Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » madfloridian » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
Madfloridian's Journal
Posted by madfloridian in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Sun Jan 28th 2007, 03:37 PM
I will make you a bet this is exactly how it will go down. The Third Way which is tied to the DLC is making policy. Here is Al From talking about it:

Who Owns the Third Way

I wrote about how this group is setting the policy for the Democrats, and why I think it should be questioned. They have too much policy making power for the Democrats.

About the DLC, its goals

Privately funded and operating as an extraparty organization without official Democratic sanction, and calling themselves "New Democrats," the DLC sought nothing less than the miraculous: the transubstantiation of America's oldest political party. Though the DLC painted itself using the palette of the liberal left--as "an effort to revive the Democratic Party's progressive tradition," with New Democrats being the "trustees of the real tradition of the Democratic Party"--its mission was far more confrontational.


Here are their policy talking points about the surge. Heard any of them lately?

http://www.third-way.com/products/69

Abstract
A short memo outlining an idea for Congress: demanding that the President provide a plan for ending America’s combat operarations in Iraq.

Description
The President has offered up yet another in a long line of “plans for victory”, but he has never told the country exactly how or when the United States would end its involvement in the Iraq War. Rather than fighting over troop numbers, we recommend in this memo that Congress demand such a plan from the President.


The full statement is in pdf version. Here is part of it.

http://www.third-way.com/data/product/file...

Third Way supports the idea for a nonbinding congressional resolution condemning the escalation. But going further, with legislation barring the troop increase, would be a mistake, for both substantive and political reasons. First, we do not believe that Congress should use the imprecise mechanism of appropriations to dictate the management of an ongoing military conflict. There is simply no way of ensuring that funding restrictions would not compromise the safety of the troops already in the field, and it is generally a bad idea for Congress to be dictating the details of military strategy. Moreover, continuing to argue over troop numbers keeps the debate on the President’s terms: the tactics of an open-ended commitment to combat operations in Iraq.

We therefore recommend that Congress take up – either by free-standing legislation invoking the War Powers Resolution or by a rider on the supplemental appropriations bill for Iraq – legislation requiring the President to submit to Congress within three months a plan laying out precisely when and how American combat operations in Iraq will come to an end. Members should put a limit on the length of the President’s plan for an end to the war – we suggest 18 months or two years. Congress also should press the President to lay out the details, both through hearings and in his report – how the United States would begin to disengage militarily in Iraq. This includes the phases and manner of military redeployment and how American strategic interests in the region will be protected, etc.

Iraq is now second only to Vietnam in the length of US involvement in a foreign conflict. In the elections of 2006 and in subsequent surveys, Americans have spoken clearly: huge majorities now believe it is time for Congress to require a genuinely new direction in Iraq, one that leads to an end of this nation’s combat there.


I agree that it is time to have a new direction....straight out of there. Talking to Bush is useless, and they know it. Democrats were elected to do something.

The DLC arm of the party also set policy in 2003 by declaring Howard Dean not fit to be the nominee. This group is a 501...they are not supposed to advocate for or against candidates.

DLC says Dean not fit to the nominee in 03

More than 50 centrist Democrats, including Virginia Gov. Mark R. Warner, met here yesterday to plot strategy for the "New Democrat" movement. To help get the ball rolling they read a memo by Al From and Bruce Reed, the chairman and president of the Democratic Leadership Council. The memo dismissed Dean as an elitist liberal from the "McGovern-Mondale wing" of the party -- "the wing that lost 49 states in two elections, and transformed Democrats from a strong national party into a much weaker regional one."

As founder of the DLC, From has been pushing the Democratic Party to the right for nearly 20 years. He was in tall cotton, philosophically speaking, when an early leader of the DLC, Bill Clinton, was elected president in 1992. As Clinton's domestic policy guru, Reed pushed New Democrat ideas -- such as welfare reform -- that were often unpopular with party liberals.

"We are increasingly confident that President Bush can be beaten next year, but Dean is not the man to do it," Reed and From wrote. "Most Democrats aren't elitists who think they know better than everyone else."


They should have been held accountable for that, but they weren't.





Discuss (56 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Profile Information
Profile Picture
madfloridian
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
DU Donor DU Donor
76629 posts
Member since 2002
Florida
Female
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
StarStar
AlienGirl has passed away
15 recs : By Contrary1
Star
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.