Thanks to LCoyote and others for keeping this alive with numerous threads that are packed full of leads.

I don't think there's been a thread yet, though, that really focuses on the original blog entries of this poster.

In my opinion, the poster has a very, very thorough posting history that started in late 2004 and ran until April of this year. There are nearly 2,000 blog entries at the site, and they all are very well sourced. The navigational setup, though, can lead one to think that there are fewer posts there than there actually are.

Plug this search string into the Google search box, and feast on the 1,970 hits that you get:

constantpated site:blogspot.com

It's all there, and it's been there for a year or two or three.

Here, as a start, is the most recent set of postings, from April of this year:

http://constantpated.blogspot.com/2007_04_...

In addition, I think that Anon has contributed to yet another site. There's a whole "book" on the topic there: (I believe Anon was going by the nick Philosophicus at this site)

http://www.correntewire.com/bush_warrantle...

These two parts of the "book" are particularly relevent, and lay out much of what Anon has been cryptically alluding to in many of his postings:

http://www.correntewire.com/the_network_ar...
http://www.correntewire.com/treasonous_dev...

Note in particular the conclusion that for around $1000 of equipment, one would be able to setup a network IP tracer (thingy -- obviously I didn't read it very carefully, just got the gist). I suspect this is what Anon means when he says that "somebody" has already done this and has all the data.

There was a poster on DU who only posted for a few months last year, who seems to either have been aware of Anon's posts or at least was on a parallel research path -- the writing does not seem (to me) to be Anon, although who knows:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discu...

It might be worthwhile to make sure multiple people have offline copies of the posts on the blogspot blog...

I just learned a little factoid that many of you may already have known.

When Cheney was Secretary of Defense for Bush 41, he apparently engaged in something equivalent to the Downing Street Memo -- fixing the intelligence around the policy.

After Iraq invaded Kuwait, Cheney needed to convince the Saudis about the need to go after Saddam, that the Saudis were in imminent danger from Iraq. Cheney somehow did this by convincing the Saudis that there were some quarter of a million Iraqi troops at the Kuwait-Saudi border. Funny thing was, though ... nobody has ever seen the "evidence" of those supposed troops, and further, there is evidence that *NO* troops whatsoever were actually on the border! In other words, Cheney conned the Saudis into letting the US stage the Gulf War from their territory, by telling them that they were in danger.

Now... when the US put air bases in Saudi Arabia, it royally pissed off one of the royalty -- Osama bin Laden, to be exact. He was so pissed that he vowed revenge, which eventually culminated in that attacks of 9/11.

SO.... there's the direct link that Cheney is responsible for 9/11. Just thought you'd like to know.

Same game, different day. Read much more at the links below, for the full story.



http://www.representativepress.org/LiesAbo...

http://foi.missouri.edu/polinfoprop/nocasu...

http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/dickcheney/timelin...