Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » meganmonkey Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
meganmonkey's journal
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Tue Jul 18th 2006, 09:30 AM
For the record - I was in DC in October of 2002. And in January of 2003. I was in Detroit and Lansing and Ann Arbor many times throughout 2003 and 2004 and 2005. I was in DC again in September of 2005, and stayed beyond the permitted Saturday march and participated in the civil action on the following Monday with Cindy Sheehan, Code Pink, UFPJ and CALCI. We surrounded the White House and refused to leave the sidewalk and were arrested. Imagine if there were 400,000 instead of 400 of us willing to get arrested? I was also in NYC a few months ago for another big one. Not to mention that I protest almost EVERY DAY Monday thru Friday in Ann Arbor for an hour and a half after a full day's work, and I have been doing so since early April...

But when it comes to protests that actually change things, I am NOT talking about permitted marches on weekends in DC being the answer. You are right in saying that they don't work. What I am talking about is mass, unpermitted protest, civil disobedience by the hundreds of thousands, in cities across the country, during the work week, disrupting government offices, media offices, for days in a row. How do you think the civil rights movement happened? By Saturday afternoon la-di-da marches that everyone ignored? NO. How about the Vietnam War protests?

People got out in the streets and wouldn't back down. THEY WOULDN'T BACK DOWN. They didn't go out for 4 hours and then come home and wonder why it didn't work.

If we did that today, if we refused to back down, would the police fire pepper spray? Probably in some towns. Would some people get hurt? Probably in some towns. Would some police side with the people? Pretty likely in a lot of places. Would some military side with the people? Again, pretty likely, since those folks are getting fucked the worst in this mess, as far as the US goes.

So the bottom line is that most people don't seem to want to risk anything. They live their relatively comfortable lives in their air-conditioned homes and listen to the news and say 'oh, that's so sad, I wish all those people weren't suffering so' and deep down they know that it is their tax dollars, their leaders making these horrors happen, and by sitting back and not risking anything to stop it they are complicit, they are responsible. And they go to their doctor because they can't sleep at night and wonder why they need to take Ambien and Prozac and it's because they are in denial that they are guilty of murder. And you may think I am overstating it and that's fine, think what you will, maybe I am. But there is some truth to it. And unless you are in total denial you know it too.

As I mentioned in a different post, most of the people who I speak to who are receptive of the idea of mass strikes are non-voters, non-political people, who have known all along that their gov't doesn't work for them (don't forget, these people make up almost half the US adult population -they are the people, not the sheeple, or ignorant, or apathetic, or whatever else people around here like to think...). The Dem activists? They drive by and honk and wave and thank us for protesting (as if we are doing it on their behalf? Please...). But the blue-collar, low income struggling people who are on their way to the bus stop after a day's work cleaning hotel rooms - THEY are the ones who will stop and protest for half-an-hour and catch the next bus out-of-town.

So IMO, based on my experiences in 'the real world' and here on DU, I have to say that the people are ready for this shit, most of them just need some leadership. And the partisan activists are holding EVERYONE back by being so goddamn careful and comfortable.

btw, my frustration and anger (which I am guessing are pretty evident in this post) aren't meant to be directed to you in particular - I have been needing to get this out of my system for awhile. But I am hella frustrated with the attitudes of many on DU. It's like everyone sees the problem, there is only one time-tested solution, it is a difficult one, and everyone is trying to avoid having to do it. But meanwhile people are screaming in pain all over the world because of us, and I for one can't take it anymore. I can't imagine how a child in Baghdad who listens to bombs all night, every night, can take it
Read entry | Discuss (0 comments)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Thu Jun 08th 2006, 11:55 AM
As a preface, I would like to say that this post was inspired by a fantastic essay by H2O Man which can be found here.

A few posters suggested I give my reply (#5) its own thread, so here it is, with a few changes since it is in a different context.

----------------------------------------------------

I have an internal locus of control (at least, I think I do). For quite awhile, I was caught up in the idea that our politicians, particularly the Democratic ones, were the people who had the power to affect change in our government (I don't mean this in relation to which party is in power right now, I mean generally speaking). So I was thinking that trying to influence our current politians to 'do the right thing' on a particular bill or nominee or whatever was the power that I had.

Unfortunately, time and time again, I was struck by major disappointment when this didn't work, and being on DU a lot I knew I was not alone - in both trying to influence them (phone calls, letters, emails, petitions) and in being disappointed when it failed (as it has dozens of times in the last several years).

In some cases, this could be blamed on partisan imbalance/Republican control, like some of the judge and cabinet nominees that a unified Democratic party could still not defeat. But in other cases, there were bills that could have been defeated, that in fact the constituents of both parties seemed to want defeated, like CAFTA, that passed with bipartisan support. If the Dems had stood together on that one, it could have failed. But it didn't. And after watching a couple of these on C-Span and seeing it all happening before my eyes, I began to understand that in some cases (and some of the BIGGEST issues, IMO) it doesn't matter to most of them what their constituents want because they don't work for us. I know many here will disagree with me on that, and I also know there are several exceptions to this in the House and a couple in the Senate, but ultimately those who guide both parties are NOT beholden to the American people, they are beholden to the industries that fund their campaigns.

When the depth of that reality hit me over the last year or two, I did feel helpless, and hopeless, and a lot like giving up. So guess what?

I gave up. And boy do I feel better now.

To clarify, I gave up on the politicians. All of them. I expect nothing from them, and I am no longer disappointed. In fact, I don't really pay that much attention to the ins-and-outs of the daily grind on Capitol Hill.

Instead, I talk to the people. Not the online activists, not even the grassroots party leaders, but the regular everyday people.
The people who often get referred to here as "apathetic" or "ignorant" or whatever.
The people who don't vote because neither party represents them right now.
The people who are too busy working three jobs to give a shit who is running for what, because almost NONE of the condidates are running on their behalf.

They aren't stupid, they are ignored.

By the Dems, the Repubs, and quite frankly, most of the 'activists' in both parties. Sorry, but election year lip service does not count. The people I talk to don't care about gay marriage or abortion, those aren't political decisions for them. They care about health care and food and job security. And aside from election time, neither party seems to give a shit about those things (again, there are a few exceptions). Neither party makes these things a priority. Both parties passed CAFTA, and both parties passed the bankruptcy bill, and so on and so forth.

So anyway, back to the question of power. What I have been concluding lately is that our real power is NOT in electoral politics, because we can't possibly have much influence on them (and I won't go into the details why, we all know what I mean - and for those who don't, we'll start with voting machines and campaign financing and go from there). The only power we can have, IMO, is the power of the people - and the people are totally turned off by the kind of activism generally advocated here and other online discussion/activism sites. Because most of what gets discussed here falls into the 2-party framework of electoral politics, and they know it is a crock.

Most of you all know it is a crock too. So why keep banging our heads against the wall?

I am not going to imply that I know the solution. I just know that what we have been doing is NOT working, and I am sick of listening to this record skip. Clunk. Clunk. Clunk. And expecting a different result...is that insanity? I think so.

The power is in the people. Our gov't was built to be broken down when it gets out of control, when those in Washington get too much concentrated power. Well guess what? We are there.

IT IS OUT OF CONTROL!!!!

So how are we going to use a broken system to fix itself? We can't. Yet people keep trying. And feeling hopeless. I say, give it up.

Give it up and get into the streets. RIGHT NOW.

I am out there 5 days a week (some weeks only 4, I do have some other things going on ). It's not that hard. And while you are out there, holding your signs and doing your thing, TALK TO PEOPLE. Even the people who drive pick-ups and wear camouflage. Don't tell them how important it is that they vote for this person or email that Senator; instead, ASK THEM WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO THEM. Don't go to them with an agenda; instead, ask them what they want from their government. You will be surprised at what you hear.

And you will feel a thousand times better.

And much, much more powerful.

I guess what it comes down to is recognizing what you can and cannot control. And we cannot control our politicians using the system as it is, no matter how hard we try, unless we become a wealthy industry leader, for example, and that would defeat the whole purpose, right? So by using process of elimination we get closer to determining what we can control, and we are one step closer to being effective, instead of wasting our energy on futile efforts.

It may sound like I am saying 'give up on the Dems'. To be totally honest, to some extent that is what I mean. But I mean it in the context of the current broken system, and that is really what I have given up on. We absolutely need to find new ways to harness the power of the people. And we need to do it now.

It's later than you think

Now for the requisite disclaimer, my futile attempt to reduce the inevitable flames...

I am not trying to tell everyone to stop emailing your Senators and signing petitions. Last time I wrote one of my Senators a real letter, he sent me a form letter about a completely different issue. And this is a generally reasonable Democratic Senator. So I am done with it. Finis. But these letters should make a difference, and I don't want to sound like I am belittling the efforts of those who choose this method.

Similarly, despite my nearly complete loss of faith in electoral politics, I am not advocating that people should stay home on election day, or stop campaigning for their candidates. If you believe in someone strongly enough to pound the pavement for them, by all means do it. Vote early and often. Do your thing. Again, it should make a difference, and on principle I will always vote, even if I have to write-in my mother's name (which I have done in the past - she'd be a great President ).

PEACE AND SOLIDARITY!!!!

Megan Monkey

Read entry | Discuss (43 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Wed Jun 07th 2006, 04:36 PM
This is a great piece, and provides much food for thought. I would like to try to ground it in our current situation, or at least my perspective/experience of it.

I have an internal locus of control (at least, I think I do). For quite awhile, I was caught up in the idea that our politicians, particularly the Democratic ones, were the people who had the power to affect change in our government (I don't mean this in relation to which party is in power right now, I mean generally speaking). So I was thinking that trying to influence our current politians to 'do the right thing' on a particular bill or nominee or whatever was the power that I had.

Unfortunately, time and time again, I was struck by major disappointment when this didn't work, and being on DU a lot I knew I was not alone - in both trying to influence them (phone calls, letters, emails, petitions) and in being disappointed when it failed (as it has dozens of times in the last several years).

In some cases, this could be blamed on partisan imbalance/Republican control, like some of the judge and cabinet nominees that a unified Democratic party could still not defeat. But in other cases, there were bills that could have been defeated, that in fact the constituents of both parties seemed to want defeated, like CAFTA, that passed with bipartisan support. If the Dems had stood together on that one, it could have failed. But it didn't. And after watching a couple of these on C-Span and seeing it all happening before my eyes, I began to understand that in some cases (and some of the BIGGEST issues, IMO) it doesn't matter to most of them what their constituents want because they don't work for us. I know many here will disagree with me on that, and I also know there are several exceptions to this in the House and a couple in the Senate, but ultimately those who guide both parties are NOT beholden to the American people, they are beholden to the industries that fund their campaigns.

When the depth of that reality hit me over the last year or two, I did feel helpless, and hopeless, and a lot like giving up.

So guess what? I did. And boy do I feel better now.

To clarify, I gave up on the politicians. All of them. I expect nothing from them, and I am no longer disappointed. In fact, I don't really pay that much attention to the ins-and-outs of the daily grind on Capitol Hill.

Instead, I talk to the people. Not the online activists, not even the grassroots party leaders, but the regular everyday people. The people who get referred to here as apathetic or ignorant or whatever. The people who don't vote because neither party represents them right now. The people who are too busy working three jobs to give a shit who is running for what, because almost NONE of them are running on their behalf. They aren't stupid, they are ignored. By the Dems, the Repubs, and most of the 'activists' in both parties. Sorry, but lip service doesn't count. The people I talk to don't care about gay marriage or abortion, those aren't political decisions for them. They care about health care and food and job security. And aside from election time, neither party seems to give a shit about those things (again, there are a few exceptions). Neither party makes these things a priority. Both parties passed CAFTA, and both parties passed the bankruptcy bill, and so on and so forth.

So anyway, back to the question of power. What I have been concluding lately is that our real power may not be in electoral politics, because we can't possibly have much influence on them (and I won't go into the details why, we all know what I mean - and for those who don't, we'll start with voting machines and campaign financing and go from there). The only power we can have, IMO, is the power of the people - and the people are totally turned off by the kind of activism generally advocated here and other online discussion/activism sites. Because most of what gets discussed here falls into the 2-party framework of electoral politics, and they know it is a crock.

Most of you all know it is a crock too. So why keep banging our heads against the wall?

I am not going to imply that I know the solution. I just know that what we have been doing is NOT working, and I am sick of listening to the record skip. Clunk. Clunk. Clunk. And expecting a different result...is that insanity? I think so.

The power is in the people. Our gov't was built to be broken down when it gets out of control, because the power is supposed to be in the hands of the people.

IT IS OUT OF CONTROL!!!!

So how are we going to use a broken system to fix itself? We can't. Yet people keep trying. And feeling hopeless. I say, give it up.

Give it up and get into the streets. RIGHT NOW.

I am out there 5 days a week (some weeks only 4, I do have some other things going on ). It's not that hard. And while you are out there, holding your signs and doing your thing, TALK TO PEOPLE. Even the people who drive pick-ups and wear camouflage. Don't tell them how important it is that they vote for this person or email that Senator. Instead, ASK THEM WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO THEM. Don't go to them with an agenda, ask them what they want from their government. You will be surprised at what you hear.

And you will feel a thousand times better.

And much, much more powerful.

on edit: I guess what it comes down to is recognizing what you can and cannot control. And we cannot control our politicians, no matter how hard we try, unless we become a wealthy industry leader, say, and that would defeat the whole purpose, right? So by using process of elimination we get closer to determining what we can control, and we are one step closer to being effective, instead of wasting our energy on futile efforts.

(Sorry, this is pretty much a hit-and-run, as I need to get out to the Federal Bldg with my signs and my fellow protestors shortly, and I don't have internet access at home right now since I live in a tent. )

Read entry | Discuss (9 comments)
Posted by meganmonkey in Michigan
Wed May 17th 2006, 12:52 PM
A group of concerned citizens are protesting every Monday through Friday from 5-6pm at the corner of Liberty and Fifth. We have been doing this for about 2 months now.

Unless it is super rainy we are there religiously.

Please join us. Bring a sign, or hold one of our extras. We have some professionally made ones including IMPEACH BUSH yard signs (which you can buy, btw) and lots of hand-made signs. We range from 3 people to 33 people, depending on the weather and mood, I guess.

We are NOT an organized group, we are not affiliated with anyone. We are just people who have had enough.

The woman who started it is named Libby, I have been involved since the get-go, as have a few others. We are bringing more and more people into the fray every day.

This is what inspired it:

The Limits of the Internet or The Silence Of the Streets
by Brigitte Schön

While we're all sitting comfortably at some desk looking at our computer screens, reading articles by people whose opinion we cherish, celebrating the feeling that we might be able to change whatever we want to change by just writing the kind of highly opinionated piece I am about to write, I have lately been giving this complacent feeling of mine a thorough cleansing which led to the following musings:

What if the world, this world of TV images we know, still was pretty archaic at heart and what if it still primarily reacted to centuries-old images and trigger patterns after all? In other words: What do political campaigns and articles via the internet really manage to accomplish? And: Does this mean that I still ought to brave icy winds or pouring rain instead and hold up some banners in demonstrations in order to really achieve anything, and does this mean that all these thoughful articles on the net don't have as much influence as all of us couch revolutionaries would like to believe?

Let me lead you through a little time machine experiment. All I'd ask you to do is imagine that there was an internet around when any of the following occured (there are thousands of cases to choose from; I just randomly picked a few):

The British are occupying India. Instead of rallying hundreds of thousands of Indians in peaceful marches, Mahatma Ghandi launches an internet campaign against the Raj (=British rule of India). Your best bet: Do you think that the British would still be ruling India?


more... http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0305-2...
Read entry | Discuss (34 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by meganmonkey in Latest Breaking News
Mon Apr 24th 2006, 11:41 AM
NYC Union Chief Roger Toussaint Remains Defiant Hours Before Heading to Jail for Leading Transit Strike

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Toussaint, president of the Transport Workers Union, Local 100, heads to jail today to serve a 10-day sentence for authorizing a strike in December that shut down New York City's Transit system for a little more than two days. Hours before heading jail, Toussaint joins us in our firehouse studio to discuss the strike, the future of the union and what he calls the "extortionist media."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By this evening, the President of the Transport Workers Union, Local 100, Roger Toussaint, will be in jail, serving a ten-day sentence in a lock-up in lower Manhattan known as "The Tombs." Toussaint was sentenced to jail earlier this month by Judge Theodore Jones of the Brooklyn Supreme Court for authorizing a strike that shut down New York City's Transit system for a little more than 2 days. The strike took place in December and violated the state's Taylor Law, which forbids public employees from striking. Toussaint and union supporters maintained that the strike was a defensive strike to stop the Metropolitan Transit Authority from, among other things, creating a two-tiered pension system. Toussaint was the only union member ordered to jail even though lawyers for the MTA and the state Attorney General said they wanted community service for union officials as opposed to jail time. And in further punishment for the strike, last week, Judge Jones fined the 33,000 member union $2.5 million and suspended its ability to automatically collect member dues.
In addition, last week, transit workers overwhelmingly ratified the contract offer that they had previously rejected. The package entails a 10.9% increase in raises and a new paid holiday. It also requires workers to put 1.5% of their earnings towards health premiums. MTA head, Peter Kalikow has stated that the agency is not legally bound by the second vote and the matter will go into binding arbitration. Roger Toussaint was elected head of the TWU Local 100 in 2000. He is originally from Trinidad and Tobago, settling in Brooklyn when he was 18. He was hired by the MTA as a cleaner in 1984, and became a track worker in 1985. In 1994, he became a formal union member when he was elected leader of the 1800-member Track Division. In 2000 he was elected President of the TWU.


Roger Toussaint, President of Transport Workers Union, Local 100.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIPT

AMY GOODMAN: Roger Toussaint joins us here in our studio. In just a few hours he will be headed back to our area to turn himself in at the Tombs. Welcome to Democracy Now!, Roger Toussaint.

ROGER TOUSSAINT: Good morning.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about why you are headed to jail today?

ROGER TOUSSAINT: Why? Well, that was up to the judge. But essentially, they are trying to send a message to the entire labor movement and all the social justice causes that if you stand up and fight, they are going to crush you, so it’s important that we send back a message to them. That's why they’re subjecting us to what is the equivalent of a public flogging. The fines, the dues checkoff elimination, as well as the jail, is truly excessive, makes no sense other than to send a message.

much more at link...

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid...

Read entry | Discuss (6 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Sun Apr 23rd 2006, 10:16 PM
When GI Joe Says No
Christian Parenti

A young former US Army sniper wearing a desert camo uniform, an Iraqi kaffiyeh and mirrored sunglasses scans a ruined urban landscape of smashed homes, empty streets and garbage heaps. His sand-colored hat bears a small regulation-style military patch, or tab, that instead of reading "Airborne" or "Ranger" or "Special Forces" says "Shitbag"--common military parlance for bad soldier.

This isn't Baghdad or Kabul. It's the Gulf Coast, and the column of young men and women in desert uniforms carrying American flags are with Iraq Veterans Against the War. They are part of a larger peace march that is making its way from Mobile to New Orleans. This is just one of IVAW's ongoing series of actions.

---snip---

Since 1973, when Congress ended the draft, the armed forces have been restructured using unit cohesion as a form of deep discipline. In other words, social control in today's military operates through a system that could be straight from a text by French philosopher Michel Foucault: Soldiers are managed not with coercion but with freedom. Because they join of their own free will, they find it almost impossible to rebel. Volunteering implicates them, effectively stripping them of the victim status that conscription allowed. Soldiers who would resist are guilt-tripped and emotionally blackmailed into serving causes they hate. During my time embedded in Iraq, I met several antiwar soldiers, but none of them considered abandoning their comrades. They said things like "you signed that paper" or "they got that contract"--as if contracts are never broken or annulled.

---snip---

Is a Vietnam-style collapse of military discipline imminent? Some peace activists think so, pointing to the estimated 400 US military deserters who have made their way to Canada, twenty of whom have applied for asylum, and the roughly 9,000 military personnel who have failed to report for duty since the war began (not all of them have been classified as deserters). Recruiting numbers, meanwhile, have flatlined.
Yet while today's military certainly faces a crisis of quantity, it does not have the Vietnam-era problem with quality.

more at link...
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060508/pare...
Read entry | Discuss (9 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by meganmonkey in Latest Breaking News
Wed Apr 12th 2006, 02:46 PM
I am sitting at my desk crying now, thanks a lot, LOL

It is so hard these days to remember how kind people actually are, and how ultimately, in our souls, we are creatures of cooperation, not of competition and hatred. If we weren't our species wouldn't have lasted this long.

We need to get back to a spirit of cooperation - not just one-on-one, like your story - but in the big picture, or we will ruin ourselves.
Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Mon Apr 10th 2006, 07:57 PM
is that they are disrupting the normal course of things in a way the anti-war movement seldom does. The are continuing their protests for days, they are leaving school and work, and they are doing it on business days so everything gets disrupted.

The anti-war movement has these big demonstrations - but always on weekends - that last one day. I am not trashing these events, I went to DC for the first time to protest in Oct 2002, 6 months before the war started, and I have gone several times since, as well as attending many, many, local events. I am also planning to go to NYC in a few weeks (see sig line).

But what we really need to do, if we want to shake things up, is to get things going during the week, have events that last for days, that disrupt people's daily lives, and shake up the status quo. We need to take more risks and get out of our comfort zones. I am doing it locally, on an almost daily basis at rush hour, and it amazes me how many people say they will join me but they never come back.



edit for spelling
Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Fri Apr 07th 2006, 04:38 PM
It really may be that simple.

The question is, WHERE IS EVERYBODY???

I demonstrate at a busy corner at rush hour almost every day. At most there may be 5 other people with me, but usually there are only 3 or 4 of us. We talk to tons of people and almost every single one supports what we are doing, and they say they'll come back another day and join us, but they almost never do.

Why not?

Imagine thousands, tens of thousands, millions of people in the streets at the same time in cities across America. It happens in other democracies all the time. Think France and the students for a current example.

Are we waiting for the politicians to decide to return the power to the people? Because it isn't going to happen. We need to DEMAND it. And we need to refuse to function until things change. End of story.

I have a sign that reads:

99% OF POLITICIANS ARE IGNORING 99% OF THE PEOPLE

Not one person has disagreed with that one. Not one.

But they still won't stand with us for more than 5 minutes. WHY???

Read entry | Discuss (1 comments)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Fri Mar 24th 2006, 10:13 AM
I should warn you, I have recently fallen over the edge of the precipice and there is no more waiting, IMO. I am sick of the killing, lying, cheating, stealing and abusing, and I am so tired of watching well-intentioned people try to use these broken systems to stop the inevitable.

I am convinced that a general strike is the only way and the time is NOW. I don't know how to make it happen, so for the last couple weeks I am spending about 5-10 hours a week doing it - demonstrating at the Federal bldg almost every day after work, and talking to the people passing by, and everyone likes the idea. We just need to DO IT. Because the people (and I don't mean Democratic activists, I mean everyone) are ready. I have a sign that says

99% OF THE POLITICIANS ARE IGNORING 99% OF THE PEOPLE

and not one person has disagreed with that. Democrat, Republican, Independent, Apolitical, doesn't matter. They all agree. Even if they don't like the "Impeach Bush" sign that my partner-in-protest is holding (a lot of people think that won't make enough of a difference).

The people are ready. So why are we all just sitting around?
Read entry | Discuss (2 comments)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Fri Mar 17th 2006, 08:38 PM
Don't be afraid to step it up. We know that they aren't listening. We need to get louder. And anyone in the DC area, the group there is awesome - I got arrested with 400 others there last fall and I highly recommend it ---mm

From Mourning to Resistance:

National Campaign of Nonviolent Actions

to Mark 3rd Year of War in Iraq


Over a dozen direct actions planned across country at Congressional offices,

Pentagon, war profiteers, and military recruiting centers


Groups involved with the National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance Against the War in Iraq (NCNR) are organizing over a dozen nonviolent resistance actions in the coming week to end the illegal and immoral war in Iraq launched by the U.S. three years ago this weekend. Nonviolent resistance actions have been spreading across the country in recent months, reflecting the growing majority of Americans opposed to the continued carnage in and occupation of Iraq. To date, over 2,300 Americans and 100,000 Iraqis have been killed and countless others severely injured and disabled. Meanwhile, the U.S. government is spending over $120 billion on the war and occupation this year alone, while diverting vital funding from a wide array of important domestic programs. For a list of actions planned as part of the “From Mourning to Resistance: 3 Years too Many – Stop the War!” national week of action, see below.

NCNR promotes nonviolent opposition to the war, following the disciplines and practices of nonviolent leaders such as King and India’s Mahatma Gandhi, and is the only national anti-war campaign and network devoted exclusively to nonviolent resistance. On the national Martin Luther King holiday in January, NCNR initiated “A Call to Conscience for the U.S. Congress,” a campaign of nonviolent sit-ins at the offices of members of Congress who refuse to speak out or otherwise take appropriate action to end the war. Many of the nonviolent resistance actions scheduled across the country during the coming week are part of this continuing campaign. For a complete copy of “A Call to Conscience for the U.S. Congress” and other information about the NCNR, go to www.iraqpledge.org

------------------------------------------------------
Actions planned during the coming week include:

Washington, DC: From Mourning to Resistance – March on the Pentagon
(March 20): The National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance is organizing a march from near the Vietnam Veterans Memorial to the Pentagon, where there will be a ceremony honoring the war dead, followed by a die-in. Other nonviolent actions also planned. Contact: Max Obuszewski 410-323-7200, ext. 31 or MObuszewski@afsc.org

Arizona
Tucson (March 20): A Citizens’ Weapons Blockade will take place at Raytheon Missile Systems, which makes a killing on bombs and missiles used in the war in Iraq. Contact: Nancy, 520-829-7107 or ncgallen@cox.net ; Jack & Felice, 520-323-8697 or nukeresister@igc.org

California
Los Angeles (March 20): Local groups will kick off a campaign of nonviolent resistance to end the U.S. occupation of Iraq with a march to Senator Diane Feinstein’s office, where a press conference will be held, followed by a sit-in. Contact: Kyle & KamGi Finch, 310-455-1670 or kalapaskyle@earthlink.net

Connecticut
Norwich (March 20): The Global Call Iraq Campaign and others, dressed in funeral attire and carrying coffins, will gather at Representative Rob Simmons’ office. A march to a local military recruiting center will follow, ending with a die-in. Contact: Danny Malec, (860) 591-4009 or dm@globalcalliraq.org

New York
New York City (March 19): The NYC War Resisters League and a wide array of peace, student, labor, religious, and other groups will lead a procession and rally that will turn Times Square into a “Zone of Mourning” for war dead. Contact: Eric Laursen, 917-806-6452 or Frida Berrigan, 347-683-4928

Syracuse (March 20): The Syracuse Peace Council will hold a rally at the Federal Building, followed by a march through downtown ending with a direct action. Contact: Jessica Maxwell, 315-472-5478

Oregon
Portland (March 20): Members of the Whitefeather House Portland Catholic Worker community and others will visit the office of Senator Ron Wyden, who the group is urging to co-sponsor a Senate bill that will bring US troops home in 2006. A press conference and demonstration is also planned outside the Federal Building. Contact: Joy Ellison, 503-327-825 or jubilus@gmail.com

Eugene (March 20): A group of local citizens will engage in several direct actions targeting multiple government facilities engaged in prosecuting the war in Iraq. Times and locations will be announced the morning of March 20. Contact: Maria Qualtere-Burcher, 541-954-0155; Rich Klopfer 541-521-0596

Pennsylvania
Philadelphia/Valley Forge (March 19-20): On March 19, the Brandywine Peace Community and religious, peace, veterans, military family and other groups will hold a candlelight vigil and service, followed by a nonviolent resistance action at the war’s chief profiteer, Lockheed Martin, the next day. Contact: Robert Smith, 610-544-1818 or brandywine@juno.com

Wisconsin
Madison (week of March 20): Instead of a previously planned vigil and media event at Senator Herb Kohl’s office, anti-war activists will call the Senator to thank him for making a strong statement calling for bringing the troops home (see http://kohl.senate.gov/~kohl/press/06/03/2... )

Read entry | Discuss (15 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Wed Mar 15th 2006, 09:33 PM
Condemning the anti-democratic actions of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should strongly support the aspirations of the democratic forces in Venezuela.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/thomas

Essentially this bill would mean the US would fund Venezuelan opposition groups - to oppose a democratically elected leader of a sovereign nation. This is not right!!!

-----------------------------------------------

Venezuela Information Office asks for your help!
By Urgent Reqest
Mar 15, 2006, 04:51

H. Con. Res. 328 will be voted on this week!
Your calls are needed in Congress today
Congressional Switchboard: 202-224-3121

Friends,

We just received word that H. Con. Resolution 328 will be up for a subcommittee vote this Thursday, March 16. Your help is needed to stop this intellectually dishonest, anti-Venezuela resolution. Please call Congress today!
What is H.Con. Res. 328?
Sponsored by Rep. Connie Mack (R-FL), H. Con. Res. 328 is a misguided and factually inaccurate resolution that condemns Venezuela and recommends funding of Venezuelan opposition parties, in direct violation of Venezuelan law.
The resolution contains so many factual inaccuracies that it should be an embarrassment for most members of Congress to support. For a full description of the errors, half-truths and misstatements please see our fact sheet.

What you can do:
Please call Representative Eliot Engel today. This New York Democrat is the ranking member of the House Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, which will be taking up the vote. The Congressional Switchboard can patch you through to his office. Call 202-224-3121 today and do the following:
1) Ask to speak to Congressman Eliot Engel's Office
2) When the receptionist answers, ask to speak to the Legislative Aide who works on Venezuela issues.
3) If you speak to the aide directly, ask him/her to recommend that Rep. Engel speak out against H. Con. Res. 328 in the subcommittee. If you are put into voicemail, please leave a message. Here are some points to consider for your discussion:

* The resolution is inaccurate. Among other things:

The resolution states that President Chavez rewrote the Venezuelan Constitution, when in fact it was drafted and approved through a democratic process;

It argues that President Chavez has taken control of the National Assembly, when in fact opposition parties made a decision not to participate in the most recent elections;

It contradicts the 2005 U.S. State Department report that Venezuela has a open and vigorous media; and

It claims that President Chavez "is supporting radical forces" in Bolivia and Colombia. The inclusion of Bolivia seems to be referring to the democratically-elected president of that country, Evo Morales, who, while a socialist, is supported and recognized by every country in Latin America. And the Colombia example refers to never-proven allegations of links to FARC rebels--a charge which is not even supported by the conservative President of Colombia, Alvaro Uribe.
* The U.S. must have a sane policy toward Venezuela. Last month, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld compared President Chavez to Hitler. Just last week, a California academic was harassed by FBI agents for his support of Venezuela's democratically-elected government. Clearly, the House needs bring a level of sanity back to our discussion of Venezuela.

* If we truly believe in the principles of democracy, the U.S. should not be advocating funding for opposition parties in other countries.


NOTE: Rep. Engel is new to the Western Hemisphere Subcommittee. He will likely vote the right way on this bill, but he needs to be educated in order to be able to speak out against H. Con. Res. 328.
4) Forward this message on to five friends and ask them to make a similar call.
5) Post this message on listservs that you belong to and get the word out!

Venezuela Information Office
2000 P Street NW, Ste. 240
Washington, DC, 20036
(202) 347-8081
Eric Wingerter, Public Education Director


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE: The Venezuela Information Office is dedicated to informing the American public about contemporary Venezuela, and receives its funding from the government of Venezuela. More information is available from the FARA office of the Department of Justice in Washington DC.
----------------------------------------------------------------

mods: based on #5 at the bottom of this statement, I believe permission to reprint in full is given
Read entry | Discuss (20 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Tue Mar 14th 2006, 09:27 AM
A friend of mine printed this out from his friend's blog and thought I would be interested. I, in turn, think you all may find it interesting too...

Jim Garrison, Playboy Interview, October, 1967
"What worries me deeply, and I have seen it exemplified in this case, is that we in America are in great danger of slowly evolving into a proto-fascist state. It will be a different kind of fascist state from the one of the Germans evolved; theirs grew out of depression and promised bread and work, while ours, curiously enough, seems to be emerging from prosperity. But in the final analysis, it's based on power and on the inability to put human goals and human conscience above the dictates of the state. Its origins can be traced in the tremendous war machine we've built since 1945, the "military-industrial complex" that Eisenhower vainly warned us about, which now dominates every aspect of our life. The power of the states and Congress has gradually been abandoned to the Executive Department, because of war conditions; and we've seen the creation of an arrogant, swollen bureaucratic complex totally unfettered by the checks and balances of the Constitution.

In a very real and terrifying sense, our Government is the CIA and the Pentagon, with Congress reduced to a debating society. Of course, you can't spot this trend to fascism by casually looking around. You can't look for such familiar signs as the swastika, because they won't be there. We won't build Dachaus and Auschwitzes; the clever manipulation of the mass media is creating a concentration camp of the mind that promises to be far more effective in keeping the populace in line. We're not going to wake up one morning and suddenly find ourselves in gray uniforms goose-stepping off to work. But this isn't the test. The test is: What happens to the individual who dissents? In Nazi Germany, he was physically destroyed; here, the process is more subtle, but the end results can be the same.

I've learned enough about the machinations of the CIA in the past year to know that this is no longer the dreamworld America I once believed in. The imperatives of the population explosion, which almost inevitably will lessen our belief in the sanctity of the individual human life, combined with the awesome power of the CIA and the defense establishment, seem destined to seal the fate of the America I knew as a child and bring us into a new Orwellian world where the citizen exists for the state and where raw power justifies any and every immoral act. I've always had a kind of knee-jerk trust in my Government's basic integrity, whatever political blunders it may make. But I've come to realize that in Washington, deceiving and manipulating the public are viewed by some as the natural prerogatives of office. Huey Long once said, "Fascism will come to America in the name of anti-fascism." I'm afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security."
http://bloggn.petercase.com/index.cfm?mode...

For some background on Jim Garrison: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Garrison
Read entry | Discuss (43 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Mon Feb 20th 2006, 01:06 PM
Listen up, folks, this is getting really serious. As some of you know, the House passed a resolution last Thursday to refer Iran to the UN Security Council in response to their nuclear ambitions. You may have missed the story, however, seeing as how practically no one (except "conspiracy sites" which I cannot post here) covered this event.

Here is a link about it with an acceptable source:
http://www.africasia.com/services/news/new...

Here is the LBN thread about it from Thursday:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discu...

As you also may know, Russia has been trying to work on a compromise with Iran on uranium enrichment. Again, not a lot of press, and a thread I started on it yesterday got all of 4 replies (2 of which were my own ) :http://www.democraticunderground.com/discu...

This compromise would allow Russia to do the actual enrichment of uranium for Iran, thus ensuring it was in controlled quantities and making it much easier to track its use.

However, as Dennis Kucinich pointed out in the ridiculously short and one-sided debate about the House resolution:

“This bill scuttles the only possibility for a peaceful resolution of this crisis. Namely, the offer, by Russia, to enrich uranium for Iran to use in its nuclear power plants. Iran would not operate any enrichment processing facilities of its own, and therefore would not have the ability to make isotopes of uranium suitable for weapons. This is the essence of a resolution offered by Russia to avert the crisis. This is the only diplomatic option available to us today."


BTW, only Dennis and Ron Paul (R-TX) spoke out against this House Bill. They are the only people who pointed out that this is playing out JUST LIKE IRAQ and that they haven't even bothered to change the script. Again, quoting Kucinich,

"“The Administration, covered by this bill, is leading this country to take military action against Iran. Make no mistake, that is the US program at the UN, just as it was prior to the invasion of Iraq in 2003."
(link to DKs complete statement: http://kucinich.house.gov/News/DocumentSin... ).

I am not naive enough to believe that a compromise with Russia would be a given, but I do believe that the more our gov't works to make compromise impossible the more likely we are to unleash something horrible in the Middle East. How soon until we hear Bush on TV saying "they gave us no choice - they refused to compromise" ? If you think the Iraq War with its mutilated children, permanently damaged soldiers, prison torture and millions of new enemies is bad, just you wait. Because it will only get worse - for everyone.

Regardless of your feelings toward Iran and it's government, we DO NOT NEED TO GO TO WAR WITH IRAN!!! And we know from Iraq that we cannot trust Bushco to tell the truth about why a war is necessary - as this WaPo article states, our own intelligence says it will be 10 years until they could possibly have a nuclear weapon. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...

Please, you guys, take the time to write your Senators and Congresspeople, talk to your friends and families, put signs on your cars, spread the word. The lies are already coming out in full force and we have to counter them. Otherwise we are well on our way to the deadly, bloody sequel to the Iraq War.

DON'T BELIEVE THE LIES!
STOP THIS WAR BEFORE IT STARTS.


There has got to be a better way. This is not my America.



Read entry | Discuss (138 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by meganmonkey in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Tue Feb 07th 2006, 02:17 PM
...With Wal-Mart rating as public enemy number one among many liberals, progressives and just regular voters, Clinton is finding her past ties to Wal-Mart too hot to handle so, presto, over the side the Beast of Bentonville must go.

For those not in the know, Clinton served on Wal-Mart’s board for six years prior to her husband’s run for the presidency. She recently received $5,000 from Wal-Mart. I’ve raised the Wal-Mart relationship repeatedly in my current race against Clinton and it causes deep unease among voters. I believe it speaks to the incumbent’s close ties to abusive corporate power: her large corporate financial contributions, her support for so-called “free trade” (which is simply trade to benefit corporations) and her unwillingness to confront corporate power that denies every American, among other things, universal health insurance.

So, I had to chuckle when I read that Clinton, having never said a bad word about the company in the past, recently said that Wal-Mart should pay more for its workers’ health benefits. And, to boot, she returned the $5,000 she had received from the company. But, when asked what she did about the company’s benefits for workers when she served on the board, she replied, “Well, you know, I, that was a long time ago ... have to remember…”

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t promote an image of being an intelligent woman who has a pile of facts at her fingertips but, at the same time, you suffer a sudden bout of amnesia when asked to answer for your record. And it would be an inconvenient record to defend.

more
Read entry | Discuss (57 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Profile Information
Profile Picture
meganmonkey
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
megan
Not a DU Donor
9352 posts
Member since Wed Oct 6th 2004
Michigan, US
My Forums
Democratic Underground forums and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.