Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » dubeskin » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
dubeskin's Journal
Posted by dubeskin in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Mon Jul 03rd 2006, 05:40 PM
You see, this is the problem with minors and adults. Since minors have no strong voice in politics(except for some), the adults are able to change anything, and children can't do anything. The only way to block such a thing would be to have a dem vote no. Also, what is the difference between 16 and 18 other than 2 years? There is this stereotype that teens are bad drivers, cause more accidents and such, but that does not apply to ALL teens. Maybe you could raise it, but let the ones who get good grades, participate in extra curricular activities and things be able to drive at 16, but let the troublemakers and bad people be at 18. Also, I am early into school. I will turn 18 during the summer which I go to college. That could cause problems. I think by keeping it at 16, it also lets teens have a little more on the road training before being let loose. Just my 2 cents.
Discuss (1 comments)
Profile Information
dubeskin
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
Dubeskin
Not a DU Donor
1440 posts
Member since Sun Apr 30th 2006
Rocklin, California, US
Male
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.