Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » hfojvt » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
hfojvt's Journal
Posted by hfojvt in General Discussion: Presidential
Mon Nov 12th 2007, 05:47 PM
Then somebody is an idiot, and it's not me.

Total income going to wages in 2006 was 6.445 trillion. 1 trillion is 15.5% of that. However, the social security tax rate is only 12.4%. So, if all wage income was taxed, total revenue would only be about $800 billion. Social security is already taking in something like $700 billion (it was $611 billion in 1999). So, the net is $100 billion which is a trillion over ten years.

Do we always talk about ten years at a time, or is that some kind of Republican trick to make a $100 billion tax increase sound bigger than it really is?

And about the middle class. Here's a table showing only 16.47% of households make more than $97,500 a year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_inc...

That's for households too, which often have multiple earners. If people in the 80th and 90th percentile of income are middle class, then that is some strange definition of "middle" that I do not understand.
Discuss (0 comments)
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.