Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » msgadget » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
Msgadget's Journal
Posted by msgadget in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Mon Mar 27th 2006, 03:00 PM
at the DHS website:

On March 23, 2005, the United States, Canada and Mexico entered into an unprecedented trilateral Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) to establish a common security strategy and promote economic growth, competitiveness and quality of life. At their meeting in Waco, TX, President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin pledged to:

“...establish a common approach to security to protect North America from external threats, prevent and respond to threats within North America, and further streamline the secure and efficient movement of legitimate, low-risk traffic across our shared borders.”

Which led to this whopper, dated today:

...

The pact signed in Waco last year by Paul Martin, George Bush and Vicente Fox, contains no concrete proposals to improve the lives of the continent's ordinary citizens. The agreement stems from the big business agenda and represents a giant step toward full continental integration.

The SPP initiative is intended to harmonize many Canadian and Mexican domestic and foreign policies with those of the U.S. Under the guise of protecting citizens from the threat of terrorism and also facilitating trade, this initiative would involve drastic measures such as a deeper integration of North American energy markets, harmonized treatment of immigrants, refugees or tourists from abroad, and the creation of common security policies. It also promotes steps towards harmonized standards in areas governing health, food safety and the environment.


Sold to the public as merely administrative and regulatory in nature, the SPP agenda is evolving away from the public eye. Tellingly, 15 top CEOs have been invited to join the leader’s summit in Cancun. “The presumptions of the business-led agenda are clear in the wording describing the SPP process where private sector leaders can get high-level meetings, other stakeholders get round table consultations, while the democratic representatives of the citizens only get briefings,” said John Foster of Common Frontiers.

According to Pierre-Yves Serinet, coordinator of the Réseau Québécois sur l’Intégration Continentale (RQIC), the SPP would not survive public scrutiny in any of the three countries. “If Stephen Harper truly believes in transparency and accountability, he has the responsibility of putting the SPP before parliament and the Canadian public. Otherwise, he should not proceed with this agenda.”

Common Frontiers, RQIC, the Mexican Action Network on Free Trade (RMALC), and the Alliance for Responsible Trade (ART-USA) are all members of the Hemispheric Social Alliance, a network that has played a central role in opposing ‘free trade’ negotiations throughout the Americas. The four North American coalitions are representative of a range of organizations including church groups, labour, student unions, women’s groups, environmental organizations, international development agencies, human rights and other social justice advocates.

Harper must come clean about the Security and Prosperity Partnership




Discuss (1 comments)
The fate of U.S. workers is no longer part of corporate decision making
Check out this article:

Invest in corporate America. Just don't work there

(clip)


Today, there's a lot of hand-wringing over offshoring, disappearing pensions, and health benefits that deteriorate and cost more every year. But very few U.S. executives are asking much from Washington, or from anybody. That's because most U.S. companies are doing quite well—witness stock indexes like the S&P 500 that are approaching record highs—even if their American workers are worried about job security and finances. "There's a shift in the balance of power between workers and their companies," says Hira. "Nobody from industry is asking for help, because they're not losing anymore. They're taking." What they're taking, as everybody knows by now, is cheap, talented labor from low-cost countries like India and China. And that's one thing that helps American companies climb onto the Global 100 and stay there. "The fact that manufacturing jobs have been leaving the United States doesn't make us less competitive," says Dennis Nally, chairman of PricewaterhouseCoopers. "You could argue it makes us more competitive."

(clip)

 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.