Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » salvorhardin » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
The R Complex Cafe
Posted by salvorhardin in September 11
Wed Mar 26th 2008, 12:26 AM
According to the 1948 Geneva Convention, genocide is defined as "acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group".


If you honestly believe that the U.S., as the goal of the war in Iraq, has the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part," the Iraqis then, well, there's no reasoning with you. I'm sorry SLAD, but not even Bush and Cheney are that sort of evil. Iraq is a horrendous, horrific quagmire that the Bush administration lied and obfuscated the U.S. into entering. The conduct of the war has been, shall we say, stupefyingly bungled at every stage and there is terrible profiteering going on at the expense of the soldiers, our treasury and the Iraqi people.

However, it is not genocide. Neither are the media ignoring the civilian casualties. Are they reporting the civilian death toll enough or placing the proper emphasis on it? No, I don't think so. But the Lancet study and the latest WHO study have been widely reported and much talked about in the media.

You can believe what you want. You're entitled to your opinion after all. But you are also wrong.

So go ahead and respond in ALL CAPS, with your tirade of youtube music videos and your deep, meaningful song lyrics. Call me all the jingoistic names you want, sputter and spit at your monitor, hell, stick pins in a salvorhardin voodoo doll for all I care. It won't change anything and it sure as hell won't save one single life. But maybe you'll feel better and often times I think that's what the rancor and venom is all about.
Discuss (3 comments)
Profile Information
salvorhardin
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? — Epicurus (341–270 B.C.), Greek philosopher
Infidel Approved
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.