Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » pipoman Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
pipoman's Journal
Posted by pipoman in General Discussion
Thu Feb 10th 2011, 07:59 AM
Farm subsidies are payment for government control of private enterprise. Subsidies pay farmers to grow specific products in specific amounts. Without subsidies, farmers, as other business owners can and will grow what they want in what ever quantities they want, just as you would do in their position. The government tells farmers to grow x number of acres of x product...in return we will insure that the price for your product will be $x. This system makes overall farm production predictable. Without such a system, farm product consumers are at the mercy of quasi farm cartels. If, for instance, corn prices dropped due to a glut this year, next year the corn growers association would strongly urge corn growers to reduce production next year, driving the price up, resulting in the same or greater profits for producers with less work and less up front expense in seed, fertilizer, fuel, and equipment costs...it would be a no brainer from a producer standpoint.

Another function of subsidies has been soil conservation and wildlife management. The references to 'paying farmers not to grow', refers to programs like the CRP program. This program pays a similar rate per acre for land which must be planted into high quality forage capable of supporting a variety of birds and other wildlife. Additionally, CRP grasses renew the soil. Without those programs, farmers will farm every acre of their ground, 'from ditch bank, to ditch bank' as they used to say.

Expect dramatic price fluctuation in farm commodities and increased costs of fulfilling trade agreements with other nations..this alone may exceed the cost of subsidies. The US makes multi-year agreements for trade of ag products with other nations. Those agreements have set quantities and prices. Without control of production, these contracts will be at the same place consumers will be..that is not knowing the volume of production. A year which is a low production in attempt to raise prices could cost our government a ton of money to fulfill the existing agreements.

People not near the farm industry often are clueless about the costs and risks associated with farming. It is a very expensive business wrought with potential pitfalls. Farmers will survive without subsidies.
Read entry | Discuss (0 comments)
Posted by pipoman in General Discussion
Sun Jan 30th 2011, 09:24 AM
What is the 2nd leading preventable cause of accidental death (after auto accidents) of children 0-14? Drowning.


* In 2007, there were 3,443 fatal unintentional drownings in the United States, averaging ten deaths per day. An additional 496 people died, from drowning and other causes, in boating-related incidents.1, 2
* More than one in five fatal drowning victims are children 14 and younger.1 For every child who dies from drowning, another four received emergency department care for nonfatal submersion injuries.1
* Nonfatal drownings can cause brain damage that may result in long-term disabilities including memory problems, learning disabilities, and permanent loss of basic functioning (e.g., ., permanent vegetative state).

-snip-

CHILDREN: In 2007, of all children 1 to 4 years old who died from an unintentional injury, almost 30% died from drowning.1 Although drowning rates have slowly declined,1,3 fatal drowning remains the second-leading cause of unintentional injury-related death for children ages 1 to 14 years.4


Yep, that's right, drowning. Some of these tragic drownings occur in necessary water holding areas or bodies of water. Of children under 1 year of age, the most common place drowning occurs is in bathtubs, toilets, and buckets. While preventative measures should be taken, bathtubs, buckets and toilets are certainly necessary for daily living, thus an argument can be made that restricting these items may be subject to a cost benefit analysis leaving us with the answer that while tragic, the overall benefit of these items outweighs the risks.

This brings us to the next leading area of danger. Private residential swimming pools. While there are localized restrictions and codes on the construction of residential pools, there are no national restrictions or codes. The CDC lists several suggestions to make residential pools more safe. None are codified as federal law.

LACK OF BARRIERS AND SUPERVISION. Children under one year most often drown in bathtubs, buckets, or toilets.6 Among children ages 1 to 4 years, most drownings occur in residential swimming pools.6 Most young children who drowned in pools were last seen in the home, had been out of sight less than five minutes, and were in the care of one or both parents at the time.7 Barriers, such as pool fencing, can help prevent children from gaining access to the pool area without caregivers’ awareness.8

-snip-

* FOUR-SIDED FENCING. Install a four-sided pool fence that completely separates the house and play area of the yard from the pool area. The fence should be at least 4 feet high. Use self-closing and self-latching gates that open outward with latches that are out of reach of children. Also, consider additional barriers such as automatic door locks or alarms to prevent access or notify you if someone enters the pool area.
* CLEAR THE POOL AND DECK OF TOYS. Remove floats, balls and other toys from the pool and surrounding area immediately after use. The presence of these toys may encourage children to enter the pool area unsupervised or lean over the pool and potentially fall in.


The above excerpts can be found here: http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecreationalSafe...

The rate of child death in residential pools has been referenced in Freakonomics as 1 pool death per 11,000 residential swimming pools. This is a shocking number considering other risks responsible for childhood deaths.

http://freakonomicsbook.com/freakonomics/c... /

The tragic accidental drowning deaths of hundreds of children 0-14 is quantified by the CDC in their WISQARS compilation site at 739 in 2007.

What could be done?

We could encourage our lawmakers to enact laws to protect children from this preventable risk.

Four sided fences with locking gates around ALL residential pools.

Hard pool covers required on ALL residential pools.

These ideas would be a start. Without penalties for failure to secure pools when unsupervised or failure to use the pool covers when not in use, these laws would be ineffective. Very few parents/pool owners are prosecuted for child endangerment following the drowning of a child. Responsible parties and pool owners should face criminal prosecution for failure to use these safety devices or for failure to properly supervise children.

Certainly not all of these drownings would be prevented by these measures, but some of the 700+ annual fatalities and countless permanent injuries could be prevented by the enactment of these simple laws and subsequent prosecution of violators IMO.
Read entry | Discuss (87 comments) | Recommend (<0 votes)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.