RE: "The story is consistent, and after nearly fifty years we probably won't get any more credible interpretation."

Sez who?

...What a lousy attitude. Where's your intellectual curiosity? Don't you even have a spark of a flicker of a hope, that just maybe, some day, the Truth will out?

Wasn't it just a little while ago that people thought we'd never solve the identity puzzle of that Watergate "Deep Throat" whistleblower?

Before Napoleon's soldiers turned over a big rock in Egypt, revealing the Rosetta Stone (a mere two centuries ago) no one could begin to conceive of a way that Egyptian Hieroglyphic writing could ever be translated.

How many days, weeks and months has it been since everyone started to believe "first black president" and "not in our lifetime" were words that always had to be included in the same sentence, like Chang and Eng, the original Siamese Twins, forever joined at the hip?

...I'm completely thrown by your linkage in that last paragraph, that because Oswald was "unaccountably without a ticket in the Texas Theater," ...

...

...

"Oswald shot Tippit."


Huh?


Can you run that by me again? What is the linkage between having -- or not having -- a ticket, and whether or not Oswald was or was not the shooter?

Pardon my sarcasm, but it turns my stomach to read a post that's so piously mainstream and middle-of-the-road, yet so soul-crushing, at the same time.