the opening in the base of the skull and the cranium was full of fluid -- was awful. What they didn't know -- whether the baby would live at all, and if so, with what sort of mental and developmental defects -- was devastating. Countless surgeries would be required if the baby did live. None of them would repair the damage that was already done. ...

...I don't remember much from those three days. Walking around with a belly full of broken dreams, it felt like what I would imagine drowning feels like -- flailing and suffocating and desperate. Semiconscious. Surrounded by our family, I found myself tortured by our decision, asking over and over, are we doing the right thing? That was the hardest part. Even though I finally understood that pregnancy wasn't a Gerber commercial, that bringing forth life was intimately wrapped up in death -- what with miscarriage and stillbirth -- this was actually a choice. Everyone said, of course it's the right thing to do -- even my Catholic father and my Republican father-in-law, neither of whom was ever "pro-choice." Because suddenly, for them, it wasn't about religious doctrine or political platforms. It was personal -- their son, their daughter, their grandchild. It was flesh and blood, as opposed to abstract ideology, and that changed everything....

Read entry | Discuss (13 comments) | Recommend (+15 votes)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.