|
krispos42's Journal
Pick the catagory that best describes your experience in defensive gun uses.
Please do not include any military, police, or armed security work. The current controversy stems from private gun ownership. (on edit: added "with a gun" to choice #5) I don't normally read the National Rifle Association magazine. I'm not a member, and while the technical writing is pretty good, the political stuff makes my stomach turn. And I'm a gun owner, for the record.
But a guy at work left the February 2007 issue of "American Rifleman" in the lunchroom, and I snagged it. Hey, it's free, right? And oh, it was glorious reading. While I'm generally not particularly happy with the stance of the Democratic party on firearms, the FEAR the NRA had of the newfound power of the new Democratic Majority was thrilling! Finally, kick-ass Democrats ready to grab the fascist Republicans by their lies and conspiracies and illegal activities and twist and squeeze until the public was screaming for action against the high crimes and misdemeanors committed by the entire RNC! And they were scared. A few selected excerpts... UNLEASHED By Marshall Lewin With many key committee chairs and positions of power held by anti-gun members, there`s a very real danger that they could hijack Congress and turn it into their own gun-ban juggernaut. For proof of that, just look to the U.S. Senate, which confirms or kills federal judicial nominations and ratifies or rejects international treaties. The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Courts--the first stop for every one of the president`s nominations to the federal bench--may now be chaired by one of the most anti-gun politicians on Capitol Hill, Brooklyn gun-ban extremist New York Sen. Charles Schumer. Like Schumer, Biden is rated "F" by the NRA Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF) for his countless votes against firearm freedom. Like Schumer, Biden voted to expose the lawful firearm industry to crippling lawsuits; to extend and expand the Clinton gun bans; to allow a ban on most hunting-rifle ammunition; and to deny the free-speech rights of groups like the NRA during elections. Now, as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden can use his power to sabotage pro-freedom nominees for U.N. ambassador--as he did with Second Amendment defender John Bolton--and bully fellow senators into accepting whatever gun-ban treaty the U.N. concocts in the name of fighting international terrorism. Biden is sure to have a committed ally in California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who may chair the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security. In fact, if you total up all the congressional votes on which the NRA has ever taken a position, you`ll see that, throughout her career, Pelosi has voted against your firearm freedoms more than 98 percent of the time! In other words, she voted with the NRA a grand total of once. Just for a moment, consider the frightening fact that as speaker of the House, Pelosi is first in line of succession behind Vice President Dick Cheney to become president of the United States. But she doesn`t have to be president --even as House speaker, Pelosi has the power to do enormous harm to your Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Conyers has repeatedly called for a total ban on all handguns, and over his congressional career has cast at least 61 votes against gun owners` and hunters` rights. What that means is that he has voted against you and your beliefs 94 percent of the time. Imagine the damage that could result from a House Judiciary Committee chaired by Conyers--a man who says that the Second Amendment confers no individual rights at all. The House Ways and Means Committee is now chaired by New York anti-gun Congressman Charles Rangel. What that means is that the committee in charge of raising your taxes is now run by a man who once praised Cuban communist dictator Fidel Castro as "brilliant." Like fellow gun-banner Bill Clinton, Rangel has a long and legendary anti-gun record. Accord-ing to The New York Times, shortly after Election Day, Rangel "sketched out an expansive federal agenda" that included "teaming up with Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg on gun control." With Rangel at the controls of Congress` tax machine, look for new "sin taxes" on firearms and ammunition; new, punitive tariffs on firearm and ammunition imports--the possibilities are limitless. http://www.nraila.org/Issues/Articles/Read... The NRA, of course, expected the Democrats to use their new-found power to attack the Second Amendment full-throttle. They have, as a lobbyist organization should have, tunnel vision. And they were wrong. I, and I believe most DUers, thought that the newfound Democratic majority, with the active, angry support of the voters, would instead charge after the corrupt, warmongering Republicans like "a starved chihuahua on a pork chop", to quote Scott Adams. The entire right-wing establishment felt the same way! They were shitting their pants! Investigations. Hearings. Grand juries. Testimony. Subpoenas. Reigning in the Imperial President. Overriding vetos. De-funding the occupation of Iraq. Finding out what really happened in Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004. Breaking up monopolies, especially the media ones. Jamming our progressive legislative agendas down their reich-wing throats. Sideways, just to make it a little more painful. Impeachment!!! Gonzales, Rove, Addington, Cheney, BUSH!!! Orange jumpsuits. Manacles. Leg irons. Supermax prisons. Mug shots. And then.... impeachment is off the table. Democrats signal that, no matter what criminal evidence comes to light, BushCo is free to finish his term with honor. Subpeonas are ignored, with no consequences. Testimony consists of "I don't recall", and nobody pays for it. Bush vetoes go un-over-ridden. Republicans filibuster, and nobody makes them stick to their guns. Democrats are forced to accept Republican minority legislation! Democrats don't perform their own filibusters to stop the lemming Republicans. The NRA article was right in one respect. With the U.S. Senate divided 51 to 49, and with red and blue voters matched almost 1 to 1, you might expect that the Democrats who squeaked out a takeover of both houses of Congress would seek moderation, prudence, caution and common ground. The current crop of Democrats obviously don't want to do what is needed. And they don't watnt o hear about what they're suppose to be doing. The recent post about Speaker Pelosi's rejected postcard made note of the fact that she had not held any town hall-style meetings in well over a year. "Battered Democrat syndrome", perhaps. Or the dragging of the political dividing line to the right means that many Dems are just moderate Republicans that had the boundry dragged over them. Or maybe they're being blackmailed. Patriot Act lets the administration do that. But it's obvious the only solution to this problem is more Democrats. New, fresh, un-battered Democrats need to be voted in to replace Republicans and DINOs. Enough so that they can drag the "we gotta be bipartisan", established, 'get-along' Democrats kicking and screaming down the path of light and right. Okay, rant over. Time to get in the shower and get ready for work. DEATHS IN IRAQ Put them in perspective The Nov. 7 Star Tribune proclaimed in big bold type proclaims that 853 soldiers were killed in Iraq this year. How about a headline which puts the war dead in perspective? Minnesota alone is on target for a total of 500 people to be killed in traffic accidents this year. More than 12,000 people have been murdered in the United States since January. A total of 853 soldiers killed protecting this country from terrorist attacks doesn't seem so bad compared to the carnage that occurs every day in the United States. It is probably safer to be in Iraq that walking down a street in a major U.S. city or driving on one of our overcrowded roads. So let's not get so excited about casualties in Iraq. HAROLD OLSON, MINNEAPOLIS http://www.startribune.com/563/story/15408... This is my response that I sent in. I don't know if they'll print it or not. But it made me feel damn good to write it!!!! This is in response to Saturday's letter by Harold Olson. Mr. Olson, the entire worth of your "put them in perspective" letter is that the soldiers died "protecting this country from terrorists attacks." If this were true, then your letter would be accurate. However, they our boys engaged in the occupation of Iraq are not dying to protect us from terrorism. They are dying to secure long-term American oil companies control of MidEast oil, and in the process making Republican industries such as Big Oil, Big Defense, and security & military contractors rich with "cost-plus" contracts, no auditing, and no oversight. They are dying so that Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney can claim sweeping powers and immunity to criticism as a "war president" and continue to terrorize the populace. They are dying so Republicans can rape the Treasury then shrug and say "Gee, looks like there's no money for S-CHIP or infrastructure. I guess they're going to have to go private instead!" And they are dying because the inflated egos of the Republicans will not admit they were wrong to invade in the first place. And, ultimately, we are losing in Iraq because the warmongering Republicans do not have the moral or political courage to do what is necessary to "win" (as they define it) in Iraq, namely, instituting a draft to flood Iraq with troops for a decade, nationalizing the defense industry to keep them supplied, and creating war taxes to pay for it. The Republicans don't even have the moral courage to take care of our wounded boys properly. Regardless of original intent, the Iraq Invasion and Occupation that we were lied into is now a cash cow for Republican-dominated industries, businessmen and corporations that, in the next few election cycles, will have tons of money to give to the GOP. And that is the most shameful aspect of this entire endeavor. STOP! DON'T VOTE YET!!!![]() Thank you for stopping and reading these instructions first *cough* SQUATCH *cough*. ![]() The purpose of this poll is to see how the general public perceives one aspect of American firearm laws. I'm not trying to find your opinion, whether or not something should or shouldn't be permitted. Nor am I trying to find out what the law is. I'm trying to find out how well the general public has been educated by the popular and news media, the politicians, the activists, and the lobbyists on this issue. I want to know what people THINK the law is. What their impression is. If you DON'T know what the law is, I would appreciate it if you voted your perception and kicked the thread. If you DO know what the law is, I would appreciate it if you abstained from revealing what the law is, voted "I know what the law is" instead, and kicked the thread. If nobody has disclosed what the law it 24 hours or so after posting, I'll post it for general edification. Question: is it your impression that the since-expired 1993 Federal Assault Weapons Ban regulated fully-automatic rifles and pistols? For the purposes of this poll, "fully-automatic rifles and pistols" are guns that, when the trigger is held down, fire two or more rounds. And special thanks to Ms. Toad for her helpful suggestion in the last poll. STOP! DON'T VOTE YET!!!Thank you for stopping and reading these instructions first. The purpose of this poll is to see how the general public perceives one aspect of American firearm laws. I'm not trying to find your opinion, whether or not something should or shouldn't be permitted. Nor am I trying to find out what the law is. I'm trying to find out how well the general public has been educated by the popular and news media, the politicians, the activists, and the lobbyists on this issue. I want to know what people THINK the law is. What their impression is. If you DON'T know what the law is, I would appreciate it if you voted your perception and kicked the thread. If you DO know what the law is, I would appreciate it if you abstained from voting or revealing what the law is, but kick the thread anyway. If nobody has disclosed what the law it 24 hours after posting, I'll post it for general edification. Question: is it your impression that, on a federal level, fully-automatic firearms are readily available for sale to the general public? For the purposes of this poll, "fully-automatic firearms" are guns that, when the trigger is held down, fires two or more rounds. Also for the purposes of this poll, "general public" means Mr. and Mrs. Law-Abiding American with a clean criminal and mental-health record. Okay, you can vote now... ![]() Repeating firearms are guns that have a mechanism that, only when physically manipulated by the shooter, will allow the shooter to fire multiple shots without reloading the gun.
Nearly all repeaters fall into the following categories: Bolt-action Lever-action Slide- or pump-action Revolving action Bolt-action guns are typically rifles of the sort that rotates to lock and unlock the bolt. The handle is typically located convenient to the shooter's right hand, the same hand used to pull the trigger. To cycle the mechanism, the shooter first rotates the bolt counter-clockwise, then yanks the bolt rearward as far as it can go. This extracts and ejects the loaded cartridge, fired or not. The bolt is then pushed forward, which strips a fresh cartridge from the magazine and inserts it into the barrel, and in some designs, cocks the firing mechanism. Finally, the bolt is rotated clockwise, which lock the bolt in place and, in many designs, cocks the firing mechanism. These types of bolt-actions are called "turnbolt repeaters". There are some designs that are simply pulled straight back and pushed forward, but those are not common. Bolt-action guns are almost all rifles, and are typically fed from a stacked magazine that may be fixed or detachable. Rifles the fire rimfire ammunition are often made with fixed tubular magazines that hold cartridges nose-to-tail underneath the barrel. This turnbolt repeater has a fixed stacked magazine with a hinged floorplate for quick, safe unloading. It does not protrude from the rifle. ![]() This turnbolt repeater has a detachable stacked magazine for quick, safe loading and unloading. It protrudes from the rifle. ![]() Lever-action guns are typically rifles that use a lever with a loop for the shooter's hand to cycle the mechanism. The lever is located where the shooter holds the rear grip, and the shooter uses his or her trigger hand to work the lever after pulling the trigger. To cycle the mechanism, the shooter slips his or her hand into the loop below the grip and pushes down with the top of the hand. The lever moves down and forward, unlocking the bolt and moving it rearwards while extracting and ejecting the loaded cartridge and cocking the external hammer. The shooter then pulls the lever up and rearwards, causing the bolt to move forward, loading a cartridge from the magazine into the barrel, and locking the bolt closed. The gun is now ready to fire. They are typically fed from a fixed tubular magazine attached to the underside of the barrel that holds the cartridges in a nose-to-tail configuration. This lever-action rifle features a tubular magazine loaded through an opening just below the bolt. Some designs can be loaded by unscrewing the front of the magazine instead. ![]() Slide-action/pump-action guns are typically shotguns with a foregrip that is used to operate the firing mechanism. The shooter uses his or her non-trigger hand to slide the foregrip back and forth after pulling the trigger. To cycle the mechanism after firing a shot, the shooter pulls back briskly on the foregrip. This causes the shotgun's bolt to unlock and slide rearward while extracting and ejecting the loaded shotshell and cocking the firing mechanism. Then the slide is pushed forward briskly, causing to bolt to move forward, strip a fresh shell from the magazine, and load it into the barrel, then finally locking the bolt closed. Shotguns are almost always fed from a tubular magazine attached to the underside of the barrel that holds the shells in a nose-to-tail configuration. This pump-action shotgun features a tubular magazine loaded though an opening located underneath the gun and in front of the triggerguard. ![]() Revolving action guns are typically handguns called "revolvers", which have a cylinder behind the barrel which has holes bored in it for holding and firing cartridges. Unlike a magazine, which only holds cartridges until they can be loaded into the barrel, the cartridges in a revolver are fired in the cylinder. The cylinder acts as an array of separate firing chambers for the barrel. Revolver mechanisms come in two types: single-action and double-action. Single-action revolvers have triggers whose only purpose is to release a cocked hammer. If the hammer does not cock, the gun will not fire. To fire a single-action revolver, the shooter draws back and cocks the hammer, typically with the shooter's thumb. This also causes the cylinder to rotate, putting a fresh cartridge in line with the barrel, then locking itself in place. With the hammer cocked, the shooter then pulls the trigger, which releases the hammer and fires a shot. For the next shot, the shooter must manually cock the hammer again. Double-action revolvers have a mechanism that allows the trigger to both cock and release the hammer. There are two ways to fire a double-action revolver. You can shoot it like the single-action revolver described above, or you can simply keep pulling the trigger. Each time the trigger is pulled, the hammer is drawn backward while the cylinder rotates a fresh cartridge behind the barrel. One the fresh cartridge is aligned, the cylinder locks itself in place. Further pressure on the trigger will cause the drawn-back hammer to release and fire a shot. This type of trigger pull is longer and heavier than the single-action one. Single-action revolvers typically have a fixed cylinder that is loaded and unloaded through a loading gate, while double-action revolvers typically have a swing-out cylinder for rapid loading and unloading. This single-action revolver has a loading gate (shown closed) between the hammer and cylinder. An under-barrel hand ejector lets the shooter push out cartridges one at a time. ![]() This double-action revolver has a cylinder that opens up. Cartridges are inserted into the rear of the cylinder. The rod protruding from the front of the cylinder is the ejector. Pushing this rod rearwards briskly will eject all of the cartridges simultaneously. ![]() And not puddle-jumpers, either. Jets the size of a 737 or A320
Fewer trips for the fuel truck Developments debuted at the Paris Air Show put airliners on a track toward flying more passengers while using less fuel. Robert Rowe Contributing Editor "It really was way ahead of its time." We're talking about the Piaggio Aero Industries P180, a perennial regular at the Paris Air Show. The Avanti is an ‘efficiency machine' conceived out of the oil crisis of the late ‘70s and hatched by the late ‘80s. Despite wise-cracks about its looks when it first appeared (like, "Is it flying back wards?"), events at this past summer's Paris Show foretell its re-emergence as in-vogue platform because of its high performance and fuel economy. It has props but cruises at 41,000 ft, runs 460 mph, and on a typical 345-mile flight arrives within five minutes of a jet. But that jet will burn 50% more fuel! ![]() <snip> It's not like aviation has stood still in operational efficiency or in reducing noise and pollution. Consider the often-cited productivity factor, passenger miles/gallon (pmpg), a measurement that accounts for the economics of the engine and airframe as a system. This is the fuel economy of a transport airplane averaged over its passenger capacity. The Airbus A380 and the Boeing 787, both now close to entering service, are expected to get over 80 pmpg. This is a whopping 3X improvement over early jets (i.e. 707-120). The air transportation fleet overall average today is about 47 pmpg. Modern 70-seat twin-engine short-haul turboprops get about 52 pmpg. <more> http://machinedesign.com/ContentItem/70215... And this is about the easyJet ecoJet: The “easyJet ecoJet”: to cut CO2 emissions by 50% by 2015 easyJet has today become the first airline to outline the environmental requirements that must be met by the next generation of short-haul super-clean aircraft; and unveiled its design of what such an aircraft could look like for operation by 2015. Dubbed the “easyJet ecoJet”, the aircraft would need to be 25% quieter and would emit 50% less CO2 and 75% less NOx than today’s newest aircraft (the 737 and A320 families of aircraft). <snip> In easyJet’s current configuration and operation, the projection for the eco-liner would generate less than 47g of CO2 per passenger km. For comparison, easyJet’s current operations generate 97.5g of CO2 per passenger km, the Toyota Prius emits 104g of CO2 per kilometre; and the European car industry has recently been given a target to achieve 130g of CO2 per kilometre. <more> ![]() http://www.easyjet.com/EN/News/easyjet_eco... About 90 minutes or so ago, I fell asleep for a nap on my bed. I don't normally take naps, because when I wake up it tastes like something died in my mouth. Like now, for example. But I was tired and the sun was setting, so I fell asleep for an hour or so.
I dreamed I was in some sort of building like a small warehouse full of boxes of government files. I was working on my computer, probably doing DU stuff. In my dream, there had been a series of robberies of files, so when I heard suspicious noises, I knew exactly what they were. I got up and began investigating the source of these strange noises, and shortly came across Alberto Gonzales, the former attorney general. He was carrying a pistol and was wearing a dark-blue windbreaker with FBI on the back and arms in yellow letters, like they do in the movies. I grabbed him and dragged him towards the sounds of the noises, but he seemed to be strangely reluctant to go. Finally, we came and saw two people in hoodies crawling all over towers of cardboard boxes of files. I said to him "THERE THEY ARE!", but he war reluctant to do anything. I kept prodding him, and finally said "There are two of them give me a gun so I can help." He didn't want to do that, either, so I reached over and grabbed his backup pistol from his belt. In my dream, it was a Phoenix Arms model HP22, which is exactly the pistol that I own and had been shooting on Saturday with a couple of friends. So I confronted them with the little .22. I think I yelled "Freeze!". The froze and looked up, then looked intently at Gonzo. I think they were black, but it might just have been the shadows. Gonzo eventually did, but reluctantly. The situation is really tense, and I'm waiting for Gonzo to begin handcuffing them or calling for backup or something. Instead, they begin talking. And as they talk, Gonzo gradually lowers his gun until it's pointing at the floor. Eventually I realize that they are having a conversation as familiars, that they know each other and have worked together in the past! Eventually, as the talking goes on, they realize I'm not going to shoot anybody without some kind of signal from Gonzo, and just sort of creep back to what they were doing. I realize this, lower the pistol, and start screaming at Gonzo, asking him WHY he didn't arrest them, WHY he didn't call for backup, WHAT did he know about those two intruders. He didn't respond, so eventually I give up. I give him the gun back and storm over to my computer, fully intending to write about this to my congressman and start a huge scandal. I turn on the lamp with the fluorescent bulb on my desk, sign into my computer, and begin to type. Then there's a power surge, and the light gets really bright. I quickly pull the chain to turn the lamp off, then as things settle down I pull the chain again. The CFB comes back on again, but it has been damaged. It is buzzing and barely lit. I shrug and continue to type. I peripherally am aware of Gonzo moving around the warehouse, turning off lights. Finally, after a couple of minutes, I realize I haven't heard him moving around for a while. And then it hits me: with the lamp broken, Gonzo can kill me and blame it on bad lighting!!!!!!! Plant the cheapie gun on me, which is identical to one I own! Hell, maybe it's not LIKE my gun, it IS my gun! NO WITNESSES!!! I jump up out of my chair and race down a corridor to the exit. And then I woke up. Snapped awake, actually, and took a few seconds to orient myself. Aside from the sheer fact that I'm having a conspiracy-theory dream about Gonzo (ugh!), what is weird is that I don't normally remember my dreams! And not with this much detail! It was INTENSE!!!. ![]() This rating was determined based on the presence of the following words: gun (13x) bomb (8x) torture (3x) dead (2x) shit (1x) I knew the Repub censors wanted to keep the electric car, the TurboSteamer concept, a dead soldier in Iraq, and the inversion of the Constitution under wraps, but this is a little extreme. And, sadly, not a bare breast in the bunch... http://journals.democraticunderground.com/... I read about this a few months ago in a car magazine, then was reminded of it last night in a discussion thread, so I though I'd bring it up. BMW is working on it, and it sounds like a really workable idea if they can mass-produce it.
Basically it's a tiny steam turbine engine linked to the engine's crankshaft. The heat source is the engine's exhaust manifold, which as anybody who's worked on a car knows, is hot as hell. The cooling source is the engine's regular cooling system, presumebly with increased cooling capacity. By capturing what is usually waste heat from the combustion process and converting it into rotary motion, the demand on the engine (and thus gasoline comsumption) is significantly reduced. The system works best on steady driving such as highway cruising, the kind of driving where the battery system of a hybrid is mostly useless. In a published test from December 2005, BMW claimed that a 1.8-liter 4-cylinder engine had a 15% decrease in fuel consumption while making 10 kilowatts (about 13.5 horsepower) more in static testing. This is important because for highway cruising, your average car only needs about 30-40 horsepower to push the air out of the way. If 15 of that can come from the Turbosteamer, you're well on your way getting drastically improved highway milage. With Congress about to pass some significant CAFE increases, something like this can be developed, built, and sold a lot easier and cheaper than a complex hybrid system. If Ford, GM, and Chrysler get their asses in gear, this could be on every engine they make, from the little Zetec in the Focus to the big 5.4 Triton V-8, increasing fuel milage across the board. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbosteamer http://www.motoring.co.za/index.php?fArtic... It is now obvious that the RNC has inverted the Constitution. I am writing this because it hit me in a simple, intuitive way two days ago and I want to share it with the world.
As outlined in the Constitution, the purpose of a member of Congress is to represent the people of his district or state to the federal government. To bring attention to the conditions and needs of the district in affairs ranging from local to international. Law, trade, economic development, social issues, and others are all topics under the purview of the district's or state's representative. For Republicans, that is not longer the case. Now, the purpose of a Republican member of Congress is to represent the will of the Republican National Committee to the people of his district or state. And that is all. Consider nearly every hot topic of the past few years: Iraq: the people, corporations, and organizations that control the RNC wanted to go into Iraq. They wanted oil, they wanted a war, they wanted Persian Gulf dominance, they wanted political capitol. So the GOP congressional delegations spend months representing the RNC to their constituents. And we got the Iraq Occupation. A massive national debt: the people, corporations, and organizations that control the RNC want a massive national debt. The profits from the deficit-spending go mostly to the rich and comfortable. The interest on the national debt goes mostly to the rich and comfortable, and are only taxed at 15% to boot. Chronic budgetary shortfalls allow the reduction or cancellation of social programs. So the GOP congressional delegations spend months representing the RNC their constituents. And we got a $9,000,000,000,000 national debt. Tax cuts for the rich: the people, corporations, and organizations that control the RNC want to pay less taxes. The motive is pretty plain there. Less taxes on the rich equals more money for the rich. "Reaganomics" are born and "proven" to work by violating common and basic fiscal sense. So the GOP congressional delegations spend months representing the RNC their constituents. Politicalization of the bureaucracy: the people, corporations, and organizations that control the RNC want the bureaucracy that serves them. So much easier to sidestep the law when you own the law, after all. And you do that with appointed political cronies that must be kept in place and defended at all costs. So the GOP congressional delegations spend months representing the RNC their constituents. Reduction of government: the people, corporations, and organizations that control the RNC do not want government. To get rid of government, you need massive fraud and incompetence, like Gonzales, Goodling, Brown and any number of other lackwits running things without supervision. They, the incompetents, must be kept in office as long as possible. So the GOP congressional delegations spend months representing the RNC their constituents. Never admitting you are wrong, and never admitting they are right: the people, corporations, and organizations that control the RNC want to stay in power and keep the Democrats out of power. That means protecting and defending ALL of your own actions regardless of the inheirent ridiculousness of the defense, or the actions or people you are defending. And that also means never admitting anything the other side does is anything but mean-spirited partisan politics. So the GOP congressional delegations spend months representing the RNC their constituents. Not impeaching Bush/Cheney: the people, corporations, and organizations that control the RNC want their most prominant Republicans (and dieties to the base) to be successful. Far too much has been invested in the Bush/Cheney Legacy to have it go down in flames because of such minor things as unconstitional, illegal, and possibly treasonous acts. So the GOP congressional delegations spend months representing the RNC their constituents. Illegal domestic wiretapping: the people, corporations, and organizations that control the RNC want a warrantless wiretapping program. It appeals to the authoritarian-seeking base, increased the 'unitary executive' theory, and doubtless provides a wealth of information on political and corporate opposition. So the GOP congressional delegations spend months representing the RNC their constituents. Election fraud: the people, corporations, and organizations that control the RNC want to say in power. They cannot stay in power based on their principals, nor their record. So they must steal elections to win. Caging lists. Questionable electronic voting machines. Lack of hand counts. Ballot stuffing. Surpressing "get out the vote" efforts. Shredding voter-registration forms of people that registered "Democrat". That nice little trick they pulled in Ohio where they ran paper ballots through other district's counting machines. So the GOP congressional delegations spend months representing the RNC their constituents. Voter fraud: the people, corporations, and organizations that control the RNC want a distraction from election fraud mentioned above. Voter fraud, election fraud, portrayed as the same thing to the populace to muddy the issue. So the GOP congressional delegations spend months representing the RNC their constituents. And so it does. On and on down the list. Gitmo. Iran. Chavez. Russia. Libby. Global warming. Even 9/11, perhaps. And that is how it works now. Republican lawmakers selling not just themselves to the electorate, but the demands and desires of the 'have-mores', corporatism, conservative think-tanks, and the religious right. This is why, ultimately, despite tough questioning and other public posturing, even the 'rebellious' Republicans untimately yield to the RNC. The DNC, which has been likened to herding cats, seems to have less of this. So far. We can only hope it stays that way. I went to this site, the American Presidency Project, to see exactly when the Democratic Party became the party of gun control.
The 2004 platform states: Crime and violence. While terrorism poses an especially menacing threat to our nation, a strong America must remain vigilant against the scourge of homegrown crime as well. We are proud that Democrats led the fight to put more than 100,000 cops on the beat through the COPS program, and we will continue our steadfast support for COPS and community policing. To keep our streets safe for our families, we support tough punishment of violent crime and smart efforts to reintegrate former prisoners into our communities as productive citizens. We will crack down on the gang violence and drug crime that devastate so many communities, and we will increase drug treatment, including mandatory drug courts and mandatory drug testing for parolees and probationers, so fewer crimes are committed in the first place. We support the rights of victims to be respected, to be heard, and to be compensated. We will help break the cycle of domestic violence by punishing offenders and standing with victims. We will protect Americans' Second Amendment right to own firearms, and we will keep guns out of the hands of criminals and terrorists by fighting gun crime, reauthorizing the assault weapons ban, and closing the gun show loophole, as President Bush proposed and failed to do. (Boldface mine) The 2000 platform states: Bill Clinton and Al Gore took office determined to turn the tide in the battle against crime, drugs, and disorder in our communities. They put in place a tougher more comprehensive strategy than anything tried before, a strategy to fight crime on every single front: more police on the streets to thicken the thin blue line between order and disorder, tougher punishments - including the death penalty - for those that dare to terrorize the innocent, and smarter prevention to stop crime before it even starts. They stood up to the gun lobby, to pass the Brady Bill and ban deadly assault weapons - and stopped nearly half a million felons, fugitives, and stalkers from buying guns. They fought for and won the biggest anti-drug budgets in history, every single year. They funded new prison cells, and expanded the death penalty for cop killers and terrorists. (boldface mine) The 1996 platform states: Fighting crime. Today's Democratic Party believes the first responsibility of government is law and order. Four years ago, crime in America seemed intractable. The violent crime rate and the murder rate had climbed for seven straight years. Drugs seemed to flow freely across our borders and into our neighborhoods. Convicted felons could walk into any gun shop and buy a handgun. Military-style assault weapons were sold freely. Our people didn't feel safe in their homes, walking their streets, or even sending their children to school. Under the thumb of special interests like the gun lobby, Republicans talked tough about crime but did nothing to fight it. <snip> Protecting our children, our neighborhoods, and our police from criminals with guns. Bob Dole, Newt Gingrich, and George Bush were able to hold the Brady Bill hostage for the gun lobby until Bill Clinton became President. With his leadership, we made the Brady Bill the law of the land. And because we did, more than 60,000 felons, fugitives, and stalkers have been stopped from buying guns. President Clinton led the fight to ban 19 deadly assault weapons, designed for one purpose only -- to kill human beings. We oppose efforts to restrict weapons used for legitimate sporting purposes, and we are proud that not one hunter or sportsman was forced to change guns because of the assault weapons ban. But we know that the military-style guns we banned have no place on America's streets, and we are proud of the courageous Democrats who defied the gun lobby and sacrificed their seats in Congress to make America safer. Today's Democratic Party stands with America's police officers. We are proud to tell them that as long as Bill Clinton and Al Gore are in the White House, any attempt to repeal the Brady Bill or assault weapons ban will be met with a veto. We must do everything we can to stand behind our police officers, and the first thing we should do is pass a ban on cop-killer bullets. Any bullet that can rip through a bulletproof vest should be against the law; that is the least we can do to protect the brave police officers who risk their lives to protect us. (italics and boldface mine) The 1992 platform states: Firearms. It is time to shut down the weapons bazaars in our cities. We support a reasonable waiting period to permit background checks for purchases of handguns, as well as assault weapons controls to ban the possession, sale, importation and manufacture of the most deadly assault weapons. We do not support efforts to restrict weapons used for legitimate hunting and sporting purposes. We will work for swift and certain punishment of all people who violate the country's gun laws and for stronger sentences for criminals who use guns. We will also seek to shut down the black market for guns and impose severe penalties on people who sell guns to children. (boldface mine) The 1988 platform states: WE BELIEVE that the federal government should provide increased assistance to local criminal justice agencies, enforce a ban on "cop killer" bullets that have no purpose other than the killing and maiming of law enforcement officers, reinforce our commitment to help crime victims, and assume a leadership role in securing the safety of our neighborhoods and homes. The 1984 platform states: ![]() *crickets* The 1980 platform states: ![]() *crickets* The 1976 platform states: Handguns simplify and intensify violent crime. Ways must be found to curtail the availability of these weapons. The Democratic Party must provide the leadership for a coordinated federal and state effort to strengthen the presently inadequate controls over the manufacture, assembly, distribution and possession of handguns and to ban Saturday night specials. Furthermore, since people and not guns commit crimes, we support mandatory sentencing for individuals convicted of committing a felony with a gun. The Democratic Party, however, affirms the right of sportsmen to possess guns for purely hunting and target-shooting purposes. (boldface mine) The 1972 platform states: There must be laws to control the improper use of hand guns. Four years ago a candidate for the presidency was slain by a handgun. Two months ago, another candidate for that office was gravely wounded. Three out of four police officers killed in the line of duty are slain with hand guns. Effective legislation must include a ban on sale of hand guns known as Saturday night specials which are unsuitable for sporting purposes; The 1968 platform states: The federal government has come swiftly to the aid of cities needing help to bring major disturbances under control, and Democratic leadership secured the enactment of a new gun control law as a step toward putting the weapons of wanton violence beyond the reach of criminal and irresponsible hands. <snip> Promote the passage and enforcement of effective federal, state and local gun control legislation. The 1964 platform states: ![]() *crickets* The 1960 platform states: ![]() *crickets* The 1956 platform states: ![]() *crickets* So that's a half-century of Democrats on gun control. Please note the 1996 platform that acknowledged that the 1993 Assault Weapons Ban cost Democrats the House and the Congress, so PLEASE stop saying that it didn't!!!!! The term and paranoia of 'assault weapons' started back in 1992. Before that, it was Saturday Night Specials and criminals buying handguns that were worried about. I wrote a little obituary/tribute in my Journal last Friday when I first heard about it.
I found out last Wednesday that the Patriot Guard Riders were going to be there. It is Kansas, after all. Fred Phelps' territory. I checked out the Patriot Guard Rider's website and they have some pictures of the arrival of the earthy remains of Spc. Forrest John Waterbury on the 21st, and of them honoring him during visitation yesterday. I expect at some point this weekend they will also post pictures of the funeral service itself. I will update as needed. 22 Mar 2007 11:08 AM After Mission Report for the Escort for Specialist Forrest J. Waterbury ( 3-21-07 Wedneday ) Before the mission on wednesady, LEO was contacted for Potowatamie County and also Riley County. Bill " Tombstone " Padget was instrumental in making sure that we had LEO Escort for this mission. On wednesday at around 1045 hrs people started arriving at the staging area...at the Manhattan Airport. Riders from as far away as Kansas City and Salina rode in. Chuck Bramhall, Chuck "Macguyver" Ford, Bill Padget, Big Jimbo from Lawrence, Trae from Kansas City, TailGunner from Salina and MSG Kirk Crabtree from Fort Riley. There were many other faces I have seen at other missions and 3 first timers. I thank all of you for participating on this mission to Escort Specialist Waterbury. A Safety and Ride Briefing was given...and a Lady CMA Rider gave the prayers for this mission and safety for all the riders. There was a count of 39 motorcylces for this escort. The CAO SFC Galeegoes and Christi Waterbury and her family arrived. Condolences were given Christi and her family. At 1230 hrs the plane with SPC Waterbury arrived and 6 of our riders to include MSG Crabtree who was allowed onto the tarmac to welcome Spc Waterbury home. As The Spc Waterbury came off the plane MSG Crabtree called the detail to attention. Then called Present arms. When Spc Waterbury was laid in the hearse. MSG Crabtree called Order Arms. MSG Kirk Crabtree served withe SPc Waterbury in Irac. We had a contingent of active duty in uniform that sreved with Spc Waterbury, on their motorcycles, riding with us on this escort. Once the Escort Detail with large American flags was in front and behind the hearse, the family members, then the rest of the riders followed behind the Family. LEO from Riley county arrived to escort us throught Manhattan...thank you sirs you did and excellent job. At the Potowatomie county Line, the Pott County Sheriff and Chief of Police Mike Baker met us to take over escort duties. The Riley County Police Depart decided that they were going to saty with us all the way to the funeral home. Upon arrival at Stewart Funeral Home we parked our bikes and gathered around the hearse to Salute Spc Waterbury as he came out of the hearse. MSG Crabtree called all the commands. Once SPC Crabtree was carried in by the Military Honor Guard. The Patriot Guard was dismissed. Thank you everyone for coming and paying our hero Spc Waterbury this honor!!!! OUTSTANDING JOB EVERYONE!!!! Ever your servant, Kai Sayson, PGR Ride Captain, Manhattan, KS 23 Mar 2007 9:18 PM The Visitation for Spc Forrest J. Waterbury went absolutely perfect. God was good with us and gave us a cool evening just with a slight breeze enough to just kiss the skin with coolness. Did not rain !!!! 19 Riders showed up from as far away as Wichita, KS and Kansas City. Thank you everyone for coming to honor Spc Waterbury. General Ham from Fort Riley shook each Patriot Guard and thanked them for being there. DC "Big Dog" Hannah was there and spoke with the the Riders and Thank them for being there and said he has never met a group of people that made him feel that proud to know...Thanks Big Dog for being there!!!! and Thank you each and everyone that came... Thank you John Deche from ALR 400 from Topeka and bringing the flags for us to use. Kai Sayson, PGR Ride Captain, Manhattan, KS Forrest John Waterbury, age 25, married not quite a year and with an adopted kid.
My boss' relatives did not find out until Wednesday. That was the day my boss left his cel phone at home. When he got home, after a long night shift where the machinery was acting up (again), he found both his voice mail and answering machine full of bad news. My boss is a retired Lieutenant Colonel in the Army. After work yesterday (where he told me about his nephew) we went back to his place and drank a toast of irish whiskey to Forrest John. We talked over a beer for about an hour and a half while my boss told me about his nephew, his new wife, his wife's child that he had adopted. About how he had joined up after high school, and how proud he was to be in the Army, driving a tank. About how, at the first family reunion after he joined up, he said "I guess now I'm legally required to salute you!" We talked further, about how my boss had had notification duty twice in his career, once during the Gulf War and once after a Minnesota Guardsman was killed in a rollover accident during the Olympics in Atlanta, and how hard that duty was. Forrest Waterbury, John to his friends, was apparently killed by small-arms fire from his position as tank commander of an M1A1 Abrams, a job which typically entails popping your head out of the turrent's hatch on a regular basis. The Houston Chronicle has a story about it here. And here is his picture: ![]() I think my boss could use some good vibes, DUers. Requiescat in pace, Specialist Forrest John Waterbury, Unites States Army. ![]() Taps
music by Brig. Gen. Butterfield, 1862 lyrics by unknown Fading light, dims the sight; And a star, gems the sky, gleaming bright; From afar, drawing nigh; Falls the night... Day is done, gone the sun; From the lake, from the hills, from the sky; All is well, safely rest; God is nigh... Then goodnight, peaceful night; Till the light, of the dawn, shineth bright; God is near, do not fear; Friend, goodnight... ![]() In February, I made this post (it's in my journal):
It is my belief that Bush will attack Iran on or about the 15th of March, shortly after twilight falls. Looking at a moonrise/moonset table for Tehran, I noticed that on the 15th of March, moonrise was at about 4am local time. The moon is waning at the time, so for the next two weeks there will be large periods of moonless night for our planes (and possibly troops) to fight in. Our night vision gear is both more numerous and better than anything the Iranians have, so it makes perfect sense to attack when the advantages are most fully ours. And that means a lot of night attacks. We will also have three carrier battle groups in the region, the John C. Stennis, the Dwight D. Eisenhowser, and the Ronald Reagan. That's 144 combat fighter aircraft, a dozen AWACS radar planes, and the better part of a thousand Tomahawk missiles potentially on the Ticonderoga-class and Arleigh Burke-class escort vessels. The Ticos and Burkes also have the Aegis combat-management system that is designed to defend against saturation attacks by planes and missiles. The Eisenhowser is already there. The Stennis left Washington State on January 4th to join her, and the Reagan left San Diego on January 28th for the 'western Pacific'. And the San Diego-based carrier Nimitz is scheduled to deploy in March, probably to relieve Eisenhowser after the initial phase of combat. Just a feeling, but it's there. I don't know if they are readying ground troops for an invasion, but maybe somebody more familar with the ground forces knows something. http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/militar... http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/loca... Basically, there will be fireworks for my birthday... again... Now, looking at all the events going on now, I really do wonder if BushCo will attack Iran as a distraction to domestic politics. Consider the 'exposivly formed penetrator' furor a couple-three weeks ago. The Iran/Hamas connection being trumpeted. And at home, the devestating Libby trial, the US Attorney firing scandal, the fight by the Repubs to keep the right to attack Iran, the Walter Reed Building 18 scandal, the fact that Valarie Plame and Patrick Fitzgerald are due to testify before Congress soon, and the attempt to get Rove under oath... Well, let's just say I'm looking for a Gulf of Tonkin incident. <edit: typo> |
Latest Threads
The ten most recent threads posted on
the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums. Boeing to Lead UAV Aerial Refueling Demo By unhappycamper Is Hillary The First White Female Secretary Of State? By malik flavors (Military Times) Op-Ed: Future Leaders By unhappycamper Islamists Say They'll Take on Pirates By unhappycamper Gen. Casey Discusses Role of the Army By unhappycamper UK militant 'killed in Pakistan' By Eugene Filner Advocates 'De-Boot Camp' for GIs By unhappycamper US Develops Tiny Flying Robots By unhappycamper Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted
on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the
last 24 hours. Rec this puppy if you think Bush should face trial in America for WAR CRIMES 200 recs : By derby378 Nadler Introduces Resolution Opposing Bush Pardons 75 recs : By Hissyspit Somali Pirates in Discussions to Acquire Citigroup 40 recs : By BR_Parkway Please Help (Iroquois) 38 recs : By H2O Man I remember you from the General Election. 37 recs : By Bicoastal **Please Help Send a Request to the Obama Transition Team** 36 recs : By JeffR Michael Moore: "We're seeing ... the end of capitalism as we know it....And I say good riddance." 34 recs : By marmar Congress Opposes Bush Pardons 32 recs : By davidswanson Former Regulator: Clear Fraud in Financial Crisis -- Why Isn't Anyone in Jail? 30 recs : By DogPoundPup PHOTOS Obama goes sandwich shopping in Chicago (Nov 21) 29 recs : By Jackeens_for_Obama Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
|

